Dear Sirs
This email is in reference to a complaint about my 3rd Faulty Plasma TV from Currys but as this latest one falls 12 days over the 12 month manufacturers warranty you were not willing to do anything about it.
At first I was deliberately misled in the Store saying I had no rights to a repair or replacement so I produced the Sale of Goods Act and highlighted where, under law I was entitled to some assistance. The store manager (Andy Bolsover) disputed this but at each encounter he conceded a little which only proved to me I was correct.
After seeking advice from Trading Standards and writing to you, Currys seemed to be still confident that they didn't have to follow the law and of course customer service didn't matter as you already had my £2,000 from the purchase of the TV.
During all 3 incidents, I was never offered any compensation for the inconvenience or a replacement TV for the duration - the first incident involved Mastercare holding my TV for in excess of a month without even looking at it which broke your own terms. I also had to call your high rate 0870 number everyday to find out what was going on (again receiving no compensation) despite being told I would be called. The second incident was also handled badly - I now know that by law I was entitled to a refund at that point. I did ask but was declined but as I didn't know better I foolishly believed your staff. That resulted in me having to pay an extra £500 for the Panasonic TH42PX60 which has now failed.
One of the main issues here has been either your staff lack of knowledge of the law, in particular the Sale of Goods Act or their choice to deliberately ignore it, but to tell me to my face that what I was saying was irrelevant or completely wrong was extremely frustrating.
I had a similar incident with an Xbox 360 console which failed after the 12 months manufacturers warranty but the retailer in question replaced the item for me under the terms of the Sale of Goods Act. In this case with my TV, Panasonic have being extremely helpful and have agreed to send an engineer out and fix my TV free of charge as a
goodwill gesture
as they are very big on customer support.
I really would like to follow this through with Currys but I fear I will get nowhere and at expense to myself despite the law being on my side, at least that is the impression I have received whilst researching my problems with yourselves using the internet. There are countless people out there just as frustrated as me because Dsgi Plc companies are misleading their customers and telling them they have no rights when they clearly do.
Another issue I had when complaining about your customer service was when I called your head office. I asked to speak to Peter Keenan's PA to try and highlight the failings I had seen at various levels of the organisation. I was put through to the Customer Services call centre. I called back and said I didn't want to be put through to the call centre, I don't want to speak to them - she did it again. I called a third time but that time she hung up on me straight away. I called again (withholding my number) and ask why she hung up on me, which she denied! I'm sorry but I didn't imagine it so I didn't appreciate being lied to by the receptionist at head office, but at least your staff are consistent with their attitude towards customers.
I will take Panasonic up on their offer of a free repair as I can not afford the engineers fee you want to charge me of £120. I appreciate it that it is small percentage of the price I paid for the TV but due to my personal circumstances I simply can not afford it. Also, Trading Standards have advised me on 4 occasions that "Currys should inspect the TV for free, the consumer should not have to suffer any significant inconvenience and never suffer any consequential costs or losses due to premature failure of parts". Given that Panasonic say the TV should last for 60,000 hours continuous use (roughly 7 years) and mine has failed after just over one year of intermittent use, it does appear to be a premature failure of parts. I am upset I can't pursue it with yourselves but I feel forced into going elsewhere due to the costs involved.
The purpose of this email is to show you the shocking experience I have had with all 3 TVs I purchased from yourselves. I hope to receive a reply to this email that addresses my concerns with your company and it's flaunting of the law and absolutely appalling customer service.