Written by John Kruse, one of the leading experts on Bailiff Law, this consumer friendly guide is essential reading for anyone who comes into contact with a bailiff.
The book is easy to understand and clearly explains the rights
a bailiff has, and also what they cannot do when collecting debts and repossessing goods etc.
The issues raised by Llloyds bank defences and claiming beyond 6 yrs
Lloyds bank admits that their charges are not penalties.
In other words they are admitting that they make profits from their penalties.
They clearly do.
We have seen that Yorkshire/Clydesdale banks' charges are never more than £2.00. Lloyds will be in the same order but less because of their economies of scale.
Don't forget that the YB/CB figure assumes that a process has been conducted manually throughout.
In fact most processes are carried out automatically by computer. Even the preparation of a letter which is automatically inserted into an envelope is all done by a machine and costs only a few pence.
You can be certain that Lloyds uses a costing system probably even more sophisticated than CYNthesys.
Lloyds case is based upon their claim that they are merely charging a fee for a service.
This is nonsense, of course. Their charges are penalties - just like those of the other banks. All they are doing is dressing up the penalty to look like a fee for a service.
This is a well known trick. It has been tried hundreds of times in the 100yrs or more that the law relating to penalties has been around.
Lloyds trick is so well known that the judges even have a phrase to describe it. The say that it is "cloaking a penalty".
This merely means that the bank is operating an unlawful penalty regime but they are merely disguising it to look like a fee for a service.
Lloyds trick is so well known that the OFT in their April 2006 report even referred to it and warned that institutions should not so this. The OFT made it clear that the handling of delinquent accounts was not core business and that penalties should not be disguised in order to get round the law.
Disguised penalties
4.21 The analysis in this statement is in terms of explicit, transparent default fees. Attempts to restructure accounts in order to present events of default spuriously as additional services for which a charge may be made should be viewed as disguised penalties and equally open to challenge where grounds of unfairness exist.12 (For example, a charge for 'agreeing to' or 'allowing' a customer to exceed his credit limit is no different from a charge for the customer's 'default' in exceeding his credit limit.) The UTCCRs are concerned with the intention and effects of terms, not just their mechanism.
Despite this, Lloyds continues to cloak its penalties.
Warning:- the bank will try to say that this all only applies to credit cards.
This would be untrue. The OFT made it clear that there is a read-across to the banks and even said that they expected the banks to comply as well.
In any event, the law is the same for banks as it is for credit card companies.
When you prepare your case against Lloyds, this is the issue which you must keep in the forefront of your mind and which you must prepare to argue.
When a judge decides that Lloyds merely are disguising their penalties, then that is the end for Lloyds and their entire penalty regime.
Finally, it seems logical to say that disguising a penalty must amount to a concealment and therefore they lose the protection of the limitation act.
We would advise lloyds claimants that there is a basis for seeking the repayment of all of their money as far back as it goes.
A single finding against Lloyds will definitively remove the limitation period.
lloyds bank financial liability will be massive.
Now you know why it is not worth their while going into court.
Please don't pm me about specific questions unless you have posted and it has not been dealt with or unless the matter is confidential. Please include a link to the post you want me to look at. If you have received a defence, contact me.
Advice & opinions of BankFodder, The Consumer Action Group and The Bank Action Group are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts.
Re: The issues raised by Llloyds bank defences and claiming beyond 6 yrs
BankFodder is there any reason why this only applies to Lloyds and not other banks using the same defence strategy? This might not be relevant to Lloyds forum as such but HSBC is using the same defence and is even stating that if the charges are found to be penalties they will counterclaim for loss/damage caused by the customer's breaches (as I believe are Barclaycard). HSBC has even amended its terms and conditions in Dec 2006 to remove the clause that said the charges were to cover their admin costs and to add in something about account breaches being an informal request for an overdraft, so entitling them to provide a service for considering it and to apply a "service" charge, or as we know it, a "cloaked penalty"! I used this argument that it amounted to concealment in my response to their defence, and they settled my pre-6 yr charges the next day!!
Are you going to be making a similar announcement in the other relevant forums?
Re: The issues raised by Llloyds bank defences and claiming beyond 6 yrs
It applies to anyone who uses the fee-for-a-service argument.
HSBC are fools because by trying to move the goalposts now they are kidding no one and are even drawing attention to themselves.
HSBC have actually weakened their position by this shift. I really do think that they should get some better advisors as at the moment they are not getting value for money.
By all means link to this thread from other forums. It has a general relevance. Natwest do the same thing.
If they think that we are stupid then they are stupid. If they realise that we are not stupid then they are even more stupid for trying it out.
Maybe they think that the courts are stupid.
Please don't pm me about specific questions unless you have posted and it has not been dealt with or unless the matter is confidential. Please include a link to the post you want me to look at. If you have received a defence, contact me.
Advice & opinions of BankFodder, The Consumer Action Group and The Bank Action Group are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts.
Re: The issues raised by Llloyds bank defences and claiming beyond 6 yrs
Hi, I have just received a response from Lloyds Bank to my bank charges reclaim letter. Their letter states that I am not receiving my claim as my charges were charges for "extra services" and they feel it is fair to make these charges as it "causes them extra work". They also claim that they are completely open about their charges to new customers by giving them a guide to their charges. The letter goes on and on about only applying to credit card charges and that the guidelines are about "default charges" that people pay when they have broken their agreement and that I have not broken my agreement with them. My charges are for unauthorised borrowing, unpaid direct debits etc.! They finish off by stating that they cannot agree to cancel my charges and that they will put me in touch with the Financial Ombudsman if I do not agree.
Could somebody please advise on my next move..... Help!
Many thanks to everybody for the information on this site!
Then have a good read of the FAQ section as well as the ltsb 'successes' forum (up the top)
Best of luck, not that luck is necessary - just a bit of patience
Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!
Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.
Re: The issues raised by Llloyds bank defences and claiming beyond 6 yrs
No. See S32 - in the case of concealment, the time limit is still whatever it would have been, but starts running until the claimant discovers* the concealment instead of running from the actual time of the breach. In effect, if you have discovered this today, you have six years from today to recover old penalties.
Re: The issues raised by Llloyds bank defences and claiming beyond 6 yrs
Hi Everyone,
I have just joined the consumer group today. I am in the process of claiming back my excess charges from Lloyds TSB. I dont have all my statements etc and I guess the first thing is to send the letter Data Protection Act "list of Charges" to Lloyds TSB at Colmore row Birmingham?? or do you think it would be best to talk to my local branch first?
Re: The issues raised by Llloyds bank defences and claiming beyond 6 yrs
it's good news being able to claim beyond the six year limitation and i would certainly go for it giving the chance, but!!! getting post 6 yr statements from Lloyd's is a different matter. they wrote informing me that all correspondence older then 6 yrs has been destroyed therefor the only way of getting them is going down the court route which means more time wasting on their part. And more importantly a total waste of tax payers money if they do supply them due to a court order. If they have them they should just give them on request of the SAR not be forced into it by a court.
Pen
if i have been off any help to you please click my scales
cases won
28th July Single Claim for bank charges against LTSB, £6,800 WON with CI to date of Judgement
18th July Joint Claime against LTSB £7,800 WON with CI to date of Judgement.
Re: The issues raised by Llloyds bank defences and claiming beyond 6 yrs
Originally Posted by Pen
it's good news being able to claim beyond the six year limitation and i would certainly go for it giving the chance, but!!! getting post 6 yr statements from Lloyd's is a different matter. they wrote informing me that all correspondence older then 6 yrs has been destroyed therefor the only way of getting them is going down the court route which means more time wasting on their part. And more importantly a total waste of tax payers money if they do supply them due to a court order. If they have them they should just give them on request of the SAR not be forced into it by a court.
Pen
Hi Pen can you post up the wording of their letter? are they saying they hold the statements but you have to get a court order to obtain them?
Re: The issues raised by Llloyds bank defences and claiming beyond 6 yrs
Re: Lloyds. I have all my Bank statements on my Business account back to 1994, and all my statements on my personal account back to 1984.
I am claiming them ALL back !!
Perhaps a Mod would like to PM me, and I'll give you a bit more info on my game-plan?
Once further underway/ settled I shall post a lot more info for others to use.
Re: The issues raised by Llloyds bank defences and claiming beyond 6 yrs
Hi Pen can you post up the wording of their letter? are they saying they hold the statements but you have to get a court order to obtain them?
I have just recived my 6 years worth of statements I asked for ALL infomation and the reply i got was that further than 6 years was held in their archives and would take time to access it I wrote and told them i wanted it all and the 40 days was up and i would start court proceedings within 7 days that time runs out on thursday
Re: The issues raised by Llloyds bank defences and claiming beyond 6 yrs
Hi Bong. when I sent the SAR i requested all information relating to all of my banking history. the letter i recieved back stated that they "could not comply with my request as our retention period for storing information is six years so we will not be able to comply fully with your request." if fact they complied with very little of it, ie 1yr
I did take Lloyds to court for the information and they had until the 11th April to respond. I called the courts today nothing from lloyds so they have advised me to fill in a request for judgment which i will do today.
pen
if i have been off any help to you please click my scales
cases won
28th July Single Claim for bank charges against LTSB, £6,800 WON with CI to date of Judgement
18th July Joint Claime against LTSB £7,800 WON with CI to date of Judgement.
Re: The issues raised by Llloyds bank defences and claiming beyond 6 yrs
Interesting, will watch this one. I have already started a 6-year claim with Lloyds. Assuming they settle for the sum I have asked, in "Full and final settlement" of my claim, is there anything to prevent me taking a second claim out for the pre-6-year charges? Presumably these would be two separate claims and so there is nothing in the phrase "full and final settlement" of the current claim that prevents me from subsequently starting another claim in reespect of the earlier charges?
If I've helped, please tick the scales at the bottom left of this message!
17th Sept: Found this site!
Lloyds TSB
22 Sept: Subject Access Req. 3 Nov: statements arrived. Charges calulated at:
A/c 1 - £2,178.01 + int of £1,206.54 (18.4% authorised)
A/c 2 - £206.11 + int of £211.07 (18.4%) 7 Nov - prelim. 3 Dec - LBA 13 Dec - £750 offered 23 Dec - £750 credited 28 Dec - rejection letter 2 March - issued 16 April - complained at court failure to forward defence
Halifax
22nd September: Subject Access Request. 4th November: No reply so LBA giving 7 days.
Cap One
22nd September: Subject Access Req. 5th October: Letter saying no record of account! 15th October: Replied telling them to try harder... 22nd October: Subject Access Req acknowledged.
Re: The issues raised by Llloyds bank defences and claiming beyond 6 yrs
There must be some way to get these statements, they have hidden theses charges for years!!! If we found out about them 15 years ago, what would they have done? they wouldn't still be charging us today!!!
Re: The issues raised by Llloyds bank defences and claiming beyond 6 yrs
Originally Posted by Alison82
If we found out about them 15 years ago, what would they have done?
Probably told you that actually there was some manual intervention involved. Had we found out 25 years ago, they would have pointed out that these decisions were indeed made manually (and cost you only £10-£15 - half an hour of someone's time). It's only been in the last 10 years or so that the manual element has been almost entirely eliminated, which is why the bank can argue the whole costs/service thing - at one point it may have been accurate, the banks can simply plead ignorance in forgetting to review the fees as their costs went down. Of course, ignorance is no defence when you're facing thousands of identical claims from your customers and have already been warned off it once by a statutory body.
Re: The issues raised by Llloyds bank defences and claiming beyond 6 yrs
Nothing to stop you from making a claim pre 6 yrs other then getting the evidence that you have paid chargers and it's in the banks interest not to supply us with them. I have heard of some cases whereby members have made estimated claims but!! i think this is a very tricky area and would not feel confidant if i did not have the prove in black and white to back up my case in court so to speak it's bad enough feeling confident when you do have the statements to prove the chargers have been taken unlawfully.
I just hope the judge when making his judgment decides the bank have to provide me with them all but! if they have destroyed them then thats it, I suppose I would then have to look at making a estimate claim and let the banks prove that the don't owe it to me and how would they do that if they did not have the statements.
but! if anyone knows of a way of estimating chargers based on your last 6 yrs bank statements please let us all know
Pen
if i have been off any help to you please click my scales
cases won
28th July Single Claim for bank charges against LTSB, £6,800 WON with CI to date of Judgement
18th July Joint Claime against LTSB £7,800 WON with CI to date of Judgement.
Re: The issues raised by Llloyds bank defences and claiming beyond 6 yrs
Originally Posted by Pen
Nothing to stop you from making a claim pre 6 yrs other then getting the evidence that you have paid chargers and it's in the banks interest not to supply us with them. I have heard of some cases whereby members have made estimated claims but!! i think this is a very tricky area and would not feel confidant if i did not have the prove in black and white to back up my case in court so to speak it's bad enough feeling confident when you do have the statements to prove the chargers have been taken unlawfully.
Don't worry too much about the estimates. If you have exercised due diligence in trying to obtain the evidence but the bank are withholding it, and you have then made a reasonable estimate (take an annual average and extrapolate it backward, for instance - the fees in the early days may have been lower, but since the bank is being obstructive you can't know that, can you?). The court is looking for two things: namely that you know you have been done wrong, and you have made a reasonable effort to find out by how much. If the bank is actively preventing you from doing this, the court will take that fact into account.
The issues raised by Llloyds bank defences and claiming beyond 6 yrs
bank admits that their charges are not penalties.
Reply With Quote
Re: The issues raised by Llloyds bank defences and claiming beyond 6 yrs
if i have been off any help to you please click my scales
Originally Posted by Pen
