Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The argument about the date of receipt is now dead because the PCN  does not comply with the wording  of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4.  First reason Section 9 [2] [e]  "state that the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver and invite the keeper—(i)to pay the unpaid parking charges;" Second Reason Section 9 [2][a] "specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates;" All your PCN does is mark the time you entered and left the car park. It does not include all the myriad things you do in between-driving into the car park, looking for a parking space-perhaps a disabled space or  parent and Child place@ getting the children or disabled person out of the car then going shopping. Coming back; loading the car with shopping [, getting the children or disabled into the car, taking the trolley back to the store; driving to the exit perhaps stopping to let vehicles/pedestrians cross in front of you etc. so subtracting the driving times from before and after parking can make quite a difference from their time to the actual period parking time. So the upshot is now that only the driver is responsible for paying the PCN and the keeper is not liable at all even if the name of the driver is never known by Nexus so well done for not appealing. You obviously want to keep it that way to make it very difficult for them to win in Court if it ever goes that far. Although your question is now moot since  the same objective has been achieved by the non compliant PCN [ie no keeper liability] just  about the only way to dispute the timing of the PCN would be if one kept the envelope and there was a discernible date stamp on it that did not match the date on the PCN. There is a new Act coming out [and it cannot come quickly enough ] and one of the things required is that parking companies will have to prove the date of sending out their PCNs. We are not the only ones who sometimes doubt the veracity of their dates particularly as the later it is sent [unlawfully] the shorter the period motorists have to benefit [?] from the reduced payment. I haven't seen it on your posts but do you know how long you are permitted to park for free?
    • I was so annoyed and frustrated about the fact this case was lost it's been floating around my head all night. Dave962, are you sure that's what the Judge said? .... It doesn't make sense. Did the judge in fact dismiss the case on the grounds that the defendant did not make an appeal within 28 days? Effectively telling the PPC about the error entering the registration number and providing proof of payment at that time? To me, that's an important point.  
    • The United Autoworkers Union took a risk in a Republican - and often anti-union - part of the US.View the full article
    • good spot...though i'm unsure, but it does seem like it can't be related to this latest issue as the OP mentions she knew nothing about the  order. dx  
    • wasn't that for the CCJ for the mental capacity with the leaseholder?   SO would be different to this.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

how long to sort out a complant


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6218 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I started a complant aganst norwich-union back on the 27 febuary and i am still awating a answer.

today after i email them again i got this

 

 

Thank you for your e-mail of 4 April addressed to Joe Beesley at this office.

 

I've made further enquiries and understand from our Liverpool office hat their investigations are still on-going. I've asked that they update you.

 

Regards

 

Brian

 

Brian Spatchett

Customer Relations Manager

Chief Executive's Office

Tel: 01603 682972/Fax: 01603 685359

[email protected]

 

 

How long should i give them before i take this further.

Link to post
Share on other sites

HERE IS THE EMAIL COMPLANT I SENT

I was involved in a motor accident on 30 august 2006 were my 1999 reg Rover 200 tdi was damaged. This incident has left me far from happy with the service your company.

First complaint –

After informing you that I had been in an accident and my car was not in a roadworthy state 2 hours after the acident, I was told somebody would be in contact with me in a few hours, I had to call you company again after two days to inform you that nobody had contacted me. Two days later a business card was sent to me in the post from a garage 30 miles from my home address asking me to contact them. When I called them they told me the only work on Renault cars hand had no provision to give me a courtesy car, which was part of my insurance agreement.

Second complaint

After further phone calls to your company trying to get things moveing a loss adjuster arrived at my home seven days after the accident, took one look at the car and stated “It’s a Rover so it’s a write of no mater what’s the damage” he give the car a quick look over never even trying to open the bonnet or look under the car to see if the was any structural damage, he then stated “You will be lucky to get a grand for that lump of rubbish”, he then left.

Several days later he phoned me and said “the car was only worth £1300 it that all right if I send that figure to the insurance company” to which I said ok, I was not made aware that this was me agreeing to this figure as the value of my claim.

Complaint three

Because of not being supplied a replacment car despite several phone calls asking for one I lost my job temping , because of the inability of me to due early shifts as their was no public transport available at that time of the morning.

Complaint four

I was in contacted by a recovery company from York 6 weeks after the initial incident saying they had been informed by you to remove my car. This was the first I had been contacted by anybody since the loss adjuster about my car, to which I refused to allow them to take my car. They said they get this a lot and would be in contact with me in due time. I rang your company again and was informed that I had agreed to the total loss of my car and a payment for the agreed amount was on its way, and their were no further costs or action to be taken on this policy. I sated that I had not agreed to anything or ever seen anything in writing on this agreement but I was told that the adjuster has stated I had agreed the price and it was now to late to do anything about it and also I should return the courtesy, car back to the suppliers as I was no longer entitled to use it, When I said I never received one their was a long silence on the other end and the phone was then disconcerted I called back once again and after explaining my story yet again, I asked if there was a way I could have the vehicle as I had been told by a local garage that they could do the work needed to put the car back on the road for £ 400, I was told there is no way I could have this car as it now belonged to your company and you never do anything like that. The payment arrive two days later with instruction for me to send you company the registration document, not the dvla as they state on their website.

Complaint five

I was then sent a two letters stating my insurance was cancelled at my request on 31 august 2006 and I owed you company a payment for the august payment although I was told the account was now clear and had no further payments. When I phoned you company to sort this out several time the phone was put down on me or I was transfer in mid conversation to another department, all the operators wanted was payment.

Complaint six

Today I received a second letter from a layer acting on the behave of the other party saying your company was not contacting them so if he did not receive any word he would be tacking action against me in the courts for the money due.

As you see I have been run raged by your company and its representatives and would like to know what your company will do about this?

As a act of goodwill maybe you should give me the costs of the courtesy car I never received although it was in the policy and supposedly your company was paying somebody for one, and I may have not lost my job.

Link to post
Share on other sites

According to the FSA rules they should acknowledge your complaint in writing within 5 working days. If they haven't resolved the issue in 4 weeks you should get another response.

 

The final response should be within 8 weeks - or you can take them to the FSO

Link to post
Share on other sites

that seems to be amazingly shabby treatment. I had a claim with NU in 2004 and it couldn't have gone easier so I'm really surprised at you treatment.

 

bed32 is spot on.

 

I have to agree - i put in a claim at 11am on Good Friday and within 3 hours the police had been round (fingerprinting) and NU picked up my car and dropped off a courtesy car and i received a total loss offer on Tuesday!

Cahoot - Rejection of offer sent 14/06/07

 

Barclaycard - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 22/03/07

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lenny's story doesn't surprise me at all.

 

In 2001 my car was stolen whilst parked at a friend's house. A burglar broke in and took the keys.

 

NU took the car to one of their approved bodyshops rather than the BMW dealer I asked for. The work was substandard, and despite their assessor agreeing, it took them over a year to get the repairs completed satisfactorily. They also sent the cheque for the stolen hi-fi to the wrong address, never phoned back when they said they would, and their customer service was generally abysmal.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...