Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi, In my last post I mentioned I had received an email from SS who were asking me to hand over the keys to my mother’s flat so they could pass them to the Law firm who have been appointed court of protection to access, secure and insure my mother’s property.  Feeling this, all quickly getting out of my hands I emailed ss requesting proof of this. I HAVEN’T HEARD BACK FROM SS.  Yesterday, I received an email (with attached court of protection order) from the Law Firm confirming this was correct (please see below a copy of this).  After reading the court of protection order I do have some concerns about it:   (a)   I only found out yesterday, the Law firm had been appointed by the court back in January.  Up until now, I have not received any notification regarding this.  (b)   Section 2   - States I am estranged from my mother.  This is NOT CORRECT    The only reason I stepped back from my mother was to protect myself from the guy (groomer) who had befriended her & was very aggressive towards me & because of my mother’s dementia she had become aggressive also.  I constantly tried to warned SS about this guy's manipulative behaviour towards my mother and his increasing aggressiveness towards me (as mentioned in previous posts).  Each time I was ignored.  Instead, SS encouraged his involvement with my mother – including him in her care plans and mental health assessments.   I was literally pushed out because I feared him and my mother’s increasing aggression towards me. Up until I stepped back, I had always looked after my mother and since her admission to the care home, I visit regularly.   .(c)    Sections -  4, 5 and 7  I am struggling to understand these as I don’t have a legal background.  I was wondering if there is anyone who might be able to explain what they mean.  It’s been a horrendous situation where I had to walk away from my mother at her most vulnerable because of; ss (not helping), scammer and groomer. I have no legal background, nor experience in highly manipulative people or an understanding of how the SS system operates, finding myself isolated, scared and powerless to the point I haven’t collected my personal belongings and items for my mother’s room in the care home.  Sadly, the court has only had heard one version of this story SS’s, and based their decision on that. My mother’s situation and the experience I have gone through could happen to anyone who has a vulnerable parent.    If anyone any thoughts on this much appreciated.  Thank you. ______________________________________________________  (Below is the Court of Protection Order)  COURT OF PROTECTION                                                                                                                                                                                   No xxx  MENTAL CAPACITY ACT 2005 In the matter of Name xxx ORDER Made by  Depty District Judge At xxx Made on xxx Issued on 18 January 2024  WHEREAS  1.     xxx Solicitors, Address xxx  ("Applicant”) has applied for an order under the Mental Capacity Act 2005.  2.     The Court notes (my mother) is said to be estranged from all her three children and only one, (me) has been notified.  3.     (Me) was previously appointed as Atorney for Property and Affairs for (my mother).  The Exhibity NAJ at (date) refers to (me) and all replacement Attorneys are now officially standing down.  4.     Pursuant to Rule 9.10 of the Court of Protection Rules 2017 and Practice Direction 9B the Applicant 2must seek to identify at least three persons who are likely to have an interest in being notified that an application has been issues.”  The children of (my mother), and any other appointed attorneys are likely to have an interest in the application, because of the nature of relationship to (my mother).  5.     The Court considers that the notification requirements are an important safeguard for the person in respect of whom an order is sought.  6.     The Court notes that it is said that the local authority no longer has access to (my mother’s) Property.  7.     Further information is required for the Court to determine the application.  IT IS ORDERED THAT  Within 28 days of the issue date this order, the Applicant shall file a form COP24 witness statement confirming that the other children of (my mother) and any replacement attorneys have been notified of the application and shall confirm their name, address, and date upon which those persons were notified.  If the Applicant wishes the Court to dispense with any further notification, they should file a COP9 and COP24 explaining, what steps (if any) have been taken to attempt notification and why notification should be dispensed with.   Pending the determination of the application to appoint a deputy for (my mother), the Applicant is authorised to take such steps as are proportionate and necessary to access, secure and insure the house and property of (my mother).   This order was made without a hearing and without notice.  Any person affected by this order may apply within 21 days of the date on which the order was served to have the order set aside or varied pursuant to Rule 13.4 of the Court of Protection Rules 2017 (“the Rules”).  Such application must be made on Form COP9 and in accordance with Part 10 Rules.              
    • Unless I've got an incorrect copy of the relevant regulation: The PCN is only deemed to have arrived two days after dispatch "unless the contrary is proved" in which case date of delivery does matter (not just date of posting) and I would like clarification of the required standard of proof. It seems perhaps this hasn't been tested. Since post is now barcoded for the Post Office's own tracking purposes perhaps there is some way I can get that evidence from the Post Office...
    • I would say You should accept it - I HIGHLY doubt you will  be able to claim for letters at trial ans they’re offering you that, which is higher monetary value than interest.   Also they raise a good point, getting interest at anything above 4% is lucky these days, yes judges give it, but rarily above 4%   Also you might find depending on the judge  you don’t get some costs if you take it all the way over £7.40 when court woukdnt award letters costs and thus meaning their award would be less than evris offer which was made    Up to you though but the wait will be 3-4mo for a trial date at least
    • Hi Folks, Been 162 days! Just by way of update. Today I received a text from Opos Ltd so no doubt Capquest are renting the debt out to anybody who fancies a nibble. Safe to say I will not be responding.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

What Happens When They Put A Charge On Your House?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4047 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

We owe a considerable sum of money at the moment and we have been to the CCCS and have a payment plan and so are making small payments to each creditor. Our problem is that we owe the Halifax the bulk of it. I have a credit card and my partner has a credit card and a loan with them. Paying off the amount set down by the CCCS it would take years to pay the debt back. we are hopeful that our finances will improve in time so that we can begin to pay a more substantial amount.

However, the counsellor at the CCCS said that it may happen that the Halifax wont accept the payments long term (they have agreed them for 6 months) and so may choose to put a charge on our house.

Can anyone tell me what effect having a charge on the house will have? One person I spoke to said we would be better selling up than letting that happen but I would welcome a more experienced opinion.

Thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi :)

To get a charge The Halifax will need to be granted a CCJ in the frst instance.

 

I am speaking from experience here as I have a debt through MBNA that was sold to 1st Credit.

1st Credit applied for a ccj and I was advised by the CCCS to admit the full amount of the debt.

 

Whatever you do, dont admit the full amount if part of the debt is made up of penalty charges.

If you are issued with papers then tick the disputed amount box.

 

Make sure you ask for the CCJ hearing to be heard at your local court so you can defend yourself.

 

Send off the SAR letter and £10 fee ASAP to the Halifax so you know exactly where you stand with penalty charges and you you can get this debt in dispute, which halts all further action.

 

I am currently in the situation where 1st Credit are applying for a final charging order on my home,and I have had to apply for a set aside of the original CCJ order to get a chance of fighting against the final charging Order.

 

If the Halifax did get a final charging order,this doesnt necesarily mean they can force you to sell.

They will get a caution against your property but there are situations where the order for sale isnt granted,eg if you have kids,the house is jointly owned.

 

I wouldnt consider giving up my home for a minute and I would fight to the end-but thats just me ,I like a good scrap lol !!

 

If you need anymore info,i'm sure someone will be along soon,maybe Sequenci,or pm me if you want,i'm no expert but I would be happy to help if I could.

 

Good luck

 

Hope xx

You need to read this if you have ever consolidated lending through your bank,

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general/49648-loans-pay-off-overdrafts.html

NatWest

S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) LETTER SENT15/12/06 - STATEMENTS RCD 22/12/06

PRE-LIM AND SOC SENT 11/01/07

FULL CLAIM OF £4093.04 INCLUDING CONTRACTUAL INT :)

JUST WAITING FOR STANDARD BOG OFF LETTER...:rolleyes:

LETTER FROM STUART HIGLEY TODAY 20TH JAN THANKING ME FOR MY LETTER AND ADVISING ME THAT THEY ARE CONSIDERING MY CLAIM.... YEAH, BET THEY ARE !!!:lol:

LBA SENT 29/01/07

 

**** G.W.G PAYMENT OFFER RECEIVED TODAY FOR £2160. THAT WILL DO NICELY AS PART PAYMENT MR HIGLEY !!!:D ****

 

 

 

 

 

Member of the official Bill-K appreciation thread cos he's just ape !! :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Hope. At the moment we dont know that they will try to put a charge on the house but I didnt know what the implications were. As someone explained it to me it just meant that when you sell they will get repaid, as in like a secured loan. Are you saying they can force the sale? The house is jointly owned but there are no dependant children now. I am waiting for statements from the Halifax so I can reclaim my bank charges but I havnt done anything about the credit card charges yet. obviously

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I am not sure but I think that the loan would have needed to be taken out originally on a secured basis, they have no right to go for an attachment to your house if you are paying them any amount whatsoever that they have agreed to accept. If it went to court, the court would decide whether, or not, you were paying enough. If you were paying them nothing, they could perhaps get an attachment order, in short it is my personal opinion that they would not be allowed to do this, but please check this with a solicitor.

Vodafone - Default removed (07/01/07).

MBNA - Claim settled with contractual interest and adjusted credit file to show no late payments (12/02/07).

CABOT - Taken to Court by Cabot/Morgan over alleged credit card debt, case dismissed (06/12/10).

Link to post
Share on other sites

We owe a considerable sum of money at the moment and we have been to the CCCS and have a payment plan and so are making small payments to each creditor. Our problem is that we owe the Halifax the bulk of it. I have a credit card and my partner has a credit card and a loan with them. Paying off the amount set down by the CCCS it would take years to pay the debt back. we are hopeful that our finances will improve in time so that we can begin to pay a more substantial amount.

 

They can only collect what you can afford to pay. If it was to go to court, no judge would say anything different. There is a big difference between "can't pay" and "won't pay".

However, the counsellor at the CCCS said that it may happen that the Halifax wont accept the payments long term (they have agreed them for 6 months) and so may choose to put a charge on our house.

 

They may choose ? What kind of advice is that ? If you have been making regular payments, however small... it is highly unlikely that a judge would order a charge to be put on your house. As advised, you would need a CCJ to be lodged against you first and there is plenty that you can do to avoid that scenario. Since Halifax have not even suggested they are going to do this, it seems irresponsible of CCCS to plant that seed in your head.

 

Can anyone tell me what effect having a charge on the house will have? One person I spoke to said we would be better selling up than letting that happen but I would welcome a more experienced opinion.

 

Absolute rubbish ! They are assuming that everyone rolls over, are they ? I recently had a creditor threaten me with a property charge.... I had been paying regular amounts for years. When challenged to produce certain documantation however, they failed.... and now they cannot pursue me for payment at all.

Thank you.

 

:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

i am not in this predicament but like to avoid it if possible, i have been told that charging orders are placed in first come first served basis, can anyone verify this, for example if i owed my daughter £50000 and she placed a Charging order against me then she would be first to be dealt with in the event of my death.?

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi,

They can only apply for a charging order on your property after they have obtained a CCJ, & the judge will only grant the charging order if you do not comply with the courts judgement, & then only in extreme cases will they force a sale.

I know this from personal experience, the judge said at my charging order that in the current financial climate, if every CO became an order to sell, they would be putting 1000's of people onto the streets.He told the banks solicitor that he would grant the CO, but on the condition that they could not apply for an order to sell.

debs

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi,

They can only apply for a charging order on your property after they have obtained a CCJ, & the judge will only grant the charging order if you do not comply with the courts judgement, & then only in extreme cases will they force a sale.

 

MANY judges are granting a 'forthwith' judgment to allow a creditor to go for a Charging Order, this is especially used if people make a small monthly offer on their judgment debt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi debs thanks for that but i was wandering if anybody could shed light on.

" i have been told that charging orders are placed in first come first served basis, can anyone verify this, for example if i owed my daughter £50000 and she placed a Charging order against me then she would be first to be dealt with in the event of my death.? or have i been given duff advice?

Link to post
Share on other sites

i am not in this predicament but like to avoid it if possible, i have been told that charging orders are placed in first come first served basis, can anyone verify this, for example if i owed my daughter £50000 and she placed a Charging order against me then she would be first to be dealt with in the event of my death.?

 

 

This is a good question which I have been pondering over for a while but cannot find any information on the web.

 

I know that in the event of your death the first charge (your mortgage) is paid off, which is obvious but my situation is that a relation of mine has been paying the vast majority of my mortgage off since I fell on hard times 2 years ago. I went from a decent income to earning just half of what I used to earn.

 

Despite trying to earn more money I have been struggling to make ends meet and instead of losing my home I have been fortunate enough to receive help from a kind relative.

 

There is no legal arrangement or anything like that, just a written agreement between the two of us (witnessed by a third party) that any sums of money paid towards the mortgage would be paid back (with 5% interest) in the event of my death or on the sale of the house.

 

The only worry I now have is if any of my creditors manage to get a charging order due to the new rules coming into force, this will leave the person who has helped me at the bottom of the pile.

 

Would it therefore be possible for said relative to get a voluntary charge off myself on the property?

 

Any advice or suggestions as always greatly appreciated.

 

Regards

 

Santos

 

Ps sorry for butting in.

 

I will also start my own thread on this issue.

Springfield

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi santos good question from what my 'guy ' has said and i'll know more tomorow is that yes your partner can take a charge against you thus rendering him first in line should any other creditor chase after you,you have to do it legally though, not too sure about all the pro's and cons' but i am certainly going to look into it..keep posting

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...
  • 1 year later...

Hi,

 

Every case is different.

 

It all depends how much you owe and how much you are paying off.

 

Also, is their enough equity in the property. Get a realistic valuation of your property and how long it will take to sell.

 

All these factors are vital.

 

For instance, if their is no equity and your payments are minimal........you are in a stronger position to negotiate a full and final settlement with the creditor, they may accept a reduced settlement rather than sit and wait.

 

You say they are adding Post judgment interest. Did the T&C's of your original agreement for the debt contain a PJI clause ?

 

Debs

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is more than enough equity on the house in fact six times what I need to borrow, but I cannot get a mortgage as the earnings we have at present are not enough for the amount we wish to borrow. The amount we offered to pay was based on only the debtors small pension of £60 a year the form did not ask for any other earnings and so the offer of £60 was not accepted and the court awarded the full amount plus costs and interest be paid. The next step will I suppose be being made to sell the property to pay the debt unless I can get an unsecured loan as the secured loan I asked about was not allowed presumably because of the low income and the CCJ on the house.

 

I am having the property valued tomorrow, spring is allegedly here but I see many houses about me which have been up for sale for years'. I doubt they will sit and wait even though they are earning £76 plus interest per week there are I suppose equity release schemes but these appear to be an even worse course of action though may be the only option I have.

Link to post
Share on other sites

When you refer to the debtor as only earning £60 per year from a pension, is the property joint owned ?

 

Did you attend the charging order ?

 

The CCJ/Charging order is only for the equity portion of the debtor and I'm pretty sure they can't force a sale. It simply sits as a restriction on the land registry, so when it is sold, they get there money, I have seen cases were the restriction does not necessarily guarantee payment.

 

I strongly suggest you start a new thread and give us a bit more info. Help will come once we have all the facts.

 

Debbie

Link to post
Share on other sites

Been reading thread (interest on post judgement) in legal section t/day regarding interest on a C/O did not think they could apply interest to a C/O if was unsecured debt regulated by the CCA 1974 or is yours wildm regarding contractual interest?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...