Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The digital bank has introduced three new plans - Extra, Perks and Max - replacing its existing Plus and Premium plans for new customers.View the full article
    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

What Happens When They Put A Charge On Your House?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4050 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

We owe a considerable sum of money at the moment and we have been to the CCCS and have a payment plan and so are making small payments to each creditor. Our problem is that we owe the Halifax the bulk of it. I have a credit card and my partner has a credit card and a loan with them. Paying off the amount set down by the CCCS it would take years to pay the debt back. we are hopeful that our finances will improve in time so that we can begin to pay a more substantial amount.

However, the counsellor at the CCCS said that it may happen that the Halifax wont accept the payments long term (they have agreed them for 6 months) and so may choose to put a charge on our house.

Can anyone tell me what effect having a charge on the house will have? One person I spoke to said we would be better selling up than letting that happen but I would welcome a more experienced opinion.

Thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi :)

To get a charge The Halifax will need to be granted a CCJ in the frst instance.

 

I am speaking from experience here as I have a debt through MBNA that was sold to 1st Credit.

1st Credit applied for a ccj and I was advised by the CCCS to admit the full amount of the debt.

 

Whatever you do, dont admit the full amount if part of the debt is made up of penalty charges.

If you are issued with papers then tick the disputed amount box.

 

Make sure you ask for the CCJ hearing to be heard at your local court so you can defend yourself.

 

Send off the SAR letter and £10 fee ASAP to the Halifax so you know exactly where you stand with penalty charges and you you can get this debt in dispute, which halts all further action.

 

I am currently in the situation where 1st Credit are applying for a final charging order on my home,and I have had to apply for a set aside of the original CCJ order to get a chance of fighting against the final charging Order.

 

If the Halifax did get a final charging order,this doesnt necesarily mean they can force you to sell.

They will get a caution against your property but there are situations where the order for sale isnt granted,eg if you have kids,the house is jointly owned.

 

I wouldnt consider giving up my home for a minute and I would fight to the end-but thats just me ,I like a good scrap lol !!

 

If you need anymore info,i'm sure someone will be along soon,maybe Sequenci,or pm me if you want,i'm no expert but I would be happy to help if I could.

 

Good luck

 

Hope xx

You need to read this if you have ever consolidated lending through your bank,

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general/49648-loans-pay-off-overdrafts.html

NatWest

S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) LETTER SENT15/12/06 - STATEMENTS RCD 22/12/06

PRE-LIM AND SOC SENT 11/01/07

FULL CLAIM OF £4093.04 INCLUDING CONTRACTUAL INT :)

JUST WAITING FOR STANDARD BOG OFF LETTER...:rolleyes:

LETTER FROM STUART HIGLEY TODAY 20TH JAN THANKING ME FOR MY LETTER AND ADVISING ME THAT THEY ARE CONSIDERING MY CLAIM.... YEAH, BET THEY ARE !!!:lol:

LBA SENT 29/01/07

 

**** G.W.G PAYMENT OFFER RECEIVED TODAY FOR £2160. THAT WILL DO NICELY AS PART PAYMENT MR HIGLEY !!!:D ****

 

 

 

 

 

Member of the official Bill-K appreciation thread cos he's just ape !! :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Hope. At the moment we dont know that they will try to put a charge on the house but I didnt know what the implications were. As someone explained it to me it just meant that when you sell they will get repaid, as in like a secured loan. Are you saying they can force the sale? The house is jointly owned but there are no dependant children now. I am waiting for statements from the Halifax so I can reclaim my bank charges but I havnt done anything about the credit card charges yet. obviously

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I am not sure but I think that the loan would have needed to be taken out originally on a secured basis, they have no right to go for an attachment to your house if you are paying them any amount whatsoever that they have agreed to accept. If it went to court, the court would decide whether, or not, you were paying enough. If you were paying them nothing, they could perhaps get an attachment order, in short it is my personal opinion that they would not be allowed to do this, but please check this with a solicitor.

Vodafone - Default removed (07/01/07).

MBNA - Claim settled with contractual interest and adjusted credit file to show no late payments (12/02/07).

CABOT - Taken to Court by Cabot/Morgan over alleged credit card debt, case dismissed (06/12/10).

Link to post
Share on other sites

We owe a considerable sum of money at the moment and we have been to the CCCS and have a payment plan and so are making small payments to each creditor. Our problem is that we owe the Halifax the bulk of it. I have a credit card and my partner has a credit card and a loan with them. Paying off the amount set down by the CCCS it would take years to pay the debt back. we are hopeful that our finances will improve in time so that we can begin to pay a more substantial amount.

 

They can only collect what you can afford to pay. If it was to go to court, no judge would say anything different. There is a big difference between "can't pay" and "won't pay".

However, the counsellor at the CCCS said that it may happen that the Halifax wont accept the payments long term (they have agreed them for 6 months) and so may choose to put a charge on our house.

 

They may choose ? What kind of advice is that ? If you have been making regular payments, however small... it is highly unlikely that a judge would order a charge to be put on your house. As advised, you would need a CCJ to be lodged against you first and there is plenty that you can do to avoid that scenario. Since Halifax have not even suggested they are going to do this, it seems irresponsible of CCCS to plant that seed in your head.

 

Can anyone tell me what effect having a charge on the house will have? One person I spoke to said we would be better selling up than letting that happen but I would welcome a more experienced opinion.

 

Absolute rubbish ! They are assuming that everyone rolls over, are they ? I recently had a creditor threaten me with a property charge.... I had been paying regular amounts for years. When challenged to produce certain documantation however, they failed.... and now they cannot pursue me for payment at all.

Thank you.

 

:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

i am not in this predicament but like to avoid it if possible, i have been told that charging orders are placed in first come first served basis, can anyone verify this, for example if i owed my daughter £50000 and she placed a Charging order against me then she would be first to be dealt with in the event of my death.?

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi,

They can only apply for a charging order on your property after they have obtained a CCJ, & the judge will only grant the charging order if you do not comply with the courts judgement, & then only in extreme cases will they force a sale.

I know this from personal experience, the judge said at my charging order that in the current financial climate, if every CO became an order to sell, they would be putting 1000's of people onto the streets.He told the banks solicitor that he would grant the CO, but on the condition that they could not apply for an order to sell.

debs

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi,

They can only apply for a charging order on your property after they have obtained a CCJ, & the judge will only grant the charging order if you do not comply with the courts judgement, & then only in extreme cases will they force a sale.

 

MANY judges are granting a 'forthwith' judgment to allow a creditor to go for a Charging Order, this is especially used if people make a small monthly offer on their judgment debt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi debs thanks for that but i was wandering if anybody could shed light on.

" i have been told that charging orders are placed in first come first served basis, can anyone verify this, for example if i owed my daughter £50000 and she placed a Charging order against me then she would be first to be dealt with in the event of my death.? or have i been given duff advice?

Link to post
Share on other sites

i am not in this predicament but like to avoid it if possible, i have been told that charging orders are placed in first come first served basis, can anyone verify this, for example if i owed my daughter £50000 and she placed a Charging order against me then she would be first to be dealt with in the event of my death.?

 

 

This is a good question which I have been pondering over for a while but cannot find any information on the web.

 

I know that in the event of your death the first charge (your mortgage) is paid off, which is obvious but my situation is that a relation of mine has been paying the vast majority of my mortgage off since I fell on hard times 2 years ago. I went from a decent income to earning just half of what I used to earn.

 

Despite trying to earn more money I have been struggling to make ends meet and instead of losing my home I have been fortunate enough to receive help from a kind relative.

 

There is no legal arrangement or anything like that, just a written agreement between the two of us (witnessed by a third party) that any sums of money paid towards the mortgage would be paid back (with 5% interest) in the event of my death or on the sale of the house.

 

The only worry I now have is if any of my creditors manage to get a charging order due to the new rules coming into force, this will leave the person who has helped me at the bottom of the pile.

 

Would it therefore be possible for said relative to get a voluntary charge off myself on the property?

 

Any advice or suggestions as always greatly appreciated.

 

Regards

 

Santos

 

Ps sorry for butting in.

 

I will also start my own thread on this issue.

Springfield

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi santos good question from what my 'guy ' has said and i'll know more tomorow is that yes your partner can take a charge against you thus rendering him first in line should any other creditor chase after you,you have to do it legally though, not too sure about all the pro's and cons' but i am certainly going to look into it..keep posting

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...
  • 1 year later...

Hi,

 

Every case is different.

 

It all depends how much you owe and how much you are paying off.

 

Also, is their enough equity in the property. Get a realistic valuation of your property and how long it will take to sell.

 

All these factors are vital.

 

For instance, if their is no equity and your payments are minimal........you are in a stronger position to negotiate a full and final settlement with the creditor, they may accept a reduced settlement rather than sit and wait.

 

You say they are adding Post judgment interest. Did the T&C's of your original agreement for the debt contain a PJI clause ?

 

Debs

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is more than enough equity on the house in fact six times what I need to borrow, but I cannot get a mortgage as the earnings we have at present are not enough for the amount we wish to borrow. The amount we offered to pay was based on only the debtors small pension of £60 a year the form did not ask for any other earnings and so the offer of £60 was not accepted and the court awarded the full amount plus costs and interest be paid. The next step will I suppose be being made to sell the property to pay the debt unless I can get an unsecured loan as the secured loan I asked about was not allowed presumably because of the low income and the CCJ on the house.

 

I am having the property valued tomorrow, spring is allegedly here but I see many houses about me which have been up for sale for years'. I doubt they will sit and wait even though they are earning £76 plus interest per week there are I suppose equity release schemes but these appear to be an even worse course of action though may be the only option I have.

Link to post
Share on other sites

When you refer to the debtor as only earning £60 per year from a pension, is the property joint owned ?

 

Did you attend the charging order ?

 

The CCJ/Charging order is only for the equity portion of the debtor and I'm pretty sure they can't force a sale. It simply sits as a restriction on the land registry, so when it is sold, they get there money, I have seen cases were the restriction does not necessarily guarantee payment.

 

I strongly suggest you start a new thread and give us a bit more info. Help will come once we have all the facts.

 

Debbie

Link to post
Share on other sites

Been reading thread (interest on post judgement) in legal section t/day regarding interest on a C/O did not think they could apply interest to a C/O if was unsecured debt regulated by the CCA 1974 or is yours wildm regarding contractual interest?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...