Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Good afternoon, I am writing because I am very frustrated. I received a parking fine from MET Parking Services Ltd , ( Southgate park Stansted CM24 1PY) . We stopped for a quick meal in Mcdonalds and were there fir around 30 mins. We always do this after flights and never received a parking fine before.  Reason: The vehicle left in Southgate car park without payment made for parking and the occupants southgate premises. they took some pictures of us leaving the car. i did not try and appeal it yet as I came across many forums that this is a scam and I should leave it. But I keep getting threatening letters.  Incident happened : 23/10/2023 I did contact Mcdonalds and they said this:  Joylyn (McDonald’s Customer Services) 5 Apr 2024, 12:05 BST Dear Laura, Thank you for contacting McDonald’s Customer Services. I’m sorry to hear that you have received a Parking Charge Notice following your visit to our Stansted restaurant.   We've introduced parking restrictions at some of our restaurants to make sure there are always parking spaces available for customers.   We appreciate that some visits such as birthday parties or large group visits might take longer and the parking restrictions aren't intended to stop this. If you think your stay will exceed the stated maximum parking time then please speak to a manager in advance.   Your number plate is scanned by our Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR) system when you enter our car park, and then again when you leave. If you have overstayed the maximum time allowed, you will not be notified straight away- a Parking Charge Notice will be sent to you via the post.   If you feel that a Parking Charge Notice has been issued in error, please contact our approved contractors who issued the charge in order to appeal the charge. Unfortunately McDonald's are unable to revoke parking tickets- the outcome of the appeal is final and cannot be overturned by McDonald’s.   Many thanks for taking the time to contact McDonald’s Customer Services.   Can someone please help me out and suggest what I should do next?  Thank you 
    • Good Evening, I've got a fairly simple question but I'll provide some context incase needed. I've pursued a company that has operations in england despite them having no official office anywhere. I've managed to find a site they operate from and the papers there have been defended so I know they operate there. They've filed a defence which is honestly the worst defence ever, and despite being required to provide their witness evidence, they have not and have completely ignored the courts and my request for copies of it. I'm therefore considering applying to strike out their defence on the grounds the defence was rubbish and that they haven't provided any evidence for the trial. However, it has a trial date set for end of june, and a civil application wouldn't get heard until a week before then, so hardly worth it. However, my local court is very good at dealing with paper applications (i.e ones that don't need hearings, and frankly I think they are literally like 1-2 days from when you submit it to when a Judge sees it. I'm wondering if I can apply to strikeout a defence without a hearing OR whether a hearing is required for a strikeout application.   Thanks
    • I have just opened another bank acc with lloyds (i have a few already) After doing some research they may have some relation to tsb or be apart of the same group will this cause me issue if my salary is paid into my lloyds account? Also, if the debts do go into default and nothing is paid then after 6 years it all goes away? As the DCAs cannot do anything? I do want to start paying in like 3/4 months or do you advise I leave it if it goes into default? again sorry for all the questions, i am just processing everything
    • one reply only  follow post 2 of letter of claim <<clickme link. dx
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Barclays - charges should be £1.50 - Whistleblower revelations


BankFodder
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4605 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

If you saw Whistleblower you will find that this is the figure which was admitted by a Barclays manager.

 

The BBc found that there was was a culture of dishonesty in Barclays. It was admitted by a manager that working for Barclays is just a selling job.

 

It seems that they want your money and that they will do anything to get it.

 

If you are claiming back your charges then don't accept anything less than 100%.

 

You have seen the lengths that Barclay's will go to to get your money.

 

We have our own experience to show that they will go to similar lengths to keep it.

 

It appears that lies and dishonesty are part of the language and of the culture of the bank.

 

It appears that the very senior management have lost contact with their bank.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 56
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

its probably less than that, if a smaller company like Yorkshire have their costs as 0.9p , then a large multinational like Barclays must have the actual cost as a lot less - just my tuppenth worth :p

Lula

 

Lula v Abbey - Settled

Lula v Abbey (2) - Settled

Lula v Abbey (3) - Stayed

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, I noticed that 9 pence figure, too.

 

The piece was very fleeting and would need to be examined frame by frame to analyse the data contained on that lap top screen.

 

I wonder if the Yorkshire Bank whistleblower has shared her info with bankfodder as well as the BBC?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder if the Yorkshire Bank whistleblower has shared her info with bankfodder as well as the BBC?

 

with that wig it probably was Bankfodder :rolleyes:

 

only joking Big Guy :D

Lula

 

Lula v Abbey - Settled

Lula v Abbey (2) - Settled

Lula v Abbey (3) - Stayed

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the 9p was what it costs in computer operation terms. You would have to add to that stationary, postage costs, and some staff costs. I think £1.50 to £2 is more like it.

 

Anyway here's the bit form the program last night

 

YouTube - Whistleblower: Barclays Bank - Penalty Charges

  • Haha 1

23/02/07 Request for payment sent (hand delivered to my local branch)

08/03/07 Standard Letter from Barlclays saying they are looking in to my complaint received

13/03/07 Letter before action sent (hand delivered to my local branch)

27/03/07 Partial offer of £1255 received

29/03/07 MCOL submitted

Link to post
Share on other sites

Who put that up there?

Fantastic. Exactly what we tried to do but our recording went wrong.

 

Well done.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello, new to all this but felt I had to make a comment. I used to work on the Barclays 'outbound' department at Doxford park, Sunderland, that was featured in last nights Whistleblower. We set it up in 2001 and its still exactly the same. The 'account executives' were still using the same sales speel that we were told to use 6 years ago so its not like its a problem thats suddenly surfaced, its been going on for years.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am not surprised by the stuborness of the headquarter, they have to deny. After all, they are negotiating a merge with the ABN AMRO in Holland at this very moment and cant use bad publicity. And knowing the Dutch (being one myself :D) this is not something they will like!!!!

And no wonder they are keen to get the headquarters to Holland. Will make it more difficult for the UK consumers to take action.

 

Oh and by the way, I never ever heard of these ridiculous charges in Holland. We were only charged with interest, thats it. So maybe a merge will bring something good.

 

Lets wait and see......

 

LMS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hopefully this programme will help us all with our cases. I've got to the stage where i'm taking them to court after them telling me they don't owe me anything, blah, blah, blah!!! I had an additions account.........not that i have any idea what benefits I got from it!!!!! Does this mean we can claim the money back they charged for having an additions account? I never asked for it and didn't know I was paying for it till I got my statements through!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was tempted to go and sit in the Manchester City Centre branch, just to watch the stream of customers complaining.

I wouldn't like to be sat on the customers service desk this morning.

I wonder how many Barclays staff are off sick today??

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thumbs up to whistleblower last night on getting Barkleys on camera admitting they profit from charges!!

Fingers crossed the courts will take a very dim view of the way the banks are clogging up the system with claims when they have admitted they are wrong and just order immediate payment to everyone!!

We can just dream..............

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have to go to Barcalys in my lunch hour to pay some money in to my account. I will investigate on the chaos.

 

As soon as my charges are repayed and my over draft is cleared I'm closing my account. Purley on the way they treated that pensioner.

23/02/07 Request for payment sent (hand delivered to my local branch)

08/03/07 Standard Letter from Barlclays saying they are looking in to my complaint received

13/03/07 Letter before action sent (hand delivered to my local branch)

27/03/07 Partial offer of £1255 received

29/03/07 MCOL submitted

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fantastic, I've got this on my Sky+ and will be making several DVD copies today for my own use :)

  • Barclays: WON!!! It took four months but was totally worth it!
  • Cabot: I'm still waiting for an enforcable agreement, more than a year after requesting it. Go on, Uncle Ken, take me to court if you dare. You know you want to!
  • Elephant.co.uk: VICTORY - they admitted there was no debt!
  • Ashbourne Management (gym membership): Finally got my default removed and out-of-court settlement; I'm not finished with them yet!

<--- If I've been helpful please remember the scales ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

What a proram blow them right out the water.

I am delivering my Summary cause form to the court this today, the program (Whistleblower) has given me so much more confidence.

I will try and get a copy and use it in court (if allowed).

Surely now OFT must address their illeagal profiteering policy.

How many accounts will be closed today?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Without wanting to sound ancient (I had just left school) I was amazed how much banking has changed. I worked for LLoyds from 1987-1990 and remember phoning customers up to let them know they'd gone overdrawn so they had time to bank on that day to avoid charges.

Mind you we were a 'rural' branch, not quite out of the league of gentlemen' but pretty close...

 

Btw does this give any grounds to claim back 'additions' fees. Its clearly a service with no paperwork, only used by barclays as a means of generating cash, and clearly fraudulantly 'mis-sold'. I think the quote was something along the liine of "Additions 1st of the month £60 Million quid thank you very much"

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've just been to the Barclays to pay some money in and the asked if I wanted to take a loan to pay off my OD. You think they would have held it down a bit on the old hard sell after last night.

23/02/07 Request for payment sent (hand delivered to my local branch)

08/03/07 Standard Letter from Barlclays saying they are looking in to my complaint received

13/03/07 Letter before action sent (hand delivered to my local branch)

27/03/07 Partial offer of £1255 received

29/03/07 MCOL submitted

Link to post
Share on other sites

:eek: :eek: :eek: Shock horror. Watched Wistleblower and was horified (as a Barclays account customer at the Guildford Branch with an Addidtions account and a Barclaycard!!!!!!!!!!) to see what was going on.

 

I was left somewhat stunned however it was a call centre that sold me my additions account and i was aware of what that entailed at the time.

 

Going to close it as soon as i have claimed off the free mobile insurance part of the account as my phone is busted!!:D

 

Wasnt going to bother with the £60 in charges but now i think I may just. Well done to everyone at CAG ive been helped no end and I hope many more will be helped in the same way.

 

D

Barclaycard

S.A.R sent 18/01/07 :o

7 Day reminder 02/03/07

Some statements rec'd 19/03/07

ICO Complaint 20/03/06

 

Alea iacta est

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4605 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...