I too have fallen foul of the interesthike from Cahoot. The previous post mention a doubling of the rate, for me it was closer to triple the rate. Although the amounts involved are small compared to other logs I would appreciate any views on my story before I take Cahoot to court. I have been deliberately vague on the amounts in case this goes to court.
I took a flexi loan of around £15k in early 2006. The rate that was applied to my loan and as shown on the first statement was 5.65%. Then a week after this statement I received 2 weeks notice that the rate was going to be 8.9%.
I complained about this and to limit the effect I paid off around £5k.
Then a few months later I received the same notification everybody else has mentioned, 2 days notice that the rate was going up to 9.something and then up to 14.9% a couple of weeks later.
Compared to my initial 5.65% that is nearly triple the original rate in six months.
I consider this plainly unfair, I know that the contract I have is that Cahoot can change the rate to whatever they want, but nobody can reasonably expect this kind of increase in such a short time. What if they decided to increase the loan rate to 30% after another 6 months and then again to 60% after that?
After looking into this a bit my opinion is that I have common law and statuary rights that over-rule their contract.
I have also learned that this type of account is NOT governed by the FSA or the Banking Code; it is governed by the OFT rules on unfair contracts. So when Cahoot say that you can take your complaint to the FSA it is not worth it.
Luckily for me I received the money I was expecting and paid off the loan almost immediately. However, I withheld around £100 in what I considered to be over charges of interest. So that rather than me trying to chase them for money they now have to chase me for money.
I wrote to Cahoot explaining that this is what I had done and asking them to recalculate my loan with a more reasonable rate. They responded with the usual letter that everybody keeps posting and stated that their calculations are correct and even sent me the spreadsheet to prove it.
The other thing I learned from the OFT website is that for this type of account they must give 30 days pre-warning of rate changes. So I used their spreadsheet to recalculate how much interest I should have paid if they had applied the 30 day rule.
The grey area for me though is what rate they should apply. I absolutely refuse to be ripped off in this way and will not pay 14.9% to any financial institution. If they wont offer me a better rate and recalculate then I refuse to accept any rate change from the original 5.65%
Thus I sent them 2 calculations. 1 based upon the applied interest rate but with 30 days notice whereby they have overcharged me by £20. And the other calculated on 5.65% interest whereby they have overcharged me by £120.
I wrote that I accepted they were entitled to increase interest rates but that increasing them by 300% in six months was in breach of my statuary rights and offered them a half way compromise. Basically I gave them 2 weeks to accept £20 to close down my account. Otherwise I will be making a claim for £120 plus interests plus costs.
They immediately refused my offer and told me to take my complaint to the next stage which is contacting Abbeycomplaints.
I contacted abbey complaints but I don’t think they are doing anything with it and the 8 weeks is nearly over.
The twist in this is that cahoot have now started charging me £30 a time for my failed direct debit, even though I wrote to them and told them that I have cancelled my DD while this is still in dispute. This puts me in the same arena as everybody else’s complaint.
My question is this: should I let Cahoot try and pursue me for the £100 that say I owe them or should I take action first and try and claim £120 in excessive interest plus the £60 in penalty fees.
The excessive interest claim is by no means clear cut, either for or against, it is entirely dependant on personal circumstances. I believe I would win if it went to court. The penalty fees argument is clear cut as the many threads on this site demonstrate.
Any thoughts out there?
Similar Threads:



Reply With Quote