Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Post the NTK up here for the regulars to double-check. I highly doubt it's compliant with POFA though. Ignore the deforestation that comes unless it's ever a letter of claim. Any luck with the organ grinder?
    • Probably the case @lookinforinfo Also an update, I've got the registered keeper letter. Just to check that I continue to ignore it until PAP letter comes in?
    • Thanks very much Bank. I've now done a lot of reading and have drafted my Letter of Claim as attached. I look forward to your comments. 16Apr24 draft Letter of Claim against Parcel2Go.pdf16Apr24 draft Letter of Claim against Parcel2Go.pdf16Apr24 draft Letter of Claim against Parcel2Go.pdf
    • ive already CAREFULLY explained how it all works earlier. what you will have to pay is already preset and detailed on the court forms/TfL stuff you already have. you wont be asked any questions upon your financial means etc. thats not under debate . you wont be asked upon any mitigating circumstances, you have pleaded guity which you always SHOULD.  the ONLY 2 reasons you are attending is to: 1) after finding the TfL prosecutor... plead directly face to face before you go in to try and get an OOC (you can bring up or say anything/everything you like ...anything that might get them to agree) 2) if 1 fails...show your genuine remorse face to face to the magistrate, BRIEFLY mention how a criminal record would hinder your future then hope they take pity on you and dont also record this on your file.  PS its only declarable/shows there for one year anyway. regardless to what an employer might ask in job questionnaires past 1yrs you forget about it. they cannot see it even on enhanced DBS etc etc. you should not latterly ever appeal a criminal record for this type (1yrs)  of 'offence' its not worth it and if you lose said appeal it will cost your dear in terms of additional wages grabbing and court fees. and extends the time it shows if you lose too. dx  
    • hit letter of claim follow post 2 despite repeated requests, the claimant has failed to produce any enforceable paperwork.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

OriBanker V RBS


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6384 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Just Starting off a thread to track my refund progress with RBS. I am going for the nice approch, went to see customer services and asked for all by bank charages back. The poor girl just didn't get it, kept on asking about the last chrages on my account etc.

 

She got her team leader who, took about 5 min's to catch on. I had break out OFT, punlative charages etc.

 

Of course they then, very quickly said they would pass my conserns on etc, etc. letter in a few days.

 

So should get the standard, our chrages are legal and fair etc, blah, blah

 

But you never know .....

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Well going in and having a chat with my branch seam's to have got something rolling. Got a letter back from one of the banks 'Customer Service Officer's' saying she had ordered up all my statments dating back to 1999.

 

So went on to say that this would then be passed on to an 'income manager' and that she would contact me with around 10 working days.

 

The letter is dated 15 May 2006, so progress we will have to wait and see.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi I have done the same I had 2 accounts with them between 1999 and 2003.

Even back in 2001 my statement shows them charging 30.00 for a failed cheque and 20.00 referral charge.

 

Both accounts closed in 2003 so I have not been into the bank but instead have sent off requests for statements.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Sorry haven't updated the thread in a while but here where I am up to.

 

Got the banks std reply saying blah blah, "fair and transparent", blah, blah "OFT is only talking about credit cards"

 

But they did go through all my statments and add up give me a list of charges. I don't think they really got what I was asking.

 

So I went back in to the bank and asked if I could have the copies of my statment they had (Which she had on her hand !!). Which the reply was yes, then all of a sudden quiet work was said to the person how was serving me. The "Yeh no problem" turn in to "Yes but..." got told that the statments had to be sent to there DPA dept. then they would be sent on to me. 3 week later and no statment, also another bank charge.

 

I just though to no more MR nice guy. I took the list of charges they give me from my account and wrote out the 14-day, please give me my £x money back else were going to court.

 

this is now 7-days later and no reply.

 

I'm to send a reminder and then follow up with a conformation by phone (all letters are reg. post anyway)

 

Soo... that's the story update....

 

We shall see.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Looks like its on to court now. Bank has said were not giving you back any charges and were in the right. Oh that they still think the OFT is only looking into credit cards.

 

The main jist of the letter said that they informed me before hand of all charges so they can do what they want. When asked to break down there charges and 'prove' that they related to the cost of maintance they said this is a 'trade' secret.

 

Well I think there in the wrong and I going to get a sheriff to tell them so...

 

 

Any advise on what angle to take with the bank when were in court would be great.

 

My current think is that there charged as unfair in term of cost vs actual cost and just keep it as simple as that. what you all think ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks like its on to court now. Bank has said were not giving you back any charges and were in the right. Oh that they still think the OFT is only looking into credit cards.

 

The main jist of the letter said that they informed me before hand of all charges so they can do what they want. When asked to break down there charges and 'prove' that they related to the cost of maintance they said this is a 'trade' secret.

 

Well I think there in the wrong and I going to get a sheriff to tell them so...

 

 

Any advise on what angle to take with the bank when were in court would be great.

 

My current think is that there charged as unfair in term of cost vs actual cost and just keep it as simple as that. what you all think ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes thats pretty well about it.

 

These people are known for their arrogence but will cave when they are at the stage when they need to defend.

 

Here is a snippet which is usually suggested,you can change it slightly but is the framework of the litigation wording for you.

 

 

Claimant has account (A/C No) with Defendant from (Date)conducted on their standard terms and conditions. Claimant is claiming the return of (£0.00) taken by Defendant in charges over (X) years. The Defendant's charges are a disproportionate penalty and therefore unenforceable as they are contrary to common law. They are also invalid under the Unfair Contracts Terms Act 1977 s.4 and under the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999.Para.8 and sch.2.1.e.

In the event that the charges are not a penalty they are unreasonable within the meaning of the Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982 s.15. Defendant has declined justification of charges despite repeated requests. Claimant claims interest under Sec.69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at a rate of 8% a year from(Date) to (Date) of (£0.00) and also interest at same rate up to the date of judgment or earlier payment at a daily rate of (£0.00)

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks dude. I'm going to sit down and fill out the forms at the start of next week, and get them handed in.

 

I really don't like the way RBS has delt with this matter because after speaking to branch staff, they are on my side its just there managers who hide behind them, that are 'not customer facing'

 

I will be looking for a new bank an 'ethical' one if such a thing exists ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with that

;)

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Well today was the day edinburgh sheriff court, all ready to do some bank whipping. Since they did they wanted to appeer. So I get approched just before the hearing starts, by a very 'green' young solicitor saying that he was instructed to get a they hearing delayed so they can settle out of court.

 

I gave him a little stick about 'well why couldn't you have sorted this out before now'. Then realised he was not the 'real' to dealing with the case.

 

They rather anoyed looking sheriff gave them two weeks to sort it out with me or were back in court.

 

Just now looking for some advice for dealing with this part.

 

Should I make sure that they know if I incur anymore charges I will follow the same action?

 

Anyother advice with this always wellcome.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 12 years later...

This topic was closed on 10 March 2019.

If you have a problem which is similar to the issues raised in this topic, then please start a new thread and you will get help and support there.

If you would like to post up some information which is relevant to this particular topic then please flag the issue up to the site team and the thread will be reopened.

- Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6384 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...