Written by John Kruse, one of the leading experts on Bailiff Law, this consumer friendly guide is essential reading for anyone who comes into contact with a bailiff.
The book is easy to understand and clearly explains the rights
a bailiff has, and also what they cannot do when collecting debts and repossessing goods etc.
I've a dumb question, so apologies if this has been covered before - I have done a search, but didn't find an answer (or at least not one I understood!)
I took out a loan with Black Horse Last November for 9k. I was told that I had two options, either take this loan at x% without PPI, or take this one at x-a bit% with PPI. They also stated that I'd be more likely to be accepted if I took the lower rate with PPI.
Is that legal then? I'm going to contact them during working hours to ask if they can cancel it, but before I do, I'm interested to know if it's legal for them to offer a lower rate solely if you take their PPI.
Also, does it make any difference if the loan is a secured loan?
Halifax - Statements requested 30-01-07 / 153 pages of statements arrived 06-02-07 / Prelim sent 10-02-07 / LBA sent 01-03-2007 / Partial offer recd 07-03-07 / Full offer received (after phone call) 08-03-07!
CrapitalOne - SAR Sent 06-02-07
HSBC - SAR Sent 12-03-07
BOS Mastercard - SAR Sent tbc
Barclaycard - SAR Sent 09-02-07 / Prelim sent 12-03-07 / Partial offer recd 16-03-07
Hi,
If you have the terms and conditions of your loan agreement I would have a good read through them first. A Secured loan can have some nasty hidden conditions, one that has come to light is that you may be liable for their Legal Costs in dealing with anything to do with the Agreement.
There is no harm in phoneing them and asking them for a quote on cancelling your PPI, what they offer may be a really small amount though. Take your time and dont just jump in and accept what they say.
I do have an FSA report on this type of offer, Reduced APR with PPI, I will have a look for it and see what it says.
Ian
Lloyds TSB -PPI - Full refund . 05/09/06 (As Seen on TV)
Halifax settled in Full.. 22/09/06
TSB First Claim SETTLED IN FULL 19/10/06
Second Claim to Lloyds TSB - Settled in Full
Firstplus - early settlement interest charges - Challenged the use of the rule of 78 - SETTLED IN FULL 12/1/07
PPI - GE Money / Purpleloans / Firstplus - Now Settled after 1 year long hard fight.
If my post has helped you, please click the scales! :grin:
Anything said is my opinion and how I understand the law, always consult professional legal advice before taking something to court.
Halifax - Statements requested 30-01-07 / 153 pages of statements arrived 06-02-07 / Prelim sent 10-02-07 / LBA sent 01-03-2007 / Partial offer recd 07-03-07 / Full offer received (after phone call) 08-03-07!
CrapitalOne - SAR Sent 06-02-07
HSBC - SAR Sent 12-03-07
BOS Mastercard - SAR Sent tbc
Barclaycard - SAR Sent 09-02-07 / Prelim sent 12-03-07 / Partial offer recd 16-03-07
Lloyds TSB -PPI - Full refund . 05/09/06 (As Seen on TV)
Halifax settled in Full.. 22/09/06
TSB First Claim SETTLED IN FULL 19/10/06
Second Claim to Lloyds TSB - Settled in Full
Firstplus - early settlement interest charges - Challenged the use of the rule of 78 - SETTLED IN FULL 12/1/07
PPI - GE Money / Purpleloans / Firstplus - Now Settled after 1 year long hard fight.
If my post has helped you, please click the scales! :grin:
Anything said is my opinion and how I understand the law, always consult professional legal advice before taking something to court.
Black Horse Ltd
St William House
Tresillian Terrace
Cardiff
CF10 5BH
Saturday 10th March 2007
RE: Account #############
Dear Sir or Madam,
I took out the above loan for £10,000 on 13/11/07. When I took it out, I signed up for Payment Protection Insurance. I phoned up on 06/03/07 to ask to cancel it and was told I would have to put my request in writing. I am writing to complain.
When I took out the loan, I said I did not need the PPI as my employer provides generous illness and redundancy benefits, but I was told I should still take it out. As this is not correct, I consider that I have been mis-sold this expensive insurance, which I do not need and which I said that I did not want.
I have been advised that I should be able to cancel the PPI contract at any time and receive a partial refund of the premium that I have paid. I would like to do this. And in view of the way I was mis-sold the insurance, I would like to ask for a full refund of the whole premium.
I would appreciate a reply to this letter within fourteen days. If you reject this complaint, I would be grateful if you could explain whether you provide an internal appeals process. If you do not, please supply me with a final response letter, so that I can take up the matter with the Financial Ombudsman Service.
Yours faithfully,
Tone
Halifax - Statements requested 30-01-07 / 153 pages of statements arrived 06-02-07 / Prelim sent 10-02-07 / LBA sent 01-03-2007 / Partial offer recd 07-03-07 / Full offer received (after phone call) 08-03-07!
CrapitalOne - SAR Sent 06-02-07
HSBC - SAR Sent 12-03-07
BOS Mastercard - SAR Sent tbc
Barclaycard - SAR Sent 09-02-07 / Prelim sent 12-03-07 / Partial offer recd 16-03-07
This is a very interesting post because it is exactly what happened to me. I have had a complaint ongoing since November 2006. I was sold the PPI in exactly the same circumstances.
Basically, what they are doing is mis-selling you, not only the PPI but the loan too because in effect the APR is not the rate you are quoted, it becomes much more because there are 2 separate agreements of ?% interest each. So, you are getting the loan at the APR quoted, but you are also getting an additional loan at the same APR which actually doubles up the APR. I hope this makes sense.
I would send the letter but quote the section in the Director General's Directive of 2000. They then dont have a leg to stand on. That is exactly what I will be doing tomorrow when I send the letter to Sunil Patel at Black Horse.
This is absolutely disgraceful behaviour. It seems to me as if it is almost extortion. I am glad that you posted this because it proves that this is common practice at Black Horse. I wonder how many more people have been sold loans in this way?
I had a phone call on Friday from the Centre Manager at my local black horse office, telling me he's certain that this wasn't the case (the different APRs offered depending on PPI) as for any discounted rate other than the standard to be offered, he would have personally had to sign it off. He also said he had my original paperwork in front of him and there's only record of one rate being offered. He's happy to cancel my PPI from now, and is sending me the paperwork.
I told him to send the paperwork, and I'd have a look. Just now, I've no idea how I'm going to progress with it, I just told him to send it on, so I have thinking time, and to see how much money I'd be fighting over if I persevere. As the loan is just a few months old, I guess it won't be too much, but we'll see...
Halifax - Statements requested 30-01-07 / 153 pages of statements arrived 06-02-07 / Prelim sent 10-02-07 / LBA sent 01-03-2007 / Partial offer recd 07-03-07 / Full offer received (after phone call) 08-03-07!
CrapitalOne - SAR Sent 06-02-07
HSBC - SAR Sent 12-03-07
BOS Mastercard - SAR Sent tbc
Barclaycard - SAR Sent 09-02-07 / Prelim sent 12-03-07 / Partial offer recd 16-03-07
I am just navigating my way through the maze that is the CAG forum! It is a doddle compared to the red tape and horse doo doo that Black Horse use...
I have just spoken with BlackHorse regarding my loan with them and several things of interest have appeared:
1) although they quote APR the interest is charged monthly; therefore if you take a 'payment break' you dont pay them any money, but you are accruing an extra months interest on the outstanding balance.
2) Apparently according to them I have a £1500 loan over 60 months - I thought I had taken it out over less (24 months) than that, but cannot find my paperwork due to house moves etc (and I am - correction was - rubbish at retaining that sort of thing) - Would they have increased the length of the loan to cover the extra charges I have incurred by missing a few payments? (another story entirely!) The figure I pay has not changed so I am even more confused!
3) When I asked for a settlement figure I was given this (paraphrased) response:
"The outstanding amount is currently £960; the settlement would be £936"
When I enquired further:
"the actual amount outstanding is £700 but the extra £230 odd is for 'admin' charges and interest..."
If I pay it off next month the amount will have increased due to the way the interest is calculated.
I took the loan out for a short-term period - I had been working in Spain for about 18 months, so my UK bank balance was 0 and credit history was pretty poor, which is why I put up with the 49% APR, but I feel I am being royally screwed over here. I can imagine I have been quite naive, but I think I innocently assumed that a large company like this would play fair!
I am currently going through the process with Lloyds trying to get my charges refunded etc but have no clue where to start with Black Horse. I think it may turn out that one of the sub-clauses gives them the right to my eternal soul.
Can someone suggest where to start in clearing up this mess? I am now in a position to be able to pay back the loan but which I thought was pretty much paid off - now I find I still have 2/3 of the loan still outstanding after nearly 2 years with apparently another 41 months to go!
This is before I go into any battle regarding PPI or overcharging..
(one loan person has told me that PPI improves your credit rating, and my lloyds bank manager automatically put it on for me on my new credit card, even though I specifically asked not to have it, and told me I could take it off later if I didn't want it!!)
Did I read this right? 49% APR!!!!! That is clearly against the law. I would have a look around and see if I can find something about companies charging extortionate interest rates. Have a look in the general debt forum. You have been shafted big style if the APR is right and I really do think you would have a good case at law for that one.
Did I read this right? 49% APR!!!!! That is clearly against the law. I would have a look around and see if I can find something about companies charging extortionate interest rates. Have a look in the general debt forum. You have been shafted big style if the APR is right and I really do think you would have a good case at law for that one.
Annie
Well I am sending off the request for my credit agreement tomorrow, which I have been advised should be my first step, then I shall see what I should do next. Any tips from an expert??!!
Sending this letter this afternoon - I belive it tells it's own story. Any advice welcome if I've phrased it horribly or stupidly. I'll check on here before I do post it...
Black Horse Ltd
St William House
Tresillian Terrace
Cardiff
CF10 5BH
Tuesday 19th June 2007
RE: Account #############
Dear Sir or Madam,
I took out the above loan for £10,000 on 13/11/07. When I took it out, I signed up for Payment Protection Insurance. I phoned up on 06/03/07 to ask to cancel it and was told I would have to put my request in writing. I wrote a letter outlining my dissatisfaction on March 10th of this year. After a phone conversation with the Meadowhall Centre manager, he agreed that I should at the very least be able to cancel the PPI immediately without penalty, and sent me the appropriate form to do so by return of post.
After signing this form, and returning it by hand to the office, I had no more communication from Black Horse. After the premium for the PPI was taken again in April, I contacted the Meadowhall centre by phone to ask why? They said they would send me another form to sign which I could then return. This never arrived.
On Monday 18th June 2007, I contacted Black Horse again to ask why my payment protection policy was still in force despite my repeated requests in writing and by phone to cancel it. I asked to make an appointment to see someone at the Meadowhall centre to discuss the payment protection and my loan.
When I was seen by an advisor at the Meadowhall centre, I was first of all told that to cancel the Payment Protection Insurance I would have to take a new loan – the PPI would be rebated, and then the new loan would be drawn up without the insurance added. When I questioned this initially I was told that it was much easier that way. Then I was told that in order to draw up the new loan, I would have to take some more money on top, the minimum being 10% of the current loan amount. “Basically you need to be walking out of here with some money, even if it’s only £700 or something”. Again I queried this, as I’m certain I am well within my rights requesting this insurance be cancelled without penalty, and the reason I was there at all was because I’d spent the best part of 4 months trying to cancel this insurance (which I believe was mis-sold to me in the first place).
After I had made it clear that I wished to cancel the insurance and not take out a further loan, the lady who saw me asked me to wait while she went to get the appropriate paperwork. 15 minutes later she returned with a typed letter in my name, requesting that Black Horse cancel my Payment Protection Insurance. I was slightly taken aback by this kind of ‘paperwork’ as I had written a letter in March 2007 making it abundantly clear that I wished to cancel the Payment Protection Immediately, and that I believed I had been mis-sold the insurance in the first place. I still believe this to be the case, and after yesterday being told that I had to take out a new loan of 10% higher value than the first in order to cancel the Payment Protection Insurance, a fact which I know to be untrue and I’m sure is in direct violation of some banking codes, I’m even more certain that I was mis-sold the policy in the first place.
As I made clear in my letter of March 10th, when I took out the loan, I said I did not need the PPI as my employer provides generous illness and redundancy benefits, but I was told I should still take it out. As this is not correct, I consider that I have been mis-sold this expensive insurance, which I do not need and which I said that I did not want. I also recall being offered two rates for the loan, one rate if I took PPI, and a second, higher rate if I didn’t take PPI. Whilst the Meadowhall Branch manager told me that this is not possible, after this weeks experience of bare-faced deception within the branch, I believe that my recollection is correct. In view of the way I have been treated since my initial request in March, and the way I was mis-sold the insurance, I would like to ask for a full refund of the whole premium.
I would appreciate a reply to this letter within fourteen days. If you reject this complaint, I would be grateful if you could explain whether you provide an internal appeals process. If you do not, please supply me with a final response letter, so that I can take up the matter with the Financial Ombudsman Service.
Yours faithfully,
tone (livid)
Halifax - Statements requested 30-01-07 / 153 pages of statements arrived 06-02-07 / Prelim sent 10-02-07 / LBA sent 01-03-2007 / Partial offer recd 07-03-07 / Full offer received (after phone call) 08-03-07!
CrapitalOne - SAR Sent 06-02-07
HSBC - SAR Sent 12-03-07
BOS Mastercard - SAR Sent tbc
Barclaycard - SAR Sent 09-02-07 / Prelim sent 12-03-07 / Partial offer recd 16-03-07
This is a very interesting post because it is exactly what happened to me. I have had a complaint ongoing since November 2006. I was sold the PPI in exactly the same circumstances.
Basically, what they are doing is mis-selling you, not only the PPI but the loan too because in effect the APR is not the rate you are quoted, it becomes much more because there are 2 separate agreements of ?% interest each. So, you are getting the loan at the APR quoted, but you are also getting an additional loan at the same APR which actually doubles up the APR. I hope this makes sense.
I would send the letter but quote the section in the Director General's Directive of 2000. They then dont have a leg to stand on. That is exactly what I will be doing tomorrow when I send the letter to Sunil Patel at Black Horse.
This is absolutely disgraceful behaviour. It seems to me as if it is almost extortion. I am glad that you posted this because it proves that this is common practice at Black Horse. I wonder how many more people have been sold loans in this way?
Kind regards
Annie
I have communicated in writing to Mr Patel, and found him to be most helpful. Whilst there has been increased attention on these types of products recently, it is apparent that there is only a small amount of wrong-doing, as opposed to it being common practice within the finance industry.
I would suggest that before approaching any finance company in relation to PPi mis-selling, that everyone checks all their paperwork thoroughly before wasting money on postage.
I have communicated in writing to Mr Patel, and found him to be most helpful. Whilst there has been increased attention on these types of products recently, it is apparent that there is only a small amount of wrong-doing, as opposed to it being common practice within the finance industry.
I would suggest that before approaching any finance company in relation to PPI mis-selling, that everyone checks all their paperwork thoroughly before wasting money on postage.
Hi
I read with interest your above post. Why do you think it is apparent that there is only a small amount of wrong-doing? If all the subscribers on this forum are anything to go by then this is absolutely not the case. I do believe that it is common practice within the finance industry to try and sell loans with PPI and I do believe that PPI is mis-sold every day of the year.
Your suggestion that people check their paperwork thoroughly before wasting money on postage seems to me to be very patronising. Perhaps you would like to post your complaint and how it was sorted. Then we can see if it has been handled "fairly".
Your post reeks to me of being someone who works in the financial service industry!!!!!!!
Here Here Gem,
Does sound a bit like Scream121 may have something to hide, After all there are a lot of spies hanging about this forum.
I would suggest that before approaching any finance company in relation to PPI mis-selling, that everyone checks all their paperwork thoroughly before wasting money on postage.
Now that line looks all too familuar too..
Ian
Lloyds TSB -PPI - Full refund . 05/09/06 (As Seen on TV)
Halifax settled in Full.. 22/09/06
TSB First Claim SETTLED IN FULL 19/10/06
Second Claim to Lloyds TSB - Settled in Full
Firstplus - early settlement interest charges - Challenged the use of the rule of 78 - SETTLED IN FULL 12/1/07
PPI - GE Money / Purpleloans / Firstplus - Now Settled after 1 year long hard fight.
If my post has helped you, please click the scales! :grin:
Anything said is my opinion and how I understand the law, always consult professional legal advice before taking something to court.
I've just been going through some docs on my work PC and found my PPI reclaim letters to black horse, and eventually found this thread as I recall giving up on the PPI thing back in 2007 when my personal/family life basically collapsed and I forgot all about it.
2 house moves down the line, I have no documents and very little memory now of what happened when I was first sold the loan with dodgy PPI with the exception of the letters (including the loan accoutn number, thankfully) and the detail I posted years ago in this thread. For ref the loan was settled in 2007.
My question is -
a: is it too late to carry on with this claim/start again?
b: where should I start. Do I need any more info than the account number and who it was with?
I've been trawling through the forum tonight, and I've just confused myself tbh. I just don't know where to start!
Any advice very very very gratefully received.
All the best
Tone
Halifax - Statements requested 30-01-07 / 153 pages of statements arrived 06-02-07 / Prelim sent 10-02-07 / LBA sent 01-03-2007 / Partial offer recd 07-03-07 / Full offer received (after phone call) 08-03-07!
CrapitalOne - SAR Sent 06-02-07
HSBC - SAR Sent 12-03-07
BOS Mastercard - SAR Sent tbc
Barclaycard - SAR Sent 09-02-07 / Prelim sent 12-03-07 / Partial offer recd 16-03-07
First thing is to SAR the bank to get as much information they hold on your account. Template is in the CAG library, the link to which is at the top of every CAG page in green. Cost is £10 and they will have 40 days to comply.
Have a read of No.1 in my signature about single premium PPI policies.
Also visit the fos website and download a consumer questionnaire ready for completion.
Finally, no its not too late to claim this back if it was mis-sold
ims
If I have helped you please leave me a message by clicking my star
I DON'T GIVE ADVICE BY PM BUT IF YOU SEND ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER HELP THERE
If you are sent a private message directing you to another website for advice or support with your issues it is your choice whether to accept. Before you decide, consider the users here who have already offered help and support.
Private message facilities are offered for users to communicate issues that are perhaps inappropriate for posting on the main forum. Site rules explain this in more detail.
If you are approached by private message with a view to asking you to visit another website, please inform the site team via the report icon, especially if this results in a request for a fee.
my views are my own and are given in good faith to try and help people. Please seek professional advice on your case if necessary