Patricia Pearl - Small Claims Procedure - A Practical Guide


An excellent guide for the layperson in how to use the County Court - a must if you are intending to start a claim.

£19.99 + £1.50 (P&P)




Last Will and Testament Kit


Make a legally valid will without the fuss and expense of a solicitor - includes a full step-by-step guide.

£9.99 + £1.50 (P&P)

BAILIFFS - The Law and Your Rights

Written by John Kruse, one of the leading experts on Bailiff Law, this consumer friendly guide is essential reading for anyone who comes into contact with a bailiff.

The book is easy to understand and clearly explains the rights a bailiff has, and also what they cannot do when collecting debts and repossessing goods etc.

£13.95 + £2.00 (P&P)


Reclaim the Right Ltd. - reg. 05783665 in the UK

reg. office:
923 Finchley Road
London
NW11 7PE



+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 17
1 2 3 11 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 322
  1. #1
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    mariejader Novitiate mariejader's Avatar

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    884

    Default mariejader v Abbey **DEFENCE STRUCK OUT!**WON**

    Having followed all the details on here I have now completed my N1 returned it to the court and it was served on Abbeyicon last Friday they have till the 9th of March to reply.

    I have just received a letter which I think is slightly different to most of yours:-

    Thank you for your letter dated xxx about bank charges. I am sorry you feel these contravene the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999.

    Having carried out a full investigation, we are satisfied the charges do not contravene those regulations and therefore cannot agree to refund them.

    The regulations say that we must explain our charges in plain language and that we have to act in good faith, which, according to the OFT, means dealing fairly and openly with customers.

    I therefore reviewd the literature and information you received when you opened your account, including the terms and conditionsicon. This explains that charges will be applied if you do not keep to the terms of the account. Because of this, I believe we have been fair and open in telling you about them. The charges were correct because you did not have enough money in your account to cover payments requested from it. When I looked at the history for your account I found that, unfortunately, this was not the first time this has happened.

    I am confident that I have been fair and have taken into account all the points you made in your letter, but if you have any additional points that you would like to discuss with me, please call me on xxxx. I have enclosed a leaflet about the fosicon, in case you are not happy with my investigation or decision. If so, you should contact them within six months of the date of this letter, enclosing a copy of it, as they would need tthis for their investigation.

    I hope we can work together to help you avoid charges in the future. Little things can help, like checking your account balance as often as possible and looking at the dates of direct debits to make sure they are teken shortly after money is paid in. In addition, we might be able to help by providing an overdrafticon facility to give you more flexibility. This could help to keep your costs down, as there are no charges unless you exceed your overdraft limit. So, if you would like to talk to someone about the options available, please call our telephone banking centre on xxxxx. Alternatively, if you think you might need longer-term help to manage your bank account, please call xxxxx and we'll be happy to help.

    Any comments?

    Similar Threads:
    Nat West Settled 2 acct's before action:

    £2194.77 settled £1904.00 08/01/2007 less interest
    £650.93 Settled overpaid GOGW £850.00 02/01/2007


    Applied Abbey statements -40 day up 24/04/06(arrived 30/06/06)
    Prem 04/01/2007 - reply rcvd 22nd Jan advising not paying
    LBA 22/01/07

    14/02/07 N1 filed @ local court
    21/02/07 issued claim
    23/02/07 deemed served
    25/02/07 Abbey acknowledgement defend in full.
    19/03/07 defence + 50% GOGW
    13/04/07 AQ final day for submission
    30/04/07 DEFENCE STRUCK OUT "ABUSE OF PROCESS"
    01/05/07 Judgement order

    8/05/07 Warrant of Execution requested


    Media coverage

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/6701231.stm

    http://www.newburytoday.co.uk/News/A...articleID=4505


    If you find my post helpfull then please click my scales

  2. #2
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    mariejader Novitiate mariejader's Avatar

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    884

    Default Re: mariejader v Abbey

    I hope we can work together to help you avoid charges in the future. Little things can help, like checking your account balance as often as possible and looking at the dates of direct debits to make sure they are teken shortly after money is paid in. In addition, we might be able to help by providing an overdrafticon facility to give you more flexibility.
    They quite clearly have not looked at my account the last time a charge was applied was March 2004 and then interest September 2004.

    Since then I have no dd or payments going out of this account and it's just short of £500 in credit.

    What do you think I should do give them a call and point out the above or just sit and wait?

    To date I have not received any GOGW offers like the rest of you

    Nat West Settled 2 acct's before action:

    £2194.77 settled £1904.00 08/01/2007 less interest
    £650.93 Settled overpaid GOGW £850.00 02/01/2007


    Applied Abbey statements -40 day up 24/04/06(arrived 30/06/06)
    Prem 04/01/2007 - reply rcvd 22nd Jan advising not paying
    LBA 22/01/07

    14/02/07 N1 filed @ local court
    21/02/07 issued claim
    23/02/07 deemed served
    25/02/07 Abbey acknowledgement defend in full.
    19/03/07 defence + 50% GOGW
    13/04/07 AQ final day for submission
    30/04/07 DEFENCE STRUCK OUT "ABUSE OF PROCESS"
    01/05/07 Judgement order

    8/05/07 Warrant of Execution requested


    Media coverage

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/6701231.stm

    http://www.newburytoday.co.uk/News/A...articleID=4505


    If you find my post helpfull then please click my scales

  3. #3
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    mariejader Novitiate mariejader's Avatar

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    884

    Default Re: mariejader v Abbey

    bump

    Nat West Settled 2 acct's before action:

    £2194.77 settled £1904.00 08/01/2007 less interest
    £650.93 Settled overpaid GOGW £850.00 02/01/2007


    Applied Abbey statements -40 day up 24/04/06(arrived 30/06/06)
    Prem 04/01/2007 - reply rcvd 22nd Jan advising not paying
    LBA 22/01/07

    14/02/07 N1 filed @ local court
    21/02/07 issued claim
    23/02/07 deemed served
    25/02/07 Abbey acknowledgement defend in full.
    19/03/07 defence + 50% GOGW
    13/04/07 AQ final day for submission
    30/04/07 DEFENCE STRUCK OUT "ABUSE OF PROCESS"
    01/05/07 Judgement order

    8/05/07 Warrant of Execution requested


    Media coverage

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/6701231.stm

    http://www.newburytoday.co.uk/News/A...articleID=4505


    If you find my post helpfull then please click my scales

  4. #4
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    mariejader Novitiate mariejader's Avatar

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    884

    Default Re: mariejader v Abbey

    seems like I am the only one replying to my thread

    Well Abbeyicon have till Friday to respond to my N1 claim, I can't wait

    Nat West Settled 2 acct's before action:

    £2194.77 settled £1904.00 08/01/2007 less interest
    £650.93 Settled overpaid GOGW £850.00 02/01/2007


    Applied Abbey statements -40 day up 24/04/06(arrived 30/06/06)
    Prem 04/01/2007 - reply rcvd 22nd Jan advising not paying
    LBA 22/01/07

    14/02/07 N1 filed @ local court
    21/02/07 issued claim
    23/02/07 deemed served
    25/02/07 Abbey acknowledgement defend in full.
    19/03/07 defence + 50% GOGW
    13/04/07 AQ final day for submission
    30/04/07 DEFENCE STRUCK OUT "ABUSE OF PROCESS"
    01/05/07 Judgement order

    8/05/07 Warrant of Execution requested


    Media coverage

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/6701231.stm

    http://www.newburytoday.co.uk/News/A...articleID=4505


    If you find my post helpfull then please click my scales

  5. #5
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    Kerrie78 Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    357

    Default Re: mariejader v Abbey

    It's a standard letter, they probably didn't even check your account before sending it to you.

    Settled at 50%
    Clydesdale £155. Should have been £310 charges, plus interest Husbands Account.


    SETTLED IN FULL:
    MBNA £1230. For Hubby.
    Halifax £39.
    RBS £342. For Hubby.
    Cap One £200.


    Abbey:
    Settled in FULL April 18th 2007. £5179.83 Paid but what a long battle!

    COMPENSATION OF £100 ON 14/04/08 FOR CONTINUED HARASSEMENT.

  6. #6
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    mariejader Novitiate mariejader's Avatar

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    884

    Default Re: mariejader v Abbey

    that's what I thought obviously they have not looked properly into my case before sending out their usual standard CR*P

    Nat West Settled 2 acct's before action:

    £2194.77 settled £1904.00 08/01/2007 less interest
    £650.93 Settled overpaid GOGW £850.00 02/01/2007


    Applied Abbey statements -40 day up 24/04/06(arrived 30/06/06)
    Prem 04/01/2007 - reply rcvd 22nd Jan advising not paying
    LBA 22/01/07

    14/02/07 N1 filed @ local court
    21/02/07 issued claim
    23/02/07 deemed served
    25/02/07 Abbey acknowledgement defend in full.
    19/03/07 defence + 50% GOGW
    13/04/07 AQ final day for submission
    30/04/07 DEFENCE STRUCK OUT "ABUSE OF PROCESS"
    01/05/07 Judgement order

    8/05/07 Warrant of Execution requested


    Media coverage

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/6701231.stm

    http://www.newburytoday.co.uk/News/A...articleID=4505


    If you find my post helpfull then please click my scales

  7. #7
    Classic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Make a contribution
    charleyfarley Informative charleyfarley Informative charleyfarley Informative charleyfarley Informative

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    1,320

    Default Re: mariejader v Abbey

    Hi Marie,

    Just had a quick read of your letter and it's word for word the same as a letter I received on 12thFeb apart from I had a two line paragraph about a GOGW payment they'd made, and they offered me an increased overdrafticon where they offered you an overdraft facility.

    Otherwise it's identical and it's so obvious that they haven't really done anything because they withdrew my o/d facility on Jan 1st, and here they are 6 weeks later offering me an increase!!


  8. #8
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    mariejader Novitiate mariejader's Avatar

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    884

    Default Re: mariejader v Abbey

    It does seem stange to me that they say they have investigate fully but obvioulsy they have not!!!

    Also everyone else apart from me has received a GOGW offer, I wonder if this is because I have been a good girl since 2004?

    I am in two minds if I should call them or just sit and wait until next week?

    Nat West Settled 2 acct's before action:

    £2194.77 settled £1904.00 08/01/2007 less interest
    £650.93 Settled overpaid GOGW £850.00 02/01/2007


    Applied Abbey statements -40 day up 24/04/06(arrived 30/06/06)
    Prem 04/01/2007 - reply rcvd 22nd Jan advising not paying
    LBA 22/01/07

    14/02/07 N1 filed @ local court
    21/02/07 issued claim
    23/02/07 deemed served
    25/02/07 Abbey acknowledgement defend in full.
    19/03/07 defence + 50% GOGW
    13/04/07 AQ final day for submission
    30/04/07 DEFENCE STRUCK OUT "ABUSE OF PROCESS"
    01/05/07 Judgement order

    8/05/07 Warrant of Execution requested


    Media coverage

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/6701231.stm

    http://www.newburytoday.co.uk/News/A...articleID=4505


    If you find my post helpfull then please click my scales

  9. #9
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    Kerrie78 Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    357

    Default Re: mariejader v Abbey

    I am on my second claim with them because since starting my first claim (which is at court stage) they have taken another £700 since November. I have not used the account since this date and my account was within the od limit when I left it, but now I am over the overdrafticon limit and they are sending me nasty letters saying they will send my account to a credit reference agency and default me for not making any payments.
    The 2 letters I have received off them for my second case are word for word the same as what I got for my first claim! They must just have a stack full of numbered letters and they pull one of the top and send it out, whether it's relevent or not.
    I haven't had any joy with phoning them, and now I have been advised to wait until my court date is through until I try again.

    I hope you have better luck than me, because I started in July!

    Settled at 50%
    Clydesdale £155. Should have been £310 charges, plus interest Husbands Account.


    SETTLED IN FULL:
    MBNA £1230. For Hubby.
    Halifax £39.
    RBS £342. For Hubby.
    Cap One £200.


    Abbey:
    Settled in FULL April 18th 2007. £5179.83 Paid but what a long battle!

    COMPENSATION OF £100 ON 14/04/08 FOR CONTINUED HARASSEMENT.

  10. #10
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    mariejader Novitiate mariejader's Avatar

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    884

    Default Re: mariejader v Abbey

    Thanks Kerry I started in March it took them until July I think from memory to send the statements (sorry all dates were in my signatureicon) but due to other matters at home I did not do anything till December.

    Nat West Settled 2 acct's before action:

    £2194.77 settled £1904.00 08/01/2007 less interest
    £650.93 Settled overpaid GOGW £850.00 02/01/2007


    Applied Abbey statements -40 day up 24/04/06(arrived 30/06/06)
    Prem 04/01/2007 - reply rcvd 22nd Jan advising not paying
    LBA 22/01/07

    14/02/07 N1 filed @ local court
    21/02/07 issued claim
    23/02/07 deemed served
    25/02/07 Abbey acknowledgement defend in full.
    19/03/07 defence + 50% GOGW
    13/04/07 AQ final day for submission
    30/04/07 DEFENCE STRUCK OUT "ABUSE OF PROCESS"
    01/05/07 Judgement order

    8/05/07 Warrant of Execution requested


    Media coverage

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/6701231.stm

    http://www.newburytoday.co.uk/News/A...articleID=4505


    If you find my post helpfull then please click my scales

  11. #11
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    KnellyK Novitiate KnellyK's Avatar

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    624

    Default Re: mariejader v Abbey

    Hi Marie

    They haven't offered me a GOGW yet either so I feel a bit left out of the Abbeyicon GOGW club too!

    KnellyK


  12. #12
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    jcaps Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    123

    Default Re: mariejader v Abbey

    they offered me £60 which I took more as an insult


  13. #13
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    mariejader Novitiate mariejader's Avatar

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    884

    Default Re: mariejader v Abbey

    KnellyK if you don't mind me asking is your account in credit? Don't feel you have to answer that

    Just wondering if there was a pattern to the offers they are making

    Nat West Settled 2 acct's before action:

    £2194.77 settled £1904.00 08/01/2007 less interest
    £650.93 Settled overpaid GOGW £850.00 02/01/2007


    Applied Abbey statements -40 day up 24/04/06(arrived 30/06/06)
    Prem 04/01/2007 - reply rcvd 22nd Jan advising not paying
    LBA 22/01/07

    14/02/07 N1 filed @ local court
    21/02/07 issued claim
    23/02/07 deemed served
    25/02/07 Abbey acknowledgement defend in full.
    19/03/07 defence + 50% GOGW
    13/04/07 AQ final day for submission
    30/04/07 DEFENCE STRUCK OUT "ABUSE OF PROCESS"
    01/05/07 Judgement order

    8/05/07 Warrant of Execution requested


    Media coverage

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/6701231.stm

    http://www.newburytoday.co.uk/News/A...articleID=4505


    If you find my post helpfull then please click my scales

  14. #14
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    mariejader Novitiate mariejader's Avatar

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    884

    Default Re: mariejader v Abbey

    well I have phoned the court to see if there have been any correspondence receive from Abbeyicon and guess what?

    They acknowledged my claims on the 27th Feb 2 working days after it was served and they are defending in full, so now they have until the 23rd March so I am told to reply to the court.

    Can someone answer this as I am now confused, the lady at the court said that this means they have a further 2 weeks which takes them to the 23rd March, does the two weeks start from the date they were orignally to reply which was this Friday 9th or does the two weeks start from the 27th which would then take it to the 13th March?

    Nat West Settled 2 acct's before action:

    £2194.77 settled £1904.00 08/01/2007 less interest
    £650.93 Settled overpaid GOGW £850.00 02/01/2007


    Applied Abbey statements -40 day up 24/04/06(arrived 30/06/06)
    Prem 04/01/2007 - reply rcvd 22nd Jan advising not paying
    LBA 22/01/07

    14/02/07 N1 filed @ local court
    21/02/07 issued claim
    23/02/07 deemed served
    25/02/07 Abbey acknowledgement defend in full.
    19/03/07 defence + 50% GOGW
    13/04/07 AQ final day for submission
    30/04/07 DEFENCE STRUCK OUT "ABUSE OF PROCESS"
    01/05/07 Judgement order

    8/05/07 Warrant of Execution requested


    Media coverage

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/6701231.stm

    http://www.newburytoday.co.uk/News/A...articleID=4505


    If you find my post helpfull then please click my scales

  15. #15
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    mariejader Novitiate mariejader's Avatar

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    884

    Default Re: mariejader v Abbey

    think I have found the answer if someone can just confirm

    It's 28 days after service has been served which would take me to the 23rd.

    Nat West Settled 2 acct's before action:

    £2194.77 settled £1904.00 08/01/2007 less interest
    £650.93 Settled overpaid GOGW £850.00 02/01/2007


    Applied Abbey statements -40 day up 24/04/06(arrived 30/06/06)
    Prem 04/01/2007 - reply rcvd 22nd Jan advising not paying
    LBA 22/01/07

    14/02/07 N1 filed @ local court
    21/02/07 issued claim
    23/02/07 deemed served
    25/02/07 Abbey acknowledgement defend in full.
    19/03/07 defence + 50% GOGW
    13/04/07 AQ final day for submission
    30/04/07 DEFENCE STRUCK OUT "ABUSE OF PROCESS"
    01/05/07 Judgement order

    8/05/07 Warrant of Execution requested


    Media coverage

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/6701231.stm

    http://www.newburytoday.co.uk/News/A...articleID=4505


    If you find my post helpfull then please click my scales

  16. #16
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    KnellyK Novitiate KnellyK's Avatar

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    624

    Default Re: mariejader v Abbey

    Hi Marie
    As a matter of fact, the account is over the agreed overdrafticon limit (because of their damn charges) I tried to arrange to pay them off over a month (we get money paid in at various times in the month) but, when I said that a couple of the credits were benefits they seemed to stop listening to what I was proposing, kept saying they'd cancel all transactions on the account and take payments from the other non-benefit credits! So that's what happened and now we have a useless bank acount til the charges are paid! That was the straw that broke the camels back and made me decide enough is enough! So, maybe that's why I'm not in the GOGW club! (I can wait!)
    KnellyK


  17. #17
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    mariejader Novitiate mariejader's Avatar

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    884

    Default Re: mariejader v Abbey

    Received the paperwork from the court yesterday advising Abbeyicon has filed an acknowledgement of Service on the 25th Feb.

    When I took my original paperwork to court (3 x N1 and list of charges etc) I left them all there,

    It took a week for the court to raise the notice of issue which they sent me a copy, however I have not received my copy of the N1 back should I have a copy?

    Nat West Settled 2 acct's before action:

    £2194.77 settled £1904.00 08/01/2007 less interest
    £650.93 Settled overpaid GOGW £850.00 02/01/2007


    Applied Abbey statements -40 day up 24/04/06(arrived 30/06/06)
    Prem 04/01/2007 - reply rcvd 22nd Jan advising not paying
    LBA 22/01/07

    14/02/07 N1 filed @ local court
    21/02/07 issued claim
    23/02/07 deemed served
    25/02/07 Abbey acknowledgement defend in full.
    19/03/07 defence + 50% GOGW
    13/04/07 AQ final day for submission
    30/04/07 DEFENCE STRUCK OUT "ABUSE OF PROCESS"
    01/05/07 Judgement order

    8/05/07 Warrant of Execution requested


    Media coverage

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/6701231.stm

    http://www.newburytoday.co.uk/News/A...articleID=4505


    If you find my post helpfull then please click my scales

  18. #18
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    Mad Nick Informative Mad Nick Informative Mad Nick Informative Mad Nick Informative Mad Nick's Avatar

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Nov 2006
    I am in
    GL12
    Posts
    692

    Default Re: mariejader v Abbey

    Marie, I believe you should, yes - a nicely court-stamped copy with the claim # entered on it. Regards, Mad Nick.

    Abbey £8370 settled 17 Apr 07

  19. #19
    Classic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Make a contribution
    joneshousehold Informative joneshousehold Informative joneshousehold Informative joneshousehold Informative

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    1,299

    Default Re: mariejader v Abbey

    Good luck with your claim Marie. I have had pretty much the same experience as Kelly, my second claim has produced the same letters as my first. Abbeyicon will just string you along until the final deadline and then pay up. Hold tight. You will probably need to produce a bundle to the court and an allocation questionnaireicon so you might be wise getting some research done about what these entail so you are ready when that stage is reached.


  20. #20
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    alexted Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Jan 2007
    I am in
    Glos
    Posts
    60

    Default Re: mariejader v Abbey

    Quote Originally Posted by Mad Nick View Post
    Marie, I believe you should, yes - a nicely court-stamped copy with the claim # entered on it. Regards, Mad Nick.
    Oh no I think I've screwed up!

    I sent 2 copies of the N1 to the court and KEPT a copy for myself, which obviously means it doesn't have a court stamp on it. Is this going to be a problem?

    Sorry for highjacking your thread, Marie.



Browsealoud
Video Tour



Reclaim the Right Ltd. - reg.05783665 in the UK reg. office:- 923 Finchley Road London NW11 7PE