Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Tangliss, if you can't upload the letter, could you tell us what the heading is please? My understanding is it should say 'Letter before claim' or similar. HB
    • Do you think I should send the CCA request now then instead of waiting? I really can do without the stress. Any advice would be appreciated. Thank you for responding.
    • How was the "receiver" appointed and what is their role? Appointed by the lender under the terms of their security on the loan (sometimes referred to as "LPA Receiver")? Or are they acting for you in insolveny? What's the current role of the agent?
    • Wait for more replies, but that letter to me can be interpreted as a letter before action. Ignoring it can have consequences. The court to impose sanctions for failure in responding to a letter of claim.
    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lowell Financial Limited Contact details and complaint help


coffeebien
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3890 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I am also having problems with these idiots.

Some help info read the Credit Service Association member code of practice.

available to download in PDF format, good to refer to.

 

Lowell - and the other million subsidiaries that pretend to hide at that office in LEEDS - break them all the time, point out which one they break and submit a complaint on CSA website, has to be printed and posted.

 

EXAMPLE AT THE END

 

 

www.csa-uk.com/index.htm

 

Very worth while, I am in the process already and with another company with another company but will do same for Wescot.

 

Also visit the Office of Fair Trading website -

 

www.oft.gov.uk/Business/licence/default.htm

 

They will have a consumer credit license to operate under

 

and read debt collection guidance they also will be worth seeing which ones if not all of those guidelines they infringe and let Andy Lowther know full details on there website.

 

Also sent the OFT a copy of your complaint to the CSA.

 

LOWELL FINANCIAL LIMITED - CONSUMER CREDIT No 528607

 

Mr. Andy Lowther

Office of Fair Trading

1C/015

FREEPOST

London

EC4B 4AH

 

[email protected]

 

Direct Line (020) 7211 8765

Fax (020) 7211 8877

 

Don’t let these idiots win and complain like hell!

 

Good luck

 

By the way started that many legal fights, I won 2 so far, yes I OWE this helpful site site some donations which will gladly follow shortly. Just preparing to cases that are certainly going to court not mentioning any name but check Lowell Financial Limited’s section.

 

Will update info and donations shortly.................

 

CSA MEMBER DETAILS FOR LOWELL FINANCIAL LIMITED

 

 

Lowell Financial Ltd

Enterprise House

PO Box 172

 

Leeds

LS11 9WS

 

Telephone: 0845 300 9410

Facsimile: 0845 300 9411

E-Mail: [email protected]

Website: Lowell Group

Region: NW

Services: CE

Areas Covered: UK

Type of Membership Full

Contact Person: Mr A Bartle

 

You can also for the cost of £1 get full company information, list of directors and their home addresses and other useful info for legal redress, all available online through Companies House

 

http://wck2.companieshouse.gov.uk/

 

 

 

SECTION TAKE FROM CSA COMPLAINT FORM>>>>>>>

 

 

In what way do you think the member has violated our Code of Practice?

 

s1 d & (vii) – XXXXX have failed to comply with ALL my requests for information as well as s7 of The Data Protection Act, Subject Access Request.

 

s3 (b) – XXXXX have continuously harassed and intimidated me into agreeing to a payment plan after threatening Court action for a alleged debt they have failed to prove is outstanding or they have the right to pursue.

 

s3 (e) – XXXX have sent numerous correspondence to chase this alleged debt and at one point a received nine letters over a period of four days.

 

s3 (j) – Letter dated XXXX from XXXXX Legal (trading style XXXXX) advising that County Court action will now commence and adding Court fees £XXX, Solicitors Cost £XXX and Interest of £XXX.

 

s3 (j) – Letter dated XXXX from XXXXX Legal advising legal proceedings are now being prepared for Court and failure to pay within 3 days a CCJ could be registered against me.

 

s3 (l) - XXXXX have failed to take ANY steps to show or verify that this alleged debt is legally due.

 

s3 (q) – failed to take into consideration any of the information supplied or respond promptly and accurately with information requested.

 

s3 ® – XXXX have failed to supply and of the information requested since XXXXX

 

 

 

What did you ask the CSA Member to do to put it right?

 

I have continuously denied this debt since XXXX and also asked XXXXXX to supply further information on numerous occasions without reply.

 

CREDIT SERVICE ASSOCIATION CONTACT

 

Credit Services Association

Wingrove House

Ponteland Road

Newcastle upon Tyne

NE5 3DP

 

Telephone:

00 44 (0)191 286 5656

Fax:

00 44 (0)191 286 0900

Email:Complaints [email protected]

 

Claire Aynsley

Code & Complaince Executive

CSA code of practice.pdf

OFT Debt collection guidelines.pdf

CSA Complaint Form.pdf

CSA complaint procedure.pdf

OFT Complaint form.doc

Capital One - Claim filed 5.12.06 6QZ90559 £759.25 (15/12/06 not aknowledged yet)

MBNA - Claim filed 5.12.06 6QZ90575 £764.45 (Aknowledged 7.12.06)

Barclaycard - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) 30.10.06 (County Summons issued for non compliance & Damages - 20.12.06 Penrith County Court £80.00

Goldfish (Lloyds) S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) 30.10.06 - Dropped as Lloyds liable

RBS Visa S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) 30.10.06 - received and holding on as own bank

RBS Bank S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) 30.10.06 (recieved waiting to open new A/c 1st)

 

Lloyds TSB - County Summons issued for non compliance & Damages - 20.12.06 Penrith County Court £80.00

 

Lowell Financial Ltd - County Summons issued for non compliance & Damages - 20.12.06 Penrith County Court £80.00

Link to post
Share on other sites

excellent!

 

i am also after them as i have 4 defaults for 1 account, 2 from Lowell Portfolio who own the debt and 2 from Lowell Financial who manage it.

 

i want maximum compensation and removal of all defaults. I'll probably see them in court i think as i don't want them getting away with it.

 

they are also now over the time limit for CCA request.

Link to post
Share on other sites

have changed the list slightly as referred to the correct sections :

 

Section 2 (f) – Lowell Financial Ltd have failed to comply with my request under Section 78(1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

Section 2 (f) - Lowell Financial Ltd has failed to respond to my request regarding the entering of multiple defaults.

Section 4 (a) – Lowell Financial Ltd have continuously harassed and intimidated me into agreeing to a payment plan after threatening Court action for a debt they have failed to prove is outstanding or they have the right to pursue.

 

Section 4 (b) – Lowell Financial Ltd have sent numerous correspondence to chase this debt.

 

Section 4 ® – Lowell Financial Ltd have failed to take into consideration any of the information supplied or respond promptly and accurately with information requested.

 

Section 4 ® – Lowell Financial Ltd have failed to supply any of the information requested since xx/xx/xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

loods good, remember the CSA Member, in this case Lowell have to repsond to the CSA regarding complaints within 14days under the CSA guidelines. So keep on top of it and get back on to the CSA if you have not had a reply within 2 weeks. The CSA advised they aim to conclude all complaints within 4 WEEKS.

 

Also read CSA compliants prodcure, now attached and push for them to proceed through the different stages as Lowell will try and delay it where possible, Mine to at Stage 2 as they have not reply to CSA regarding my complaint.

 

Fingers Crossed

Capital One - Claim filed 5.12.06 6QZ90559 £759.25 (15/12/06 not aknowledged yet)

MBNA - Claim filed 5.12.06 6QZ90575 £764.45 (Aknowledged 7.12.06)

Barclaycard - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) 30.10.06 (County Summons issued for non compliance & Damages - 20.12.06 Penrith County Court £80.00

Goldfish (Lloyds) S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) 30.10.06 - Dropped as Lloyds liable

RBS Visa S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) 30.10.06 - received and holding on as own bank

RBS Bank S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) 30.10.06 (recieved waiting to open new A/c 1st)

 

Lloyds TSB - County Summons issued for non compliance & Damages - 20.12.06 Penrith County Court £80.00

 

Lowell Financial Ltd - County Summons issued for non compliance & Damages - 20.12.06 Penrith County Court £80.00

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hi tifo

 

did you have any joy with your letters to ICO and CSA? a while ago I too found the Code of Practice (from Lowells website!) and have downloaded a copy.

 

I have CCA'd them, the 12 days has passed and they sent me a photocopy of a fax of a photocopy of my application form, and I am just waiting for the 30 days to pass before I do anything else, but I would be very interested to hear how your letter went down with the CSA as I want to complain about Lowell to them.

 

Here is my thread, which really seems to be following the same route as everyone else's dealings with Lowell.

 

Help needed re Lowell Financial & CCA

 

regards

 

maggieboo:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi maggieboo,

 

no, i have had absolutely no luck with the ICO, CSA and TS. For me, they have been a total waste of time. Not even a reply to my complaint after 3 months now.

 

If you look at my thread on Lowell, any progress i have made has only been through talking with the Director.

 

But, i have had 2 accounts written off and a promise of defaults being cleared. I am still talking to them regarding compensation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...

Dont know if any one can help me, but ive just checked my credit report to find i have a default on an account i have been disputing, they called me one morning about 3 months ago and i disputed the aco**** said that i wanted all infromation and they havent sent anything to me, they said they would and i confimed all my detials to them. What should i do? please could some one help?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

Hi, my wife has started to get letters regarding an old bank account with lloyds. They have never made any contact before and the amount is nominal. They are threatening to apply for an enforcement on our home. Can they still do this if the mortgage is in joint names with her father?

 

I was wondering if there are any suggestions that can be made with where to start with these cretins?

 

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...