Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Better version attached with the late appeal explained more clearly for the judge. This will sound silly, but I think it would be a good idea to e-mail it to the court and UKPC on Sunday.  It's probably me being daft, but Sunday is still March, and as it's late, sending it in March rather than April will make it sound like it was less late than it really is.  if you get my drift. You can still pop in a paper version on Tuesday if you want. E-mail address for the court: [email protected] And for UKPC: [email protected]   [email protected] Defendant WS.pdf
    • Update 15th March the eviction notice period expired, and I paid my next month rent along with sending them the message discussed above. After a short while they just emailed me back this dry phrase "Thank you for your email." In two weeks' time I'm gonna need to pay the rent again, and I have such a feeling that shortly after that date the contracts will be exchanged and all the payments will be made.  Now my main concern is, if possible, not to end up paying rent after I move out.  
    • they cant 'take away' anything, what ever makes you believe that?  dx  
    • The text on the N1SDT Claim Form 1.The claim is for breaching the terms and conditions set on private land. 2. The defendant's vehicle, NumberPlate, was identified in the Leeds Bradford Airport Roadways on the 28/07/2023 in breach of the advertised terms and conditions; namely Stopping in a zone where stopping is prohibited 3.At all material times the Defendant was the registered keeper and/or driver. 4. The terms and conditions upon  entering private land were clearly displayed at the entrance and in prominent locations 5. The sign was the offer and the act of entering private land was the acceptance of the offer hereby entering into a contract by conduct. 6.The signs specifically detail the terms and conditions and the consequences of failure to comply,  namely a parking charge notice will be issued, and the Defendant has failed to settle the outstanding liability. 7.The claimant seeks the recovery of the parking charge notice, contractual costs and interest.   This is what I am thinking of for the wording of my defence The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and are generic in nature which fails to comply with CPR 16.4. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 1. Paragraph 1 is denied. It is denied that the Defendant ever entered into a contract to breach any terms and conditions of the stated private land. 2. Paragraph 2 and 4 are denied. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was only contracted to provide car park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. 3. It is admitted that Defendant is the recorded keeper of the vehicle. 4.  Paragraph 6 is denied the claimant has yet to evidence that their contract with the landowner supersedes  Leeds Bradford airport byelaws. Further it is denied that the Claimant’s signage is capable of creating a legally binding contract. 5. Paragraph 7 is denied, there are no contractual costs and interest cannot be accrued on a speculative charge.   I'm not sure whether point 4 is correct as I think this side road is not covered by byelaws? Any other suggestions/corrections would be appreciated.
    • Dear EVRi parcelnet LTD t/a evri   evri parcelnet isnt a thing also you say defendant's response which is a bit of a weird format.   Something like   Dear EVRi, Claim no xxxx In your defence you said you could not access tracking. Please see attached receipt and label Regards
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lowell Financial Limited Contact details and complaint help


coffeebien
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3871 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I am also having problems with these idiots.

Some help info read the Credit Service Association member code of practice.

available to download in PDF format, good to refer to.

 

Lowell - and the other million subsidiaries that pretend to hide at that office in LEEDS - break them all the time, point out which one they break and submit a complaint on CSA website, has to be printed and posted.

 

EXAMPLE AT THE END

 

 

www.csa-uk.com/index.htm

 

Very worth while, I am in the process already and with another company with another company but will do same for Wescot.

 

Also visit the Office of Fair Trading website -

 

www.oft.gov.uk/Business/licence/default.htm

 

They will have a consumer credit license to operate under

 

and read debt collection guidance they also will be worth seeing which ones if not all of those guidelines they infringe and let Andy Lowther know full details on there website.

 

Also sent the OFT a copy of your complaint to the CSA.

 

LOWELL FINANCIAL LIMITED - CONSUMER CREDIT No 528607

 

Mr. Andy Lowther

Office of Fair Trading

1C/015

FREEPOST

London

EC4B 4AH

 

[email protected]

 

Direct Line (020) 7211 8765

Fax (020) 7211 8877

 

Don’t let these idiots win and complain like hell!

 

Good luck

 

By the way started that many legal fights, I won 2 so far, yes I OWE this helpful site site some donations which will gladly follow shortly. Just preparing to cases that are certainly going to court not mentioning any name but check Lowell Financial Limited’s section.

 

Will update info and donations shortly.................

 

CSA MEMBER DETAILS FOR LOWELL FINANCIAL LIMITED

 

 

Lowell Financial Ltd

Enterprise House

PO Box 172

 

Leeds

LS11 9WS

 

Telephone: 0845 300 9410

Facsimile: 0845 300 9411

E-Mail: [email protected]

Website: Lowell Group

Region: NW

Services: CE

Areas Covered: UK

Type of Membership Full

Contact Person: Mr A Bartle

 

You can also for the cost of £1 get full company information, list of directors and their home addresses and other useful info for legal redress, all available online through Companies House

 

http://wck2.companieshouse.gov.uk/

 

 

 

SECTION TAKE FROM CSA COMPLAINT FORM>>>>>>>

 

 

In what way do you think the member has violated our Code of Practice?

 

s1 d & (vii) – XXXXX have failed to comply with ALL my requests for information as well as s7 of The Data Protection Act, Subject Access Request.

 

s3 (b) – XXXXX have continuously harassed and intimidated me into agreeing to a payment plan after threatening Court action for a alleged debt they have failed to prove is outstanding or they have the right to pursue.

 

s3 (e) – XXXX have sent numerous correspondence to chase this alleged debt and at one point a received nine letters over a period of four days.

 

s3 (j) – Letter dated XXXX from XXXXX Legal (trading style XXXXX) advising that County Court action will now commence and adding Court fees £XXX, Solicitors Cost £XXX and Interest of £XXX.

 

s3 (j) – Letter dated XXXX from XXXXX Legal advising legal proceedings are now being prepared for Court and failure to pay within 3 days a CCJ could be registered against me.

 

s3 (l) - XXXXX have failed to take ANY steps to show or verify that this alleged debt is legally due.

 

s3 (q) – failed to take into consideration any of the information supplied or respond promptly and accurately with information requested.

 

s3 ® – XXXX have failed to supply and of the information requested since XXXXX

 

 

 

What did you ask the CSA Member to do to put it right?

 

I have continuously denied this debt since XXXX and also asked XXXXXX to supply further information on numerous occasions without reply.

 

CREDIT SERVICE ASSOCIATION CONTACT

 

Credit Services Association

Wingrove House

Ponteland Road

Newcastle upon Tyne

NE5 3DP

 

Telephone:

00 44 (0)191 286 5656

Fax:

00 44 (0)191 286 0900

Email:Complaints [email protected]

 

Claire Aynsley

Code & Complaince Executive

CSA code of practice.pdf

OFT Debt collection guidelines.pdf

CSA Complaint Form.pdf

CSA complaint procedure.pdf

OFT Complaint form.doc

Capital One - Claim filed 5.12.06 6QZ90559 £759.25 (15/12/06 not aknowledged yet)

MBNA - Claim filed 5.12.06 6QZ90575 £764.45 (Aknowledged 7.12.06)

Barclaycard - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) 30.10.06 (County Summons issued for non compliance & Damages - 20.12.06 Penrith County Court £80.00

Goldfish (Lloyds) S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) 30.10.06 - Dropped as Lloyds liable

RBS Visa S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) 30.10.06 - received and holding on as own bank

RBS Bank S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) 30.10.06 (recieved waiting to open new A/c 1st)

 

Lloyds TSB - County Summons issued for non compliance & Damages - 20.12.06 Penrith County Court £80.00

 

Lowell Financial Ltd - County Summons issued for non compliance & Damages - 20.12.06 Penrith County Court £80.00

Link to post
Share on other sites

excellent!

 

i am also after them as i have 4 defaults for 1 account, 2 from Lowell Portfolio who own the debt and 2 from Lowell Financial who manage it.

 

i want maximum compensation and removal of all defaults. I'll probably see them in court i think as i don't want them getting away with it.

 

they are also now over the time limit for CCA request.

Link to post
Share on other sites

have changed the list slightly as referred to the correct sections :

 

Section 2 (f) – Lowell Financial Ltd have failed to comply with my request under Section 78(1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

Section 2 (f) - Lowell Financial Ltd has failed to respond to my request regarding the entering of multiple defaults.

Section 4 (a) – Lowell Financial Ltd have continuously harassed and intimidated me into agreeing to a payment plan after threatening Court action for a debt they have failed to prove is outstanding or they have the right to pursue.

 

Section 4 (b) – Lowell Financial Ltd have sent numerous correspondence to chase this debt.

 

Section 4 ® – Lowell Financial Ltd have failed to take into consideration any of the information supplied or respond promptly and accurately with information requested.

 

Section 4 ® – Lowell Financial Ltd have failed to supply any of the information requested since xx/xx/xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

loods good, remember the CSA Member, in this case Lowell have to repsond to the CSA regarding complaints within 14days under the CSA guidelines. So keep on top of it and get back on to the CSA if you have not had a reply within 2 weeks. The CSA advised they aim to conclude all complaints within 4 WEEKS.

 

Also read CSA compliants prodcure, now attached and push for them to proceed through the different stages as Lowell will try and delay it where possible, Mine to at Stage 2 as they have not reply to CSA regarding my complaint.

 

Fingers Crossed

Capital One - Claim filed 5.12.06 6QZ90559 £759.25 (15/12/06 not aknowledged yet)

MBNA - Claim filed 5.12.06 6QZ90575 £764.45 (Aknowledged 7.12.06)

Barclaycard - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) 30.10.06 (County Summons issued for non compliance & Damages - 20.12.06 Penrith County Court £80.00

Goldfish (Lloyds) S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) 30.10.06 - Dropped as Lloyds liable

RBS Visa S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) 30.10.06 - received and holding on as own bank

RBS Bank S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) 30.10.06 (recieved waiting to open new A/c 1st)

 

Lloyds TSB - County Summons issued for non compliance & Damages - 20.12.06 Penrith County Court £80.00

 

Lowell Financial Ltd - County Summons issued for non compliance & Damages - 20.12.06 Penrith County Court £80.00

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hi tifo

 

did you have any joy with your letters to ICO and CSA? a while ago I too found the Code of Practice (from Lowells website!) and have downloaded a copy.

 

I have CCA'd them, the 12 days has passed and they sent me a photocopy of a fax of a photocopy of my application form, and I am just waiting for the 30 days to pass before I do anything else, but I would be very interested to hear how your letter went down with the CSA as I want to complain about Lowell to them.

 

Here is my thread, which really seems to be following the same route as everyone else's dealings with Lowell.

 

Help needed re Lowell Financial & CCA

 

regards

 

maggieboo:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi maggieboo,

 

no, i have had absolutely no luck with the ICO, CSA and TS. For me, they have been a total waste of time. Not even a reply to my complaint after 3 months now.

 

If you look at my thread on Lowell, any progress i have made has only been through talking with the Director.

 

But, i have had 2 accounts written off and a promise of defaults being cleared. I am still talking to them regarding compensation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...

Dont know if any one can help me, but ive just checked my credit report to find i have a default on an account i have been disputing, they called me one morning about 3 months ago and i disputed the aco**** said that i wanted all infromation and they havent sent anything to me, they said they would and i confimed all my detials to them. What should i do? please could some one help?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

Hi, my wife has started to get letters regarding an old bank account with lloyds. They have never made any contact before and the amount is nominal. They are threatening to apply for an enforcement on our home. Can they still do this if the mortgage is in joint names with her father?

 

I was wondering if there are any suggestions that can be made with where to start with these cretins?

 

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...