Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Oil and gold prices have jumped, while shares have fallen.View the full article
    • Thank you for your reply, DX! I was not under the impression that paying it off would remove it from my file. My file is already trashed so it would make very little difference to any credit score. I am not certain if I can claim compensation for a damaged credit score though. Or for them reporting incorrect information for over 10 years? The original debt has been reported since 2013 as an EE debt even though they had sold it in 2014. It appears to be a breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 Section 13 and this all should have come to a head when I paid the £69 in September 2022, or so I thought. The £69 was in addition to the original outstanding balance and not sent to a DCA. Even if I had paid the full balance demanded by the DCA back in 2014 then the £69 would still have been outstanding with EE. If it turns out I have no claim then so be it. Sometimes there's not always a claim if there's blame. The CRA's will not give any reason for not removing it. They simply say it is not their information and refer me to EE. More to the point EE had my updated details since 2022 yet failed to contact me. I have been present on the electoral roll since 2012 so was traceable and I think EE have been negligent in reporting an account as in payment arrangement when in fact it had been sold to a DCA. In my mind what should have happened was the account should have been defaulted before it was closed and sold to the DCA who would then have made a new entry on my credit file with the correct details. However, a further £69 of charges were applied AFTER it was sent to the DCA and it was left open on EE systems. The account was then being reported twice. Once with EE as open with a payment arrangement for the £69 balance which has continued since 2013 and once with the DCA who reported it as defaulted in 2014 and it subsequently dropped off and was written off by the DCA, LOWELL in 2021. I am quite happy for EE to place a closed account on my credit file, marked as satisfied. However, it is clear to me that them reporting an open account with payment arrangement when the balance is £0 and the original debt has been written off is incorrect? Am I wrong?
    • OMG! I Know! .... someone here with a chance to sue Highview for breach of GDPR with a very good chance of winning, I was excited reading it especially after all the work put in by site members and thinking he could hammer them for £££'s and then, the OP disappeared half way through. Although you never know the reason so all I can say is I hope the OP is alive and well regardless. I'd relish the chance to do them for that if they breached my GDPR.
    • The streaming giant also said it added 9.3 million subscribers in the first three months of the year.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

CCJ after insurance claim


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6141 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Back in March 2006, my wife hit another car, we claimed on our insurance through Norwich Union Direct, and left it in their hands. In June 06 received a letter from Liverpool court informing that a CCJ wouuld go against my wifes name due to insurance claim. I phoned Norwich Union and asked what was going on, they assured me that they would deal with this and nothing would go against my wife.

 

In November my wife applied for a credit card and got turned down, we thought it was starnge as she is always good with her finances.

So we tried again for another card, and again she was declined. So I decided to look at her credit file, and to our dismay there was a CCJ against her name in the court of Liverpool for the insurance claim.

 

I immediately contacted Norwich Union and got put through to the Litigation department in Liverpool, who informed me that they was aware of this and were dealing with it. So if they knew, why did they not tell us when it happened, rather than us finding out by accident?

 

Anyway to cut a long story short after a lot of phone calls by myself to Norwich Union, Livrpool court and The 3rd party solicitors after nearly 2 months we got the CCJ deleted.

 

But now my wife is finding it difficult to get credit due to the searches she has had against her. And to top it off I cancelled my insurance with Norwich Union afetr a month, and they want to charge me £55 cancellation fee for the privelege.

 

Does anyone think I should be getting compensation from them for this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't quite understand why a CCJ would be applied for because of an insurance claim, can you explain this please,. I have never heard of this before

Lula

 

Lula v Abbey - Settled

Lula v Abbey (2) - Settled

Lula v Abbey (3) - Stayed

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't quite understand why a CCJ would be applied for because of an insurance claim, can you explain this please,. I have never heard of this before

 

The 3rd party insurers took my wife to court, because they were getting no reply from Norwich Union, so my wife was expected to pay the money to the 3rd party. I am as bemused as you

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

100%WHU, you should take it up with beccus, who is an officially endorsed representativd of NU on CAG. See here: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/insurance-assurance-companies/98186-i-am-customer-relations.html

Robertxc v. Abbey - £3300 Settled in full

Robertxc v. Clydesdale - £750 Settled in full

Nationwide v. Robertxc - £2000 overdraft wiped out, Default removed by order of the sheriff

Robertxc v. Style Card - Default removed by order of the sheriff

Robertxc v. Abbey (1) - Data Protection Act action. £750 compensation

Robertxc v. Abbey (2) - Data Protection Act action. £2000 compensation, default removed

 

The opinions on this post are those of Robertxc and not necessarily the opinions of the group and do not constitute sound legal advice. You are advised to seek professional legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Presumably you received a CCJ here because there is some dispute in the case - either over liability or quantum.

By the sounds of it it is due to liability - insurance companies are merely your agents - acting on your behalf and hence litigation is usually in your own name.

In this case there mus have been a Judgment either through trial, or more likely in default and they have simply either failed to settle it or failed to settle it in time.

 

NU aren't always the best to deal with on a one to one basis as they are a vast company, but they have done well to have the CCJ removed from your file - as this involves a huge amount of work. as for the seaqrches against your wife - this is a different matter as may not be directly related to this, but if you complain strongly then you may get some compensation.

 

However this is not always quite so straightforward, as there may be be many reasons why you had the CCJ, such as failure to attend Court in a liability dispute - in which the insurers would have expended a vast sum of money to represent you, but your non-attendance would have caused you to lose the case and hence the CCJ - having said that though it should still have been settled before obtaining a CCJ.

 

Good Luck.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Aviva Support

100%WHU as Robertxc says I am here on behalf of Nu and would be very happy to look into this for you, If you could email me some more details to [email protected] I'll find out what i can for you.

 

I am sorry that you have had so many problems and I hope that we can get something resolved for you.

Becca

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...