Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • If it was done via N245 and the payments are up todate then the landlord must make an application with fee for a redetermination. Can't execute with bailiffs can't do anything until he attends a hearing and presents his arguments    ignore. Andy
    • Sorry I didn’t think to come and update this.    So the outcome was that he went to court. Apparently the judge told the landlord off for not sending a letter before action but did nothing about it. He didn’t accept all the damages the landlord claimed, and told him off for accusing my friend of deliberately and maliciously damaging anything, and he awarded him small amounts of the damages he claimed for. The landlord had also made an awful lot of things up that never existed and accused my friend of stealing them, and the judge didn’t accept any of those claims.   However, I’m back asking advice now. So he made an offer of payment via the court forms, sometime before Christmas and straight after the hearing. The landlord didn’t reply so the court accepted the payments.  My friend has been paying the £10 a month each month. Then a couple of days ago he had received a letter from court with a hearing date in a couple of weeks, and a very irate letter from the landlord saying that my friend has consistently lied and that nothing he says should be believed, and that he wants the bailiffs to be called on him and that he absolutely refuses the payment plan. The letter is marked as received by the courts in December and this is the first that’s been sent since then. My friend and his wife are now panicked, what does this mean? And can they now get bailiffs sent round? He earns an ok wage, which somehow the landlord has referred to in his letter, but he equally has a lot of expenditure and can’t afford to pay any more. What will happen at this hearing and can they send out the bailiffs just because the landlord wants them to?    I have no clue what to advise him, can you help at all please?
    • Thanks Bank – I took your cynicism / experience on board and responded thus: Thank you for your response Mr Schnur  I set out my position quite clearly in my letter of claim and nothing has changed. Your insurance requirement is unlawful and is contrary to section 57 of the Consumer Rights Act, and also section 72 of the same statute. I would also refer you to the outcomes in PENCHEV v P2G (225MC852) and SMIRNOVS v P2G (27MC729).  My deadline for action - 1 May 2024 - still stands.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

How to raise a court action in Scotland when living in England


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3229 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have gone through the process as advised in the website - obtained statements from RBS for last six years, written requesting the £7k in charges over the period and they have now offered me £1,800. I've rejected this and would like to lodge a court action. My account is with a scottish branch but I live in England. Do i lodge the action in England or Scotland ?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I looking at starting an action in the Sherriff Court next week and have found the court staff really helpful.

 

You can download the claim forms here

http://www.scotcourts.gov.uk/sheriff/small_claims/forms.asp

There is also a helpful information booklet

http://www.scotcourts.gov.uk/sheriff/small_claims/guidance_notes.asp

The CAB have some basic information here http://www.adviceguide.org.uk/scotland/your_rights/legal_system_scotland/small_claims_in_the_sheriff_court_scotland.htm

 

A couple of points you may want to consider regarding the difference between the two systems:

 

1. Limit for small claims is only £750 ( £5000 In England & Wales)

There is a process for a higher amount but a different form

 

2. Most small claim matter in England and Wales in my experience are held 'in Chambers' which is the District Judge's Office, although still formal it is less intimitating than open court.

 

In Scotland I understand that most civil issue such as Small claim are in open court.

 

One final thing, in our local court civil matters are only heard every 2 weeks on one particular day, so it may be a large County Court in England, which would be your local court anyway, may process any claim more quickly.

 

Good luck where ever you decision to go.

RBOS - £1435.00 LBA - 2/5/06 - rtn date 6/07 -hearing 13./07 Settled 1st claim of £740 + costs in full.

 

Abbey - £1525.00 LBA- 8/5/06

 

Clydesdale -£1738.10 - LBA 16/06/06

"that will be my money, non?"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mags, Definitely England, where the small claims limit is £5000, not £750 like in Scotland. Because you are a consumer you can sue in the court nearest you. Use moneyclaim and do it for the first £5000 worth of charges only. Once that's all done and dusted (i.e. they've settled), do another one for the rest. Don't try and do two claims at the same time, or they'll just go to court and get them rolled into one big one, thereby taking you out of small claims.

 

When they offer settlement, make sure you don't agree to make it full and final for all sums ever, or you won't be able to go back for the second lot.

 

There are plenty of experienced people on the forum who will be happy to give you guidance and support, you only need to ask...

Robertxc v. Abbey - £3300 Settled in full

Robertxc v. Clydesdale - £750 Settled in full

Nationwide v. Robertxc - £2000 overdraft wiped out, Default removed by order of the sheriff

Robertxc v. Style Card - Default removed by order of the sheriff

Robertxc v. Abbey (1) - Data Protection Act action. £750 compensation

Robertxc v. Abbey (2) - Data Protection Act action. £2000 compensation, default removed

 

The opinions on this post are those of Robertxc and not necessarily the opinions of the group and do not constitute sound legal advice. You are advised to seek professional legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks this is good news ............. although I am still unclear as to how I can go through the moneyclaim site ie in England when the branch that has my account is in Scotland ie when asked for the defendants address it must be in England .....do I just pick my nearest RBS branch in Yorkshire ? If so do I need to write to that branch explaining my intentions etc and giving them the link with their scottish colleagues ??

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah. Good point, I had forgotten about that. Phone your nearest county court and ask them to send you the forms (or tell you where to download them). Moneyclaim is a bit funny that way. All it means is that you will have to fill in the claim by hand rather than online.

Robertxc v. Abbey - £3300 Settled in full

Robertxc v. Clydesdale - £750 Settled in full

Nationwide v. Robertxc - £2000 overdraft wiped out, Default removed by order of the sheriff

Robertxc v. Style Card - Default removed by order of the sheriff

Robertxc v. Abbey (1) - Data Protection Act action. £750 compensation

Robertxc v. Abbey (2) - Data Protection Act action. £2000 compensation, default removed

 

The opinions on this post are those of Robertxc and not necessarily the opinions of the group and do not constitute sound legal advice. You are advised to seek professional legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If it any help at all, with people having accounts at RBS branches up and down the country and perhaps living in England/Wales with accounts in Scotland, one tip I could give is to state the registered office address of RBS as the Defendant's address on the claim form if you are issuing your claim in England/Wales.

 

Just because your account was held in Scotland and you now live in England/Wales - you do NOT have to start your claim in Scotland. You can start your claim at your local County Court (can't use Money Claim for defendants outside England/Wales).

 

Your Particulars of Claim MUST contain the following statement if you are using a defendant's address outside England/Wales:

 

"'I state that the High Court of England and Wales has power under the Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Act 1982 to hear this claim and that no proceedings are pending between the parties in Scotland, Northern Ireland or another Convention territory of any contracting state as defined by section 1(3) of the Act."

 

Please note that if you do this, then the period of time for the defendant to file the acknowledgement of service or the admission is extended from 14 days to 21 days from the date of service of the claim (if the particulars of claim are served with the claim form) or 21 days from the date of service of the particulars of claim if they were not served with the claim form - remember, the deemed day of service is two days from when it was posted.

 

The time for filing a defence is 21 days from the date of service of the particulars of claim or 35 days from the date of service of the particulars of claim if the defendant has filed an acknowledgement of service.

 

So if a claim (with particulars of claim attached) was issued on 2 May and posted that same day, the date of service is 4 May. The date for filing the acknowledgement, defence or admission would be 25 May. If an acknowledgement was filed, then the date for filing the defence would be 8 June.

 

Sorry if this sounds confusing but it is quite simple really!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 9 years later...
  • 3 years later...

This topic was closed on 09 March 2019.

If you have a problem which is similar to the issues raised in this topic, then please start a new thread and you will get help and support there.

If you would like to post up some information which is relevant to this particular topic then please flag the issue up to the site team and the thread will be reopened.

- Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3229 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...