Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi welcome to the Forum.  If a PCN is sent out late ie after the 12th day of the alleged offence, the charge cannot then be transferred from the driver to the keeper.T he PCN is deemed to have arrived two days after dispatch so in your case, unless you can prove that Nexus sent the PCN several days after they claim you have very little chance of winning that argument. All is not lost since the majority of PCNs sent out are very poorly worded so that yet again the keeper is not liable to pay the charge, only the driver is now liable. If you post up the PCN, front and back we will be able to confirm whether it is compliant or not. Even if it is ok, there are lots of other reasons why it is not necessary to pay those rogues. 
    • Hi 1 Date of the infringement  arr 28/03/24 21:00, dep 29/03/24 01.27 2 Date on the NTK  08/04/2024 (Date of Issue) 3 Date received Monday 15/04/24 4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012?  Yes 5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Yes 6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] No  7 Who is the parking company? GroupNexus 8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Petrol Station Roadchef Tibshelf South DE55 5T 'operating in accordance with the BPA's Code of Practice' I received a Parking Charge letter to keeper on Monday 15/04/24, the 17th day after the alleged incident. My understanding is that this is outside the window for notifying. The issue date was 08/04/2024 which should have been in good time for it to have arrived within the notice period but in fact it actually arrived at lunchtime on the 15th. Do I have to prove when it arrived  (and if so how can I do that?) or is the onus on them to prove it was delivered in time? All I can find is that delivery is assumed to be on the second working day after issue which would have been Weds 10//04/24 but it was actually delivered 5 days later than that (thank you Royal Mail!). My husband was present when it arrived - is a family member witness considered sufficient proof?
    • lookinforinfo - many thanks for your reply. It would be very interesting to get the letter of discontinuance. The court receptionist said that the county court was in Gloucester 'today' so that makes me think that some days it is in Gloucester and some days its in Cheltenham, it was maybe changed by the courts and i was never informed, who knows if DCBL were or not. My costs were a gallon of petrol and £3.40 for parking. I certainly don't want to end up in court again that's for sure but never say never lol. Its utterly disgusting the way these crooks can legally treat motorists but that's the uk for you. I'm originally from Scotland so it's good that they are not enforceable there but they certainly still try to get money out of you. I have to admit i have lost count of the pcn's i have received in the last 2 yr and 4 months since coming to England for work, most of them stop bothering you on their own eventually, it was just this one that they took it all the way. Like i mentioned in my WS the the likes of Aldi and other companies can get them cancelled but Mcdonalds refused to help me despite me being a very good customer.   brassednecked - many thanks   honeybee - many thanks   nicky boy - many thanks    
    • Huh? This is nothing about paying just for what I use - I currently prefer the averaged monthly payment - else i wouldn't be in credit month after month - which I am comfortable with - else I wold simply request a part refund - which I  would have done if they hadn't reduced my monthly dd after the complaint I raised (handled slowly and rather badly) highlighted the errors in their systems (one of which they do seem to have fixed) Are you not aware DD is always potentially variable? ah well, look it up - but my deal is a supposed to average the payments over a year, and i dont expect them to change payments (up or down) without my informed agreement ESPECIALLY when I'm in credit over winter.   You are happy with your smart meter - jolly for you I dont want one, dont have to have one  - so wont   I have a box that tells me my electricity usage - was free donkeys years ago and shows me everything I need to know just like a smart meter but doesnt need a smart meter,  and i can manually set my charges - so as a side effect - would show me if the charges from the supplier were mismatched. Doesn't tell me if the meters actually calibrated correctly - but neither does your smart meter. That all relies on a label and the competence of the testers - and the competence of any remote fiddling with the settings. You seem happy with that - thats fine. I'm not.    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Mercers Debt Collection


Donel261
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3800 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

If anyone is getting calls from 08701242495 then it is Mercers Debt Collection Agency working on behalf of Barclaycard.

 

I would ignore the calls if I were you, it an automated dial up and my mother receives up to 30 calls a day from them, we are beyond angry now, we just cancel the call, or if we are in the mood have some fun with them, they don't want to waste time messing around with you if you wont put the person they want on so they must have some hefty targets to hit. poor things!!

 

I have sent off the relevant letters asking them to stop and they have ignored, so no point speaking to them. Mind you, if you ignore them they may sell on the debt to Cabot, they are even worse!! :|

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 509
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

A few ways around

 

1. caller reject available from bt/telewest you can stop upto 10 numbers from phoning you. costs approx £2.00 per month.

 

2. annonymous call reject available from bt/telewest. £2.00 per month stops people who have witheld their numbers from getting through. they recieve a recorded message.

 

put one of these services on and they will really p off these sorts of people. mercers are incidently barclays bank themselves.

CLICK HERE FOR A LOOK AT ALL OF MY FILES: http://s134.photobucket.com/albums/q82/bailiffchaser/

do not forget to click on my scale if i am giving you the right advice or advice is making sense click my scales otherwise others think i am not helping you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest The Terminator
I have just read somewhere that Mercers are registered as non-trading at Companies House... worth checking out seeing as they are trying to get money out of you. Receiving payments = trading. :)

 

They are non-trading and dormant.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My mum had a phone call from Mercers at the weekend regarding her overdue barclay card payments.

 

They told her if she didn't make a payment there and then the debt collectors would be round to her house and / or place of work.

 

Needless to say this put the frightners on her and she paid an amount she could not afford.

 

I want to write a letter for her to send about threatening phone calls as i'm sure they are not allowed to do this.

 

Anyone know of a good place to start?

for FAQs & Step By Step

click here

for Templates Library

click here

for Court Bundle

click here

________________

 

WON 121o121 'vs' LloydsTSB

here

WON 121o121 'vs' Halifax C C

here

WON 121o121 'vs' Cahoot CC

here

WON 121o121 'vs' LloydsTSB (again)

here

 

________________

Link to post
Share on other sites

My mum had a phone call from Mercers at the weekend regarding her overdue barclay card payments.

 

They told her if she didn't make a payment there and then the debt collectors would be round to her house and / or place of work.

 

Needless to say this put the frightners on her and she paid an amount she could not afford.

 

I want to write a letter for her to send about threatening phone calls as i'm sure they are not allowed to do this.

 

Anyone know of a good place to start?

 

There is a letter in Bank Templates - Harrassment by Telephone... scroll down and you will find it. There is also a bit you can add to it re. harrassment by doorstep visits......

 

Please note that I am only prepared to communicate with you in writing. Should it be your intention to arrange a “doorstep call”, please remember that there is only an implied license under English Common Law for certain people to visit me on my property without express permission; the postman and people asking for directions etc (Armstrong v. Sheppard and Short Ltd [1959] 2 Q.B. per Lord Evershed M.R.).

 

Please therefore take note that, I revoke license under English Common Law for you, or your representatives to visit me at my property and if you do so without my permission, you will then be liable to damages for a tort of trespass. You would also be conspiring in a trespass if you sent someone to visit me nevertheless.

 

Should it be necessary, I will obtain an injunction.

 

:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

great stuff, thanks Priorityone.

 

also added a bit about OFFCOM & OFT.

for FAQs & Step By Step

click here

for Templates Library

click here

for Court Bundle

click here

________________

 

WON 121o121 'vs' LloydsTSB

here

WON 121o121 'vs' Halifax C C

here

WON 121o121 'vs' Cahoot CC

here

WON 121o121 'vs' LloydsTSB (again)

here

 

________________

Link to post
Share on other sites

have just read somewhere that Mercers are registered as non-trading at Companies House... worth checking out seeing as they are trying to get money out of you. Receiving payments = trading. :-)

 

If this is true, could you say you will only pay Barclaycard as they are no longer trading?

for FAQs & Step By Step

click here

for Templates Library

click here

for Court Bundle

click here

________________

 

WON 121o121 'vs' LloydsTSB

here

WON 121o121 'vs' Halifax C C

here

WON 121o121 'vs' Cahoot CC

here

WON 121o121 'vs' LloydsTSB (again)

here

 

________________

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I too have received numerous phone calls from Mercer's. I wrote a letter of complaint to the company and also to Barclaycard. Mercer's denied ever receiving the letter, but admitted receiving my Income and Expenditure form, ( which by the way was with the letter of complaint)

Barclaycard wrote back to me and said that i couldn't call it Harassment, even though the man i spoke to from Mercer's was very absusive, and kept ringing a few times in concession. I'm afraid i did use a choice word in the end, especially after quoting to him the harassment act.

 

I now dont answer their calls, and just continue to pay them every month.

All i can say is dont let them get to you, the worse that can happen if for you to receive a CCJ, but at least that way the Judge can see that you have been trying to pay, and hopefully will stop the interest and charges.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, So here's MY problem with Mercer's.

 

for the past couple of weeks, they've been phoning my house, and asking for my ex-wife. She's NEVER lived at this address, and NEVER will! I don't know how they got MY number, as it's never been connected to her in any way, and it's ex-directory.:mad:

 

So, the other day I replied to one of the messages they left, and told their operator the situation. She was full of apologies, and said she'd remove my number from 'the system'. I gave her the Ex's current address and phone number at the same time.

 

LATER THAT DAY..... they rang for her again! Somewhat annoyed, I went through the whole story a second time. Again I was promised it would be sorted.:mad: :mad:

 

Guess who rang at 8.15 this morning....?:-x :-x :-x

 

 

So the question is, how can I make sure they've got the right data, and can I find out where they got my number from? The first girl I spoke to seemed to imply that it had come from the ex herself... NAUGHTY!

 

I need to send something in writing to Mercers, but what action can I take against them? Someone's not complying with the Data Protection Act, but will they tell me where the number came from?

 

Any advice appreciated.

 

 

D.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi unfortunately there doesn't seem to be a solution where Mercer's are concerned. I have wrote to the company asking them to stop phoning me, just to correspond in writting. I have wrote to Barclaycard who passed my debt over to Mercer's, and have made a formal complaint in writting.

 

Mercer's are still phoning, Barclaycard doesn't accept what Mercer's are doing is harassment, even though i have had abuse off one gentleman, and even phoning me twice within a matter of minutes.

 

While i accept that i owe the debt, and are paying Mercer's every month, the only solution i have found is not to answer the phone at all now.

 

Dont know if anyone else can think of a solution.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest The Terminator

It may be worth pointing out to Barclayshark that they are also responsible for the conduct of the DCA their using and that you will report both of them to the OFT and trading standards

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi thanks for your reply. I have already pointed out to Barclaycard and Mercer's that they will face criminal proceedings under' Section 2 of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997', and also threatened them with the OFT. But the two letters i have had back from Barclaycard point out that Mercer's are within their rights to keep phoning me, even though i know they are not, especially as i have asked them not to phone verbally, and in writting.

 

Mercer's have denied ever receiving my letter of complaint, but admitted receiving my 'Income and Expenditure Form', which by the way was with the letter of complaint.

So what proof do i need to report Mercer's to the OFT?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I keep getting these phone calls, have read your replies and it seems these are from Barclaycard?? I havent got a Barclaycard and no one in my family has, any idea on what sort of call this could be please?

 

I rang them back once and it said something like 'G Money and personal Finance' who I dont know either, it wouldnt let me talk to anyone it was a recorded message requesting that I reply to one of their letters?????????

 

which I havent had either?????

Link to post
Share on other sites

Everybody should get caller display on their phones, then bar withheld numbers. Its bound to pee these people off bigstle especially their autdiallers. We could then set up a thread listing ex directory numbers that the parasites use when we dont accept withheld calls. ITS YOUR PHONE YOU CAN DECIDE WHO TO ANSWER AND WHO NOT TO ANSWER Why should we have to put up with some jumped up bully-boy from a call centre. It also pees them off when you lift the phone and dont speak to them (And it costs them money).

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they are asking you to respond to a letter then they are chasing you for some debt. Ignore them, and get a copy of your credit reports from Experian and Equifax (£2 each) you can order online and they will post them out to you DONT buy the expensive versions advertised on the website... anyway, when you get them see what debts you have listedand it will give you an idea as to what they want....

 

Experian WiseConsumer

 

https://www.econsumer.equifax.co.uk/consumer/uk/gb_consumerletter.ehtml

Link to post
Share on other sites

Everybody should get caller display on their phones, then bar withheld numbers. Its bound to pee these people off bigstle especially their autdiallers. We could then set up a thread listing ex directory numbers that the parasites use when we dont accept withheld calls. ITS YOUR PHONE YOU CAN DECIDE WHO TO ANSWER AND WHO NOT TO ANSWER Why should we have to put up with some jumped up bully-boy from a call centre. It also pees them off when you lift the phone and dont speak to them (And it costs them money).

 

One thing I like doing is answering the phone, they ask for who they want, I say yes, Ill get her/him, then throwing the phone on the sofa/in front of speakers etc whilst playing a rather loud classical track or similar/enjoying the rest of the film/programme I am watching.

 

Found out the people (G Money & trinity personal finance 08701242495) who were ringing me werent on behalf of barclays but for time retail finance about a very small charge that I had left on the account not realising before I ceased the direct debit. :roll:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Just spoke to companies house and explained to them about Mercers etc... They checked and said that they have filed accounts in the past but have now ceased trading and if you have any info then email it to them and they will investigate it.

 

link on Dormant Companies.

About Us - Guidance

 

 

Reading through this looks a bit complicated .....Anyone see if Ba***card is using this as some sort of Loophole!!

 

Other info:

They changed their name --Previous Names:

Date of changePrevious Name10/07/1991

BARSHELFCO (NO.49) LIMITED ----- To: MERCERS

 

Looking into Barclays one of their subisidiaries is

BARSHELFCO (NO.61) LIMITED and if you do a search for Barshelfco Barclays name always comes up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just spoke to companies house and explained to them about Mercers etc... They checked and said that they have filed accounts in the past but have now ceased trading and if you have any info then email it to them and they will investigate it.

 

link on Dormant Companies.

About Us - Guidance

 

 

Reading through this looks a bit complicated .....Anyone see if Ba***card is using this as some sort of Loophole!!

 

Other info:

They changed their name --Previous Names:

Date of changePrevious Name10/07/1991

BARSHELFCO (NO.49) LIMITED ----- To: MERCERS

 

Looking into Barclays one of their subisidiaries is

BARSHELFCO (NO.61) LIMITED and if you do a search for Barshelfco Barclays name always comes up.

 

we did some searching generally on barshelfco

 

-------------------------------

 

Approved Lending Institutions - Communities and Local Government

Approved Lending Institutions

 

Section 156 of the Housing Act 1985 enables lenders to secure the first charge on a property ahead of the landlord. Under statute, high street banks or building societies automatically get the first charge. Other organisations must apply to the Secretary of State for Approved Lending Institution status.

List of Approved Lending Institutions

 

Name given on order under s156

 

 

Barshelfco (No.16) Limited

Barshelfco (No.39) Limited

Barshelfco (No.40) Limited

Barshelfco (No.41) Limited

Barshelfco (No.68) Limited

-------------------------------------

barshelf co (no.73) was a joint it venture with xansa in 2002 abou "it"

 

put barshelfco into google and turn the handle see what happens x

:cool: sunbathing in juan les pins de temps en temps

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also Found this as Proof that Mercers are Barclays!

 

 

This exhibit contains a list of subsidiaries of Barclays PLC and Barclays Bank

PLC and their jurisdiction of incorporation. This list is not complete. Any

subsidiaries not included in the list would not, in the aggregate, constitute a

"significant subsidiary" as defined in Rule 1-02(w) of Regulation S-X as of

December 31, 2004

 

BARCLAYS BANK PLC /ENG/ Annual and Transition Report (foreign private issuer) (20-F) EXHIBIT 8.1

 

And this is what is found:

 

Jurisdiction Company

 

 

United Kingdom Mercantile Leasing Company (No.132) Limited

United Kingdom Mercantile Leasing Company (No.135) Limited

United Kingdom Mercantile Leasing Company (No.138) Limited

United Kingdom Mercantile Leasing Company (No.141) Limited

United Kingdom Mercantile Leasing Company (No.144) Limited

United Kingdom Mercantile Leasing Company (No.147) Limited

United Kingdom Mercantile Leasing Company (No.150) Limited

United Kingdom Mercantile Leasing Company (No.153) Limited

United Kingdom Mercers Debt Collections Limited

United Kingdom Mervest (Chislehurst) Limited

United Kingdom Mervest (Maidenhead) Limited

United Kingdom Mervest (Sloane) Limited

 

 

:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...