Written by John Kruse, one of the leading experts on Bailiff Law, this consumer friendly guide is essential reading for anyone who comes into contact with a bailiff.
The book is easy to understand and clearly explains the rights
a bailiff has, and also what they cannot do when collecting debts and repossessing goods etc.
I'm about to submit my court bundle - have to do it tomorrow to be well in time.
I've used Bookworms zip file as the basis with other relevant information I've found in other threads.
However, when coming to the witness statement (using Karnevil's suggestion), and reading the statement of evidence suggested for the new approach to the aq's, I'm wondering if I should be including more than the first two paragraphs in Karnevil's witness statement - or if I should use relevant passages from the statment of evidence.
From the defence that has so far been submitted, I believe the bank is going for the legitimate contractual charge in which case the para's in Karnevils WS won't apply.
So - do I add or change those paras or is it irrelevant and I can just submit the short WS as suggested?
If it would be better to select relevant paras from the new SoE, which (apart from the personally applicable ones) would be best to use or leave out?
Statement of Evidence v Witness Statement
's, I'm wondering if I should be including more than the first two paragraphs in Karnevil's witness statement - or if I should use relevant passages from the statment of evidence.
Reply With Quote