Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I hope Lord Frost is OK. Islamists and the woke Left are uniting to topple the West ARCHIVE.PH archived 18 Apr 2024 19:12:37 UTC  
    • Ok you are in the clear. The PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 for two reasons. The first is that in Section 9 [2][e]  says the PCN must "state that the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver and invite the keeper— (i)to pay the unpaid parking charges ". It does not say that even though it continues correctly with blurb about the driver. The other fault is that there is no parking period mentioned. Their ANPR cameras do show your arrival and departure times but as that at the very least includes driving from the entrance to the parking space then later leaving the parking space and driving to the exit. It also doesn't allow for finding a parking spot: manoeuvering into it avoiding parking on the lines: possibly having to stop to allow pedestrians/other cars to pass in front of you; returning the trolley after finishing shopping; loading children disabled people in and out of the car, etc etc.  All of that could easily add five, ten or even 15 minutes to your time which the ANPR cameras cannot take into account. So even if it was only two hours free time you could  still have been within the  time since there is a MINIMUM of 15 minutes Grace period when you leave the car park. However as they cannot even manage to get their PCN to comply with the Act you as keeper cannot be pursued. Only the driver is now liable and they do not know who was driving as you have not appealed and perhaps unwittingly given away who was driving. So you do not owe them a penny. No need to appeal. Let them waste their money pursuing you . 
    • If Labour are elected I hope they go after everyone who made huge amounts of money out of this, by loading the company with debt. The sad thing is that some pension schemes, including the universities one, USS, will lose money along with customers.
    • What's the reason for not wanting a smart meter? Personally I'm saving a pile on a tariff only available with one. Today electricity is 17.17p/kWh. If the meter is truly past its certification date the supplier is obliged to replace it. If you refuse to allow this then eventually they'll get warrant and do so by force. Certified life varies between models and generations, some only 10 or 15 years, some older types as long as 40 years or maybe even more. Your meter should have its certified start date marked somewhere so if you doubt the supplier you can look up the certified life and cross check.
    • No I'm not. Even if I was then comments on this forum wouldn't constitute legal advice in the formal sense. Now you've engaged a lawyer directly can I just make couple of final suggestions? Firstly make sure he is fully aware of the facts. And don't mix and match by taking his advice on one aspect while ploughing your own furrow on others.  Let us know how you get on now you have a solicitor acting for you.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

help with claiming tax back on tools purchased


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6302 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi all, i am a roofer working for a local firm, the only help i get with purchsing tools is the use of the firms accounts. i then pay this money back weekly via my pay. i could hire tools (drills etc) but its not always practical to do so. i would like to be able to claim some tax exemption on these tools that i have bought, maybe even a refund. my employer is going to give me copies of all invoices that i have paid to them, this is in excess of £3k over the last 3 years. what i need to do now is write a letter to the taxman/inland revenue asking them to review my case. that is where i am stuck, i am not great at writing letters and would be very grateful if anyone could point me in the right direction.

many thanks

graeme

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not aware of any legistlation that allows the taxman to fund the purchase of tools of the trade for any purpose, if the purchaser is an individual. If you register yourself for VAT, there is a possibility you'll be able to reclaim the 17% as the tools are required for your work, hgowever you will then have to add this amount to all Invoices for all your customers. However, as you refer to 'your employer' if the firm is not prepared to discount the tools for you to use, I'm not aware of any schemes that would allow staff to benefit in the way you describe. THe last scheme I heard of, the supply of computers for personal use, was removed at the last budget.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i spoke to inland revenue about this today, they say i can make this claim, each year at the moment there is an amount incorporated into my tax code to allow for the purchasing of tools and work clothing, that amount is approx £50. what i intend to do is show them the amount i have actually spent on essential tools and clothing, they will then use this to work out what my tax code would/should have been, and then change my current code and hopefully issue a refund on overpayment.

not expecting the taxman to fund my tools, but to have my tax contributions worked out on my actual expenses

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not aware of any legistlation that allows the taxman to fund the purchase of tools of the trade for any purpose, if the purchaser is an individual.

 

I think you can. It's like claiming any other necessary expense incurred to do your job. The expense has to be incurred "wholly, necessarily, and exclusively" for your work.

 

The expense with which we're all most familiar is travel expenses. Regardless of whether your employer reimburses you for travel, and regardless of the rate, you can claim travel expenses on your tax form at the Inland Revenue's rates ... anything paid by your employer is income.

 

Tim

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you can. It's like claiming any other necessary expense incurred to do your job. The expense has to be incurred "wholly, necessarily, and exclusively" for your work. Tim

 

I tried this ages ago, however it was (effectively) buttons, as the coding change worked out at £3.50 or so over the year, AIUI the OP is hoping to claim in the high figures, and when they stat looking into the 'wholly necessary' bit, the costs of each item rarely exceeds £15! (Just try that at B&Q)! At least VAT does offer 17.5% across everything! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've done this and it is very simple. Collect all the invoices together, write a letter explaining that you are required to have these tools to do your job and the IR will make a decision. If they decide to refund you the tax bear in mind that you only get the applicable tax rate back, 22% of the invoice total for example. They may refuse to refund the tax if they feel that the item you are claiming for can be used for other purposes.

 

What you are have at the moment is known as a Fixed Rate Expense Allowance, if you make your own claim you will loose this allowance for the tax years you are claiming for. You are not limited to this tax year, you can claim back for a couple of years if you choose to. If you are a member of a union or professional organisation then check to see if you can claim back your subscription as well.

Lloyds TSB, Total Charges £900, Claim Filed for £1379 - Settled

 

Sainsbury's Bank Credit Card, Total Charges £90 - Settled.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...