Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • let the ombudsman do their job. you'll win handsdown you dont obv owe OVO p'haps anything at all.  dont worry about Past Due credit or any other DCA ( THEY ARE NOT BAILIFFS!) as for you being added to the debt, thats quite OK, you were a resident adult and equally liable under law. once you start getting things moving via the  ombudsman dont forget to get your credit files cleansed of any negative data & seek compensation for distress etc, again the  ombudsman should sort both out for you. as you are now NOT a customer of OVO, there is very very little they can do to you now.  
    • A question - did you use the supermarket or the restaurant? I see the restrictions are different. Sign.pdf
    • DN is ok DCA NOA is ok, though not one from Newday saying they've sold it. agreement states esigned on a sunday at 11am?? really??  but no typed names or tick box nor any IP address used. if the date is correct then poss ok, it that your correct address for that time of take out? but if not, then that could simply be a copy of someone elses they've used with you details copy'n'pasted over theirs. the agreement details separate T&C's in at least 8.4. a full set of T&C containing your correct address for the time MUST be included. failure renders the agreement unenforceable... have you the T&C's too? dx
    • Npower and Scottish Power and others have always had regulations that require them to treat customers fairly - the threads here and my experiences demonstrate that those regs are little more than useless.   Even Octopus recently spent month after month saying they needed to increase my monthly payments despite my credit balance slowly going up TWICE I had to reset it online back to prior payment as they unilaterally increased it unilaterally. Raised formal complaint and they than said i was paying too much and reduced the payment, again without my agreement, although that time at least they told me they were doing it.   .. and Octopus has been one of the better ones.    
    • Thank you. You left all your personal details showing on the invoice, but I've removed them. From Googling it seems the free parking is limited to one hour.  You stayed two.  There is no point appealing, you did overstay.  That's apart from the fact the private parking companies are just interested in £££££ and never accept appeals. We have other Iceland cases, Iceland as a company refuse to have these invoices cancelled. So it's up to you. Pay £51 and the matter goes away. Or refuse to pay.  Horizon very rarely do court.  We would support you all the way. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

HairyScotsman v Rbs


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6307 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I am just away to start court proceddings against rbos in Scotland.

I need to add the 8% onto every charge for the last 5 years.

Do i simply find out a daily rate of interest and multiply that by the amount of days since i was charged up until my claim date??

I have seen the spreadsheets but want to know i can do it this way??

If i can ..do i divide 8% by 365 to get a daily rate??

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

The daily rate is worked out by your total charges X 0,00022= daily rate.

 

Say your charges are £3065

 

Times this by 0.00022 for the daily rate = 0.65 pence

 

The 0.00022 is calculated like this:

 

8%/365 = 0.00022

 

uk

WARNING TO ALL

Please be aware of acting on advice given by PM .Anyone can make mistakes and if advice is given on the main forum people can see it to correct it ,if given privately then no one can see it to correct it. Please also be aware of giving your personal details to strangers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply.. My overall total is 1055 which gives me a daily rate of 23p. Do i then multiply this by the amount of days since the first charge OR work out how many days on each charge and do them individually.

 

Thanks !!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, im a bit lost on this too , i have charges from capital one totalling £660 starting from april 04, ive tried the spreadsheets in the templates library but cant work them out correctly. The annual rate they were charging was 26.9%, i put this into the spreadsheets along with balances, dates e.t.c and it showed i should claim £960 in total, im not sure if this is wrong. Im so confused as the first charge goes back to april 04 and in between months i had paid balance of in full, and then later on had charges again. Have you had any joy, please someone help meeeeeeeeeeee!!!!!!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

HI, let me see if i can explain this for you. I got confused too but dont worry.

 

Use this calculation in order to get a correct figure.

 

Have each chagre set out individually on your charge spreadsheet

 

Count how many days the charge has been outstanding for...eg charge from 01/01/06 would be o/s for 373 days

 

If that charge was for £35 then you would do the following calculation:

 

35 (charge in pounds) x 0.00022 (daily interest rate value) x 373 (days since offence) = £2.87 for the charge.

 

You only need to show interest for up to the day you file court papers. Any interest due after that will be automatically calculated by the bank when they settle or you can give them a new figure.

 

If you want the daily interest rate it is simply 35 (charge in pounds) x 0.00022 (daily interest rate) = 0.0077p per day

 

Hope this helps some way, if still unsure post me your thread and i can check the figures for you

 

Good luck

  • Haha 2

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest willowb

Hi:)

 

Here are some threads to do with claiming contractual interest, if that is what you intend to do. You need to be very sure about what you are doing, set up a thread in RBS so that you can get some help if you need it......I'm totally dumb when it comes to scottish Courts so you'll have to make sure that it's claimable....it should be hey?:confused:

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general/18313-why-no-one-claiming.html?highlight=scottish+interest+rate

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/barclaycard/22690-contractual-interest.html?highlight=scottish+interest+rate

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/nationwide/28574-authorised-interest-unauthorised-interest.html?highlight=scottish+interest+rate

 

Wxxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Doesn't the spreadsheet in the library work this out automatically?

 

And then apply the 8% to your total claim for charges from the date you issue the proceedings to the date of settlement - so when the bank offer to settle calculate the interest to that date and include it in the amount you will accept in setlement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply

 

Do i still charge them interest from the day they applied the charge to me, even though i paid the balance of in full on some months, my charges total £660 starting from april 04 and the last charge was in sep 06 and my monthly rate on the statement varied from 2.228 to 2.248, i tried the spreadsheet, do you think £960 sounds right?, They have also charged me £74 since ocotober but on the new reduced charge of £12 each, do you include that as well, many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest willowb

It sounds like you know how to use the spreadsheet then, yes?

 

If so, then you really need to do some reading and be sure about the rate you want to charge. start a thread in RBS like I said.

 

Wxxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi have moved your posts here and started a thread for you.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I went to the sheriff court today and handed in my summary cause. Was informed from the clerk that the 8% was only to be added from the date the summary cause was handed in (today!). I pointed out that i thought she was incorrect and explained what i have done re the 8%. She said it will have to be looked at by a sheriff and if he says it is ok then it will go through with the added 8%. When i mentioned that lots of other claimants in Scotland have been doing this and adding on the interest her reply was " not every court is the same, we do things here that other courts dont do and vice versa" when i pointed out that surely the law of the land is just that and if i am entitled to claim this in one part of the country i should be allowed to claim it in another she just shrugged her shoulders !

Anyone else encountered problems like this???

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hairyscotsman,

 

The law on interest in Scotland differs from that down south. Firstly, the law relating to interst on claims in England and Wales is governed by the County Courts Act 1984. In Scotland the rules are largely based on the common law.

 

Interest on contractual claims in Scotland can only run from the date of service of the summons on the defender (also known as the date of citation). The principle behind this restriction being, that until you raise a court action, the defender is not aware that you have a claim against them, for you are required to state in your summons the factual and legal basis upon which your claim rests, thereby giving the defender notice of why you should be entitled to the sums you seek. If the defender does not then settle the matter with you and you succeed, you should be entitled to interest on the sum for their delay in paying you what you demanded in judicial proceedings and which has, by your success, been found to be due to you. This has been criticised by, amongst others, the Scottish law Commission, but remains the law.

 

This may seem daft, when a pursuer may have been in negotiations with the defender for payment of the sum for some time. Letters and phone calls may have made it clear to the defender at an earlier stage that you have a claim and its amount is £x. Nevertheless, the law is as stated.

 

In relation to other types of claim, such as personal injury, it is settled that a claimant has a right to claim interest on the sum sought from the date of the accident, although it is not settled that this will always be granted.

 

In relation to claims for repetition (bank charge claims are claims for repetition - claims for repayment of money paid to a party but which, for whatever reason, were not properly payable), the law is unclear whether interest can be claimed from the date the erroneous payment was made, or simply from the date of citation. Some suggest the former, and on principle this may seem correct, although it is by no means certain that this will be the case, as it also seems right that interest should be payable on contractual claims at a date earlier than citation, but that is the rule that governs contractual claims.

 

On the sheriff courts, one must remember that while "the law" is simply that, it is only ever definitively stated when pronounced by a court from which there is no appeal. In Scotland (and England and Wales), that court is the House of Lords. Decisions of the sheriff on the law are found to be incorrect as many times as they are found to be correct. Different sheriffs will come to different conclusions depending on the argument that is laid before them. In this respect, having a decent lawyer who knows what he is talking about may, and often does, make all the difference.

 

The sheriff clerk deputes are often very knowledgable about procedure and sometimes the substantive law itself, but it is always the sheriff who will make the determination of what the law is in any particular case and how it relates to the facts presented to him. The law, in this respect, is very rarely certain, but then that is what makes the practice a fascinating challenge.

 

Good luck.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi guys,

I have a basic question on completion of the Form1/1b.

This involves the name and address of the defender.

The branch where in the town I bank does not have a court. The most convenient for me is in another town and county in Scotland.

Do I therefore put the name and address as the Royal Bank of Scotland head office in St.Andrew Square and then in Part 7, I have included the line" the defender has a branch in (name of town where court sits) therefore is under the jurisdiction of this court.

It seems to make sense to me but others seem to put their branch address on the forms.

Any advice please?

With reference to interest, I have calculated it on a daily basis from when the charges were applied to the date the forms will be submitted, at a rate of 8%.

 

Any help gratefully received.

 

Tweaky

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tweaky,

 

Really does not matter, as the Royal Bank has branches in each sheriffdom in Scotland. The important point for you is to ensure you raise your action in the court which is most convenient to you for the purposes of lodging and attendance.

 

Your entries are perfectly acceptable and appropriate.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...