Patricia Pearl - Small Claims Procedure - A Practical Guide


An excellent guide for the layperson in how to use the County Court - a must if you are intending to start a claim.

£19.99 + £1.50 (P&P)




Last Will and Testament Kit


Make a legally valid will without the fuss and expense of a solicitor - includes a full step-by-step guide.

£9.99 + £1.50 (P&P)

BAILIFFS - The Law and Your Rights

Written by John Kruse, one of the leading experts on Bailiff Law, this consumer friendly guide is essential reading for anyone who comes into contact with a bailiff.

The book is easy to understand and clearly explains the rights a bailiff has, and also what they cannot do when collecting debts and repossessing goods etc.

£13.95 + £2.00 (P&P)


Reclaim the Right Ltd. - reg. 05783665 in the UK

reg. office:
923 Finchley Road
London
NW11 7PE



+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: pv1511 vs A & L

  1. #1
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    pv1511 Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    3

    Default pv1511 vs A & L

    Have just been slapped with £25 (paid item charge) and £25 (overdrafticon fee) by A & L on a Premier Direct account. A/c has been maintained very healthily since Sept 2005. Timeline:
    Wed 20/12 Paid in cheques via PO counter.
    Sat 23/12 Cheques showed up in account uncleared - presumably delayed by Christmas mail.
    Thu 28/12 Outgoing payment made (CC bill), triggering paid item charge and unauthorized overdraft charge.
    Overdraft (presumably for two days, until cheques cleared) was just under £150.
    I complained by phone on receiving the standard computer-signed letter; I received a further computer-signed brushoff letter today denying any refund.
    Presumably I should now move straight to the lbaicon, giving them 14 days to respond? Is this likely to succeed?
    thanks for any advice.


  2. #2
    Royalties Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    Rooster-UK Authoritative Rooster-UK Authoritative Rooster-UK Authoritative Rooster-UK Authoritative Rooster-UK Authoritative Rooster-UK Authoritative Rooster-UK Authoritative Rooster-UK Authoritative Rooster-UK Authoritative Rooster-UK Authoritative Rooster-UK Authoritative Rooster-UK's Avatar

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Mar 2006
    I am in
    Heaven
    Posts
    13,580

    Default Re: pv1511 vs A & L

    Hi PV1511

    Yes letter before actionicon, next.
    If no results after 14 days then MCOL.

    Good luck.
    Regards, Rooster.

    If this has been useful to you, please click on the scales at bottom left of post. Thanks.

    Advice & opinions of Rooster-UK are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Please use your own judgment.
    -------------------------------------------------------
    LOOK! Free CAG Toolbar.
    Follow link for more information.

    ------------------------------------------------------
    Please donate,
    Help us to help others.


    LINKS....

    Forum Rules.
    FAQs....

  3. #3
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    pv1511 Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    3

    Default Re: pv1511 vs A & L

    OK, am about to submit a claim using MCOL - substance of claim to be as below. DOes that look OK? Anything missing?
    thanks, Andrew.

    "The claimant has held a current account xx
    xxx xxxx xx-xx-xx with the defendant,
    conducted on their Standard terms and
    conditions since 2005. The defendant from
    December 2006 to present day has applied
    charges to the claimant account, totalling
    not more than £50.00. The bank's charges are
    a disproportionate penalty and therefore
    unenforceable. Penalty charges are
    irrecoverable at common law. The precedent
    for this was Dunlop Pneumatic v New Garage
    [1915] AC 79.along with Murray v. Leisure
    play [2005] EWCA Civ 963. The Defendant's
    charges are also contrary to the Unfair
    Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations
    1999. Para.8 and sch.2(1)(e)) The claimant
    has asked the bank to refund their charges.
    The bank has declined to do so.
    The claimant claims no more than £50, being
    the sum unlawfully debited."


  4. #4
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    pv1511 Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    3

    Default Re: pv1511 vs A & L ** SETTLED **

    A & L settled in full after acknowledging service of the claim with MCOL. OK, only £50 (plus fees), but still a minor victory. Now, however, they have written to say they will be closing my account next month "as it is clear that you do not accept certain aspects of the terms and conditionsicon" and so on. As it happens, I don't really care - it's not my main account and I don't need it any more, the only advantage being the ability to pay in cheques at the Post Office. But it smacks of pettiness and is quite inexplicable given the very healthy credit with which the account has always been run. Is it worth my complaining to the Financial Ombudsmanicon?


  5. #5
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    younganfree Informative younganfree Informative younganfree Informative

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    May 2006
    Posts
    838

    Default Re: pv1511 vs A & L

    Hi, pv1511. You'll need to make a complaint to the A&L first, before you can take it to the fosicon.



Browsealoud
Video Tour



Reclaim the Right Ltd. - reg.05783665 in the UK reg. office:- 923 Finchley Road London NW11 7PE