Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I would stand your ground and go for the interest. Even if the interest is not awarded you will get the judgement and the worst that might happen is that you won't get your claim fee.  However, it is almost inevitable that you will get the interest.  It is correct that it is at the discretion of the judge but the discretion is almost always exercised in favour of the claimant in these cases.  I think you should stand your ground and don't give even the slightest penny away
    • Yep, true to form, they are happy to just save a couple of quid... They invariably lose in court, so to them, that's a win. 😅
    • Your concern regarding the 14 days delivery is a common one. Not been on the forum that long, but I don't think the following thought has ever been challenged. My view is that they should have proof of when it was posted, not when they "issued", or printed it. Of course, they would never show any proof of postage, unless it went to court. Private parking companies are simply after money, and will just keep sending ever more threatening letters to intimidate you into paying up. It's not been mentioned yet, but DO NOT APPEAL! You could inadvertently give up useful legal protection and they will refuse any appeal, because they're just after the cash...  
    • The sign says "Parking conditions apply 24/7". Mind you, that's after a huge wall of text. The whole thing is massively confusing.  Goodness knows what you're meant to do if you spend only a fiver in Iceland or you stay a few minutes over the hour there.
    • Hi and thanks It looks like they ticked all the boxes to me but I'll try and upload the notice. I was wondering if a witness to late delivery might be considered proof - I'm assuming they posted it as normal but Royal Mail stuffed up delivery. If not then they're really saying it just has to be posted within 12 days of the incident, regardless of when it is received. Annoying! edit ok thanks Honeybee here's my 2nd (actually 3rd) attempt at anonymising, copying and uploading the notice! Sorry about the state of it - I sat on it while distracted by my dog 🙃 pcn front.pdf pcn back page.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Rosco v RBS


Rosco
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6485 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Currently owed £356.94 for 2 DD (1 for £4!) that were not paid, and as a result this charge has been generated.

 

They threatened to take legal action against me and i received a solicitors letter today telling me i had 7 days. However, i requested all my statements last week (told 5-7 days at first, and now it's 10 days, what a shock), and plan to send an LBA immediately.

 

I called the Credit Management services and was told if paid £100 towards the debt, then it would be cancelled off (in essence, a £256.94 settlement). I refused this, letting the person know that offering £100 off the money they claimed to be owed is farcical, but i'm wondering if i should have accepted the offer and then proceeded with an action to recover the £100 afterwards. This wouldn't be looked upon as greedy, would it? Although i doubt it'll get anywhere near court, i hope this doesn't go badly against me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm no legal expert but what you're proposing sounds reasonable enough to me.

Pay them the £100 to avoid the hassle of dealing with any court action they may take against you. Then get all your facts together and go after them for the full amount of unlawful penalties they have charged you.

(Yes I work for a bank but am here to help! Please be nice to me! :))

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm a poor student and i actually could do with £100 in my wallet instead, so i'm just gonna sue for the full amount methinks. Awaiting the statements in the next couple of days, so i'll fill you all in when that time comes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I didn't realise you finacial situation was like that. Just try and stall them then (tell them you can't afford £100 right now, are going to CAB to get advice on how best to deal with it, ask for more time etc etc)

You ideally want them to delay any action against you until after you've won your money back (and then they won't have a case against you anyways)

(Yes I work for a bank but am here to help! Please be nice to me! :))

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Got through the bank statements today and i was charged £35 3 times for 3 returned DD's. Add an unauthorised overdraft limit of £10 p/m and interest, and that made the £356.94.

 

What a racket, eh? Writing the LBA now.

 

thegoodsamaritan - i didn't accept the £100 settlement, so going for the full amount.

 

Wish me luck!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Righto, it's been 8 days since i sent the letter (by recorded delivery), and i've had no reply. Do you think it would be a bit fast to raise an action right now? I did state that i required them to reply within 7 days and this hasn't been done.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah it might be scary but its what you need to do (apply for the court order). Look at Candices thread, there's lots of helpful tips there. She has just had all her money and court fees refunded in the last day from RBS as they said it wasn't "financially viable" to contest the ruling. Your claim is for much less so you'll win as well. Go for it!

(Yes I work for a bank but am here to help! Please be nice to me! :))

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Sorry, haven't been on for a while but letters have been sent back and forth. First, i was told my letter had been lost, and when i informed them that i had sent it by recorded delivery, they suddenly discovered it had been moved to another department. ANYWAY, their response to the LBA was as follows

 

"I write with reference to your recent correspondence, the contents of which have been noted.

 

Please find statements enclosed as per your request (?!, I got them a month before that!).

 

They show that your account became overdrawn due to an unpaid direct debit. Charges have been applied to your account in line with the Bank's published tariff. Therefore you are fully liable for the outstanding balance.

 

However, as a gesture of goodwill (haha) I am willing to accept a nominal full and final settlement.

 

Please forward your offer to us within the next seven days.

 

Yours sincerely

 

'Customer Services Manager'"

 

 

There is so much wrong with that i don't know where to start. Yours sincerely from 'Customer Services Manager'?!?

 

Anyway, my reply was as follows-

 

 

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

 

I have read the contents of your letter dated 22/06/06 (in response to my original letter dated 10/05/06, so thank you for your prompt response), and I am of the impression that your Customer Services Manager (whoever that is) has either not read my letter, or does not have the requisite intelligence to understand the contents of it. Therefore I have attached my previous letter in the hope that someone may actually read it on this occasion.

 

I am fully aware that you have charged me due to an unpaid Direct Debit. Furthermore, the charges applied may have been applied in line with the Bank’s published tariff, but neither of these points are relevant. Please take the time and care to read through the contents of my letter fully, and I recommend that the Customer Services Manager should perhaps allow someone else in the department to deal with this matter, since he/she has proved him/herself unable to do so as a matter of urgency.

 

In your letter, I have noted that you’re willing to accept a nominal full and final settlement in this case. As a gesture of goodwill, I am willing to accept full settlement of this claim (£356.94) and removal of any adverse entry into the credit register by RBS against my name, rather than having to raise legal action against your company, which would be a lot more costly and time-consuming to yourselves. I hope that my generous offer will be accepted.

 

You have 7 days to unconditionally accept my offer. I expect a letter from an employee from your department confirming that my offer has been accepted within this time-scale.

 

Yours Faithfully

 

'Rosco'

Link to post
Share on other sites

I then received this reply

 

Dear Mr Rosco

 

I write further to your letter of 9 May 2006 regarding the charges on your account.

 

As your concern relates to the Bank's charging policy, it has been necessary to refer your letter to the Bank's Customer Relations Unit who will investigate your case and respond to you directly in the next 10 working days.

 

Naturally this department has placed matters on hold pending the outcome of those investigations.

 

Thank you for bringing this matter to our attention.

 

Yours sincerely

 

Mr S Morrey

 

Customer Care Team

 

 

I assume no-one else has tried to get their charges off RBS yet because apparently i'm the one that has brought it 'to their attention' ;)

 

I'm quite enjoying the letters stage of this, so i might keep it going for a while longer. I'm causing letters to be sent and inter-depatmental communication, so that will cost money to them. 4 days to the reply! (allegedly)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I got another letter from Credit Management Services, despite the fact they said that the issue was being handled by their Customer Care Team. Anyway, the letter shows utter confusion methinks.

 

This letter was dated 13/07/06, so at least the replies are getting quicker.

 

"Thank you for your letter dated 10/7/06.

 

I have considered your offer of payment and as an exceptional matter we are prepared to accept £356.94 in full and final settlement of the above, providing payment is made by 13 August 2006.

 

Upon receipt and clearance of the payment, the Bank will no longer pursue you in respect of the residual balance. This is no way limits, restricts or prejudices our rights in respect of any other parties to the account, neither does the settlement extend to any other liabilities you may have now or at any time in the future.

 

In the absence of payment in full by the date specified, this full and final settlement will lapse and you will remain liable for the full amount due.

 

*RANDOM WAYS TO PAY THEM*

 

I look forward to hearing from you shortly and thank you for your co-operation in this matter.

 

Yours sincerely

 

 

'Customer Services Manager'"

 

 

That letter was so wrong for a few reasons. Did they not realise that i meant i wanted them to pay it to me?! Did they just totally ignore my credit register request? Are they just ****ing thick? Probably the last one. Anyway, my reply was as follows-

 

 

Thank you for your letter dated 13th July 2006. However, I feel that the Customer Services Manager (still not sure who that is) has perhaps misunderstood the content of my letter. Therefore, I shall attempt to make my stance clear for the final time. I recommend that two (or more) people deal with my account as a matter of priority, since the Customer Services Manager has again proved his/herself to be incapable of dealing with this issue correctly and to my satisfaction. Furthermore, having realised that RBS do not really do communication internally, I have been kind enough to enclose my previous 2 letters to you. I assume you have copies of the letters that you have sent to me.

 

The Customer Services manager seems to believe that my letter dated 10th July 2006 indicated that I am willing to pay the £356.94 balance outstanding in my account. Considering I have been offered the opportunity to write off the entire debt for £100, this would clearly not be the case. For the reasons outlined in my 2 previous letters, I am willing to pay you £0.00 towards this debt, which has been illegally attributed to my account by yourselves. However, what I will accept is the repayment of this £356.94 BY YOURSELVES into my account within the next 7 days, as well as the removal of any adverse entry into the credit register by you against my name. If there is anything unclear about this, do not hesitate to contact me and I will clarify any point of uncertainty.

 

If the following does not happen within the next 10 days; my account is reimbursed, any adverse entry into the credit register is removed, a letter is sent confirming this has been done; I shall start legal proceedings against you to recover my debt. I feel I have been extremely generous in allowing your company to right their wrongs outside of court, and I have grown tired of your constant inability to do so. Additionally, I may also report RBS to the Financial Ombudsman

 

 

Yours Faithfully

 

 

Rosco

 

 

 

Has anyone ever encountered such absolute incompetence? Exceptional to want £356.94 as full and final payment? That's the actual balance they think i owe them!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 12 years later...

This topic was closed on 09 March 2019.

If you have a problem which is similar to the issues raised in this topic, then please start a new thread and you will get help and support there.

If you would like to post up some information which is relevant to this particular topic then please flag the issue up to the site team and the thread will be reopened.

- Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6485 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...