Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • love the extra £1000 charge for confidentialy there BF   Also OP even if they don't offer OOC it doesn't mean your claim isn't good. I had 3 against EVRi that were heard over the last 3 weeks. They sent me emails asking me to discontinue as I wouldn't win. Went infront of a judge and won all 3.    Just remember the law is on your side. The judges will be aware of this.   Where you can its important to try to point out at the hearing the specific part of the contract they breached. I found this was very helpful and the Judge made reference to it when they gave their judgements and it seemed this was pretty important as once you have identified a specific breach the matter turns straight to liability. From there its a case of pointing out the unlawfullness of their insurance and then that should be it.
    • I know dx and thanks again for yours and others help. I was 99.999% certain last payment was over six years ago if not longer.  👍
    • Paragraph 23 – "standard industry practice" – put this in bold type. They are stupid to rely on this and we might as well carry on emphasising how stupid they are. I wonder why they could even have begun to think some kind of compelling argument – "the other boys do it so I do it as well…" Same with paragraph 26   Paragraph 45 – The Defendants have so far been unable to produce any judgements at any level which disagree with the three judgements…  …court, but I would respectfully request…   Just the few amendments above – and I think it's fine. I think you should stick to the format that you are using. This has been used lots of times and has even been applauded by judges for being meticulous and clear. You aren't a professional. Nobody is expecting professional standards and although it's important that you understand exactly what you are doing – you don't really want to come over to the judge that you have done this kind of thing before. As a litigant in person you get a certain licence/leeway from judges and that is helpful to you – especially if you are facing a professional advocate. The way this is laid out is far clearer than the mess that you will get from EVRi. Quite frankly they undermine their own credibility by trying to say that they should win simply because it is "standard industry practice". It wouldn't at all surprise me if EVRi make you a last moment offer of the entire value of your claim partly to avoid judgement and also partly to avoid the embarrassment of having this kind of rubbish exposed in court. If they do happen to do that, then you should make sure that they pay everything. If they suddenly make you an out-of-court offer and this means that they are worried that they are going to lose and so you must make sure that you get every penny – interest, costs – everything you claimed. Finally, if they do make you an out-of-court offer they will try to sign you up to a confidentiality agreement. The answer to that is absolutely – No. It's not part of the claim and if they want to settle then they settle the claim as it stands and don't try add anything on. If they want confidentiality then that will cost an extra £1000. If they don't like it then they can go do the other thing. Once you have made the amendments suggested above – it should be the final version. court,. I don't think we are going to make any more changes. Your next job good to make sure that you are completely familiar with it all. That you understand the arguments. Have you made a court familiarisation visit?
    • just type no need to keep hitting quote... as has already been said, they use their own criteria. if a person is not stated as linked to you on your file then no cant hurt you. not all creditors use every CRA provider, there are only 3 main credit file providers mind, the rest are just 3rd party data sharers. if you already have revolving credit on your file there is no need to apply for anything just 'because' you need to show you can handle money. if you have bank account(s) and a mortgage which you are servicing (paying) then nothing more can improve your score, despite what these 'scam' sites claiml  its all a CON!!  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Inaccurate Electricity Meter - Powergen


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4462 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

A word of advice to all consumers out there ! - I changed electricity suppliers in March of this year. The new supplier decided to change my electricity meter as it was 16 yrs old. Within a month of the change, I noticed a dramatically reduced rate of consumption. I contacted my old supplier, and requested that the old meter be checked for accuracy. They were unable or unwilling to trace and inspect the old meter.

 

I have calculated my consumption over a three year period with my old supplier, and compared it with over 6 months readings on my new (digital) meter. Present calculations show that the old meter was providing readings 37% in excess of the new meter.

 

My home consumption situation has not altered - normal electrical appliances, heating by gas fire and combi ch boiler.

 

The old supplier refuses to accept any fault on the part of their (old) meter and will not supply a calibration certificate for it. I have calculated a rebate due to me on the 'overread' for the past three years and again they refuse to refund any monies. They have offered a 13% discount on an outstanding bill which I refuse to pay.

 

It occurs to me that there appear to be no processes in place to check the accuracy of installed meters, and suppliers conveniently assume that all meters are accurate. It would seen that under the present regulations,no checks have to be made on meters from their initial construction when they are calibrated, to the point when they are deemed to be too old, and are removed. It would seem that when they are removed, and the consumer then has an opportunity to compare the running of the old meter with a new one, the old meters are then disposed of so no checking is possible - why not retain them for a few months in case these issues arise ?

 

Anybody any ideas about where to go next ? I am considering MCOL but would welcome advice on legislation or any other ideas.

 

Cheers

 

Jonnie.:evil:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would have thought, in basic form, that you would be able to make a claim against Powergen for overcharging you, but you would need some form of proof against them that you were not using the electricity which you were charged for.

 

Where this proof would come from - I'm afraid I hold my hands up and say I do not know!

 

First of all, why not contact OFGEM who are the regulatory body for gas and electric suppliers - www.ofgem.gov.uk

 

They may be able to help you a bit more.

Lived through bankruptcy to tell the tale! Worked in various industries and studied law at university. All advice is given in good faith only :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can demand a check of the meter and its consumption if your supplier won't do this (as it seems) then you can ask someone at OFGEM or energywatch.org.uk to get on the case for you and demand this.

Ex CAG helper ^_^

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi Folks,

 

Quick update - The saga continues.... now in the hands of Energywatch. Powergen have refused to provide any realistic rebate, and have waited for my meter readings to rise, which they did, over the festive period. They used underhand tactics to obtain my up to date readings - they asked for the latest reading to prepare a rebate,then wrote to me stating that the old meter was accurate and refusing rebate.

There is still a variation of over 40% between it and the new meter.

 

My advice - if you're with Powergen - change supplier, and try to get a new digital meter fitted. You may get a pleasant surprise.

 

Electricity supplers are reluctant to carry out any checks on their (often old) meters after installation. CHECK YOUR METERS !!!!!!!!

 

J.

Link to post
Share on other sites

All Token meters are now being removed in most area’s, being replaced by key meters which are a lot better and a lot of these issues are being fixed. This however does not really help anyone with past disputes but it is a move in the right direction.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Hi Jonnie, may be able to shed a little light on this for you as ive .

have a little experience with the industry.

 

It sounds like your old meter was replaced due to its age (what the industry calls a "statutory change") this isnt decided by your supplier but the actual meter owner as they have the last say in what happens to the meter. in most cases your supplier will not know about this until the Meter Operator who replaces the meters informs them of the change (usually after this has been done)

 

Under the existing licensing conditions all energy providers have to have processes in place to prove the accuracy of any recording device if this is requested by a customer. There is usually a charge for these tests (between £70 to £100 dependant on supplier) which you will have to pay, and this has been backed up by the industry regulators, as its you who doesn't think the meter is recording correctly not your supplier, but this will be refunded to you if the meter is found to be recording incorrectly and immediate action should be taken to resolve this for you. This test will involve either a known set load being fed through the meter to ensure the meter reads the right amount of current going through it, or another calibrated ("check") meter will be installed alongside your own and left for a set period of time. the amount of electricity recorded on the "check" meter should be the approximately same as your meter.

 

There is a tolerance limit accepted by the industry and regulators which states that if a meter is running 3.5% slow to 2.5% fast it will be deemed to be recording correctly.

 

Most suppliers (and all of the so called big 5, Powergen, Npower, British Gas, Southern Electric and Scottish and Southern) do operate standard "billing tolerance" tests. In these tests if your billing exceeds the pre set limits set by your supplier based on your previous billing your account will be forwarded to one of their specialist teams to look into and you will be contacted. im sure you will agree it would be logistically impossible for all suppliers to regularly check all meters in the UK regularly for accuracy (if memory serves i think Powergen alone supply over 9 million and Npower a further 8.3 million and thats just 2 of the biggest)

 

However in your case this will not help as your meter has already been removed. the certificate of calibration you talked about would have been issued by ofgen and would have been issued at the date of manufacture of the meter (which as you state will be 16 years old so not of much use to you if they did send it) even then the certificate would be with the meter owners (known in the industry as the meter operators or MOPS) not your supply company so they would struggle to get hold of it, so this isnt just a case of "they cant be bothered".

 

You are not correct with the assumption that all meters are disposed of after removal. The some meters removed due to age are re-conditioned and used again. so even if your meter was traced and tested now it may have been re calibrated and installed in another property, again not great for you or your previous supplier as this wouldn't prove anything either way. Also all meters have to be tested and pass the ofgen accuracy test before they are used so its not really right to suggest that digital meters are more accurate as these have just as much chance of recording incorrectly as any other. You can ask your supplier to change your meter at any time but if there is no evidence that the meter is recording incorrectly you can expect to pay a charge for this as again you are requesting it not the supplier, also as its up to the meter owners what kind of meter you get not your supplier and (this does vary region by region) you are not guaranteed to get a digital meter

 

At the end of the day the dispute is, you say the meter was not running correctly and your previous supplier says it was, there is no way to check this now which anyone at energywatch should be able to tell you. As untasteful as this may seem the only way to resolve this without legal action on either side would be to negotiate the amount you are to pay to settle the debt. i can see what your saying that you have seen a big drop in consumption and your bills after the new meter was installed and you say the meter defiantly has to be incorrect but your old supplier could likewise say that there may have been something being used at the time that has since been removed and this could account for the drop in usage. i know that isn't the case but you see my point (without going back in time it will be impossible to prove either point satisfactorily) so like i say your best bet would be to put these points to your supplier and see what they say.

 

sorry if this has turned out a bit long and hope it helps

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and thanks for the information.

 

The dispute was subsequently dealt with by Energywatch who negotiated settlement with Powergen who refunded the overpaid amount and cancelled an outstanding bill. Escalation to the Ombudsman apparently prompted their action, until that point they were quite obstinate.

 

I would advise any other power consumers to involve energywatch and then escalate to Ombudsman if they want action !

 

Good luck to all out there taking on these giant faceless corporations !!!!

 

J.:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am involved in a dispute with Powergen involving a "new" meter installed in April 2005. Since then, my electricity usage has shot right up, to the point that Powergen's computer has disregarded the meter readings being collected by Siemens, and I have been given bills based on estimated readings instead. I contacted Powergen several times as I was worried about all this, and each time they sent another operative to read the meter. There seemed to be confusion about expecting to find 2 meters in the property (there was only one, just a replacement). I assumed each time that it was being sorted out and it's only now that I've checked again and they are still billing me on estimated readings which fall very short of actual readings. I pay set amounts by DD - based on previous usage with old meter. Finally I called again this month and demanded they try to resolve this. I was put through to the Consumption Dept and believed they would agree that my meter must be wrong - instead they have simply billed me an extra £1300!!! Help - what do I do now?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Patti,

 

It may be an idea to describe the events to-date in a very factual way, in writing.Send one copy to Powergen, and the other to Energywatch.This should hopefully focus Powergen and encourage them to deal with the problem.Energywatch have a website and phone number, so give them a ring.Powergen don't always comply with requests made by Energywatch, so be prepared for this and don't be afraid to escalate to the Ombudsman if needed. Hope this helps.

 

J.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hello, can I jump in to this thread about prepayment meters, I know they are more expensive but I have found out I am still paying for arrears I no longer have and may have over paid for several years, how do I go about getting reimbursed for the overpayment, without being fobbed off??

 

any advice appreciated urgently as they are taking meter away soon:):) and there might be info on it I need to record?

'rise like lions after slumber, in unvanquishable number, shake your chains to the earth like dew, which in sleep had fall'n on you, ye are many, they are few.' Percy Byshse Shelly 1819

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Patti,

 

I have been having exactly the same issue as you. I moved into a new house in 09/05 and am using Powergen for both Gas and Electricity. My meter readings were estimates. In December I called with my readings and they were 5000 units more than the estimates.

 

I had someone come round 3 times and read the meter and I did individual readings ever day for a month but heard nothing more from Powergen. Then yesterday I received another bill still with an estimated reading. This time 7000 units lower than the actual reading.

 

After calling last night I was put through to a "Consumption" expert who said everyting is right and I will be getting a bill for £989.47 not including VAT for the underpaid bills!!

 

:(

 

Not good!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Found this thread while hunting around for Ofgem docs on statutory rules on changing the electric meter.

 

My meter is about 16 years old and although I don't know that its inacurate I would like to get it changed over to a smart meter.

 

Who owns the meters?

 

I've heard that there is a statutory change of the meters but can't find a time on that. Some people say its 10 years.

 

Does anyone know....? My supplier is Eon.

George Loveless - “We raise the watchword, liberty. We will, we will, we will be free!"

 

My advice is only my opinion, I am not a legal expert.

 

IF YOU LIKE THE ADVICE I'M GIVING AND ARE HAPPY WITH IT, CLICK THE SCALES ON THE BOTTOM LEFT OF THIS POST AND TELL ME.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you call Eon, they will be able to contact the distributer on your behalf who will be able to tell them the date. You can ask for a smart meter at any time but will be expected to pay approx £50 to do so.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I recently challenged my electrical supplier on the accuracy of their meter readings. I must admit they tried everything to make me feel the fool and when that did not work advised me of the cost of having someone come out and test my meter if I was wrong.

 

I went to Energy Watch and they got their customer complaints section involved and they then sent EON to do a Meter Accuracy Test instead of installing a check meter.

 

The upshot was my meter was 24.95% reading too high. I have received an apology letter and then a rebate of the overpaid amounts.

 

I have been doing power measurements on RF Systems for over 30 years so therefore I have both the equipment and the ability to test my meters.

 

One of the "tricks" the suppliers like to try is to have you list the equipment that you have in your home and then they will inform you based on the current ratings of the equipment that their readings are accurate.

 

The current ratings of the equipment in your homes is not the current draw of the individual equipment but rather a nominal indication of the current rating or maximum draw of the equiipment.

 

For example many 1KW heater only draw 800 watts of power and if you were using this for a test of your utilisation you would not be accurate.

 

The best test is to have a fixed resistive load placed on your system for a set period of time to see if the meter is really accurate. In my case I used a 52.5ohm load capable of handling 2500 watts.

 

This load would reach 1kw in 54.7 minutes. So if I had set the meter to where it just clicked over in a unit that did not have a tenths reading. It would click over again in 54.7 minutes

 

Since finding the defective meter and receiving my refund I have checked an additional 10 meters in my area and have found, not the 2% as told to me by my supplier but that 100% of the meters have been from 10 - 27% reading high.

 

I can not reccomend enough to anyone with a question about their readings being high to get them independently tested.

 

The reason I say independent is that the replacement meter arrived from my supplier and it is also 10% high.

 

So I begin the procedure once again with my supplier. I will update as the Saga continues.

 

John

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Carbon_kid

Tucked away on the old Energy watch site it said that a third of meters tested turned out to be inaccurate!

Link to post
Share on other sites

when a new employee starts to work in customer service for energy companies they are taught that 99.95% of meters claimed to be faulty are not it is bad judgement on the customers part (dont shoot the messanger)just a bit of factual trivia for you all from an ex british gas and powergen employee at an higher level than advisor.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I work for a company that installs Electricity meters across the UK and as part of my role I carry out accuracy tests, I do not know how much the energy supplier charges for this, but I do this thoroughly and it takes me around an hour to do.

 

The previous poster mentioned the test in a nutshell, what I do is take a fixed load heater with me, but first I need to test the voltage at the consumers equipment, bearing in mind that with the voltage fluctuations that occur across the grid the voltage that reaches your home can range from +10% or -6% so an accurate Voltage reading is essential.

 

Once I have this reading then I turn on the fixed load and I record the current being drawn using my Clamp on Ammeter, from these two readings I can calculate the power (Watts) that is being instantaneously used. Then what I do next is record ten pulses/turn that the meter does and using a nifty formula I turn this into KW and this tells me what the meter was recording for the same fixed load.

 

What I end up with is two measured loads, one from my Ammeter & Voltmeter and the other from the Meter, it is a simple comparison that allows you to find out what the accuracy is.

 

I hope this explains what happens, personally I have carried out a few tests and so far the meter has been below 0.5% accurate and from here I spent an additional 30 mins going through the customers usage profile and this has made them appreciate what they are using at any time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The current price is £90 from EDF that you pay if you are wrong. British Gas and Swalec want £186 upfront and if you are right they will refund it.

 

As far as a nifty formula used it should be simple enough where power is V*I.

 

Assuming you know the resistance of your load ( I hope in fact it is resistive and not inductive) then you divide the voltage by the resistance to get the current. Taking this actual current and multiplying it by voltage you get the actual power consumption.

 

This is much more accurate as the clamp on ammeter may or not be accurate. Also you use the pulses from the customers meter ( only on the newer ones) Which can also have an inductive error.

 

I am glad your meters have such a high accuracy. I have seen, as I mentioned previously, 100% are over 10% high. Guess we should all move to where you are.

 

John

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
I recently challenged my electrical supplier on the accuracy of their meter readings. I must admit they tried everything to make me feel the fool and when that did not work advised me of the cost of having someone come out and test my meter if I was wrong.

 

I went to Energy Watch and they got their customer complaints section involved and they then sent EON to do a Meter Accuracy Test instead of installing a check meter.

 

The upshot was my meter was 24.95% reading too high. I have received an apology letter and then a rebate of the overpaid amounts.

 

I have been doing power measurements on RF Systems for over 30 years so therefore I have both the equipment and the ability to test my meters.

 

One of the "tricks" the suppliers like to try is to have you list the equipment that you have in your home and then they will inform you based on the current ratings of the equipment that their readings are accurate.

 

The current ratings of the equipment in your homes is not the current draw of the individual equipment but rather a nominal indication of the current rating or maximum draw of the equiipment.

 

For example many 1KW heater only draw 800 watts of power and if you were using this for a test of your utilisation you would not be accurate.

 

The best test is to have a fixed resistive load placed on your system for a set period of time to see if the meter is really accurate. In my case I used a 52.5ohm load capable of handling 2500 watts.

 

This load would reach 1kw in 54.7 minutes. So if I had set the meter to where it just clicked over in a unit that did not have a tenths reading. It would click over again in 54.7 minutes

 

Since finding the defective meter and receiving my refund I have checked an additional 10 meters in my area and have found, not the 2% as told to me by my supplier but that 100% of the meters have been from 10 - 27% reading high.

 

I can not reccomend enough to anyone with a question about their readings being high to get them independently tested.

 

The reason I say independent is that the replacement meter arrived from my supplier and it is also 10% high.

 

So I begin the procedure once again with my supplier. I will update as the Saga continues.

 

John

I think i will continue to pursue this with my energy supplier. I have a brand new digital meter which flashes. according to the energy supplier it could not possibly be inaccurate since it is new. they came out and did some sort of test and said it was accurate. i have no idea what tests were carried out. the energy company was also reading my neighbours meter for 18 months and sending me his bill even though they were given the correct serial numbers. they then started pursuing me for the difference between what they had been billing me and what they claimed i now owe (£1500). In this whole saga they have not taken any responsibility for their mistake. I have also contacted the energy ombudsman. However, the energy company will not put the account on hold and have sent me a red bill demanding full payment. How do i get the meter tested independently?
Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Carbon_kid

Checking with the ombudsman, but I believe that they company can not take you to court is the bill is in dispute. I'm sure I've read in in one of the Acts that cover the supply of electricty and/or gas.

 

If you find out do let us know.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i wont go into detail but i will if asked

but for any one having issues with meters and powergen

i cannot more highly recommend contacting this gent in their meters dept.

 

Paul Brown.

012334 323127

 

this was june 2007 so might not still be there.

 

but i had issues with an intermittent accuracy issue of a new pulse meter.

jumped through all the ussual hoops, inc test, but still got no understanding that is was an int fault.

 

then i was passed to the above gent.

within 2 weeks the issue was solved.

he even cameout himself to check my findings. [work in the installation trade]

 

got over £1200 back

 

hth

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...