Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Regarding a driver, that HAS paid for parking but input an incorrect Vehicle Registration Number.   This is an easy mistake to make, especially if a driver has access to more than one vehicle. First of all, upon receiving an NTK/PCN it is important to check that the Notice fully complies with PoFA 2012 Schedule 4 before deciding how to respond of course. The general advice is NOT to appeal to the Private Parking Company as, for example, you may identify yourself as driver and in certain circumstances that could harm your defence at a later stage. However, after following a recent thread on this subject, I have come to the conclusion that, in the case of inputting an incorrect Vehicle Registration Number, which is covered by “de minimis” it may actually HARM your defence at a later stage if you have not appealed to the PPC at the first appeal stage and explained that you DID pay for parking and CAN provide proof of parking, it was just that an incorrect VRN was input in error. Now, we all know that the BPA Code of Practice are guidelines from one bunch of charlatans for another bunch of charlatans to follow, but my thoughts are that there could be problems in court if a judge decides that a motorist has not followed these guidelines and has not made an appeal at the first appeal stage, therefore attempting to resolve the situation before it reaches court. From BPA Code of Practice: Section 17:  Keying Errors B) Major Keying Errors Examples of a major keying error could include: • Motorist entered their spouse’s car registration • Motorist entered something completely unrelated to their registration • Motorist made multiple keying errors (beyond one character being entered incorrectly) • Motorist has only entered a small part of their VRM, for example the first three digits In these instances we would expect that such errors are dealt with appropriately at the first appeal stage, especially if it can be proven that the motorist has paid for the parking event or that the motorist attempted to enter their VRM or were a legitimate user of the car park (eg a hospital patient or a patron of a restaurant). It is appreciated that in issuing a PCN in these instances, the operator will have incurred charges including but not limited to the DVLA fee and other processing costs therefore we believe that it is reasonable to seek to recover some of these costs by making a modest charge to the motorist of no more than £20 for a 14-day period from when the keying error was identified before reverting to the charge amount at the point of appeal. Now, we know that the "modest charge" is unenforceable in law, however, it would be up to the individual if they wanted to pay and make the problem go away or in fact if they wanted to contest the issue in court. If the motorist DOES appeal to the PPC explaining the error and the PPC rejects the appeal and the appeal fails, the motorist can use that in his favour at court.   Defence: "I entered the wrong VRN by mistake Judge, I explained this and I also submitted proof of payment for the relevant parking period in my appeal but the PPC wouldn't accept that"   If the motorist DOES NOT appeal to the PPC in the first instance the judge may well use that as a reason to dismiss the case in the claimant's favour because they may decide that they had the opportunity to resolve the matter at a much earlier stage in the proceedings. It is my humble opinion that a motorist, having paid and having proof of payment but entering the wrong VRN, should make an appeal at the first appeal stage in order to prevent problems at a later stage. In this instance, I think there is nothing to be gained by concealing the identity of the driver, especially if at a later stage, perhaps in court, it is said: “I (the driver) entered the wrong VRN.” Whether you agree or not, it is up to the individual to decide …. but worth thinking about. Any feedback, especially if you can prove to the contrary, gratefully received.
    • Women-only co-working spaces are part of the new hybrid working landscape, but they divide opinion.View the full article
    • The music streaming service reports record profits of over €1bn (£860m) after laying off 1500 staff.View the full article
    • deed?  you mean consent order you and her signed? concluding the case as long as you nor she break it's conditions signed upto? dx  
    • Well tbh that’s good news and something she can find out for herself.  She has no intention of peace.  I’m going to ask the thread stays open a little longer.   It seems she had not learned that I am just not the one!!!!  plus I have received new medical info from my vet today.   To remain within agreement, I need to generally ask for advice re:  If new medical information for the pup became apparent now - post agreement signing, that added proof a second genetic disease (tested for in those initial tests in the first case but relayed incorrectly to me then ), does it give me grounds for asking a court to unseal the deed so I can pursue this new info….. if she persists in being a pain ? If generally speaking, a first case was a cardiac issue that can be argued as both genetic and congenital until a genetic test is done and then a second absolute genetic only disease was then discovered, is that deemed a new case or grounds for unsealing? Make sense ?   This disease is only ever genetic!!!!   Rather more damning and indisputable proof of genetic disease breeding with no screening yk prevent.   The vet report showing this was uploaded in the original N1 pack.   Somehow rekeyed as normal when I was called with the results.   A vet visit today shows they were not normal and every symptom he has had reported in all reports uploaded from day one are related to the disease. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Wrong car colour so is the ticket lawful ???


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4121 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I unfortunately got a parking ticket for overstaying on a ticket in Nottingham (expired time). Fairs fair I was in the wrong (chatting too much!), but on the ticket it states colour of car as Brown, when it is in-fact Red (a dirty red all beit!). (NB the reg number was correct though)

 

Can I refuse to pay under the premise the ticket had incorrect details?

 

Any help appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would think the ticket is invalid.

 

I once got a ticket with the wrong make of vehicle recorded - parking attendent had put down Hyundai when I drive an Honda. I challenged it with council stating that though the registration number was correct that if they checked they would see that the vehicle was an Honda. I didn't admit anything in my letter to them - just stated the facts and that the ticket was therefore invalid. I was successful - ticket quashed!

 

You might be in with a chance here as colour must be correct too. If your registration document states red then it's red. Nothing to lose by challenging it within 14 days. Wise to send letter by recorded delivery, only costs about a pound, then you have proof that you challenged within time limit. Good luck!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
....but on the ticket it states colour of car as Brown, when it is in-fact Red (a dirty red all beit!). (NB the reg number was correct though)

 

If the colour of the car is wrong, then it's not only challengable, it's also invalid....BUT, the colours on the DAP (or preprinted ticket) aren't as vast as the coulours of the cars available today. This is why in training we are taught to put the closest colour to our personal knowledge as there are no 'off silvers' or 'slight greys'...'aqua-marine' etc etc.... silver/grey, blue/green (bluey green), red/brown....depends on the shade of your car. Without seeing it, it's really hard to tell. If for example your car was blue and he put brown, then YES, it's invalid. :)

But if your car isn't your average run of the mill, lucious cherry red, and it is in fact a dirty darker red, then brown may stand because on a technicality...there are no shades of red that can be added to a PCN. (or other colours that you can imagine.)

Try challenging it...you may get lucky. Get your car washed, take photos (in bright weather to make it look lighter) and submit them with your letter. Worth a shot perhaps.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

I think you will be very lucky to have a ticket cancelled on the basis of colour alone.

What one person sees as red another may well see it as brown.

Good luck anyway.

regards

Please remember our troops, fighting and dying in our name. God protect them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for advice.as my wife was in a meeting she was 4 mins over time on the ticket displayed.the people who she was been interviewed by sent her a letter saying it was unavoidable she was delayed so i sent that off with the pcn.havent heard anything yet and that was monday.probably looks like im not getting away with this one maybe im clutching at straws.as my wife isnt working at the mo and we have two children maybe they can see our financial situation and maybe show a compassionate side.we are struggling with just my wage coming in.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

It has often been pointed out that the colour of the car is not legally required although is usually included presumably to assist any doubt on which car was involved, so no, I think you will find this in itself is not grounds for appeal.

 

Informal appeals regarding wrong colour have somtimes been allowed which I would say would come under the reason of "council goodwill" (wow! there's a rare commodity) but if you appeal on this and get it rejected I would see little point in bring that alone to an adjudicator.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...
If the colour of the car is wrong, then it's not only challengable, it's also invalid....BUT, the colours on the DAP (or preprinted ticket) aren't as vast as the coulours of the cars available today. This is why in training we are taught to put the closest colour to our personal knowledge as there are no 'off silvers' or 'slight greys'...'aqua-marine' etc etc.... silver/grey, blue/green (bluey green), red/brown....depends on the shade of your car. Without seeing it, it's really hard to tell. If for example your car was blue and he put brown, then YES, it's invalid. :)

But if your car isn't your average run of the mill, lucious cherry red, and it is in fact a dirty darker red, then brown may stand because on a technicality...there are no shades of red that can be added to a PCN. (or other colours that you can imagine.)

Try challenging it...you may get lucky. Get your car washed, take photos (in bright weather to make it look lighter) and submit them with your letter. Worth a shot perhaps.

 

Sorry I'm new to this just signed up! I have had similar situation as I used my fathers car to go to my GP and I'm disabled . No parking facilities available for either disabled or otherwise near GP so I parked on a very wide pavement off the road but with plenty of room for fellow disabled access and walkway. The PCN stated the car is black but it is registered Silver. I sent an appeal and received a response with no reference to colour but instead they upheld the fine! Should I appeal further I will have to pay the full fine please help and advise what to do next - it is bad enough trying to park with a mobility problem and I would have had to park a very long way from the doctors . I was not restricting or obstructing anything and all four wheels were on the very large pavement where you could have parked 2 vehicles! What can I do?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was not restricting or obstructing anything and all four wheels were on the very large pavement where you could have parked 2 vehicles! What can I do?

 

Footways are designed and constructed for pedestrians not for use as a car park, it costs Councils and utility companies millions a year repairing the damage caused to footways and underground pipes/cables. A footway is usually contructed of a concrete paving slab resting on a bed of sand if that was a suitable surface to use for cars roads would not be several feet of hardcore and concrete topped with tarmac.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldn't appeal further as you'll forfeit the discount and are unlikely to win. I don't really understand why you had to use the pavement, but if you really had no choice, that would be a better line of appeal in my view.

 

Hi,thank you for your advice. There really was no choice - no parking spaces available in the vicinity and the pavement is wide enough for two cars parked sideways. In fact residents are allowed to park on the pavement at specific times in the same road! I will pay reluctantly to avoid high cost of ticket I guess - it is so unreasonable as there is only one disabled bay at the front of the doctors. It was in Barking and disabled bays have disappears in the last couple of years! I think I will write to the MP as it looks like new plans for the area will mean further problems for the disabled. If abled body would just understand how difficult it is for the disabled and not park in disabled bays that would help! Especially at supermarkets!

Thanks for your help

Link to post
Share on other sites

Footways are designed and constructed for pedestrians not for use as a car park, it costs Councils and utility companies millions a year repairing the damage caused to footways and underground pipes/cables. A footway is usually contructed of a concrete paving slab resting on a bed of sand if that was a suitable surface to use for cars roads would not be several feet of hardcore and concrete topped with tarmac.

 

Hi Green and Mean - please c my response below -- parking is permitted for residents on the pavement at certain hours!

This is because there is just nowhere else to park for residents, visitors or those attending doctor appointments. Thanks anyway

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,thank you for your advice. There really was no choice - no parking spaces available in the vicinity and the pavement is wide enough for two cars parked sideways. In fact residents are allowed to park on the pavement at specific times in the same road! I will pay reluctantly to avoid high cost of ticket I guess - it is so unreasonable as there is only one disabled bay at the front of the doctors. It was in Barking and disabled bays have disappears in the last couple of years! I think I will write to the MP as it looks like new plans for the area will mean further problems for the disabled. If abled body would just understand how difficult it is for the disabled and not park in disabled bays that would help! Especially at supermarkets!

Thanks for your help

 

This is something which should be raised with the local council. They should look into installing more disabled bays, as per the requirements of the DDA. It is often the case that councils are simply unaware of issues like this, until someone brings them up and requests they take a look.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 11 months later...

I recently parked on a double yellow line whilst displaying a blue badge, by mistake i overstayed my 3 hours & was issued with a penalty notice.

My car is gold coloured & this is plain to see on the evidence photographs, however the ticket states colour as silver.

being very new to this situation, i am wondering if i should challenge this fine ?. or do i just save time & pay up.

any advise would be appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I recently parked on a double yellow line whilst displaying a blue badge, by mistake i overstayed my 3 hours & was issued with a penalty notice.

My car is gold coloured & this is plain to see on the evidence photographs, however the ticket states colour as silver.

being very new to this situation, i am wondering if i should challenge this fine ?. or do i just save time & pay up.

any advise would be appreciated.

The original thread is over 3 years old so maybe better starting your own thread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...