Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Wrong car colour so is the ticket lawful ???


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4121 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I unfortunately got a parking ticket for overstaying on a ticket in Nottingham (expired time). Fairs fair I was in the wrong (chatting too much!), but on the ticket it states colour of car as Brown, when it is in-fact Red (a dirty red all beit!). (NB the reg number was correct though)

 

Can I refuse to pay under the premise the ticket had incorrect details?

 

Any help appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would think the ticket is invalid.

 

I once got a ticket with the wrong make of vehicle recorded - parking attendent had put down Hyundai when I drive an Honda. I challenged it with council stating that though the registration number was correct that if they checked they would see that the vehicle was an Honda. I didn't admit anything in my letter to them - just stated the facts and that the ticket was therefore invalid. I was successful - ticket quashed!

 

You might be in with a chance here as colour must be correct too. If your registration document states red then it's red. Nothing to lose by challenging it within 14 days. Wise to send letter by recorded delivery, only costs about a pound, then you have proof that you challenged within time limit. Good luck!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
....but on the ticket it states colour of car as Brown, when it is in-fact Red (a dirty red all beit!). (NB the reg number was correct though)

 

If the colour of the car is wrong, then it's not only challengable, it's also invalid....BUT, the colours on the DAP (or preprinted ticket) aren't as vast as the coulours of the cars available today. This is why in training we are taught to put the closest colour to our personal knowledge as there are no 'off silvers' or 'slight greys'...'aqua-marine' etc etc.... silver/grey, blue/green (bluey green), red/brown....depends on the shade of your car. Without seeing it, it's really hard to tell. If for example your car was blue and he put brown, then YES, it's invalid. :)

But if your car isn't your average run of the mill, lucious cherry red, and it is in fact a dirty darker red, then brown may stand because on a technicality...there are no shades of red that can be added to a PCN. (or other colours that you can imagine.)

Try challenging it...you may get lucky. Get your car washed, take photos (in bright weather to make it look lighter) and submit them with your letter. Worth a shot perhaps.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

I think you will be very lucky to have a ticket cancelled on the basis of colour alone.

What one person sees as red another may well see it as brown.

Good luck anyway.

regards

Please remember our troops, fighting and dying in our name. God protect them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for advice.as my wife was in a meeting she was 4 mins over time on the ticket displayed.the people who she was been interviewed by sent her a letter saying it was unavoidable she was delayed so i sent that off with the pcn.havent heard anything yet and that was monday.probably looks like im not getting away with this one maybe im clutching at straws.as my wife isnt working at the mo and we have two children maybe they can see our financial situation and maybe show a compassionate side.we are struggling with just my wage coming in.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

It has often been pointed out that the colour of the car is not legally required although is usually included presumably to assist any doubt on which car was involved, so no, I think you will find this in itself is not grounds for appeal.

 

Informal appeals regarding wrong colour have somtimes been allowed which I would say would come under the reason of "council goodwill" (wow! there's a rare commodity) but if you appeal on this and get it rejected I would see little point in bring that alone to an adjudicator.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...
If the colour of the car is wrong, then it's not only challengable, it's also invalid....BUT, the colours on the DAP (or preprinted ticket) aren't as vast as the coulours of the cars available today. This is why in training we are taught to put the closest colour to our personal knowledge as there are no 'off silvers' or 'slight greys'...'aqua-marine' etc etc.... silver/grey, blue/green (bluey green), red/brown....depends on the shade of your car. Without seeing it, it's really hard to tell. If for example your car was blue and he put brown, then YES, it's invalid. :)

But if your car isn't your average run of the mill, lucious cherry red, and it is in fact a dirty darker red, then brown may stand because on a technicality...there are no shades of red that can be added to a PCN. (or other colours that you can imagine.)

Try challenging it...you may get lucky. Get your car washed, take photos (in bright weather to make it look lighter) and submit them with your letter. Worth a shot perhaps.

 

Sorry I'm new to this just signed up! I have had similar situation as I used my fathers car to go to my GP and I'm disabled . No parking facilities available for either disabled or otherwise near GP so I parked on a very wide pavement off the road but with plenty of room for fellow disabled access and walkway. The PCN stated the car is black but it is registered Silver. I sent an appeal and received a response with no reference to colour but instead they upheld the fine! Should I appeal further I will have to pay the full fine please help and advise what to do next - it is bad enough trying to park with a mobility problem and I would have had to park a very long way from the doctors . I was not restricting or obstructing anything and all four wheels were on the very large pavement where you could have parked 2 vehicles! What can I do?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was not restricting or obstructing anything and all four wheels were on the very large pavement where you could have parked 2 vehicles! What can I do?

 

Footways are designed and constructed for pedestrians not for use as a car park, it costs Councils and utility companies millions a year repairing the damage caused to footways and underground pipes/cables. A footway is usually contructed of a concrete paving slab resting on a bed of sand if that was a suitable surface to use for cars roads would not be several feet of hardcore and concrete topped with tarmac.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldn't appeal further as you'll forfeit the discount and are unlikely to win. I don't really understand why you had to use the pavement, but if you really had no choice, that would be a better line of appeal in my view.

 

Hi,thank you for your advice. There really was no choice - no parking spaces available in the vicinity and the pavement is wide enough for two cars parked sideways. In fact residents are allowed to park on the pavement at specific times in the same road! I will pay reluctantly to avoid high cost of ticket I guess - it is so unreasonable as there is only one disabled bay at the front of the doctors. It was in Barking and disabled bays have disappears in the last couple of years! I think I will write to the MP as it looks like new plans for the area will mean further problems for the disabled. If abled body would just understand how difficult it is for the disabled and not park in disabled bays that would help! Especially at supermarkets!

Thanks for your help

Link to post
Share on other sites

Footways are designed and constructed for pedestrians not for use as a car park, it costs Councils and utility companies millions a year repairing the damage caused to footways and underground pipes/cables. A footway is usually contructed of a concrete paving slab resting on a bed of sand if that was a suitable surface to use for cars roads would not be several feet of hardcore and concrete topped with tarmac.

 

Hi Green and Mean - please c my response below -- parking is permitted for residents on the pavement at certain hours!

This is because there is just nowhere else to park for residents, visitors or those attending doctor appointments. Thanks anyway

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,thank you for your advice. There really was no choice - no parking spaces available in the vicinity and the pavement is wide enough for two cars parked sideways. In fact residents are allowed to park on the pavement at specific times in the same road! I will pay reluctantly to avoid high cost of ticket I guess - it is so unreasonable as there is only one disabled bay at the front of the doctors. It was in Barking and disabled bays have disappears in the last couple of years! I think I will write to the MP as it looks like new plans for the area will mean further problems for the disabled. If abled body would just understand how difficult it is for the disabled and not park in disabled bays that would help! Especially at supermarkets!

Thanks for your help

 

This is something which should be raised with the local council. They should look into installing more disabled bays, as per the requirements of the DDA. It is often the case that councils are simply unaware of issues like this, until someone brings them up and requests they take a look.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 11 months later...

I recently parked on a double yellow line whilst displaying a blue badge, by mistake i overstayed my 3 hours & was issued with a penalty notice.

My car is gold coloured & this is plain to see on the evidence photographs, however the ticket states colour as silver.

being very new to this situation, i am wondering if i should challenge this fine ?. or do i just save time & pay up.

any advise would be appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I recently parked on a double yellow line whilst displaying a blue badge, by mistake i overstayed my 3 hours & was issued with a penalty notice.

My car is gold coloured & this is plain to see on the evidence photographs, however the ticket states colour as silver.

being very new to this situation, i am wondering if i should challenge this fine ?. or do i just save time & pay up.

any advise would be appreciated.

The original thread is over 3 years old so maybe better starting your own thread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...