Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Update 15th March the eviction notice period expired, and I paid my next month rent along with sending them the message discussed above. After a short while they just emailed me back this dry phrase "Thank you for your email." In two weeks' time I'm gonna need to pay the rent again, and I have such a feeling that shortly after that date the contracts will be exchanged and all the payments will be made.  Now my main concern is, if possible, not to end up paying rent after I move out.  
    • they cant 'take away' anything, what ever makes you believe that?  dx  
    • The text on the N1SDT Claim Form 1.The claim is for breaching the terms and conditions set on private land. 2. The defendant's vehicle, NumberPlate, was identified in the Leeds Bradford Airport Roadways on the 28/07/2023 in breach of the advertised terms and conditions; namely Stopping in a zone where stopping is prohibited 3.At all material times the Defendant was the registered keeper and/or driver. 4. The terms and conditions upon  entering private land were clearly displayed at the entrance and in prominent locations 5. The sign was the offer and the act of entering private land was the acceptance of the offer hereby entering into a contract by conduct. 6.The signs specifically detail the terms and conditions and the consequences of failure to comply,  namely a parking charge notice will be issued, and the Defendant has failed to settle the outstanding liability. 7.The claimant seeks the recovery of the parking charge notice, contractual costs and interest.   This is what I am thinking of for the wording of my defence The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and are generic in nature which fails to comply with CPR 16.4. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 1. Paragraph 1 is denied. It is denied that the Defendant ever entered into a contract to breach any terms and conditions of the stated private land. 2. Paragraph 2 and 4 are denied. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was only contracted to provide car park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. 3. It is admitted that Defendant is the recorded keeper of the vehicle. 4.  Paragraph 6 is denied the claimant has yet to evidence that their contract with the landowner supersedes  Leeds Bradford airport byelaws. Further it is denied that the Claimant’s signage is capable of creating a legally binding contract. 5. Paragraph 7 is denied, there are no contractual costs and interest cannot be accrued on a speculative charge.   I'm not sure whether point 4 is correct as I think this side road is not covered by byelaws? Any other suggestions/corrections would be appreciated.
    • Dear EVRi parcelnet LTD t/a evri   evri parcelnet isnt a thing also you say defendant's response which is a bit of a weird format.   Something like   Dear EVRi, Claim no xxxx In your defence you said you could not access tracking. Please see attached receipt and label Regards
    • Welcome to the Forum I have moved your topic to the appropriate forum  Residential and Commercial lettings/Freehold issues Please continue to post here.   Andy
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Barclays breach of the Data Protection Act


BankFodder
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4167 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Now that Barclays has been found by the information Commissioner to be in breach of their data protection obligations,, there must be many people who have been waiting a very long time for disclosure of their personal data and who are now able to receive it.

 

I suggest that anyone who has not yet received their subject access request disclosure from Barclays should write an abrupt letter to the bank and make it clearthat as they have been in violation of their data protection act duties for some time, that you will wait no longer and that if they do not make the disclosure within seven days you will applied to the court for an order.

 

As usual, only make this threat if you are prepared to carried out. However please understand that this is a 100% winner and that you will recover your costs as well without any problem.

 

If you are one of the many people who have had to endure the strutting arrogance of Barclays bank and their flawed opinion as to their duties under the Data Protection Act which presumably has been fed to the bank by the people who pass for their legal advisers, then you may decide that this is the moment to begin your action and to force the bank now to retreat from a position which to the rest of the world was quite clearly wrong and which one can only imagine might have been adopted by the bank in order to frustrate the legitimate claims of their own customers.

 

This is the industry which is trying to persuade the country that it can be trusted enough to regulate its own affairs!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 185
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I read the sticky about Barclaycard microfiche being relevant, however does this really mean the whole Barclays system? Or just Barclaycard?

Halifax

S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) request sent - 14th September

Non-compliance letter- 26th October

Prelim sent-3rd November

LBA sent - 21st November

Settlement rejection offer sent- 28th November

N1 form filed 8th December

PAID IN FULL:D

Barclays

S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) request sent - 26th October

Barclays Acknowledged letter and sent back P.O - 1st November

Barclays sent out statement. Jan-Mar 01 is missing.

Letter for missing statements sent 14th Nov

Barclays sent letter claiming microfiche data

Letter sent back claiming data again 28th November

Non compliance letter sent 8th Dec

Prelim sent-18th January.

LBA sent Pending

Moneyclaim made-Pending

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suggest that anyone who has not yet received their subject access request disclosure from Barclays should write an abrupt letter to the bank and make it clearthat as they have been in violation of their data protection act duties for some time, that you will wait no longer and that if they do not make the disclosure within seven days you will applied to the court for an order.

 

As usual, only make this threat if you are prepared to carried out. However please understand that this is a 100% winner and that you will recover your costs as well without any problem.

I sent such a letter off yesterday, and I AM prepared to take it to court. One thing bothers me slightly - what am I taking them to court FOR? Am I seeking a ruling that they are in breach of the Act and MUST handover relevant information?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I received on 2 years information from Barclaycard (for a visa and a mastercard) I know that I had problems in 2003/2004 which they said they could not send me. Do they now have to supply this information. I have held off as I was not sure how to approach for the 2003/2004. Anyone have any advice?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Read this, it should make disturbing reading for Peter Townsend (DATA CONTROLLER OF BARCLAYS BANK if Judge Forrester is reading) assuming he doesnt want become a guest of Her Majesty.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=43&Itemid=2

 

 

Non disclosure imprisonment threat against RBS Data Controller! pdf_button.png printButton.png emailButton.png

A Consumer Action Group User was today (21/11/06) granted a County Court order in respect of the failure by the Royal Bank of Scotland to comply with his disclosure request under the Data Protection Act.

District judge Forrester, making the order commented that had the claimant been able to supply him with the name of the data controller

at the Royal Bank of Scotland that he would have added a threat of imprisonment for non-compliance.

 

The Royal Bank of Scotland now has until January 2007 to comply with the users subject access request. The District Judge has indicated that if the Bank has not complied with the order by that time that he may make an order for imprisonment of the RBS Data controller.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Bankfodder,

 

Done just what u said [ see my other posts ]and lo and behold "all statements are in the post "BUT "might take a few weeks."

 

How long should I give them?

 

Happy Christmas Barclaycard!

 

Bicester1

Bicester1

 

MBNA WON £623

:)

GM Card Won £580

:)

Nat West CC Won £525.08

:)

Nat West Bank Won £2346.60:)

Lloyds PPI LBA

Barclaycard defence received. Trial date 30th July. Barclays missed deadline for servicing and filing of their bundle! Going to try for strikeout or summary disposal

HBOS about to issue N1

LLoys Bank LBA

 

I am not a lawyer. Get trained professional advice if unsure of your legal position. If my advice is helpful please tip my scales!

Link to post
Share on other sites

If "all statements are in the post" why might it take "a few weeks"?

 

If the boot was on the other foot, they would have no hesitation in dragging you into court.

 

What do you imagine their response to "Its in the post but it might take a few weeks" would be?

 

As is oft said on this site, YOU set the timescales, not the banks.

 

Start proceedings immediatley.

 

(A mention to Peter Townsend that the RBS data controller is facing imprisonment due to non-compliance may induce a sufficiently unpleasant sphincta contraction for him to comply)

 

 

What ever you do, Peter, dont go into the greenhouse. :eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

please see my posting on the INvestor in people "angle"

Tam Wing Chuen -v- Bank of Credit and Commerce Hong Kong Ltd [1996] 2 BCLC 69

 

1996

PC

Lord Mustill Commonwealth,

 

Lord Mustill discussed the need to construe a contract contra preferentem: "the basis of the contra proferentem principle is that the person who puts forward the wording of a proposed agreement may be assumed to have looked after his own interests, so that if words leave room for doubt about whether he is intended to have a particular benefit there is reason to suppose that he is not."

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All - ive just received a letter from Barclaycard acknowledging the position of the OFT re the Microfich argument, although they "reserve their position" in this regard, but as "a gesture of goodwill" they are now going to supply all of my information and I will receive it within 28 days. Unfortunately for them their 40 days expired yesterday so im moving on with an estimated claim and then proceedings.

 

Intersting to see that they are now relenting - anyone else got one of these letters? If not, its from Tracey Burgess, Customer Relationship Manager at their Manchester address.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All - ive just received a letter from Barclaycard acknowledging the position of the OFT re the Microfich argument, although they "reserve their position" in this regard, but as "a gesture of goodwill" they are now going to supply all of my information and I will receive it within 28 days. Unfortunately for them their 40 days expired yesterday so im moving on with an estimated claim and then proceedings.

 

Intersting to see that they are now relenting - anyone else got one of these letters? If not, its from Tracey Burgess, Customer Relationship Manager at their Manchester address.

 

 

how about making sure unless they offer you "extra compensation" you make sure the complaint goes to the ombudsman ( costing them money)

they have "played dirty" ........

 

also the matter could be referred to investors in people -----

see my posting

 

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/newreply.php?do=newreply&p=436070

Tam Wing Chuen -v- Bank of Credit and Commerce Hong Kong Ltd [1996] 2 BCLC 69

 

1996

PC

Lord Mustill Commonwealth,

 

Lord Mustill discussed the need to construe a contract contra preferentem: "the basis of the contra proferentem principle is that the person who puts forward the wording of a proposed agreement may be assumed to have looked after his own interests, so that if words leave room for doubt about whether he is intended to have a particular benefit there is reason to suppose that he is not."

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
Now that Barclays has been found by the information Commissioner to be in breach of their data protection obligations,, there must be many people who have been waiting a very long time for disclosure of their personal data and who are now able to receive it.

 

I suggest that anyone who has not yet received their subject access request disclosure from Barclays should write an abrupt letter to the bank and make it clearthat as they have been in violation of their data protection act duties for some time, that you will wait no longer and that if they do not make the disclosure within seven days you will applied to the court for an order.

 

As usual, only make this threat if you are prepared to carried out. However please understand that this is a 100% winner and that you will recover your costs as well without any problem.

 

If you are one of the many people who have had to endure the strutting arrogance of Barclays bank and their flawed opinion as to their duties under the Data Protection Act which presumably has been fed to the bank by the people who pass for their legal advisers, then you may decide that this is the moment to begin your action and to force the bank now to retreat from a position which to the rest of the world was quite clearly wrong and which one can only imagine might have been adopted by the bank in order to frustrate the legitimate claims of their own customers.

 

This is the industry which is trying to persuade the country that it can be trusted enough to regulate its own affairs!

 

Are you referring to default removals here? I've just sent off the template to Barclays Bank telling them that I have no recollection of ever receiving a default and would like further information. I've included a £1 postal order. It's been nearly a week and i've heard nothing from them. Any suggestions???? The problem is that they've placed a default on my credit report from 2001. It's satisfied now but apparently wont be removed by the CRA's until November 2007. It's badly affecting my mortgage and lending opportunities. My credit rating was very poor then went up to fair and now for some strange reason it's gone back down to poor.

Link to post
Share on other sites

can anyone help please - I sent my letter before Xmas to Barclays with the £10 fee - they sent a letter back stating that they were under no obligation to present info according to any particualr format therefore my request to assemble charges was turned aside - they have however sent me copy statments which make no sense whatsoever! They are not detailed in anyway so cannot see what is what - is this their way of getting round things? Is this part of the breach? Can someone please advise me! As i have no longer got my statments this is they only way to obtain info on charges.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi lisa - I think you'll find the response to this is:

Start your own thread so Mods (and any rockers!) can help you on your specifics

Read the FAQs again, you'll find that they will help - honest!

Have a flick through the successes, they help me loads!

But basically, they will only send you the old statements, have alook for all debits that are for 'Paid Referral' or 'O/D charge' or similar which is for £25 £30 or £35 over the last six years. I'm sure there are more to look for, so have a look through the threads, I know someone has the info you are after - but they are unlikely to answer you here (so start your own thread)

 

Peter

Sign my petition to the Prime Minister here:

PETITION

Thanks

Peter

 

!!!WON!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

:o hi bankfodder

 

could you help with this query, my business account is in my partners and my name, it has our home address on and our business name. i have requested data or the statements that tell my quartlery what my charges are, Barclays have said this info is on my statments, which the total charges are, but the breakdown is not, i have sent my LBA this seems new to the site everyones else has personal bankings issues, i have spent hours reading all the sites but would like if you could comment. Also wheres the link to N1 as this is what i will need in 6 days from now and am only at requesting the info stage never mind the charges. oh my god!!!

 

help if u can please.

 

requested the info

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Oh dear. i thought i was alone in this. It seems like Barclays in particular are really fighting this .

 

I wrote to them before Christmas and got an extremely patronising letter back about the supply of information relating to charges they'd put on my account and the supply of statements ( they said they would supply within 40 days). the 40 days have expired and i have sent them a 7 day letter. i'm quite prepared to go to the info commissioner as i think it is disgsuting that they are not even wanting / reluctant to supply statements. surely the ombudsman should be sorting this out .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all, i am takin on the Hellifax on behalf of my pertner. We sent the SAR back on the 12th of September. They cashed the cheque, sent a letter after 4 weeks sayin gthey would process the request, and then nothing despite several reminder letters and reporting them to the info comissioner. I have now started proceedings against them for non compliance, took the N1 forms to birmingham county court approx 10 days ago... they said it would take up to 10 days to process ,,waiting to hear further from the courts

Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyone tell me the addess for the Data Controller at Barclays Bank???

 

I need to send them a CCA letter asking for a default to be removed.

 

Thanks

 

Mr Peter Townsend can be found in:-

Privacy & Data Protection

Radbroke Hall

Knutsford

Cheshire

WA16 9EU

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...