Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Yes that looks fine. It is to the point. I think somewhere in the that the you might want to point out that your parcel had been delivered but clearly had been opened and resealed and the contents had been stolen
    • Hi All, I just got in from work and received a letter dated 24 April 2024. "We've sent you a Single Justice Procedure notice because you have been charged with an offence, on the Transport for London Network." "You need to tell us whether you are guilty or not guilty. This is called making your plea."
    • Okay please go through the disclosure very carefully. I suggest that you use the technique broadly in line with the advice we give on preparing your court bundle. You want to know what is there – but also very importantly you want to know what is not there. For instance, the email that they said they sent you before responding to the SAR – did you see that? Is there any trace of of the phone call that you made to the woman who didn't know anything about SAR's? On what basis was the £50 sent to you? Was it unilateral or did they offer it and you accepted it on some condition? When did they send you this £50 cheque? Have you banked it? Also, I think that we need to start understanding what you have lost here. Have you lost any money – and if so how much? Send the SAR to your bank as advised above
    • In anticipation of lodging my court claim next Weds 1 May (14 days after advising P2G that was my deadline for them to settle my claim) I have completed my first draft POC as below: Claim Claim number: xxxxx Reference: P2G MAY 2024   Claimant xxxxx   Defendant Parcel2Go 1A Parklands Lostock Bolton BL6 4SD  Particulars of Claim The defendant has failed to arrange for the safe delivery of the claimant's parcel containing a 8 secondhand golf clubs (valued at £265) that was sent to a UK address using their delivery service (P2G Reference xxxxx). The defendant contracted Evri to deliver the parcel (Evri Reference xxxxx) and refuses to reimburse the claimant on the grounds that the claimant did not purchase their secondary insurance contract. The defendant seeks to exclude their liability in breach of section 57 Consumer Rights Act. The secondary insurance contract is in breach of section 72. The claimant seeks reimbursement of £265, plus P2G fees of £9.10, plus postage costs for two first class letters to P2G of £2.70, plus court fees, plus interest. The claimant claims interest under section 69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8% a year from xxxxx to xxxxxx on £276.80 and also interest at the same rate up to the date of judgment or earlier payment at a daily rate of £xxxx   Details of claim Amount claimed £276.80 I look forward to your thoughts and comments guys! As ever, many thanks - G59    
    • Hmm, that's strange how they got my email then.  I assume the below is ok to send to DCBL, Nicky?  Hello, I am writing regarding our ongoing dispute and the upcoming court claim reference xxxxxxxx. To ensure fairness and transparency in our communications leading up to the court hearing, I request that you use postal mail exclusively for all further correspondence related to this claim. Please refrain from sending any communication or documents via email. Thank you for your understanding and cooperation. If you have any questions or need clarification, please feel free to contact me via postal mail at the address provided above. Yours sincerely, xxxx
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Natwest Blocked my card whilst on Holiday


VZR00
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6327 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I was on holiday in Italy and ran out of cash, so I used my Mastercard to withdraw cash 250 Euros, which I did successfully. The next day I was unable to withdraw cash at the ATM or use my Mastercard to pay for train tickets, hotel bills or meals! as natwest had blocked my card!

I contacted Natwest bank to give my mobile number so that someone could phone me and explain what is going on.To cut a long story short I had to curtail my holiday by two days and return to the UK. When I queried this, I was told that the fraud squad had put a hold on the account!

Has anyone been in this situation? because I am would like to compensation £250, for dennying me the ability to withdraw cash or use my credit card to pay for train tickets, hotel bills or meals!

Link to post
Share on other sites

This happened to me once. I was in America and tried to use my credit card to settle my hotel bill. The card was denied. When I got home there was a letter waiting for me to say that they thought someone else had tried to use my card and had been unable to contact me to confirm whether or not it was me. Thats because I was stood in a hotel in the States trying to use my card!!!!!! I remember being very embarrassed and p-----d off at the time. I did make a call to them to complain at the time but they assured me that if there was irregular activity they put a block on the card until they can contact. Not much help when you are abroad with no contact number.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Welcome to the site.

It seems because the Banks are generally agreed in refunding transactions that may be fraudelant they are tightening up on security.Heres a piece I found elaborating on this.

"

While banks are not required to reimburse customer accounts for fraudulent ATM/debit card activity, many do, and accordingly they have become particularly vigilant about detecting these transactions as soon as possible. Banks use computers and staff to scan incoming transactions for unusual patterns and will suspend activity immediately if they detect something amiss. Banks are particularly alert for foreign transactions, especially from certain countries with reputations for this kind of activity. When banks believe there may be fraud, they may shut down individual accounts, and in some cases, temporarily block all transaction activity from a particular country. Areas of Eastern Europe and Africa have seen problems, but so have England and Canada.

Unfortunately while consumers can take appropriate steps to safeguard their cards and PIN numbers, account security can be compromised. When an account is suspended for security reasons, banks and credit card companies try to notify the client by phone or mail, but a message may not reach travelers away from home. The first clue that something is amiss comes when they try to use the card. The second will be when strange purchases or withdrawals pop up on their statements.

Calling the issuer immediately to report the problem can minimize the damage. But what can a traveler do to minimize the potential for difficulties in the first place?

First, before you leave the country, call the toll-free customer service number on the back of your cards and report your travel plans, what countries you'll be visiting and the approximate dates. Ask if there are any regional security alerts that might affect you. Finally, get a regular phone number that you can call from abroad in the case of an emergency.

Second, never rely entirely on one form of plastic for payment. Ideally carry at least two credit cards and two ATM/debit cards issued by different institutions. Keep these spares in a secure place other than your purse or wallet. Take along a second form of photo ID in addition to your passport, as well as some backup cash or travelers checks."

 

 

 

So maybe you should look at any travel insurance policies to see if theres anything in there.

I would also add that its entirely at the banks discretion that they consider compensating you,I would certainly try and get it by sending them a strong letter together with any documentary evidence.

You could consider a small claims but if the bank can show that they made reasonable attempts to contact you and the account activity prompted the freezing action,then that would go for them.As usual they will quote their terms and conditions and say they did nothing wrong.It should be remembered that it would be very uneconomical for the bank to defend such action so as in the case of charges,you may want to look at that.

Maybe a strong letter with a suggestion of court if they do not refund you or certainly look at this,may bring a result.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent advise from the moderator, I have travelled to many countries and never had problems with my credit cards . It seems since the introduction of chip & pin, the fraud systems detect changes in pattern and the card is blocked. I spent hours trying to contact them listening to endless muzak in the attempt to unblock my card with no luck and it was nota 24x7 number. I have just written to Natwest asking them why they do not inform their users of their fraud/emergency procedure and stated that I would like some ££ compensation. As a user I was denied the use of my mastercard, suffered embarrassment even though I had more than aqequate funds and for the lack of prior advise on their fraud/emergency procedures. I will let you know the outcome.

Msg for Stansfield5131

just received Natwest's credit cards notice of variation, and checked the back of my statement, no mention of a 24hr number for fraud/emergency. Why do they make it so difficult for us to contact them?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi have moved your thread into Natwest from Welcome.There may be other users here who have experienced the same as you.

If you do decide to claim compensation you will need to read up on Cobbetts responses to litigation.....something I am sure you will need to be extremely well briefed on ha ha !

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

I complained to Natwest and asked for £170 compensation, which was approx the amount I was denied withdrawal (250 euros). I mentioned that I consulted CAG for advise. Just received a letter from Natwest Mcard offering me £50 and 300 airmiles as a good will gesture. They do claim that they tried contacting me, but have provided no vmail evidence. It was worth writing to them, thank you for your support.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...