Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • No, do the section 75 chargeback to your credit card provider.
    • See what dx thinks but it seems to me that sending a photo of your own pass isn't relevant to what happened. Let's wait and see what he says. HB
    • 1st letter image.pdf1st letter 2nd page.pdf
    • Many thanks for the replies and advice!   I what to send this email to the Starbucks CEO and the area manager. Your thoughts would be appreciated.   [email protected] [email protected]   Re: MET Parking PNC at your Starbucks Southgate site   Dear Ms Rayner, / Dear Heather Christie,   I have received a Notice to Keeper regarding a Parking Charge Notice of £100 for the driver parking in the Southgate Park Car Park, otherwise infamously known as the Stanstead Starbucks/McDonalds car park(s).   Issued by: MET Parking Services Ltd Parking Charge Notice Number: XXXXXXXXX Vehicle Registration Number: XXXX XXX Date of Contravention: XX.XX.XXXX Time: XX:XX - XX:XX   After a little research it apears that the driver is not alone in being caught in what is commonly described as a scam, and has featured in the national press and on the mainstream television.   It is a shame that the reputation of Starbucks is being tarnished by this, with your customers leaving the lowest possible reviews on Trustpilot and Trip Advisor at this location, and to be associated with what on the face of it appears to be a doubious and predatory car park management company.   In this instance, during the early hours of the morning the driver required a coffee and parked up outside Starbucks with the intention of purchasing one from yourselves. Unfortunately, you were closed so the driver walked to McDonalds next door and ordered a coffee, and for this I have received the Notice to Keeper.   It is claimed that the car park is two separate car parks (Starbucks/McDonalds). However, there is no barrier or road markings to identity a boundary, and the signage in the car park(s) and outside your property is ambiguous, as such the terms would most likely be deemed unfair and unenforcable under the Consumer Rights Act 2015.   I understand that Starbucks-Euro Garages neither operate or benefit from the charges imposed by MET Parking. However, MET Parking is your client.   Additionally, I understand that the charge amount of £100 had previously been upheld in court due to a ‘legitimate interest in making sure that a car park was run as efficiently as possible to benefit other drivers as well as the local stores, keeping cars from overstaying’.   However, this is not applicable when the shop or store is closed (as was the case here), as there is no legitimate interest. Therefore, the amount demanded is a penalty and is punitive, again contravening the Consumer Rights Act 2015.   As the driver’s intention of the visit was genuine, I would be grateful if you could please instruct your client to cancel this Notice to Keeper/Parking Charge Notice.   Kind regards
    • I received the promised call back from the Saga man today who informed me that the undertakers have decreed it IS a modification and they will need to recalculate a quote individually for me. However it all sounds very arbitrary. The more I think about it, and with help from forum replies, the more I am sure that it is not a modification. If for example the original seatback had become damaged by a spillage or a tear, I would be entitled to replace it with the nearest available part. The problem is when it comes to a payout after an accident, there is no telling what an individual insurer will decide when he notices the change. I am still undecided which of the two best routes to go with, either don't mention the replacement at all, or fill in the quote form without mentioning, and when it comes to buying the insurance over the phone, mention it at the time.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Natwest Blocked my card whilst on Holiday


VZR00
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6325 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I was on holiday in Italy and ran out of cash, so I used my Mastercard to withdraw cash 250 Euros, which I did successfully. The next day I was unable to withdraw cash at the ATM or use my Mastercard to pay for train tickets, hotel bills or meals! as natwest had blocked my card!

I contacted Natwest bank to give my mobile number so that someone could phone me and explain what is going on.To cut a long story short I had to curtail my holiday by two days and return to the UK. When I queried this, I was told that the fraud squad had put a hold on the account!

Has anyone been in this situation? because I am would like to compensation £250, for dennying me the ability to withdraw cash or use my credit card to pay for train tickets, hotel bills or meals!

Link to post
Share on other sites

This happened to me once. I was in America and tried to use my credit card to settle my hotel bill. The card was denied. When I got home there was a letter waiting for me to say that they thought someone else had tried to use my card and had been unable to contact me to confirm whether or not it was me. Thats because I was stood in a hotel in the States trying to use my card!!!!!! I remember being very embarrassed and p-----d off at the time. I did make a call to them to complain at the time but they assured me that if there was irregular activity they put a block on the card until they can contact. Not much help when you are abroad with no contact number.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Welcome to the site.

It seems because the Banks are generally agreed in refunding transactions that may be fraudelant they are tightening up on security.Heres a piece I found elaborating on this.

"

While banks are not required to reimburse customer accounts for fraudulent ATM/debit card activity, many do, and accordingly they have become particularly vigilant about detecting these transactions as soon as possible. Banks use computers and staff to scan incoming transactions for unusual patterns and will suspend activity immediately if they detect something amiss. Banks are particularly alert for foreign transactions, especially from certain countries with reputations for this kind of activity. When banks believe there may be fraud, they may shut down individual accounts, and in some cases, temporarily block all transaction activity from a particular country. Areas of Eastern Europe and Africa have seen problems, but so have England and Canada.

Unfortunately while consumers can take appropriate steps to safeguard their cards and PIN numbers, account security can be compromised. When an account is suspended for security reasons, banks and credit card companies try to notify the client by phone or mail, but a message may not reach travelers away from home. The first clue that something is amiss comes when they try to use the card. The second will be when strange purchases or withdrawals pop up on their statements.

Calling the issuer immediately to report the problem can minimize the damage. But what can a traveler do to minimize the potential for difficulties in the first place?

First, before you leave the country, call the toll-free customer service number on the back of your cards and report your travel plans, what countries you'll be visiting and the approximate dates. Ask if there are any regional security alerts that might affect you. Finally, get a regular phone number that you can call from abroad in the case of an emergency.

Second, never rely entirely on one form of plastic for payment. Ideally carry at least two credit cards and two ATM/debit cards issued by different institutions. Keep these spares in a secure place other than your purse or wallet. Take along a second form of photo ID in addition to your passport, as well as some backup cash or travelers checks."

 

 

 

So maybe you should look at any travel insurance policies to see if theres anything in there.

I would also add that its entirely at the banks discretion that they consider compensating you,I would certainly try and get it by sending them a strong letter together with any documentary evidence.

You could consider a small claims but if the bank can show that they made reasonable attempts to contact you and the account activity prompted the freezing action,then that would go for them.As usual they will quote their terms and conditions and say they did nothing wrong.It should be remembered that it would be very uneconomical for the bank to defend such action so as in the case of charges,you may want to look at that.

Maybe a strong letter with a suggestion of court if they do not refund you or certainly look at this,may bring a result.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent advise from the moderator, I have travelled to many countries and never had problems with my credit cards . It seems since the introduction of chip & pin, the fraud systems detect changes in pattern and the card is blocked. I spent hours trying to contact them listening to endless muzak in the attempt to unblock my card with no luck and it was nota 24x7 number. I have just written to Natwest asking them why they do not inform their users of their fraud/emergency procedure and stated that I would like some ££ compensation. As a user I was denied the use of my mastercard, suffered embarrassment even though I had more than aqequate funds and for the lack of prior advise on their fraud/emergency procedures. I will let you know the outcome.

Msg for Stansfield5131

just received Natwest's credit cards notice of variation, and checked the back of my statement, no mention of a 24hr number for fraud/emergency. Why do they make it so difficult for us to contact them?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi have moved your thread into Natwest from Welcome.There may be other users here who have experienced the same as you.

If you do decide to claim compensation you will need to read up on Cobbetts responses to litigation.....something I am sure you will need to be extremely well briefed on ha ha !

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

I complained to Natwest and asked for £170 compensation, which was approx the amount I was denied withdrawal (250 euros). I mentioned that I consulted CAG for advise. Just received a letter from Natwest Mcard offering me £50 and 300 airmiles as a good will gesture. They do claim that they tried contacting me, but have provided no vmail evidence. It was worth writing to them, thank you for your support.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...