Bank of Scotland - SAR rejected

**ally7770** · 28th November 2006 22:24

I've been trying to claim £1432 bank charges back from Bank of Scotland icon

and was initially offered £120 which I rejected, they then offered £360 which I again rejected and then advised would accept a recalculation of charges at £12 each (which was offered by my credit card company) meaning I would accept a refund of £868.00 which they have now refused, stating their previous offers are now withdrawn and they will not refund any charges.

Considering taking them to court now and, before doing this, have sent a Subject access request icon

asking them to advise of all instances where there has been any manual intervention on my account. They have now replied advising they are "under no statutory obligation to record this information and, therefore, are unable to assist further with your request".

They have added they are sending copies of duplicate statements separately (a bit pointless as I keep all copies of my statements, hence how I was able to calculate the charges applied over the past 5 years in the first place).

Can anyone advise if this sounds correct - that they would not keep a record of any manual intervention on my account?

Thanks

Similar Threads:

**killbi11** · 29th November 2006 13:32

Hi ally7770,

I got this letter as well. I assume since charges are not shown as "manual intervention" on statements the duplicate statements will still show any charges over the 5 year period. Manual Intervention I take as being if they have refunded charges to your account manually...can anyone else confirm if this is correct??

Thanks.

**LondonPam** · 29th November 2006 14:08

Believe it or not "no manual intervention" is a good thing. It simply means that an actual person didn't have to do anything manually on your account. This means that the charges they impose should be lower as no-one has had to do anything...does that make sense lol
Ally if you have already sent the letter before action icon

then I would issue a court claim straight away. There is no reason at all to wait any longer as they have made it quite clear they aren't going to give you the full amount.

Good luck.

**Mike220359** · 29th November 2006 14:20

Originally Posted by killbi11

Hi ally7770,

I got this letter as well. I assume since charges are not shown as "manual intervention" on statements the duplicate statements will still show any charges over the 5 year period. Manual Intervention I take as being if they have refunded charges to your account manually...can anyone else confirm if this is correct??

Thanks.

A log of manual interventions would allow the bank to argue that the charges they impose are rightfully expensive since they have had to pay someone to 'manually' examine and adjust something in your account. We all know that inverventions are computerised and therefore cheaper.

Beleive me when I say that no manual interventions is a good thing.

Mike

**alw** · 29th November 2006 18:33

This means they will give you your list of charges, but not discuss "manual intervention". If / When it gets to court we all ask for "standard disclosure" becasue this means the banks have to disclose this information.

Something they don't want to do, and why so far all cases have been settled.

Good Luck
Hope this helps
AL

**ally7770** · 30th November 2006 19:56

Thanks for the replies, going ahead with claim now.

Thread: Bank of Scotland - SAR rejected

Thread Tools

Bank of Scotland - SAR rejected

Re: Bank of Scotland - SAR rejected

Re: Bank of Scotland - SAR rejected

Re: Bank of Scotland - SAR rejected

Re: Bank of Scotland - SAR rejected

Re: Bank of Scotland - SAR rejected