Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • What's the reason for not wanting a smart meter? Personally I'm saving a pile on a tariff only available with one. Today electricity is 17.17p/kWh. If the meter is truly past its certification date the supplier is obliged to replace it. If you refuse to allow this then eventually they'll get warrant and do so by force. Certified life varies between models and generations, some only 10 or 15 years, some older types as long as 40 years or maybe even more. Your meter should have its certified start date marked somewhere so if you doubt the supplier you can look up the certified life and cross check.
    • No I'm not. Even if I was then comments on this forum wouldn't constitute legal advice in the formal sense. Now you've engaged a lawyer directly can I just make couple of final suggestions? Firstly make sure he is fully aware of the facts. And don't mix and match by taking his advice on one aspect while ploughing your own furrow on others.  Let us know how you get on now you have a solicitor acting for you.
    • Oil and gold prices have jumped, while shares have fallen.View the full article
    • Thank you for your reply, DX! I was not under the impression that paying it off would remove it from my file. My file is already trashed so it would make very little difference to any credit score. I am not certain if I can claim compensation for a damaged credit score though. Or for them reporting incorrect information for over 10 years? The original debt has been reported since 2013 as an EE debt even though they had sold it in 2014. It appears to be a breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 Section 13 and this all should have come to a head when I paid the £69 in September 2022, or so I thought. The £69 was in addition to the original outstanding balance and not sent to a DCA. Even if I had paid the full balance demanded by the DCA back in 2014 then the £69 would still have been outstanding with EE. If it turns out I have no claim then so be it. Sometimes there's not always a claim if there's blame. The CRA's will not give any reason for not removing it. They simply say it is not their information and refer me to EE. More to the point EE had my updated details since 2022 yet failed to contact me. I have been present on the electoral roll since 2012 so was traceable and I think EE have been negligent in reporting an account as in payment arrangement when in fact it had been sold to a DCA. In my mind what should have happened was the account should have been defaulted before it was closed and sold to the DCA who would then have made a new entry on my credit file with the correct details. However, a further £69 of charges were applied AFTER it was sent to the DCA and it was left open on EE systems. The account was then being reported twice. Once with EE as open with a payment arrangement for the £69 balance which has continued since 2013 and once with the DCA who reported it as defaulted in 2014 and it subsequently dropped off and was written off by the DCA, LOWELL in 2021. I am quite happy for EE to place a closed account on my credit file, marked as satisfied. However, it is clear to me that them reporting an open account with payment arrangement when the balance is £0 and the original debt has been written off is incorrect? Am I wrong?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2455 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello everyone,

I have just joined the group to seek help if possible!!

 

This morning I received two notices of Enforcement From a Company called Marston addressed to my correct name and address.

 

 

Collection is on behalf of Waltham Forest Council for motoring offences in a vehicle I have no knowledge of, in a City I have not driven in for 20 years.

 

 

Called Marstons this morning and they told me it has been through the courts in my name from an address I have never lived at last year,

 

 

and the 2x £278.00 outstanding Sums must be paid by 10-08-17.

 

 

They then advised me to get a report or Incident number from Police and Action Fraud and to relay the information to them.

 

Does anyone know what I really need to be doing...

 

 

..Thanks in advance everyone.

Link to post
Share on other sites

so cloned number plate or someones given your details,

ring the council's PCN Dept Monday and get it sort.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

This morning I received two notices of Enforcement From a Company called Marston addressed to my correct name and address.

 

Collection is on behalf of Waltham Forest Council for motoring offences in a vehicle I have no knowledge of, in a City I have not driven in for 20 years.

 

Called Marstons this morning and they told me it has been through the courts in my name from an address I have never lived at last year, and the 2x £278.00 outstanding Sums must be paid by 10-08-17. They then advised me to get a report or Incident number from Police and Action Fraud and to relay the information to them. Thanks in advance everyone.

 

Before getting to this very late stage, you should have received 3 notices from Waltham Forest (Notice to Owner, Charge Certificate and Order for Recovery). From your post it is evident that you had not received any of the notices.

 

Almost certainly, you should be submitting an Out of Time witness statement to the Traffic Enforcement Centre but before even considering step a step, it is vitally important that you call the local authority on Monday to make enquiries. Thankfully, your account is still within the 'compliance' period with Marston Holdings and a personal visit cannot take place until after 10th August.

 

Having access to the vehicle registration number, you should be able to view the alleged contravention on Waltham Forest's website.

Link to post
Share on other sites

BA Op says not their motor, and not been there for years, so how can OOT help if not driver or keeper?

 

Perhaps this is a faulty trace, as in the wrong Mr Jones. Have you ever owned or driven the vehicle the PCN is issued to?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

BA Op says not their motor, and not been there for years, so how can OOT help if not driver or keeper?

 

The OOT should be a last resort if the local authority fail to address the complaint. I would hope that the council will intervene on Monday.

 

The only way in which a warrant can be 'set aside', is by submitting an OOT. The OP would need to tick Box 1 (Did not receive a Notice to Owner). He can then state on the form that he only knew of this penalty when he received a letter from Marston's etc.

 

He can then state on the form something like this:

 

If I had of received the Notice to Owner, I would have responded to make representation to London Borough of Waltham Forest on the basis that the vehicle registration number quoted is not a vehicle that I have ever owned etc etc etc.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Bailiff advice thanks for the quick response.

 

I read an out of time witness statement definition and its merit as to me not receiving any notices,

 

however as I was not responsible for the act what so ever I am not sure if it will serve me.

 

Also there will be an additional cost of £255 pound per late witness statement that is rejected.

 

I have tried to view the offence on Waltham Forests site but wont find out until they e-mail me results, that saying the reference number on my NOE may not be the coinciding number of the PCN as I have no access to prior references to the contravention.

 

How would the evidence help? I am not sure.

 

Yes Platinum

I have not lived at the original address that Marstons say the court proceedings were processed from at any time ever.

 

 

Marstons advised me to report to the police and Action Fraud?

They said get a crime report/ reference number.

 

 

Went to police and he said not their bag and give me contact for Action Fraud.

 

 

Marstons said relay information back to them before deadline ie when bailiffs were due.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Bailiff advice thanks for the quick response.

 

I read an out of time witness statement definition and its merit as to me not receiving any notices, however as I was not responsible for the act what so ever I am not sure if it will serve me.

 

Also there will be an additional cost of £255 pound per late witness statement that is rejected.

 

I have tried to view the offence on Waltham Forests site but wont find out until they e-mail me results, that saying the reference number on my NOE may not be the coinciding number of the PCN as I have no access to prior references to the contravention.

 

How would the evidence help? I am not sure.

 

The OOT will likely not be required as this penalty will probably turn out to be an error of some sort but you will need to wait a few days to find out.

 

However, if you fail to get a response before the compliance period ends, (10th August) then the OOT will become an option; not least, because it will place enforcement of the warrant 'on hold' for approx 6 weeks which should give you the necessary time to get to the bottom of this query.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you ever owned the vehicle in question? Past or present?

 

From the OP's opening post, the vehicle is not one that he has any knowledge of:

 

Collection is on behalf of Waltham Forest Council for motoring offences
in a vehicle I have no knowledge of,
in a City I have not driven in for 20 years.

 

PS: As I have mentioned in posts yesterday, I would expect this penalty to be an error which LB of Waltham Forest will sort out fairly swiftly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

From the OP's opening post, the vehicle is not one that he has any knowledge of:

 

Collection is on behalf of Waltham Forest Council for motoring offences
in a vehicle I have no knowledge of,
in a City I have not driven in for 20 years.

 

PS: As I have mentioned in posts yesterday, I would expect this penalty to be an error which LB of Waltham Forest will sort out fairly swiftly.

 

Or 20 years ago, someone stole their identity or used it to register for various.

 

A relative of mine who is very careful about most things, found out from DVLA that someone had somehow gotten hold of paperwork related to driving licence, possibly renewal document. The relative had moved abroad, had to register abroad for a foreign licence and as part of the application process needed DVLA information. When DVLA provided the information, someone had registered the licence at a different UK address, that was nothing to do with my relative. Obviously DVLA were alerted to the issue found out.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...