Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

HalifX V Kia


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2462 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi just thought id post this see what happen

 

 

i have had a love hate relationship with the halifax for a number of years and just thought id see what anyone thinks on here as i keep hitting a brick wall .

Right i opened a credit card account with these jokers a number of years ago and having tackled them on two seperate occasions and won :whoo:

i thought id have a go at ppi

 

 

the way i remember it is i opened my account and i was forcefully persuaded that i should take out a ppi with it :|

fair enough my memory isnt what it used to be and we are talking more than ten years ago prob closer to 20 :!:

 

 

i could be remembering it wrong and i could of said no to the ppi

but way i remember it i signed up for it

 

 

they are saying i definetly didnt have one last letter off

them they got very shirty and said having checked your account again :oops:u did not have this with us

 

 

now what i want to know is

do i still persue this cos have started to do this 3 times now and then backed down when i got the fob off letter

cos am really not sure what to do cos

 

 

its 50/50 and is it worth the fight is this a standard fob off letter

or is this exclusive to me cos i cant keep starting this then getting stuck when they fight back yet again any ideas ppl ? xxxxxkia

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well if you have been paying PPI then the payment should appear on your statements. On the basis that you don't have your statements you need to begin by sending them an SAR.

 

Do that now. Ask for everything they have got on you going back to the beginning of the account – in any form.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Already tried that ages ago and they didn't send me true copies just a load of print outs which is wrong as it's not what I asked them for and doesn't show any of the payments I made or what I was been charged for so kinda hit a brick wall there 😧Xxkia

Link to post
Share on other sites

when?

was this the one that cl took you to court over?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

In addition to the questions asked by DX above, are you telling us that you send a subject access request – a statutory demand for disclosure which imposes legal duties, that they didn't comply and that you just let it go?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well if you have been paying PPI then the payment should appear on your statements. On the basis that you don't have your statements you need to begin by sending them an SAR.

 

Do that now. Ask for everything they have got on you going back to the beginning of the account – in any form.

 

I can do that but it dates back the account over ten years although I only decided recently to go after them again

 

they have continually fobbed me off at every turn saying I never had a ppi with them and as I couldn't prove it as no proper statements I gave up ��

 

Prob big mistake that cos it's been like an itch I can't scratch I always felt I should of pursued it xxkia

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...