Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi. Could you post up what they've sent please so we can see what the charge is? Cover up your name and address and their reference number. HB
    • I've looked through all our old NPE threads, and as far as we know they have never had the bottle to do court. There are no guarantees of course, but when it comes to put or shut up they definitely tend towards shut up. How about something like -   Dear Jonathan and Julie, Re: PCN no.XXXXX cheers for your Letter Before Claim.  I rolled around on the floor in laughter at the idea that you actually expected me to take this tripe seriously and cough up. I'll write to you not some uninterested third party, thanks all the same, because you have are the ones trying to threaten me about this non-existent "debt". Go and look up Jopson v Homeguard Services Ltd, saddos.  Oh, while you're at it, go and look up your Subject Access Request obligations - we all know how you ballsed that up way back in January to March. Dear, dear, dear - you couldn't resist adding your £70 Unicorn Food Tax, you greedy gets.  Judges don't like these made-up charges, do they? You can either drop this foolishness now or get a hell of a hammering in court.  Both are fine with me.  Summer is coming up and I would love a holiday at your expense after claiming an unreasonable costs order under CPR 27.14(2)(g). I look forward to your deafening silence.   That should show them you're not afraid of them and draw their attention to their having legal problems of their own with the SAR.  If they have any sense they'll crawl back under their stone and leave you in peace.  Over the next couple of days invest in a 2nd class stamp (all they are worth) and get a free Certificate of Posting from the post office.
    • Yes that looks fine. It is to the point. I think somewhere in the that the you might want to point out that your parcel had been delivered but clearly had been opened and resealed and the contents had been stolen
    • Hi All, I just got in from work and received a letter dated 24 April 2024. "We've sent you a Single Justice Procedure notice because you have been charged with an offence, on the Transport for London Network." "You need to tell us whether you are guilty or not guilty. This is called making your plea."
    • Okay please go through the disclosure very carefully. I suggest that you use the technique broadly in line with the advice we give on preparing your court bundle. You want to know what is there – but also very importantly you want to know what is not there. For instance, the email that they said they sent you before responding to the SAR – did you see that? Is there any trace of of the phone call that you made to the woman who didn't know anything about SAR's? On what basis was the £50 sent to you? Was it unilateral or did they offer it and you accepted it on some condition? When did they send you this £50 cheque? Have you banked it? Also, I think that we need to start understanding what you have lost here. Have you lost any money – and if so how much? Send the SAR to your bank as advised above
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Check companies before firing - AVOID Plumbingforce


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2467 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

As a consumer I feel the needs to provide feedback/compliments for good services,

which would work as great motivation for the providers,

also input for bad services in order to help them to improve,

because no business can survive by delivering half-finished products/services,

furthermore it creates a low moral culture within the organisation.

 

I contacted a Gas safe registered company, which I found on the HSE Gas Safe directory.

I was asked for my bank details before they even came out to the property to look to the problem.

 

I should have stopped there, but carried on because of desperation to get it fixed, which this provider took advantage of.

 

An engineer came out 2 hours after the agreed time, looked at the system for 5 minutes,

got into his car and talked on the phone for an hour.

 

He sent me an electronic invoice around 2 hours after arrival charging me for an hour’s work at £108

and took the money from my account at the same time without any warnings,

even I was assured that they only charged the first half hour,

and any additional work would be informed for me to make decision and provide direction.

 

Two weeks went by without a sign from this provider, Plumbingforce.

 

I decided to wait for the company, I know does provide good services [removed] .

 

I don’t know where to get advice for this kind of services regarding to types of issues and the cost associated.

 

I would like to share with you that you can be ripped off in the UK in 2014,

even you would imagine that companies would do anything to create and maintain good reputation

in the world of powerful use of social media.

 

However I also like to emphasize that there are decent companies out there,

who want to help you, just because they are passionate about doing the jobs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 11 months later...

I booked a service of my boiler via their Bedford offices. They were supposed to call today between 10am & 12pm. That never happened, so I called and they told me it would be before 6pm. That never happened either.

 

They finally called at 5:45pm to say they would come the next day, I told them to cancel - I had taken the entire day off work waiting for these cowboys. To say that the lady on the phone was curt would be an adequate description.

 

To cap it all, I just checked with my bank and as suspected, they have not only charged me for this non-visit, they have also charged me more than they quoted. I have already been in touch with the police as recommended by TSB and the bank will be taking further action. These guys are absolute crooks. They deserve a place on Rogue Traders. :mad2::mad2::mad2:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Keep away from this company. I called Plumbing Force to my boiler which intermittently would fail to ignite. The original appointment was cancelled by them at short notice and re-scheduled. The engineer diagnosed the fault was due to low gas pressure and arranged for Northern Gas to replace the regulator and I was charged £237.60 by Plumbing Force. Whether there was a fault with the regulator or not I do not know, but the problem continued. I arranged a further appointment for Plumbing Force to return but again this was cancelled by them on two occasions at short notice.

Utterly frustrated with Plumbing Force I then called a Vaillant engineer who diagnosed faults internally with the gas valve, spark electrode and burner gasket and following replacement the boiler has continued to work without fault. I complained to Plumbing Force about the cancellation of appointments at short notice and about the poor standard of the engineer who was not familiar with the boiler, could not correctly diagnose the fault and had no relevant parts even if he had

The utter contempt and disregard Plumbing Force then displayed towards me is breath-taking. They did absolutely nothing to address my concerns and simply ignored my complaint even after I wrote directly to the Director. This shows a lack of professionalism and governance that is not acceptable by a company acting in the public service and endorsed by the Gas Safe Register. Having further ignored my request for a letter of deadlock I attempted to complain to the retail ombudsman, but Plumbing Force are not listed under the UtilitiesADR Home Services Providers Membership list which speaks volumes about this company.

While I cannot comment on the safety standard of work carried out by Plumbing Force (the engineer actually did nothing other than charge for his time) the disdain shown by this company is appalling and I would urge any customer to keep well away

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...