Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Just to clear it up, sorry I don't make sense sometimes. I have paid £4000 £1200 of that was suppose to clear the £1200 debt.   Meaning I have sent a extra £2800 on top of my normal mainternance money.   Thank you
    • Try CPR 31.15 Possibly but a party is not compelled to disclose any documents pre allocation
    • Hi, I shown my key worker a letter that was sent to me saying that I owe £1200, she setup a standing order around 2021, this was to pay back money I owed, with my mental health status I have had complex issues to deal with and I just simply forgot about this standing order so it has been running for about 3.5 years acording to my key worker, anyway I'm not worried about the money that was sent that I call a overpayment, it went towards supporting my child's household so I am just happy with that, I am a little sad that I am being told I still owe this £1200, I have sent bank statements over 3 years worth but they have not taken away this £1200 bill and still say I owe it   Thank you
    • She did try contacting EON in the early days of the debt but they refused to speak to her because she could not pass the security checks. She didn't know the answers on an account she hadn't opened?   I also saw this article recently which could be what has happended here: Debt collection agencies in the UK are using fair means or foul to link people to an address where an unpaid debt has been run up, sometimes years after they have moved out The Guardian Anna Tims Mon 22 Apr 2024 The letter from the debt collection agency arrived out of the blue, and it was intimidating. It informed Joshua Simpson* that he owed £2,212 to Octopus Energy, and accused him of ignoring previous requests to settle the bill. If he did not stump up within 14 days, he was told, further action would be taken to recover the money. Simpson checked his Octopus account – it was in credit. Then he noticed the address where the debt had been accrued between 2022 and 2023. It was his childhood home – which his family had sold 18 years previously. "Since I was only 16 when we left the property, I was astonished that they'd linked my name [to it]," he says. "The debt collection agency insisted I provide a tenancy agreement to prove how long I've lived at my current address. I couldn't, since we bought our home. "They are now actively pursuing me for this debt, causing me a huge amount of stress. We are about to remortgage, and if this debt prevents us switching to a better deal, we will face real financial hardship." Simpson had been sucked into the shadowy world of "identity tracing", whereby investigators recruited by creditors seek to locate individuals who have moved home without paying their bills. It is an unregulated sector where anyone can set up as an agent in a back room without a licence, or scrutiny, and use fair means or foul to identify debtors. Reputable companies join a trade association that operates a code of practice, but membership is not mandatory, and mistakes are common. Last year, a teenage boy was chased for a debt of more than £900 by debt collectors acting for the energy company Ovo. A "trace agent" had somehow linked him to the debt because his parents had previously rented the property in question. An investigation by the Observer established that the debt had been run up by a subsequent tenant. The consequences of mistaken identity can be catastrophic. Individuals who are erroneously linked to a debt face, at worst, court action, bailiffs and a ruined credit rating. At best, they can endure weeks of stress and paperwork in order to prove they are not the debtor. It is estimated that 20m identity traces are made in the UK every year, many on behalf of companies that are owed money. Personal data is often obtained from credit reference agencies, which record applications for credit, and details are supposed to be verified with several different sources before being used for debt enforcement. In practice, however, this does not always happen. Simpson's details had been passed along a chain of intermediaries before the demand was issued. Octopus had given the unpaid account to a debt collection agent, which had contracted a tracing service, GBG, to find the debtor................ Full Article: https://www.theguardian.com/money/2023/oct/04/a-cry-for-help-energy-providers-play-the-villain-in-dramas-to-chill-the-blood ..............The Financial Ombudsman Service, which investigates complaints about financial firms, states that debt collection agents have to produce convincing evidence to link an individual to a debt, rather than rely on names, addresses and birth dates. According to the trade association, the Institute of Professional Investigators, an unknown number of investigators and trace agents are operating below the radar. Many more are merely inept, as data protection compliance training is not mandatory. "We have been campaigning for many, many years to try to get all private investigators regulated," says secretary general Glyn Evans.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

2 PCNs timed three minutes apart for the same offence


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2462 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I stopped in what it now appears is a restricted parking zone i.e Orpington high street to drop off some items to a charity shop. I was gone no more than three minutes in total. Both notices that I've received state the enforcement officer was unable to fix the ticket to the vehicle as it was driven away. But I couldn't have done this twice in three minutes, so I'm thinking of disputing the issue of at least the second notice.

 

ntvrman

Link to post
Share on other sites

No I wasn't , I had just pulled into the side of the road. I should point out that my car is registered as a disabled vehicle, as my wife needs to use either sticks or a frame to walk ( she also had to give up driving) therefore needs to be able to park closer to most amenities

Link to post
Share on other sites

No I wasn't , I had just pulled into the side of the road. I should point out that my car is registered as a disabled vehicle, as my wife needs to use either sticks or a frame to walk ( she also had to give up driving) therefore needs to be able to park closer to most amenities

 

Except you said you were driving and you dropped items off to the charity shop, so I can't see how your wife's disability has any bearing on the matter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, this thread isn't going to go anywhere unless we get the full story. For instance, how is the vehicle "registered" as a disabled vehicle? How would a CEO know? What bearing would that have on the situation anyway?

 

Something we've not been told yet is what happened when the driver returned to the vehicle the first time (sorry, I meant the only time). Was there a CEO there? Was he issuing anything? Was there a conversation? Did you drive off before he could issue?

 

And the two PCNs - issued by the same officer? are they three minutes apart? Which is exactly how long the car was there, so we are told, so one was logged the moment you arrived and the other logged the moment you left - not very likely.

 

We need the full, truthful sequence of events or no constructive advice can be given.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, this thread isn't going to go anywhere unless we get the full story. For instance, how is the vehicle "registered" as a disabled vehicle? How would a CEO know? What bearing would that have on the situation anyway?

 

Something we've not been told yet is what happened when the driver returned to the vehicle the first time (sorry, I meant the only time). Was there a CEO there? Was he issuing anything? Was there a conversation? Did you drive off before he could issue?

 

And the two PCNs - issued by the same officer? are they three minutes apart? Which is exactly how long the car was there, so we are told, so one was logged the moment you arrived and the other logged the moment you left - not very likely.

 

We need the full, truthful sequence of events or no constructive advice can be given.

 

Full story: probably not relevant was the fact that the car is reg as disabled.

When I pulled up at the side of the road there wasn't anybody around let alone CEO. I stopped the engine got out took two bags from the back close the tailgate, no traffic so crossed the road about 40 feet straight into the charity shop , put the bags on the floor at the back of the shop. Turned around and walked back out ( no pausing) had to wait a few second for traffic to clear crossed the road and got back into the car. So as to your questions - there was no CEO present by the car therefore no conversation took place.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Was your wife with you that day? My understanding is that if you use a blue badge, the disabled person has to be with you.

 

I'm pretty sure we had a discussion the other day about the car not being registered, it would be the person.

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

My wife wasn't with so I didn't show the badge. Yes my car is registered as a disabled vehicle on the v5c, taxation class. it then changes the road tax rate.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, well if that's what happened, you can certainly appeal the second one. You can't be issued a second PCN for the same contravention. You can just explain everything to them.

 

Just start with a brief, polite letter explaining you had two PCNs for the same contravention and are asking them to cancel the second of them, as it is invalid.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've had a look and only the second (later numbered) offence has any photo evidence, I'm going to look for the sign post that indicates that it's a restricted zone, as when I went back to where I had stopped I didn't see any signs at all. I noticed that the time on the second photo the one showing the sign is timed over 30 minutes after I was supposed to have committed the offence.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As per the link above, there'a a sign at the entrance to the street on Google maps, saying it's a restricted zone with no loading except in marked bays, and no times stated (therefore, it's 24/7).

 

I understand you weren't in a bay, and therefore cannot stop to load/unload, or for any reason. They can issue a PCN with no observation time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

no tax disc so haow is CEO supposed to know? The BB scheme would still apply to get parking rights sowithout your mrs you cant use the badge As siad by others, challenge the tickets for duplication and also challeneg the first one as you were loading/unloading so allowed to park on SYL or DYL that do not prohibit it.

.

My wife wasn't with so I didn't show the badge. Yes my car is registered as a disabled vehicle on the v5c, taxation class. it then changes the road tax rate.
Link to post
Share on other sites

also challeneg the first one as you were loading/unloading so allowed to park on SYL or DYL that do not prohibit it.

.

It's a restricted zone where loading is only allowed in signed bays, and would apply whether the BB was displayed or not, which it was not.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...