Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

MOTORTRADES.CO.UK advertising CCJ - set aside hearing.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2414 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

the claim form is attached on an earlier post however this was never received and as such I didn't know anything about it.

also on the claim form its got two addresses the current address and a service address which is where I moved out of in December 2012 they were informed in one of the phone calls hence they had the new address on the claim form.

Edited by busbysneedshelp
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 74
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

the claim form is attached on an earlier post however this was never received and as such I didn't know anything about it.

 

If you're saying that you never received the Claim Form at all in the first place, what is the relevance of you temporarily living away from home?

 

Either is was delivered to your usual place of residence or it wasn't.

Link to post
Share on other sites

think theres a mix up.

 

Ive had a copy of the claim form forwarded once I had asked the courts about the unknown CCJ. this is the claim form I am referring to.

 

The original had never been received by me hence I couldn't challenge or defend it.

hopefully this clears any confusion up

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I understand that, just wondering why the emphasis on you not living at the property when really it's irrelevant.

 

The way your set aside application is worded it comes across as if you did receive the original claim form in the post but because you were living away you didn't read it or respond to it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Internet advertising order 7th November 2012

ordered by recorded call and esigned agreement signed by the defendant using ip address *********** at 1442 on 7th November 2012.

The only document i esigned was giving motortrades permission to prepare a template advert for my approval prior to placing my order. We had only discussed rough costings at this point and final costings would be done once I had received and approved the template.

 

Payment has not been made,

defendant was contacted by track and trace mail ******** and telephone and email.

refused to make the payment on the basis he did not order.

 

I did exchange a few emails with this company, however in each and every email I stated clearly that I had not agree to any internet advertising and how or why would I agree to pay for something that I had not seen or approved for my (at the time) new business.

Then claimed to only have confirmed that we could make a template advert.

this is not the case and we have demonstrated this by series of emails on 30th November 2012 attempting to resolve without the need for court action.

 

I have since day one of this dispute continued to inform this company that at no point had I agreed or Signed for any ORDER only for a template to be made once I was happy with it I would then look at full costings and take it from there. I continued to receive the exact same response each time and at no point did I receive any reference to my querys or complaints, until I had emailed the then chief executive of motortrades.co.uk the last contact I received stated that they would look into my complaint.

Defendant now claims we have been investigated by watchdog which is not the case and is clearly trying to make an excuse not to make payment that he is legally due to make.

 

This is simply not true I pointed out that during the intial period of awaiting them preparing my template I had carried out research into the company and had read a series of complaints about false promises this company had made, including tricking customers into signing 2-3 different agreements, all of which I can provide evidence of.

 

we will provide the court with copies of the recorded call, esigned agreement and email exchanges in order to prove validity of the debt in relation to contract *************

fee due 365+vat

 

I have never received copies of any so called agreements recordings or emails with me admitting I had agreed to the advertising. The only emails I have sent is to confirm that I had only agreed to the template being prepared.

 

 

Anyone got any edits or suggestions to make this any more professional

Link to post
Share on other sites

What is it suppose to be ?

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

So its a defence or a witness statement?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Set a side hearing to determine to set a side and see if you have a valid defence.

 

And their defence is as follows ..verbatim you have not shortened it ?

 

Particulars of Claim

 

1.Internet advertising order 7th November 2012 ordered by recorded call and esigned agreement signed by the defendant using ip address *********** at 1442 on 7th November 2012.

 

2.Payment has not been made, defendant was contacted by track and trace mail ******** and telephone and email. refused to make the payment on the basis he did not order.

 

3.Then claimed to only have confirmed that we could make a template advert. this is not the case and we have demonstrated this by series of emails on 30th November 2012 attempting to resolve without the need for court action.

 

4.Defendant now claims we have been investigated by watchdog which is not the case and is clearly trying to make an excuse not to make payment that he is legally due to make.

 

5.we will provide the court with copies of the recorded call, esigned agreement and email exchanges in order to prove validity of the debt in relation to contract *************

fee due 365+vat

 

 

#######Defence#######

 

1. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made.

 

2. Paragraph 1 is denied. The document esigned was giving motortrades permission to prepare a template advert for my approval prior to placing my order.

 

3. Paragraph 2 is denied. We only discussed rough costings at this point and final costings would be done once I had received and approved the template and confirmed my order.

 

4. Paragraph 3 is denied. It is admitted that there was exchange of emails with this company, however in each and every email I stated clearly that I had not agree to any internet advertising and how or why would I agree to pay for something that I had not seen or approved for my (at the time) new business.

 

5. Paragraph 4 is Irrelevant to this claim.

 

6. Paragraph 5 is noted and expected from the claimant at standard disclosure and witness statement at the appropriate stage of this claim.

 

7. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed.By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

page 2 of the PDF in post 5 andy

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Type out the particulars of claim here on the thread and break them down into paragraphs...your defence should only respond to the points raised in the particulars by either admitting or denying each point...anything you do not respond to is taken as an admittance by the court.

 

Do not add anything further...detail comes later in the process.

 

andy

 

Andy this is way I was replying to above. The red sections I added were my reply to each section of the p.o.c.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay well it requires a little tweaking and legalising..will take a look at it in the morning.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Defence posted in post#36 above.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you andy.

can I ask you what the set aside hearing will be like i.e what should I be saying (reading the defence you put together for me) or stating the original papers etc were never received, also on the p.o.c it has my old and new address my old address being the service address does this mean the original papers would have been sent to the service address as if so they were well aware I had moved as I had told them during a one of the many phone calls hence them having both addresses?

Link to post
Share on other sites

District Judge will conduct it...look at the paperwork...ask you fe w questions and then make his decision.If they were aware of your new address and they must have been if it was on the N1...then thats were they should have been served.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

It will be served to the service address...anyway there shouldnt be 2 addresses on a claim form...so you can point that out also

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

brilliant thank you so much for your time help and advise Andy its appreciated. I take it the defence you helped prepare above is for the next stage of the process should the set aside be granted?

 

Well thats only an initial defence...you will be expected to expand in a witness statement further into the process...if it gets that far.For a successful set a side not only have you to show errors but also be able to provide a defence with possible merit...otherwise no point setting it a side.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

soo.

if I'm right

I should take the initial defence with me Friday,

as well as pointing out to the judge the address the papers were sent to was in fact the old address

that motor trades already knew the new address as they have enclosed that on their claim form.

That had I received the forms I would have been able to defend the claim against myself and that my intial defence is (wrote out above) ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes..take everything you need to prove your point...it wont be a trial at this hearing..just to decide if it can be set a side....and proceed.If you have not submitted any form of defence with your application to set a side I would run a 3 copies of the defence and ask the Court Manager/Usher to put one in the file.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Andy

Have just returned from the courts.

As expected there's been no response and no attendance from motortrades.

 

Judge however has asked I prepare and file a witness statement and statement of truth inc any exhibits.

 

He asked me to ensure I include the section in my set aside about being temporarily out of the property.

I can get affadvit from my mother who we had stayed with

copy of the tenancy agreement

affadvit from my landlord to confirm he had to do remedial works on the house.

 

I have to submit and serve by 11th August

 

 

my question is

how would I prepare a witness statement and statement of truth.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...