Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I've just taken another look through the stuff they sent me in response to the CPR request, the notice of assignment isn't the original , it's on a plain sheet of non letterhead paper, in fact it could have easily been typed up by Overdales, or anybody really.  On the other side of the paper are standard Lowell terms and conditions that are only half on the page. Should this be part of my defence?
    • I agree with my site team colleague above. We need to know all the facts including which company you are dealing with and an explanation of the problem. It really is too difficult to start giving speculative advice on some speculative problem that you have laid out as a generalised scenario
    • Moorcroft are sending a rep round to my house this week. What is the best way to handle this? Ignore and not answer the door or engage with them? I haven't acknowledged anything since I started on this journey and defaulted on my cards in December 2022
    • Very sorry but with the best will in the world, I don't think we can at all understand what the situation is here. Please can you try rewriting this on a word processor and maybe send a copy of what you have written to a friend and working out together so that the story is complete but as brief as possible. Maybe a list of dates as well. If you can do that and then repost your story we can have a look
    • Hi, I am a local authority tenant and was in a 3 bed house. At the end of last year, my last child moved out and so did my spouse as we are now going through a divorce which meant that I was in the house alone and decided that I needed to downsize not only for myself but to offer the property to a family that needed it. I registered on the local authority housing bidding site as i was asked to do and I was accepted and given a priority banding as I was downsizing and they were desperate for my house. I have been extremely lucky and after about 6 weeks was accepted for a new build from a housing association via the housing gateway. I viewed the property 2 weeks ago and had to sign the tenancy last week when they were doing bulk signups for the houses and that is the day I moved. In between viewing and sign up, I contacted my current local authority landlord and asked how I give notice as I had been accepted for a property I had bid on and was moving.  The lady told me how to do it online and then said that I needed to give a full weeks notice which wasnt a problem as I had enough time.  (I was also told a weeks notice was what i would need to give by another staff member about a month ago when I phoned up for another housing related question.  I dont have any of this in writing.) I have now moved, handed back the keys and I am now being told that I need to give 4 weeks notice which I cannot afford. I hav e spoken to the council again explaining that I was told a week and that to be honest, if I knew they were going to charge me 4 weeks I would not have been able to move and would have stayed in the other house.  I thought I was doing the right thing. They said that calls are recorded and they asked me when I called in and was told a week and they would listen to the telephone conversation and if it was correct what I was told, they would see what they could do to reduce the notice period. They have now emailed me back and said that they have listened to the conversation and the lady said 4 weeks notice and I am liable for 4 weeks rent.  Now I may well of misheard her when I thought she said a full weeks notice she may have said 4 weeks notice but I am sure she said a full weeks notice and i was told a week by another member of staff a few weeks ago. I have emailed her back and said that I may of misheard but I would like to listen to the phone recording myself.  As yet they havent responded. I think its unreasonable for them to make me give 4 weeks when I had to sign the new tenancy with little notice or loose the property.  And it was all done through their gateway, and they will have a tenant in there pretty much straight away getting rent from them. I am on a very low income, I am on my own, I have serious medical issues and I am really getting myself stressed out over this. Any advice would be so appreciated.  Can I insist they let me listed to the recording? RH  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Barclays Personal Loan


lockhart1
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2485 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi. Just after some thoughts.

 

My dad went to a Barclays branch in 2008 to take out a business loan

 

The branch staff member stated that he could not take out a business loan to start up his business

 

As an alternative, the staff member suggested just taking out a personal loan in my mums name as my dads credit file was terrible - despite him knowing it was for business purposes.

 

They went ahead with this advice.

 

My mum and dad have since split up and she's left with this loan amongst other debts he's left her with.

 

Obviously with it being a loan it's in her name only and she is liable for it.

 

She's in financial difficulty and I am trying everything I can do to sort everything out.

 

My main concern here is that the staff were happy with a personal loan being taken out for business purposes and stated 'just pretend it's for house renovations'. This was in fact their idea too.

 

Might not be anything, might be something, but during such a difficult time I'm not leaving any stone unturned.

 

 

Further information .....

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?479077-Barclays-unknown-debts

Link to post
Share on other sites

Was the debts not reviewed at the time of the split....either legally or amicably ?

 

How much is the loan for and what its age and term?

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Was the debts not reviewed at the time of the split....either legally or amicably ?

 

How much is the loan for and what its age and term?

 

Regards

 

Andy

 

I don't think she has a leg to stand on legally because the loan is in her name only. The loan is down to around the £4,500 mark but I'm unsure on the agreed term.

 

It's not something that can be resolved between them because when brought into discussion it's avoided. Because of various problems he's not able to contact her as he has been warned by the police. This has left me in the middle to pick up the pieces (yay).

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks ...just viewed your other thread in relation to the whole problem.

 

I would send a section 77 CCA request for starters and take a look at this dubious application to make sure all is in order.

 

Is this being paid direct or through PP ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks ...just viewed your other thread in relation to the whole problem.

 

I would send a section 77 CCA request for starters and take a look at this dubious application to make sure all is in order.

 

Is this being paid direct or through PP ?

 

Thanks for viewing the other thread.

 

All debts are being paid through PP at this moment in time. I'm looking into writing up an SAR tonight. I'll take a look at a section 77 CCA in a moment.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

But is PP paying BC or a DCA ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

But is PP paying BC or a DCA ?

 

The one displaying 'LINK' is a DCA originally with BC.

 

The rest are displaying 'Barclays' so I can only assume they are still with BC/Barclays.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

If Mums BC business loan is with link ..then the Section 77 goes to link assuming its been legally assigned to them...if they cant comply with the request I would consider stopping payments if they fail to respond to your request...as they usually cant....thats one less off the list.:wink:

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

If Mums BC business loan is with link ..then the Section 77 goes to link assuming its been legally assigned to them...if they cant comply with the request I would consider stopping payments if they fail to respond to your request...as they usually cant....thats one less off the list.:wink:

 

It's a personal loan because they would not give my dad a business loan and made this suggestion to take out a personal loan in mums name.

 

Barclays suggested lying and say that the loan is being used to renovate the house despite their knowledge that it would be used for a business and not for personal purposes. Do you think we should log a complaint about this or would this be a waste of time?

 

As far as I know personal loans cannot be used for businesses and considering they gave this advice they're out of line imo.

 

Do you think this could be considered misselling?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I know its a personal loan...but it was used as a business loan...but all thats irrelevant....see my last post

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I know its a personal loan...but it was used as a business loan...but all thats irrelevant....see my last post

 

I see. The personal loan is still with Barclays at the moment.

 

The LINK debt is for a Barclaycard but on that note I could proceed with a section 78 CCA for that one couldn't I?

 

In relation to the loan which is still with Barclays, should I not pursue a complaint in relation to the whole personal/business fiasco?

 

I've got quite a bit of work to do on this mess so I don't want to waste any efforts if I don't need to.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

I see. The personal loan is still with Barclays at the moment. Excellent so a section 77 to BC

The LINK debt is for a Barclaycard but on that note I could proceed with a section 78 CCA for that one couldn't I? If its a credit card yes...send to Link

 

In relation to the loan which is still with Barclays, should I not pursue a complaint in relation to the whole personal/business fiasco? No need to a section 77 request cuts all that out..they either comply or dont...if they cant ..no pay.

 

I've got quite a bit of work to do on this mess so I don't want to waste any efforts if I don't need to.Well it takes time to sort out so you will need patience and is worthwhile if you can ease the problems for Mum.

Thanks

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi LH,

 

It'll help us if you only discuss one topic per thread.

 

Let us know which thread is about a BC a/c and we'll move it to the BC forum.

 

Also if you were charged penalties on the BC or a Barclays Loan a/c, you can look to reclaim the penalties PLUS compound interest at a nominal rate (19.9% or 24.9%) have both succeeded here, as well as 29.9%. But you will need to take court action to recover this, just like many have done in the past.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...