Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • we dont get N157 because its new OCMC but no court dont have evidence either.   Just seems a bit of a pointless wait but oh well
    • Post #9 suggested some options to avoid or put off having a smart meter. Post #12 a simple solution to your complaint about the ay they handle fixed monthly DD. It's not really clear why you posted if you're going get irate when members "jump in" with suggestions. You can see what I'm referring to on "gasracker.uk" to allay your suspicion that I was lying in Post #16 which was made to correct ther misinformation shown in your Post #15
    • Back to octopus from the smart meter/tariff salesperson. Octopus have now said just ignore the letter - I dont have to have one despite there letter implying (at least) it was required, but that i will HAVE to have a smart meter if current meters stop working as 'their suppliers dont supply non smart meters any more'. They also say they do not/will not disable any smart functionality when they fit a smart meter I am of course going to challenge that. Thats their choice of meter fitter/supplier problem not mine
    • Point taken that we should inform new Caggers that the £20 option is there in wrong registration cases.  Well, supposedly there, who knows what the PPCs would do in practice.  Anyway, the option is allegedly there with both the BPA as you say, but also the IPC (I've just checked). However, there's a danger here of baby, bathwater. The two easiest types of cases to win are (a) residential - due to Supremacy of Contract and (b) wrong registration - due to "de minimis".  Indeed until recently we has been boasting that no Caggers, over two years, who had sent a PPC the wrong registration snotty letter, had even been taken to court, let alone lost a court hearing. We simply can do nothing about a terrible judge.  The judge seems - I say seems because we haven't had all the details - to have ignored "de minimis",. got fixated on a sign and awarded unreasonable behaviour costs.  A totally bizarre judgement.
    • You mean your witness statement 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Santander don't like savers much


Jim Davis
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2482 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I advised him to invest the money in property.

Meanwhile he will get some interest on the money sat in his savings account.

.........

Are there any tax liabilities for transferring the money to my son?

I hope not.

 

If you've taken financial advice, you'd know the CGT and income tax ramifications of:

Transferring the money, your son gaining interest on the money in a savings account, as well as the income tax and CGT liability from investing the money in property.

 

If you have transferred the money without taking financial advice: Oops.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OP, you really should be taking some professional advice to help you with your plans. Lots of questions will be raised. It may cost you for an initial meeting (although a lot will do it for free) but would be worth it in the long run.

Link to post
Share on other sites

To my house sale conveyancing solicitor I provided my paper driving licence,

 

You can exchange your paper-only driving licence for the photo card one, free of charge.

 

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/personalfinance/11028839/Driving-licence-changes-what-do-paper-licence-holders-need-to-know.html

 

(You'll have to renew the photo card at least every 10 years though : current cost for renewal £20, though they do the initial exchange free.)

Since you'll need both a counter-signed photo, and to be exempted from the fee for a photocard replacement you'd have to do this by post rather than the online service.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OP, you really should be taking some professional advice to help you with your plans. Lots of questions will be raised. It may cost you for an initial meeting (although a lot will do it for free) but would be worth it in the long run.

 

OP has been so advised, a number of times.

 

My perception is the OP likes to let situations develop they can then grumble about (financial advice, interest rates on savings, photo ID, interest rates on borrowing), instead of taking action to help themselves.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My money is now in my Son's bank account. Nobody has complained or sent him or me

any kind of tax demand.

 

Why should anyone complain?.

 

The lack of a tax demand doesn't mean he won't be liable to pay the relevant tax, when it becomes due.

 

It isn't HMRC's responsibility to ensure he declares taxable income, it remains his responsibility to do so - even if they don't send him a notification that they want him to submit a tax return, or a 'tax demand'.

 

How much (if anything) he'll owe will be influenced by how much he invests, and how much he saves, and the income he gets from both.

 

For savings, tax depends on his Personal Savings Allowance (which itself depends on if he is a basic, higher, or additional rate tax payer), and how much interest he gets (which is no longer paid with basic rate tax already deducted).

https://www.gov.uk/apply-tax-free-interest-on-savings/how-much-tax-you-pay

 

Investment income is also taxable, and doesn't attract Personal Savings Allowance.

 

Have you told him he may now have to pay more tax?, and submit a tax return? (even if he didn't have to previously.........)

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK Bazza so you are implying that I shouldn't invest in property but take advice from some

financial adviser. I think you are talking out of your a**. My first house cost me £7,300 and I sold

my last house for £250,000. Please explain why you think such an investment is so poor.

Edited by Andyorch
edited
Link to post
Share on other sites

OK Bazza so you are implying that I shouldn't invest in property but take advice from some

financial adviser. I think you are talking out of your a**. My first house cost me £7,300 and I sold

my last house for £250,000. Please explain why you think such an investment is so poor.

 

Where have I said you shouldn't invest in property?

 

It MIGHT be ideal for you, (although doing so through your son may have added a layer of complexity.....)

It might not be ideal ..... reasons why it might not be ideal include:

 

Does it fit with your desired outcomes? (are you looking for income? or capital growth of your portfolio?)

Are you looking for quick access to your funds (property can often be difficult to convert to liquid assets without paying a premium to do so)

Are you looking for a long or short term investment? (property is more suited to long-term ... short term, what if there is another 'property price crash'?)

 

Tax : property as a capital growth investment (rather than for a main residence) attracts CGT.

Property (to generate rental income) attracts income tax on rental income.

You have evaded answering about you and your son's new tax obligations....... have you reminded him of the obligations he is taking on?.

 

Moving to why "I think such an investment is poor" (which I never actually said, but lets look at if it is poor or not....)

Your first house cost you £7,300 in year and your new house (aproximately!) £100,000 in 2017.

How much is £7,300 in year when adjusted for the 'time value of money'? as you can't directly compare £7,300 years ago with £100,000 today ......

 

Also, are you comparing a house of the same size with a house of the same size?? You've downsized.

You need to be comparing a house of the same size / location / upkeep as your £100k house, and find the purchase price of that house in year . Factor in payments made on upkeep over the years, too.

 

Then compare that cost with the £7,300 you paid back then, adjust that difference for (the time value of money / inflation / FTSE 100 / cost of Mars bars / whatever you feel is the best way to compare like with like across many years.....) to give a present day sum, and compare that with the £150,000 you were left as proceeds of sale ......

 

That may show THAT HOUSE was 'a good investment' (with the benefit of hindsight), but that doesn't mean property is still a good investment for you, in the future....

 

For example, you didn't have to pay CGT (if it was a main residence). So, you can't imply that doing the same on non-"main residence" is as good a deal, as you need to factor in CGT.

 

You have said "I'm talking out of my a**".If you are being so superficial as to say "£7,300 has become £250,000 so that must be a good investment", without looking at the effects of inflation, how other investments have performed, and the effects of you downsizing, then I doubt that is an assessment you can reliably make, even before considering CGT on investment property, income tax on rental income, and if property is a good fit for

 

a) your desired level of risk and

b) your desired level of access to the money invested

 

Ohh, and I'm not a financial adviser (independent or 'tied'), Yes, an IFA might cost you a little, but not involving an IFA may end up costing you a lot .....

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...