Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • OP stated they had been arrested, but not charged (let alone convicted). They DON'T have a criminal record, but do have an entry on the PNC. That information stays on the PNC (Police National Computer) for life, but doesn't get released in a standard DBS. It only MIGHT get released for an Enhanced DBS (eDBS) check  ... but it would be incredibly unlikely. (The rational behind this is that eDBS's allow for 'information at Chief Officer of Police's discretion' ..... this covers the 2 'barring lists' and is also intended for the scenario where someone has multiple arrests or investigations, where safeguarding is a concern .... it was brought in after the Soham murders / Ian Huntley case, where the information known about the now-convicted child murderer may have prevented his employment in a school, had it been made available). So, for the sake of accuracy and completeness, arrests stay on the PNC for life, wont appear in a standard DBS, MIGHT appear in an eDBS, but in reality, would be the exception rather than the norm, and I can't see them being released  to a defense barrister. What then if the defence found out a different way, and brought it up in court?. Again, unlikely, but the important feature is that the judge would make sure they trod very carefully!. They MIGHT consider using it if there were other factors that allowed them to try to cast doubts as to the truthfulness of your evidence, but on its own : No way. Anyone MIGHT be arrested (if a seemingly plausible complaint been made against them)! The approach to take if it did come up is to be truthful. "Yes, I was arrested. It arose from a vexatious complaint. I wasn't charged, let alone convicted. That could happen to any one of us, if a vexatious complaint gets made" Far better that than lying, saying you'd never been arrested, and getting caught in a lie : that would ruin your credibility. I'm incredibly doubtful it will even come up, though.
    • we dont get N157 because its new OCMC but no court dont have evidence either.   Just seems a bit of a pointless wait but oh well
    • Post #9 suggested some options to avoid or put off having a smart meter. Post #12 a simple solution to your complaint about the ay they handle fixed monthly DD. It's not really clear why you posted if you're going get irate when members "jump in" with suggestions. You can see what I'm referring to on "gasracker.uk" to allay your suspicion that I was lying in Post #16 which was made to correct ther misinformation shown in your Post #15
    • Back to octopus from the smart meter/tariff salesperson. Octopus have now said just ignore the letter - I dont have to have one despite there letter implying (at least) it was required, but that i will HAVE to have a smart meter if current meters stop working as 'their suppliers dont supply non smart meters any more'. They also say they do not/will not disable any smart functionality when they fit a smart meter I am of course going to challenge that. Thats their choice of meter fitter/supplier problem not mine
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

JP Morgan/Rooftop Arrears fees- The saga continues.


jotty
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1553 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Thanks Ellenn you are truly an angel.

 

One more question, my wife isn't really looking forward to going into court as she has friends who work there. Can I attend on behalf of us both.

 

Just a little support for you jotty. In case you are unaware, this isn't held in a proper court, you sit in a little office with only the judge and one person representing the mortgage company. It is very informal with you sitting around a table.

 

As Crapstone has said, you should both attend if at all possible and you will leave saying to each other 'that wasn't as bad as I thought'. If you can show that you can afford the payments and an amount to clear the arrears, there is no way the judge will allow them possession.

 

Just remember, the judge is just as human as you are.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Jotty,

 

Just another word of support. You really are doing a good job on these repayments - far more than so many people who have been allowed to stay in their homes - including me. I had much larger arrears and just managed to scrape together £500 a week before the hearing. :eek: As Conniff says, judges are human and I really don't think they want to throw people out just for the hell of it.

 

DDxxxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Update, the hearing lasted 5 mins, nothing at all to worry about inreality. I spoke with the other sides solicitor prior to the hearing and agreed to pay £150 per month off the arrears.

The Judge accepted this and did state, that if we had further problems because of the suspended order we should not automatically think that we would lose the house.All felt a little pre determined if I am honest.

 

What was shocking was the number of people at the county court with worse cases than mine. Majority where hard working couples who had fallen foul of these mortgage companies and now faced losing it all.

The country is in a worse financial state than any politician will admit.

 

Thanks to all for support especially Ell-enn

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Jotty, that's great news - well done for being so brave! :)

 

It's sad to hear how many were at the court for repossession hearings though :( and how many of them had no idea about CAG or how to present their case.

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Could not have done it without your support.

 

Yes it was a very sad place and without doubt we on CAG are not alone but are very fortunate to have people who care about our plight., I went dressed in a suit and tie and a couple in their early 50's asked if I was a solicitor. I said no but the lady was very upset and afraid. Thankfully I had noted the CAB people on the way in so took them both to speak with them. Hope I managed to help in my own way.

Edited by dx100uk
unnecessary previous post quote removed
  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done Jotty, that was a kind thing to do - hopefully the CAB advisor would go into the courtroom with them.

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...

We currently have arrears on our mortgage of £1000, at the moment I am clearing them at £50 per month.

 

When we took out the mortgage in 2007 our paydays where the 15th,

this changed in 2008 to the 25th so I wrote to the company concerned and explained that we needed to change, they agreed but said that the mortgage would always be shown as in arrears for the 10day gap.

 

They also charge £40 per month in "late payment fees".

Having asked for a breakdown of costs I also not there are a number of "agents fees" which I presume means home visits of £60 none of which where agreed to and no one spoken to.

It also shows "solicitors fees" for various letters etc.

 

Having been succesful during the bank charge days, can we still claim for these fees in the same way or have the mortgage companies wised up as well now.

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 years later...

We have had a mortgage with JP MORGAN for some years and current arrears are £1600 on a balance of £165,000.

 

We have been overpaying by £50 pm for some time without any issues apart from the odd pre printed letter from them mainly as they forgot that they had agreed to payments being made on the 1st not the 15th of the month so it appears to their untrained eye that we are further in arrears every month for 2 weeks till the payment is made.

 

No they have transferred us to Rooftop which filled me with a little dread and low and behold within a month they are threatening possession unless the arrears are cleared etc. This we can deal with but it hacks me off when we have been overpaying even slightly for a long time now without the need for this threat and suddenly change of company = change of attitude.

 

The eye watering bit was they also mention something called "Monthly Insurance Charge" of £37 and "Arrears Management fee" £40 on a separate statement going back to 2008 which totals over £4000. Thye have quite conveniently now added that to the arrears figure to make it look a lot worse albeit in a separate paragraph.

 

So can anyone comment please on the charges and if we need to worry, and also anything we can do to calm them down on the arrears front, or are we over a barrel on this ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You say that you had an agreement in place to repay the arrears at £50 per month in addition to the regular payments. Is that correct

Link to post
Share on other sites

How long has this implied scheme of overpayments been going on?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its at least 12 months, the rate changed and payments due dropped but we continued to pay the usual figure which was £52 more than it should have been.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay. You have been making overpayments for 12 months and these have been accepted by your original creditor without causing any problem and without trying to protest against what you are doing. I think that this amounts to an implied agreement and my immediate recommendation to you is to keep on making the payments without fail. One mistake and there could be a problem for you.

 

Mortgage lenders and the people who take them over are bound by MCOBS. In keeping with the other FCA COBS regulations there is a duty to treat you fairly. There is no doubt in my mind that if they buy a debt then they are saddled with any existing agreements. There is no doubt in my mind that despite the lack of writing, there is an implied agreement that you will repay the arrears at the rate you are currently making and that they will accept that repayment scheme.

 

I think you need to state your position very firmly.

 

Write to them and tell them in no uncertain terms that you have been making overpayments in respect of the arrears for 12 months and that you propose to keep on doing so at the same rate. Point out to them that they are subject to the FCA MCOBS regulations and if they try to deviate from the agreement or if they try to levy any other charges or if they start to make any threats against you, that at the very least you will begin a complaint to the Financial Ombudsman Service.

 

Tell them that if they begin any court action against you that you will counterclaim under MCOBS. Tell them that you fully expect to be successful before the County Court's and that in the event that you do obtain a judgement on the counterclaim that not only will you enforce whatever figure compensation the courts decided but also you will send a copy of the judgement to the FOS and to the FCA.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks BankFodder, it does seem a bit hard faced from them as your right it isn't my fault that they bought the debt and the perceived problems.

 

Have you any advice about the fees they appear to want to levy on us as well, it appears that they also took these on as an almost separate account and seem to think it is an another nice revenue stream. Are Rooftop not just JP Morgan under another name ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are not entitled to apply charges which are not reflective of their administrative losses. In other words they are not allowed to make profits from this. Read about Kensington mortgages and also Deutsche Bank. Also Redstone

 

Follow the mortgages link to get more information.

 

In your letter remind them of the rules relating to charges and also that they are not allowed to add these charges to any mortgage arrears. Tell them that unless they withdraw this immediately that you will be making an immediate complaint to the FOS. Make sure you do this. Don't bluff.

 

Tell them that if there are any additional charges they wish to levy then you want a full breakdown and a full explanation of them which will satisfy not only you but also the FOS.

 

Make sure you send all communications by recorded delivery or preferably special next day delivery. Keep all proofs of posting and all proofs of delivery.

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

whats that insurance fee?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is the first time we have ever had these separate statements covering charges so don't have a lot of old paperwork.

 

However I recall that every year until around 2014 they would ask for a copy of our home insurance policy which we sent usually by fax but they would still state if we didn't send them the copy that they would place their own insurance in place in case the house fell down from their providers at their cost.

 

I can only think that they have gone ahead even though we had insurance.

 

Do these possibly class as unlawful charges as we would have never had copies of the ins docs and wouldn't have been aware of their existence ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

all you must have inplace on a secured loan or mortgage is buildings insurance

and I bet you had that elsewhere

 

 

time to get reclaiming that too.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

DX your right my friend I feel another charges reclaim battle coming, problem is I wont have the previous years of insurance policies etc and I know the current one but I would struggle to find the names of the others. Whats the level of proof on this ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

well I bet they never sent one letter asking to see any documents on insurance you already had anyway yearly?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...