Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx for your feedback. That is the reason I posted my opinion, because I am trying to learn more and this is one of the ways to learn, by posting my opinions and if I am incorrect then being advised of the reasons I am incorrect. I am not sure if you have educated me on the points in my post that would be incorrect. However, you are correct on one point, I shall refrain from posting on any other thread other than my own going forward and if you think my post here is unhelpful, misleading or in any other way inappropriate, then please do feel obliged to delete it but educate me on the reason why. To help my learning process, it would be helpful to know what I got wrong other than it goes against established advice considering the outcome of a recent court case on this topic that seemed to suggest it was dismissed due to an appeal not being made at the first stage. Thank-you.   EDIT:  Just to be clear, I am not intending to go against established advice by suggesting that appeals should ALWAYS be made, just my thoughts on the particular case of paying for parking and entering an incorrect VRN. Should this ever happen to me, I will make an appeal at the first stage to avoid any problems that may occur at a later stage. Although, any individual in a similar position should decide for themselves what they think is an appropriate course of action. Also, I continue to be grateful for any advice you give on my own particular case.  
    • you can have your humble opinion.... You are very new to all this private parking speculative invoice game you have very quickly taken it upon yourself to be all over this forum, now to the extent of moving away from your initial thread with your own issue that you knew little about handling to littering the forum and posting on numerous established and existing threads, where advice has already been given or a conclusion has already resulted, with your theories conclusions and observations which of course are very welcomed. BUT... in some instances, like this one...you dont quite match the advice that the forum and it's members have gathered over a very long consensual period given in a tried and trusted consistent mannered thoughtful approach. one could even call it forum hi-jacking and that is becoming somewhat worrying . dx
    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕 The more I read this forum and the more I engage with it's incredible users, the more I learn and the more my knowledge expands. If my case gets to court, the Judge will dismiss it after I utter my first sentence, and you DCBL and Highview don't even know why .... OMG! .... So excited to get to court!
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Advice please: avoiding insurance claim when car hit in car park.


RedPillGuy
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2497 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I was at Sainsbury's last week and sitting in my car in the car park, reading my emails before I went into the shop. Engine was off and I was stationary. Suddenly an almighty thump from behind.

 

I jumped out thinking someone had reversed into me, but found that the car that had hit me had no driver.

 

Turns out the dozy bint had parked her 4wd without putting on the handbrake, or put it in gear and just waked off into the shop.

 

Plenty of witnesses, and video. The lady came back and admitted fault, but asked to send her the quote to fix to avoid having to claim on insurance. Got quote - about £1k. now she says thats more than she thought, so is "thinking about" claiming on insurance.

 

Now, in the past I was a bad boy and have a drink driving ban (now finished) but my insurance is very expensive already because of this, and I don't want to make a claim, both because my excess is high and also because it will further hit my premiums. Also I AM NOT AT FAULT!

 

Anyone have any advice on how I can proceed with this? DOnt report t omg insurance company, and instead do it through small claims court?

 

Any other suggestions.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are obliged to inform your insurers, but can tell them you are only informing them and do not wish to make a claim.

What do you plan to do if you don't inform your insurers, and the other person decides she wants to put it through insurance due to the value, and then her insurers discuss it with yours, who wonder why they aren't aware of the incident?

 

If you tell your insurers that you are only advising them & don't wish to make a claim, you can deal yourself with the other driver and their insurers: you'd need to ask them to arrange the repair and/or set out your losses and ask them to settle them before leaping to issuing a claim in the small track of the county court .....

Link to post
Share on other sites

You still have to report it to your insurance.

Your no claim bonus won't be affected if you claim from the third party insurance.

Unfortunately there's nothing you can do.

Your insurance will go up but not by a lot because it's a non fault accident.

Get in touch with your insurance and make a notification.

Follow up with an email just in case they play the silly games and they say you never called.

Then claim entirely from third party insurance.

Do not get involved with accident management companies.

If the third party insurance doesn't offer a rental car while yours is repaired and you can't do without it, rent it yourself and let the insurance know.

It will be much cheaper and they won't be able to say that you didn't mitigate costs.

****e happens.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was at Sainsbury's last week and sitting in my car in the car park, reading my emails before I went into the shop. Engine was off and I was stationary. Suddenly an almighty thump from behind.

 

I jumped out thinking someone had reversed into me, but found that the car that had hit me had no driver.

 

Turns out the dozy bint had parked her 4wd without putting on the handbrake, or put it in gear and just waked off into the shop.

 

Plenty of witnesses, and video. The lady came back and admitted fault, but asked to send her the quote to fix to avoid having to claim on insurance. Got quote - about £1k. now she says thats more than she thought, so is "thinking about" claiming on insurance.

 

Now, in the past I was a bad boy and have a drink driving ban (now finished) but my insurance is very expensive already because of this, and I don't want to make a claim, both because my excess is high and also because it will further hit my premiums. Also I AM NOT AT FAULT!

 

Anyone have any advice on how I can proceed with this? DOnt report t omg insurance company, and instead do it through small claims court?

 

Any other suggestions.

 

Should be easy.

 

Just contact the lady saying that you want to claim against her Insurance directly, as you have a large excess and if you went through your own Insurance it might include issuing a court claim against her which you want to avoid.

 

Advise her that all she needs to do is phone her Insurers to advise them what happened and that you want to claim directly against her policy. Tell her to ask her Insurers to contact you to sort out the repair to your car. Ask her to confirm to you that she has spoken to her Insurers and to confirm what number you have to chase up if you don't hear anything,

 

If you do it this way, then you have no excess to worry about., but the ladies Insurers might want to get a quote from their own garage to repair the car. Also if the repair cost is close to the current value of the car, you might face a write off. Come back for more advice if relevant.

 

As advised you should also advise your Insurers anyway for info only.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Try to do everything in writing – but if you do have to use the telephone then read our customer services guide first and make sure that you have fully implemented our advice. This is essential. Do not use the telephone unless you are recording the call

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks everyone.

She just emailed me to confirm she will pay, and to go ahead with booking in my car for repairs. Guess even though its only £990 its better for them to avoid insurance companies as well.

 

Given its getting sorted do you all still advise me to tell my insurance company? Us ex-DrinkDrivers get shafted left right and centre on insurance, so hoping to avoid if at all possible.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Given its getting sorted do you all still advise me to tell my insurance company? Us ex-DrinkDrivers get shafted left right and centre on insurance, so hoping to avoid if at all possible.

 

You must tell your insurance company, if not now then you would have to when you renew so probably best to get it over with. As you have her agreement to pay, you can copy that to your insurance company to prove it's non-fault.

RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You must tell your insurance company, if not now then you would have to when you renew so probably best to get it over with. As you have her agreement to pay, you can copy that to your insurance company to prove it's non-fault.

 

I agree. The only advantage of not informing the insurers now is if the OP intends not to mention it on renewal.

If they do that, if the insurers find out (which is possible if the other driver has informed their insurers), the OP may well find their insurance gets cancelled.

 

If the OP finds insurance expensive after a drink-driving conviction, I doubt they'll be happy with the cost with both a drink-drive conviction and an insurance cancellation occurring after they'd served their ban .......

Link to post
Share on other sites

Us ex-DrinkDrivers get shafted left right and centre on insurance, so hoping to avoid if at all possible.

 

Yup, car insurance is expensive.

Putting aside the misery drink drivers can cause by killing people or injuring them in accidents, the cost of car insurance has many factors increasing it. (I almost said 'driving it', but well, you know what I mean ...)

 

One of those factors is the cost caused by drink drivers.

So, sympathy for those affected by high premiums, but I doubt those with convictions for drink-driving will be high up on the list for sympathy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...