Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • They have defended the claim by saying that the job was of unsatisfactory standard and they had to call another carpenter to remedy. My husband has text messages about them losing the keys a second time and also an email. What do they hope to achieve??? Most importantly,  as far as I have seen online, now I need to wait for paperwork from the court, correct?
    • The Notice to Hirer does not comply with the protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule  4 . This is before I ask if Europarks have sent you a copy of the PCN they sent to Arval along with a copy of the hire agreement et. if they haven't done that either you are totally in the clear and have nothing to worry about and nothing to pay. The PCN they have sent you is supposed to be paid by you according to the Act within 21 days. The chucklebuts have stated 28 days which is the time that motorists have to pay. Such a basic and simple thing . The Act came out in 2012 and still they cannot get it right which is very good news for you. Sadly there is no point in telling them- they won't accept it because they lose their chance to make any money out of you. they are hoping that by writing to you demanding money plus sending in their  unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors that you might be so frightened as to pay them money so that you can sleep at night. Don't be surprised if some of their letters are done in coloured crayons-that's the sort of  level of people you will be dealing with. Makes great bedding for the rabbits though. Euro tend not to be that litigious but while you can safely ignore the debt collectors just keep an eye out for a possible Letter of Claim. They are pretty rare but musn't be ignored. Let us know so that you can send a suitably snotty letter to them showing that you are not afraid of them and are happy to go to Court as you like winning.  
    • They did reply to my defence stating it would fail and enclosed copies of NOA, DN Term letter and account statements. All copies of T&C's that could be reconstructions and the IP address on there resolves to the town where MBNA offices are, not my location
    • Here are 7 of our top tips to help you connect with young people who have left school or otherwise disengaged.View the full article
    • My defence was standard no paperwork:   1.The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 2. Paragraph 1 is noted. The Defendant has had a contractual relationship with MBNA Limited in the past. The Defendant does not recognise the reference number provided by the claimant within its particulars and has sought verification from the claimant who is yet to comply with requests for further information. 3. Paragraph 2 is denied. The Defendant maintains that a default notice was never received. The Claimant is put to strict proof to that a default notice was issued by MBNA Limited and received by the Defendant. 4. Paragraph 3 is denied. The Defendant is unaware of any legal assignment or Notice of Assignment allegedly served from either the Claimant or MBNA Limited. 5. On the 02/01/2023 the Defendant requested information pertaining to this claim by way of a CCA 1974 Section 78 request. The claimant is yet to respond to this request. On the 19/05/2023 a CPR 31.14 request was sent to Kearns who is yet to respond. To date, 02/06/2023, no documentation has been received. The claimant remains in default of my section 78 request. 6. It is therefore denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant, the Claimant has failed to provide any evidence of proof of assignment being sent/ agreement/ balance/ breach or termination requested by CPR 31.14, therefore the Claimant is put to strict proof to: (a) show how the Defendant entered into an agreement; and (b) show and evidence the nature of breach and service of a default notice pursuant to Section 87(1) CCA1974 (c) show how the claimant has reached the amount claimed for; and (d) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim; 7. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed. 8. On the alternative, as the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act and Section 82A of the consumer credit Act 1974. 9. By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Small claim against builder - not disputed - next steps***Paid in Full***


t1grm
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2472 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I’ve started a small claim against a builder to recoup money paid in advance for work not done. I’ve sent two letters as per process and he disputed the claim, saying the money paid in advance was put towards cost overruns on other work he did for me. This was not agreed with me in advance. I’ve since hired another builder to complete the work not done.

 

Now legal action has been launched he has decided not to dispute the claim. However, rather than acknowledge the claim he has contacted me directly to say he is selling his house and he is willing for me to have a charge on the property to the value of the claim (including costs) but he wants to do it out of court so he doesn’t have a CCJ against his name.

 

I can’t see the property on the market via rIghtmove.co.uk. That doesn’t mean it’s not for sale though. He has told me that the mortgage company has a charge on the property but there is enough equity to pay the claim after the mortgage. He says he can’t afford to pay the claim outright and can’t get a loan. The claim is around £7.5K so I doubt he has movable assets that could be sold to that value which means, even if I did pursue the claim, the best I would probably get is a charge on the property.

 

I want to settle this amicably as possible. I don’t think he’s a crook, he’s just disorganized, got out of his depth on a large job and let the budget get out of control. We had a good working relationship for two years before it fell apart on this job. So, questions:

 

1. Does this seem a reasonable proposal and how would I go about implementing this?

 

2. How can I check the value of any charge the mortgage company may have?

 

3. How much does it cost to put a charge on a property and how can I do it?

 

4. I assume I should seek some sort of written guarantee of his proposal?

 

5. I also assume I should apply some sort of time limit to selling the property at which point I would reinstated the claim if the house is not sold – maybe 3 months, or 6?

 

6. What should be done on MCOL? Should he acknowledge the claim saying he does not dispute the amount or would that result in a CCJ? Or should I just leave it dormant for three months then request a judgment it if the sale falls through?

 

7. Would it be safer to decline this proposal and proceed with the claim?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well he certainly sounds like a very honest and decent man and in a way I feel quite sorry for him.

 

I don't know the answers to all of the questions you are asking such as how much the cost to put a charge of property et cetera – although these are expenses which he should very properly pay rather than you.

 

I think the best thing to do would be to sue him and then to settle on a Tomlin order. A Tomlin order will be in agreement between you which is signed off by the judge which will lay down certain conditions such as – that he agrees immediately that a charge should be placed on his property to the value of £X pounds.

That the charge be redeemed by him within a certain time – say 12 months (better make it a very reasonable amount of time) and that on redemption, all claim fees et cetera and also interest (normally 8%) on the agreed sum owed will be paid the same time. In default of which you will be free to proceed to obtain judgement on the agreed sum plus interest plus costs and to enforce it in any way you see fit.

 

You puppy need to think about the details a bit more.

 

The good thing about a Tomlin order is that it means that there is no judgement recorded. It is a sort of informal agreement but which is formalised by the courts. If he fails to abide by the terms of the Tomlin order then you are free to move in as per the terms of the agreement. If he abides by the Tomlin order then you get your money and he gets no judgement against him stop

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the tip. A Tomlin order seems to be exactly what I am looking for. I've never heard of one of these so will do some research on it.

 

Yes he is a decent chap but he's also very good at playing the heart strings, so I don't feel sorry for him anymore.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you suspect him in the slightest, then I would suggest that you go in heavy, issue the claim as soon as possible after having given him a written warning, and then once he has the claim papers you can negotiate over the Tomlin order.

 

There is a strong risk that he won't take you seriously until he has the claim papers

Link to post
Share on other sites

My two pence.

I would suspect that he will never pay you, charge or not.

His equity is probably so small that he prefers to get a charge rather than start paying you.

I would secure a ccj and make him find the money to clear his credit otherwise he won't be able to get another mortgage, loan, building merchants credit etc.

Don't let him mess you about, if he really wants to avoid a ccj he needs to pay you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The advantage of a Tomlin order is that you can phrase it that you bet the charging order, and within the Tomlin order also an agreement to clear the charge within x months, else you release the charge and can go back to get a CCJ.

 

That way you still hold the ability to obtain a CCJ if that is what you feel is the main lever.

 

2 main scenarios where this wouldn't run smoothly : if there is insufficient equity to cover your charge, or if he goes bankrupt once you release the charge. However if either of these are risks, they are still risks if he goes bankrupt now.

 

If you get a CCJ now: he may not be able to trade and thus may further worsen his financial position! That isn't your major concern but could impact on your ability to enforce any judgment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

So after a lot of toing and froing I have got the builder to agree to a Tomlin order and a charge but I'm having a hell of a job finding a lawyer to set it up. I've been quoted £400 for just the Tomlin order by one (they won't do the charge because apparently that's conveyancing which they don't do). Another has quoted me £600 to do both but doesn't return my calls. On top of that there is a £100 court fee for registering the Tomlin order and a £50 fee to the land registry for placing the charge. Do the lawyer costs seem about right? Can anyone recommend a lawyer in Brighton? Seems finding a reliable lawyer is just as difficult as finding a reliable builder - which is ironic!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Only a court fee of £50 for the Tomlin......and £50 Land Registry...why not draft it yourself?

 

CAG does not refer or recommend Solicitors/Litigators

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I did look at drafting it myself but want to make sure it's water tight and was worried I might misword something and leave some loophole if the agreement all goes bad at a later date. Court fee is defo £100 I checked with the county court business centre already. Maybe it goes up over a certain amount? My claim is over 7K with costs. I'll have to rely on Facebook friends for recommendations :D I have a barrister friend who works in corporate law so she’s asking round as well.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fair enough they must have increased the County Court fee..a while since I have done one.

 

Simple to draft though...plenty of examples here on CAG...save your self £600

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

No luck with any lawyers. Can find loads of references to Tomlin orders on CAG but no actual example documents. Starting to think the best option might be to request a judgement via MCOL and try to enforce the judgement via a charge that way. Claim was issued 9th June and has not been acknowledged so past due and eligible for judgement.

 

Problem then is builder gets a CCJ and the sale will probably fall through so it's a catch 22. Anyone know how that works? If you have a CCJ and a charge on the house your are selling then presumably you will be refused a mortgage on a new purchase even if the CCJ is cleared when you sell. Or will they take that into account?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Clearly all the legal talk about Tomlin orders worked. Builder has just paid in full by bank transfer. Should I wait a couple of days before marking the claim as paid. paranoid the bank transfer could get reversed. Can't think how. Just amazed he paid up so quick in the end.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cant be reversed ...inform the court hes paid...thread title amended to reflect the outcome...well done.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...