Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm not sure we were on standard tariffs - I've uploaded as many proofs as I can for the ombudsman - ovo called last night uping the compensation to 100 from 50 pounds for the slip in customer service however they won't acknowledge the the problem them not acknowledging a fault has caused nor are they willing to remedy anything as they won't accept the meter or formula was wrong.   I'd appreciate more details on the economy 7 approach and I'll update the ombudsman with any information you can share. 
    • To re-iterate and highlight my urgent question on this one: The N24 from the court did not include any instructions to submit paperwork 28 days before the date, unlike the N157 received for other smaller claims. Do I have to submit a WS for this court date? Link has!...
    • No, reading the guidance online it says to wait for a letter from the court. Should I wait or submit the directions? BTW, I assume that the directions are a longer version of the particular of claim accompanied by evidence, correct?
    • Thanks for opening, it's been another rough year for my family and I've procastinated a little.. Due to the age of my defaults on this and other accounts (circa 2021), I really need to avoid a CCJ as that will be another 6 years of credit issues. Mediation failed as I played the 'not enough info to make a decision' however during the call for some reason they did offer settlement at 80%, I refused. this has been allocated to small claims track, court date is June 3 and I've received their WS. I'm starting on my WS. They do appear to have provided everything required of them (even if docs could be reconstructions). Not really sure what my argument is anymore but I do want to attend court and see this through. Should a judgement be made against me then I will clear the balance within 30 days and have the CCJ removed - this is still possible isn't it? I'm going to be reading up today and tomorrow and hope you can provide me some guidance in the meantime. Wonder what your advice would be given the documents they have provided? I am now in a position to clear the debt either by lump sum or a few large installments - Is this something i should look into at this late stage? Thanks as always in advance
    • I have now received my SAR. It includes a great deal of information! Is there a time limit on how long account information is kept and/or can be provided to debtors? I have received many account statements which were not previously sent to me. I remember that the creditor should provide explanations of any acronyms and abbreviations that maybe used in the documents. Is this still the case? Also what, if any, are the regulations in regard to adding fees to a debt? Can fees be added to a debt after the court has approved a charge on a property. Perhaps due to the numerous owners of the debt, many payments I made were not properly recorded on the account, some were entered over a year after the payment was made! Following the Legal Charge, I paid every month until my payments were refused. I am trying to compute the over payments, but the addition of fees etc. is confusing me. Any comments and/or help would be appreciated.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Lowell claimform - old JDW CAT debt***Claim Discontinued***


stuggling
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2442 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I've received a ccj notice for Lowell for jd Williams

 

I've got the usual 14 days to respond,

 

my only thing is I have currently have a jd Williams account!

 

Amount they taking me to court for is 616 from 2013,

my current account is up to date and is £150 but in credit.

 

It's says Lowell purchased the debt in 2014 :(

 

I'm worried now as I've just put credit rating well

Link to post
Share on other sites

Contact JD williams and give them the account number lowell state. Theyll tell you the info.

 

If youve only ever had one account, then tell lowells they are incorrect, you only have one, and it is currently active and in credit, and any court action will be defended fully. If they go to court, i'd counter claim too.

 

Have they sent ANYTHING else about this alleged debt before?

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would suggest these are two separate accounts?

 

does the account number in the POC match that of your present account?

 

as for its Lowell operating for JDW.

no its not

 

they've SOLD the debt on

so it must be another account from your present one.

it will state assignment in the poc too.

 

so

get this link done please

you need to get moving:

 

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?419198-You-have-received-a-Claim-What-you-need-to-do.-**UPDATED-2016**(1-Viewing)-nbsp

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Name of the Claimant ? Lowell Portfolio I LTD

 

Date of issue – . 09 June 2017

 

Date to submit defence 11 July 2017

 

What is the claim for –

 

1.The claim is for the sum of £618.30 due by the Defendant under the agreement regulated by the consumer credit act 1974 for JD Williams account with and account reference of ---------

2.The defendant failed to maintain contractual payments required by the agreement and a Default notice was served under s.87(1) of the consumer credit act 1974 which has not been complied with

3.the debt was legally assigned to the claimant on 31/mar/2014, notice of which has been given to the defendant.

4.The claim includes statuary interest under s.69 of the county courts act 1984 at a rate of 8% per annum from the date of assignment to the date of issue of these proceedings in the sum of £49.46.

The claimant claims the sum of £667.76

What is the value of the claim? 618.39

 

Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? catalogue

 

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after 2007? after

 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. debt purchaser

 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? no

 

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? yes in 2013

 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year ? no

 

Why did you cease payments? 2012 september ?

 

What was the date of your last payment? september 2012

 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? no

 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? no

Link to post
Share on other sites

so confirmed as a different account to the running one now yes?

 

 

WHY did you cease payments please?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

They said they are, and ceased payments as could t afford it, I contacted them as time to set up payment plan but for every £10 pcm a £12 pcm fee was applied!

 

I didn't know that simply be was jd Williams when opened up this account but that's in credit

Link to post
Share on other sites

eh?

so they are NOT the same account??

 

can you not simply answer the questions?

 

what you've posted is far from clear...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

good we go there

the fact that you had an old sold account wouldhave nowt to do with the OC allowing 'more' credit in the same name

 

they've wiped their hands of it and sold it on.

 

now the reason why is going to be important...

no agreement?

made up of unlawful charges?

 

your CCA and CPR will reveal those if the claimant wants to progress the claim....

 

so

 

pop up on the MCOL website detailed on the claimform.

.

register as an individual

note the long gateway number given

then log in

.

select respond to a claim and select the AOS box.

.

then using the details required from the claimform

.

defend all

leave jurisdiction unticked.

click thru to the end

confirm and exit MCOL.

.

get a CCA Request running to the claimant

leave the £1PO blank and uncrossed

.

get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors

.

don't sign anything

.

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

got a response from solicitors:

 

we write in relation to the above matter,

 

We have received your letter in which you make a request for documents and have notified our client Lowell Portfolio I Ltd of this request.

 

Documents in support of our client's claim will be disclosed on or before disclosure as directed by the Court.

 

In the meantime, please file your response to the Claim form in accordance with the Court Timetable.

 

If you require further time prepare your response, Please let us know as we may be able to agree a short extension to the Court time table.

 

if you have any further queries please do not hesitate to get in touch with us.

Link to post
Share on other sites

safe to ignore

 

 

just do not miss your defence filing date whatever happens.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

urm..cag is self help too.

cant see yo've read one other legal thread whatsoever?

 

 

search CAG box top red toolbar

 

 

Lowell claimform cat debt

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok ive read and still reading load, such amazing information thanks guys, im sorry sound lazy just so tierd, (like most, each on of my children has been ill over the last few weeks and partner on 5/6 nights a week on 15 hour shifts, just not stopped)

 

Had a strong Tea and have tried to do defence, my only thing is i got a default notice in 2013, ive put this but stated ive not had one since i will post it when i finished going over it, i just need to get my head round it

Link to post
Share on other sites

you don't send/do anything without posting it up here FIRST.

not due till 11th anyway.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok thank you, ive done what i think is right, but while all kids asleep im gonna go bed and refresh and carry on when they all in school tomorrow thank you, i think its right but ill get my head wrapped round it easier when my awake

Link to post
Share on other sites

got a response from lowell, that says:

 

thank you for your recent correspondance, We not your request for information regarding the above refernce number under section 77-79 of the consumer credit act 1974 we write to advise that we do not hold any accounts with the above reference number in your name.

 

But on back page is states Account numer -- JD Williams 678.30- but they tell me that they hold the above account and is be managed on our behalf by our outsource team Lucas Credit services Limited and we ask that any further correspond is sent to them directly on the details shown below.

 

Lucas Credit Services.

 

and have said will cease collections for 30 days (not gonna happen with courts involved so still doing defence) and if they do not hear from me in 30 days will return my postal order.

 

now im confused, do i do another postal order to lucas credit but court say it lowell collecting it

Link to post
Share on other sites

no just them being obstructive.

to be noted in your defence.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

this ok for defence

 

1.The claim is for the sum of £618.30 due by the Defendant under the agreement regulated by the consumer credit act 1974 for JD Williams account with and account reference of ---------

 

2.The defendant failed to maintain contractual payments required by the agreement and a Default notice was served under s.87(1) of the consumer credit act 1974 which has not been complied with

 

3.the debt was legally assigned to the claimant on 31/mar/2014, notice of which has been given to the defendant.

 

4.The claim includes statuary interest under s.69 of the county courts act 1984 at a rate of 8% per annum from the date of assignment to the date of issue of these proceedings in the sum of £49.46.

The claimant claims the sum of £667.76

 

 

 

 

Defence

 

The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made.

 

1. Paragraph 1 is noted. I have had in the past an agreement with JD Williams but do not recognise the account number referred to by the claimant.

 

2. Paragraph 2 . I have received a Default Notice from the original creditor in 2013, but nothing since.

 

3. Paragraph 3 is denied. I am unaware of any legal assignment or Notice of Assignment allegedly served.

 

Therefore Paragraph 1 is denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant and the Claimant is put to strict proof to:

 

(a) show how the Defendant has entered into an agreement; and

(b) show and evidence the nature of any breach by way of a Default Notice

© show how the Defendant has reached the amount claimed for; and

(d) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim;

 

4. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed.

 

5. On the alternative, as the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act and Section 82A of consumer credit Act 1974.

 

6. On the 15th June 2017 I made a legal request by way of a CPR 31.14 request and a Section 78 request to the Claimant. The Claimant has failed to comply and therefore is in default of this request and as such is not entitled to to enforce the agreement or request any relief until such compliance.

 

7. By reason of the facts and matters set out above, the claimants claim is denied

Edited by Andyorch
edited
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...