Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help! Got a rlp letter, after shoplifting in TkMaxx - do I pay?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2503 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I made a very stupid and quick idea to take a few things from Tk Maxx with my friend last saturday,

 

walking out a security guard and he walked us back in and told us to follow his collegue.

 

We were then told because we were 16 and 17 that the police wouldn't be called but we would get a 'fine'.

 

Our details were taken for this and we signed a banning letter, and were told to expect a letter for the fine. The letter has come through today and I know it's utter karma and I won't do it again,

 

I've seen other threads saying to ignore it and not pay,

but retail loss prevention is written on the envelope,

and my parents will be bound to see it at one point which I'm dying at the thought of.

 

Does anyone know what happens if I ignore the letters, such as going to court or police or ANYONE visiting my house?

 

How long do the letters take to go and what can i expect :-(:???:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do not under any circumstances pay ANYTHING WHATSOEVER. Do not call them and do not write to them

 

This is not a fine, it is a speculative invoice requesting that you pay an amount of money in respect of costs incurred by the retailer in dealing with your actions.

 

I am assuming that any goods taken will have been recovered in a saleable condition? The security staff would have to be paid even had you not visited the store, so no costs have been incurred at all.

 

RLP will tell you that hell and damnation will rain down on you if you do not pay but the reality is that it won't. But there will be more letters - several in fact, and they may refer to the extremely bad advice that you will receive here as they read these pages religiously, but they also know that there is almost nothing that they can do about it.

 

Their grubby little enterprise relies on the fear of people that they write to simply paying up. They cannot take you to court, only TK Maxx could do that and they won't - not least because of your age - but also because it is not in their commercial interest to do so, and another major retailer was badly defeated when they tried to do so . Nor will they involve the police - they could have done at the time but chose not to. RLP may well say that the matter will sit on file until you are 18 so that you can then be sued, but this is nonsense.

 

The letters may well cause a problem if you are worried about parents seeing the RLP details on the envelope. Impossible to say how many will arrive, but there is usually a series of threats increasing in intensity and then a couple from whichever bottom-feeding debt collection agency they are using this month.

 

It normally stops at that point. If you are brave enough then we would normally suggest that you bite the bullet and tell your parents what happened. RLP have in the past even written to 'The Parent/Guardian of XXXX' in a further attempt to obtain payment, so it is often useful for parents to read the forum here rather than pay up to make RLP go away.

 

You can certainly stop the letters to your parents with a simply worded letter removing any implied permission for your details to be used to contact your parents and insisting that all correspondence is addressed to yourself - which of course you then ignore completely.

 

Nobody will visit your house so rest easy on that score

 

Others will add their advice but the above is the standard - and correct - approach

 

Now the shouty bit - DO NOT EVER DO THIS AGAIN. We do not approve of RLP or their methods and would always say that the correct source of justice is via the police, and if you were to shoplift again then you might well be in a far worse position. We do not approve of shoplifting either, but appreciate that mistakes and moments of madness occur

 

Post back whenever you need more advice

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you ignore them totally no IF's or BUT's

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and welcome to CAG

I echo Sidewinders post in its entirety.

 

The problem you will have is the continued letter writing from RLP and then their tame debt collector of the day (if there is any debt collector willing to waste their time with RLP)

RLP use the envelope as coercion to pay to stop the letters.

 

As mentioned, you are under 18 and therfore TKMaxx cannot take you to court, not that they will anyway. The case mentioned by Sidewinder was in 2012 where a retailer backed up by RLP took action against two teenage girls and tried to justify the costs they were demanding. They failed. Since that time, no other store (to my knowledge) has taken any action via the courts.

IF any retailer did take action, it would not be a criminal court, just a civil court.

 

Now the hard bit. I encourage you to tell your parents UNLESS you are in a broken type home. Parents will be understandably upset and angry with you but you can then show them the RLP forum and show them what lengths RLP will go to to part you from any money you have. One day, your parents may see an envelope addressed and would demand to know what it was all about.

In one case on these boards, RLP wrote to the parents of the juvenile which caused no end of issues. I would not normally recommend that you write to them but if you cannot tell your parents, do you have an alternative address they could write to? If so, I would then write ONE letter only headed with the following:

 

"I acknowledge no sum claimed by you nor any company you claim to represent."

 

Then go on to tell them that any permission to write to other members of your family are removed and to write to you at the following address.....

 

Obviously it goes without saying, don't do this again as it would make you and us look silly and the next time the police could get involved which is not what you want.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Were your parents or the police not called at the time of arrest ?

 

The tk maxx rules for the loss prevention staff are very plain - if you arrest someone under 18, you must only release them to parents or police. Never release them by themselves.

 

If you wouldn't mind, a quick email to their head office to let them know which store and date etc would be lovely.

 

And was there a female present in the holding room at all times ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

That doesn't sound like a good idea. How would that help the OP?

 

Whilst I agree that emailing is not the best idea, under 18's must be represented by a responsible adult, someone who is impartial before any search or questioning take place. If that didn't happen then TKMaxx are breaking the law.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

That doesn't sound like a good idea. How would that help the OP?

 

Because their permanent ban, photos taken for the local shop watch scheme, and details may end up being erased as a goodwill gesture because the lp team didn't folllow procedure. It's very clear in the rules that kids must not be released except to parents or police. It's simply the lp team being lazy.

 

Oh and the rlp action stopped.

 

They already have the kids details, how possibly could it make it worse ....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Whilst I agree that emailing is not the best idea, under 18's must be represented by a responsible adult, someone who is impartial before any search or questioning take place. If that didn't happen then TKMaxx are breaking the law.

 

Ok, I will bite. Which law is this then please.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, I will bite. Which law is this then please.

 

You may have a point. I read something early this year but I can't find what I was looking for so I am now concerned that what I said may be wrong (unless I can find it)

Perhaps you can help given your knowledge of detaining juveniles.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no law. Whilst it may be unwise to be in a room alone with a minor (and bear in mind that all tk stores have permanently recording cameras and microphones in their holding rooms), there's nothing illegal about it.

 

The minor is technically under arrest by the security staff, so they have a right to hold them there until an adult takes custody of them, be it police or parents.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I beg to differ. A juvenile (while being lawfully detained under S24a of PACE) they cannot question nor search the juvenile without an appropriate adult present as an under 18 is unable to give that consent. The police can take over the detention but then they are not allowed to question anyone without that protection in place (on the assumption they actually bother to turn up).

 

What is an appropriate adult? Parent or guardian. Trusted friend who is over 18. Certainly NOT store staff nor the Police. Security staff tend to omit this to deal with the theft quickly. Physical searches are also out of bounds.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you reading the pace codes of practice again.

 

Which don't apply to non police arrests ......

 

The lp staff in tk's are enhanced dbs checked for the sole reason they could have unsupervised contact with minors, which is a lot above what sia guards get (only a standard dbs). Although as we've both pointed out, it shouldn't happen.

 

Nobody should be asking them for anything but their name and a contact number so parents or police are called. Searching them certainly is out of bounds and I don't know anyone that would!.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

hi

i'm wondering if there's any possible way i can get rlp to stop writing to my address,

 

has anyone tried writing to them and saying you've changed address and to send letters elsewhere?

 

my step mum is a police officer and she's bound to know what retail loss prevention means as it says on the outside of the envelope. no criticism please as i've since learnt my lesson

Link to post
Share on other sites

My step mum is a police officer and she's bound to know what retail loss prevention means as it says on the outside of the envelope. no criticism please as i've since learnt my lesson

 

As your step Mum is a police officer she'll have met all sorts of youths who have done stupid things.

Have you considered telling your parents?.

 

At the moment (since RLP are 'toothless' and the police weren't involved), their only power over you is your fear your parents will find out.

 

Chances are your parents have noticed 'there is something wrong', and are waiting to find out what it is, and help you deal with it.

 

Which is going to be better, you telling your parents in a controlled manner, on your terms, or them finding out outside of your control?.

 

I don't think it will be an easy ride for you, but consider confessing to your parents!.

Link to post
Share on other sites

when they get no response anyway

they'll resume to the old one.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is difficult to get RLP to write to other addresses however it can be done.

 

What I would do is send something like this.

 

"I acknowledge no sum claimed by you nor any company you claim to represent"

"Take notice that this is the only address to which correspondence will be accepted." [Add the alternative address] " Also take notice that any post addressed to the previous address will be returned as Not at This Address."

"I reserve my absolute right to ignore your petulant missives and should you revert to sending letters to the previous address, I may consider further action." [Never tell them What Action]

" You could leave this bit out if you want as it will get up their noses :whoo:

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

get a grip tell your mother, face up to it, it happened you cannot run away way, then get on with your life, end of! you could join the forces?

 

hi Old Cogger, but i did ask for no rude messages as i've learnt my lesson, and there's no help with your message to what i was asking whatsoever.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Now move on learn and ignore RLP.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...