Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • They have defended the claim by saying that the job was of unsatisfactory standard and they had to call another carpenter to remedy. My husband has text messages about them losing the keys a second time and also an email. What do they hope to achieve??? Most importantly,  as far as I have seen online, now I need to wait for paperwork from the court, correct?
    • The Notice to Hirer does not comply with the protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule  4 . This is before I ask if Europarks have sent you a copy of the PCN they sent to Arval along with a copy of the hire agreement et. if they haven't done that either you are totally in the clear and have nothing to worry about and nothing to pay. The PCN they have sent you is supposed to be paid by you according to the Act within 21 days. The chucklebuts have stated 28 days which is the time that motorists have to pay. Such a basic and simple thing . The Act came out in 2012 and still they cannot get it right which is very good news for you. Sadly there is no point in telling them- they won't accept it because they lose their chance to make any money out of you. they are hoping that by writing to you demanding money plus sending in their  unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors that you might be so frightened as to pay them money so that you can sleep at night. Don't be surprised if some of their letters are done in coloured crayons-that's the sort of  level of people you will be dealing with. Makes great bedding for the rabbits though. Euro tend not to be that litigious but while you can safely ignore the debt collectors just keep an eye out for a possible Letter of Claim. They are pretty rare but musn't be ignored. Let us know so that you can send a suitably snotty letter to them showing that you are not afraid of them and are happy to go to Court as you like winning.  
    • They did reply to my defence stating it would fail and enclosed copies of NOA, DN Term letter and account statements. All copies of T&C's that could be reconstructions and the IP address on there resolves to the town where MBNA offices are, not my location
    • Here are 7 of our top tips to help you connect with young people who have left school or otherwise disengaged.View the full article
    • My defence was standard no paperwork:   1.The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 2. Paragraph 1 is noted. The Defendant has had a contractual relationship with MBNA Limited in the past. The Defendant does not recognise the reference number provided by the claimant within its particulars and has sought verification from the claimant who is yet to comply with requests for further information. 3. Paragraph 2 is denied. The Defendant maintains that a default notice was never received. The Claimant is put to strict proof to that a default notice was issued by MBNA Limited and received by the Defendant. 4. Paragraph 3 is denied. The Defendant is unaware of any legal assignment or Notice of Assignment allegedly served from either the Claimant or MBNA Limited. 5. On the 02/01/2023 the Defendant requested information pertaining to this claim by way of a CCA 1974 Section 78 request. The claimant is yet to respond to this request. On the 19/05/2023 a CPR 31.14 request was sent to Kearns who is yet to respond. To date, 02/06/2023, no documentation has been received. The claimant remains in default of my section 78 request. 6. It is therefore denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant, the Claimant has failed to provide any evidence of proof of assignment being sent/ agreement/ balance/ breach or termination requested by CPR 31.14, therefore the Claimant is put to strict proof to: (a) show how the Defendant entered into an agreement; and (b) show and evidence the nature of breach and service of a default notice pursuant to Section 87(1) CCA1974 (c) show how the claimant has reached the amount claimed for; and (d) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim; 7. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed. 8. On the alternative, as the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act and Section 82A of the consumer credit Act 1974. 9. By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Missed Work Capability Assessment Due to Illness - Now been told capable of work???


diaz1970
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2528 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello and thank your reading,

 

I unfortunately suffer from the following which I take medication for:

Spinal Injury - Long term disability affecting movement, loss of feeling in legs and feet

Chronic Pain due to spinal injury and herniated discs

Depression

ADHD

 

I missed my Work Capability Assessment as I had an infection, I called the centre prior to the appointment to tell them and I also visited the GP and obtained medication.I was told that I would receive a letter from the DWP asking why I missed the appointment.

I subsequently received the form, I completed the form complete with an appointment card and the medication container which listed the date on which I obtained the medication, at no point was I asked to explain my disability/illness or the reason as to why I had been in receipt of "not fit for work" note from the GP and have been since Sept 2016.

A couple of weeks later I received a "Decision maker has decided your capable of work"

The questions I am asking are:

1.How can this have been made when there has been no formal assessment completed or any forms filled out by myself to explain the conditions and difficulties I face on a day to day basis?

2.I have note received any explanation as to why this decision was made, so I want to appeal, whats the best way to do this?

3.I have no benefits in the meantime, I am in a lot of debt and am behind in my rent, which means that I may lose my home due to this decision, what can I do?

 

Many thanks in advance for the advice, it is really appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

First thing you need to do is get a 'No Income' form from the council, fill it in and give it back to them. That will get your rent paid again. Second thing you should do is write to your MP and tell them about this and ask for their assistance in regaining your benefits. They might help, they might not so you need to apply for what's known as a Mandatory Reconsideration. This means you're asking the DWP to look again at their decision. I forget how you do that exactly, someone will be along in a minute to explain further I imagine. When that fails, if it does, you can then appeal against the original decision, the one you've just had, and once your appeal is underway you should start getting ESA at the basic rate again to keep you going.

The problem you're going to have right now is you've been declared fit to work so they'll be expecting you to be visiting the job centre to sign and and probably doing job search or courses or all sorts of other unsavoury pursuits you are clearly unable to do. To get round that you need to apply for an 'extended period of sickness'. There's more on that here https://www.google.co.uk/search?client=opera&q=90+days+extended+sickness&sourceid=opera&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8#q=extended+sickness+jsa I know you'll read the govt stopped this, and they did, but it's been started again. I know as I've just recently had to look into this for a friend of mine. Basically, for a period of three months I think it is, you can go sick while on JSA and not have to do any of the usual nonsense you have to do with JSA. This should easily see you through the waiting period for your mandatory reconsideration, and when that comes you can appeal and go back on normal basic ESA. HTH!

Link to post
Share on other sites

To make a request for mandatory reconsideration you can telephone or write to the office that pays your benefits. If you choose to call, follow up with a letter and advise them on the call that this is what you intend to do. There is some more advice available at this site. In regards to the fact that the letter says you've been found fit for work, this is just the way the DWP phrases these things. In effect, they're saying not so much that they've decided you're fit for work, but that you can't be treated as being unfit for work because you didn't attend the assessment.

 

This should easily see you through the waiting period for your mandatory reconsideration, and when that comes you can appeal and go back on normal basic ESA.

 

Most of the advice you've given is sound and I'd urge the OP to follow it, but there is just one point to note: you can only receive ESA on appeal if you're appealing against a points failure of the assessment. You can, of course, appeal a "failure to attend" decision but you won't be paid ESA while it's pending.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

CAB or Welfare rights advisers may be able to help you with this, They may know of an escalation route to get your payments restarted quicker than the MR route

 

A letter from the GP may also help , IMO you should not have to wait for an MR.It probably wouldn't have gone this far had you covered your bases with regards of supporting evidence from your GP to back up your case for having good cause, Had you rescheduled the WCA appointment previously? , If not then i would think they maybe in the wrong on this

 

Also due to your health conditions Spinal Injury - Long term disability affecting movement, loss of feeling in legs and feet

Chronic Pain due to spinal injury and herniated discs

Which i would imagine will limit your ability to mobilise, As well as using stairs etc, And if stairs are an issue they have to offer you a ground floor venue, but you would have to tell them that stairs are a no go

 

Do you know how long it would take for you to travel from the assessment centre, from your home to the front door of the centre using public transport, and by car ,if it would take more than 90mins in either direction on public transport including any waiting time or walking time then they should offer to to provide a taxi in the journey time would take no more than 1 hr or a home visit,

You can request a home visit or a paper based assessment but would need a letter of support from your GP or other HCP who sees you regularly and knows how your conditions affect you, Also If they insist on a F2F WCA , then you should insist on it being audio recorded

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also please note that in these type of circumstances where the DWP deemed a claimant to have failed to submit to their farce called the WCA , ESA assessment rate is not payable until they have had a WCA should the MR not change this decision, all a tribunal can do is instruct the DWP to rearrange a new WCA , but until this WCA ESA payments won't be paid

http://www.cpag.org.uk/http%3A/%252Fwww.cpag.org.uk/content/ask-cpag-online-esa-problem-areas-claims-and-payments-have-you-failed-attend-medical-examina

 

If your condition has significantly worsened since you completed the ESA50 and you r GP will support this being the case, or you have a newly diagnosed condition then you could make a new claim for ESA but you would have to complete a new ESA50 if the DWP accept a worsening or new condition then they will pay you ESA at the assessment rate again until the WCA .

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...