Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx for your feedback. That is the reason I posted my opinion, because I am trying to learn more and this is one of the ways to learn, by posting my opinions and if I am incorrect then being advised of the reasons I am incorrect. I am not sure if you have educated me on the points in my post that would be incorrect. However, you are correct on one point, I shall refrain from posting on any other thread other than my own going forward and if you think my post here is unhelpful, misleading or in any other way inappropriate, then please do feel obliged to delete it but educate me on the reason why. To help my learning process, it would be helpful to know what I got wrong other than it goes against established advice considering the outcome of a recent court case on this topic that seemed to suggest it was dismissed due to an appeal not being made at the first stage. Thank-you.   EDIT:  Just to be clear, I am not intending to go against established advice by suggesting that appeals should ALWAYS be made, just my thoughts on the particular case of paying for parking and entering an incorrect VRN. Should this ever happen to me, I will make an appeal at the first stage to avoid any problems that may occur at a later stage. Also, I continue to be grateful for any advice you give on my own particular case.  
    • you can have your humble opinion.... You are very new to all this private parking speculative invoice game you have very quickly taken it upon yourself to be all over this forum, now to the extent of moving away from your initial thread with your own issue that you knew little about handling to littering the forum and posting on numerous established and existing threads, where advice has already been given or a conclusion has already resulted, with your theories conclusions and observations which of course are very welcomed. BUT... in some instances, like this one...you dont quite match the advice that the forum and it's members have gathered over a very long consensual period given in a tried and trusted consistent mannered thoughtful approach. one could even call it forum hi-jacking and that is becoming somewhat worrying . dx
    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕 The more I read this forum and the more I engage with it's incredible users, the more I learn and the more my knowledge expands. If my case gets to court, the Judge will dismiss it after I utter my first sentence, and you DCBL and Highview don't even know why .... OMG! .... So excited to get to court!
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Credit Unions and Compliance with DPA and questions about CCA


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2530 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello all,

 

I was hoping someone here can help me regarding this issue.

I took out a loan in 2011 with a Credit Union in Scotland.

They have defaulted my credit file with the wrong info, including amount, default date and address.

 

I've had both the ICO and FOS involved in this matter and am now tearing my hair out to get it resolved.

 

 

A high level timeline of events:

 

In August, I contacted the CU about the default and they gave no indication that this would happen.

It was also not reported for 4 years after the fact.

 

 

In September, I paid outstanding amount.

They told me the default would be settled and closed.

 

 

In October, wrote a letter and called the CU several times.

They told me it would be marked as settled by November over the phone, no formal response.

 

 

In November took to the FOS, couldn't do anything without a final response letter, until 8 weeks had past, and my letter was ignored by the CU.

 

 

In December contacted the FOS and they sent a letter to the CU.

 

 

In Jan, followed up with the FOS.

Their letter had been ignored.

They called called the CU.

 

 

In Feb, they finally respond to the FOS stating the default was sorted and the FOS sided with them.

 

 

I responded with a copy of my credit file and told them this was not the case

(felt bad for the Girl totally deconstructed her email with DPA legislation etc, she clearly was worried in her response to me).

 

 

The FOS, as part of the closure, say the default was fair to be recorded after 4 years..

.. guidance from the ICO states 3 - 6 months.

 

 

I also complained to the ICO.

However, the FOS reopened the case because the CU hadn't sorted the default.

 

 

In March / Apr, Information gathering by myself, the FOS and Experian.

 

 

In late April, FOS sides with me and awards compensation. ICO finally assign a case advisor.

 

 

In May, wait two weeks for the response, then the CU say not happy with that, escalate within the FOS and I need to wait for an Ombudsman to be assigned..

.. as it was an investigator who made this decision.

 

Today, ICO respond saying that they can't uphold the complaint as they deal with the org and not the individual, but are willing to be communicated further information.

Email in progress.... but they also notify me that CU's aren't regulated under the CCA.

 

So my questions really is...

the distress this has caused has been over 9 months.

 

 

I can't get a new car (which I could lose my job over),

I need to sort out the Mortgage for my current residence (which means I could lose my home)

and in all honesty I've spent hours on this.

 

 

What can I do?

The FOS is saying it now may take the ombudsman a while to respond.

Bringing this whole incident to 10, possibly 11 months.

 

The other thing I'm unsure of is if the CU isn't regulated by the CCA, what can actually be done?

How can this be fair processing of consumer data?

 

Thanks in advance and sorry for the long post!

Edited by tripspace
Link to post
Share on other sites

companies don't have to be CCA regulated to default a credit file [re gas electric mobile etc]

 

regardless to the other issues

did you default on the loan?

yes its crass it was recorded 4yrs late, but there are no longer any rules/guidelines that state they cant now

[the ICO guidelines AT THE TIME might have been 3-6mts]

 

it appears, that you are lucky [though you might not see it that way..]

that they are going to remove the default now [they don't have too!]

 

is it SCU are unhappy with the compo?

could you just not state i'll be happy for the default to just be removed now.?

 

you appear to be shooting yourself in the foot if the above is the case and its the compo that you want that's the sticking issue?

 

why stuff your credit file just because you want Wonga?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Thanks for the response.

 

I wasn't aware this is no longer the guidance, I was just following the info for best practice posted on the ICO website.

 

The ruling means the default will not be removed, but closed and settled due to full and final payment. This wasn't done. So for the last 9 months, I've had an open default on my file. It will fall off in January, but in order to progress any further financial applications this will need to be closed (according to the Mortgage Adviser).

 

As a result, I'm in a position where the FOS has told them to correct the file, but the Credit Union did not comply with the request after being contacted by myself more than 5 times and the FOS more than 4.

 

I did speak to the FCA saying that the CU does have to provide proof that the Credit Agreement stated the account would be defaulted and provide a copy of the letter. This is under CONC 13 of their code apparently.

 

In any case, all I'm simply asking is for the default to be fixed and marked as settled. The CU have not done this.... Which is why I'm cracking up. It is nothing to do with compensation and I have asked them to remove it in exchange of ignoring compensation. I just want it closed :'(

 

Also, if you mean a Wonga Loan... I'd never touch one ^^

 

Thanks

Edited by tripspace
Link to post
Share on other sites

no Wonga=compo.

 

 

a default will always show until its 6th birthday, but the account would show settled somewhere else

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Thanks for the advice, but the account isn't showing as settled after this was paid 9 months ago.

 

So I guess there really is nothing else to be done, but wait until the FOS makes it's decision again....

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

wont matter - its defaulted - the default shows and will do no matter what you do

it doesn't matter if you settle a debt it does not remove the default status

and the default status overrides any settled benefit.

 

 

why do you need it gone mortgage?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

have you been told this specifically

that if you pay the debt and have PROOf its settled

 

 

and that even though the default will still show, you'd get the mortgage?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...