Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx for your feedback. That is the reason I posted my opinion, because I am trying to learn more and this is one of the ways to learn, by posting my opinions and if I am incorrect then being advised of the reasons I am incorrect. I am not sure if you have educated me on the points in my post that would be incorrect. However, you are correct on one point, I shall refrain from posting on any other thread other than my own going forward and if you think my post here is unhelpful, misleading or in any other way inappropriate, then please do feel obliged to delete it but educate me on the reason why. To help my learning process, it would be helpful to know what I got wrong other than it goes against established advice considering the outcome of a recent court case on this topic that seemed to suggest it was dismissed due to an appeal not being made at the first stage. Thank-you.   EDIT:  Just to be clear, I am not intending to go against established advice by suggesting that appeals should ALWAYS be made, just my thoughts on the particular case of paying for parking and entering an incorrect VRN. Should this ever happen to me, I will make an appeal at the first stage to avoid any problems that may occur at a later stage. Although, any individual in a similar position should decide for themselves what they think is an appropriate course of action. Also, I continue to be grateful for any advice you give on my own particular case.  
    • you can have your humble opinion.... You are very new to all this private parking speculative invoice game you have very quickly taken it upon yourself to be all over this forum, now to the extent of moving away from your initial thread with your own issue that you knew little about handling to littering the forum and posting on numerous established and existing threads, where advice has already been given or a conclusion has already resulted, with your theories conclusions and observations which of course are very welcomed. BUT... in some instances, like this one...you dont quite match the advice that the forum and it's members have gathered over a very long consensual period given in a tried and trusted consistent mannered thoughtful approach. one could even call it forum hi-jacking and that is becoming somewhat worrying . dx
    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕 The more I read this forum and the more I engage with it's incredible users, the more I learn and the more my knowledge expands. If my case gets to court, the Judge will dismiss it after I utter my first sentence, and you DCBL and Highview don't even know why .... OMG! .... So excited to get to court!
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Arrow/Reston claimform - M&S Chargecard changed to Credit card


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2007 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello folks,

i have been reading the various posts regarding the M&S cards that were transferred without permission to a credit card with higher credit limit etc to get an answer, but i can't find what i need to know.

 

I have received a court claim form claimant Arrow Global regarding my old M&S a/c.

I have not seen a deed of assignment and up until a few months ago the account was still on my credit file as M&S in default,

then Arrow added themselves to my credit file for the same sum without me being informed,

so I had both.

Now M&S have disappeared and Arrow remain.

 

My original M&S chargecard was taken in approx 1994,

it was converted without any new terms, signature etc in approx 2003/4 I believe?

 

 

I had some issues paying due to a flooded business/bodgit builders and entered into an agreement to pay reduced monthly instalments, which eventually lowered to £5 per month.

 

 

Despite entering into a temporary agreement they defaulted the account,

which they said they had to do to allow the lowered payments. I

 

 

cannot remember when i last paid the instalments due to various stresses and disabilites, including a brain glitch that effects my memory, but I dont think I have paid for a couple of years (I am making enqs).

 

The claim is addressed to my christian name, but only the second half of my hyphenated surname, at an address i no longer live at, albeit I still have a connection there, which is how I received the claim form, but nothing prior to his?

 

Should I just do acknowledgement to defend,

request the original docs,

then put in defence that they do not have a signed agreement,

therefore there is nothing to claim?

 

Are Arrow able to claim the monies if I have not received an assignment?

Is anything enforceable?

 

Any comments much appreciated.

Many thanks in advance.

JQ

Link to post
Share on other sites

You will not see a deed if assignment, just a notice of assignment fyi.

 

Absolutely yes, go and acknowledge the claim

Tick defend all

Leave jurisdiction unticked

 

Send a CCA request to Arrow Global

Send a CPR 31:14 to the solicitors acting for Arrow.

 

Note the date you need to file a defence, 33 days from date of issue, the date on the claimform being day 1 of the count.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Click Here To Make A Donation

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?419198-You-have-received-a-Claim-What-you-need-to-do.-**UPDATED-2016**(1-Viewing)-nbsp

 

Please see the link above and do as instructed answering all questions before pasting back to thread

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Click Here To Make A Donation

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

get the above link done before you do anything please

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you both, as requested:

 

Name of the Claimant ? ARROW GLOBAL LIMITED

 

Date of issue – 28.04.17

 

Date to acknowledge) 17TH FOR ACK? - no 16th - dx

 

What is the claim for –

 

 

1.THE CLAIMANT CLAIMS PAYMENT OF THE OVERDUE BALANCE DUE FROM THE DEFENDANT UNDER A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE DEFENDANT AND MARKS AND SPENCER FINANCIAL SERVICES PLC DATED ON OR ABOUT FEB 07 1994 AND ASSIGNED TO THE CLAIMANT ON FEB 18 2016.

AC NO XXXXX

DATE 03.03.17,

ITEM DEFAULT BALANCE,

VALUE £9163.23,

POST REFRL CR NIL.

 

What is the value of the claim? £9163.23 PLUS COURT FEE £410.00 PLUS COSTS £100.00

Is the claim for a current (Overdraft) or credit card /loan or catalogue or mobile phone account?*M&S CHARGE ARD TURNED CC

 

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after 2007? BEFORE

 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim.*ASSIGNED TO ARROW GLOBAL

 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment?*NO

 

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor?*POSSIBLY I CANT REMEMBER, I REMEMBER ASKING THEM NOT TO AS IT WOULD AFFECT CREDIT FILE, BUT THEY INSISTED THEY WOULD HAVE YO TO FACILITATE LOW PAYMENTS?

 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year ?*NO

 

Why did you cease payments? BECAUSE I FORGOT ALL ABOUT IT, I HAD SO MUCH GOING ON THAT IT SLIPPED MY MIND, I HAD TO CHANGE SO & FORGOT, I HAD ANOTHER M&S LOAN ACCOUNT WITH APPROX £2K OUTSTANDING, ONE I PAID LONGER THAN THE OTHER, BUT I DONT REMEMBER WHICH

 

What was the date of your last payment? POSSIBLY 2 YEARS AGO, IM TRYING TO TRACK DOWN LAST PAYMENT

 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved?*ONLY THAT I COULDNT AFFORD TO PAY, THEY CHASED ME RIGOROUSLY IN THE BEGINNING, THEN IT DIED OFF

 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a* management plan?*LOW TOKEN PAYMENTS TO KEEP ACCOUNT GOING, THEN I CANT REMEMBER I WILL HAVE TO TRAWL THROUGH MY MEMORIES, BUT NOTHING OUTSIDE M&S?

 

I HOPE THIS EXPLAINS IT?

JQ

Link to post
Share on other sites

As post #2 please, acknowledge now.

 

Defence due by 30/5/2017

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Click Here To Make A Donation

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you,

does it matter that they do not have the correct info,

shall I just ack with the details given rather than my full name

so I can do online without any issues?

 

Address wrong too?

Actually invalid issue as they know I do not live there,

but I don't want to muddy the waters if it will cause a problem?

 

 

Restons are the solicitors,

ideally I would prefer to email so I have an easily accessible record,

rather than my dizzy brain having to remember where I put the paperwork and when,

shall i ring and request email address?

JQ

Link to post
Share on other sites

NO you do NOT use email

 

 

pop up on the MCOL website detailed on the claimform.

.

register as an individual

note the long gateway number given

then log in

.

select respond to a claim and select the AOS box.

.

then using the details required from the claimform

.

defend all

leave jurisdiction unticked.

click thru to the end

confirm and exit MCOL.

.

get a CCA Request running to the claimant

leave the £1PO blank and uncrossed

.

get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors

.

don't sign anything

.

dx

 

.

ring or contact either.!!

 

what do you mean by wrong address? and they already knew correct one & who did?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Or should I point out that the address and name (second half of hyphenated only) are wrong and try to get it out of the court and then for them to see they have no enforceable agreement for credit card in the hope they wont reissue?

 

 

Court deadlines cause me such stress and my brain short circuits and leaves me as a blithering idiot unable to communicate, so I wonder if I could save myself that stress?

 

Any thoughts?

JQ

Link to post
Share on other sites

no stick with the tried and tested method please

 

 

so as post 8

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The address is a previous address,

this was prior to my actual address which was flooded and I had to move several times,

 

 

I am not sure which address M&S had last but it wasnt the one they sent it to?

 

 

I havent had any contact wth Restons or Arrow, so they would have got my details from M&S?

Link to post
Share on other sites

the claimant will serve against the last verified address regarding the account and what the OC knew.

 

so doesn't look like an issue

but INSURE mcol has your correct address when you ack the claim

and ofcourse the CCA/CPR you will be sending sorts those two out as well

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello,

please may I ask a question?

 

I have done ack online and sent off the CCA & Part 31,

 

how long should I wait before putting in my defence if I do not hear anything back?

 

JQ

Link to post
Share on other sites

It explains the time line in the link provided in post #4...you have 33 days from the date on the claim form (that date being day 1) 19 days to submit acknowledgment of service and then a further 14 days to submit your defence.

 

Tuesday the 30th May...but dont be waiting for any response..you wont get any...start looking at defences now.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Andy, I remember reading that now, apologies,

 

 

I have a brain glitch that affects my memory, I should have known to read it again with my dizzy brain. JQ

Link to post
Share on other sites

Look for a no paperwork/holding defence of which there are many on here and adapt it to counter the PoC from your claim form.

Make sure that the paragraphs correctly match each point in the claim and then post here for checking along with the PoC itself( saves us going looking for it to check)

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Click Here To Make A Donation

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi again folks, in a panic, just realised I didn't do defence & it has to be in today, so any comments much appreciated.

 

This is what is says in claim form

 

1. THE CLAIMANT CLAIMS PAYMENT OF THE OVERDUE BALANCE DUE FROM THE DEFENDANT UNDER A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE DEFENDANT AND MARKS AND SPENCER FINANCIAL SERVICES PLC DATED ON OR ABOUT FEB 07 1994 AND ASSIGNED TO THE CLAIMANT ON FEB 18 2016.

 

AC NO XXXXX

DATE 03.03.17,

ITEM DEFAULT BALANCE,

VALUE £9163.23,

POST REFRL CR NIL.

 

My proposed DEFENCE adapted from another thread if it is deemed appropriate?

 

1. Paragraph 1 is neither admitted or denied with regards to the Defendant entering in to an Agreement referred to in the Particulars of Claim ('the Agreement') the Claimant has yet to disclose any Agreement. Furthermore any claim for partial monies is averred Contrary to s35 of the county courticon Act 1984 s35 Division of causes of action.

 

2. Paragraph 1 is denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant and the Claimant is put to strict proof to:

 

(a) show how the Defendant has entered into an agreement with the Claimant; and

(b) show how the Defendant has reached the amount claimed for; and

© show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim;

 

 

3. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed.

 

4. On the alternative, if the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act and Section 82A of theconsumer crediticon Act 1974.

 

5. By reason of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.

 

Apologies for the panic and thank you sincerely for any help available?

 

JQ

Link to post
Share on other sites

Some store card debtors may be let off - BBC News

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-17670803

17 Apr 2012 - Santander v Mayhew [94.9kb] ... Image caption M&S is one of more than 20 store cards and store-branded credit cards currently on offer.

 

 

would this be of relevance as stated at the top store card changed to credit card??

:mad2::-x:jaw::sad:
Link to post
Share on other sites

Well they are not claiming for partial monies so your point 1 and Contrary to s35 of the county court Act 1984 s35 Division of causes of action is not applicable.

 

 

Particulars of claim

 

1. THE CLAIMANT CLAIMS PAYMENT OF THE OVERDUE BALANCE DUE FROM THE DEFENDANT UNDER A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE DEFENDANT AND MARKS AND SPENCER FINANCIAL SERVICES PLC DATED ON OR ABOUT FEB 07 1994 AND ASSIGNED TO THE CLAIMANT ON FEB 18 2016.

 

AC NO XXXXX

DATE 03.03.17,

ITEM DEFAULT BALANCE,

VALUE £9163.23,

POST REFRL CR NIL.

 

####Defence #####

 

The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature.The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made

 

1. Paragraph 1 is accepted with regards to the Defendant entering in to an Agreement referred to in the Particulars of Claim ('the Agreement').However the original agreement signed in 1994 was for a M&S Charge Card (Store Card) and subsequently converted to a credit card around 2003/4 without my knowledge or agreement.I have therefore on receipt of this claim requested a copy of the superseding agreement by way of a section 78 request.The claimant has yet to comply and cannot possibly comply as there is no executed agreement in existence.

 

2.It is denied that I have ever received a Notice of Assignment pursuant to s.136 of The Law of Property Act 1925.

 

3. It is therefore denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant and the Claimant is put to strict proof to:

 

(a) show how the Defendant has entered into an agreement; and

(b) show and evidence any cause of action and service of a Default Notice:

© show how the Defendant has reached the amount claimed for; and

(d) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim;

 

4. As per Civil Procedurei Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed.

 

5. On the alternative, if the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act and Section 82A of The Consumer Credit Act 1974.

 

6. By reason of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you, thank you, thank you, I'm off to find login details to submit defence, I have put it in a safe place.

 

 

My daughter has gone in to hospital & I have two small grandchildren I have been helping with, so my brain is more addled than usual!

 

Some store card debtors may be let off - BBC News

www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-17670803

17 Apr 2012 - Santander v Mayhew [94.9kb] ... Image caption M&S is one of more than 20 store cards and store-branded credit cards currently on offer.

 

 

would this be of relevance as stated at the top store card changed to credit card??

 

I am hoping so, fingers crossed & thank you for mentioning.

 

It is filed, fingers crossed & thank you for help in getting it in by today's deadline Andyorch. ��

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Folks

 

I have received a notice from the court acknowledging my defence and stating they have forwarded to the claimant/solicitor and they await a response. if nothing is heard within 28 days it will be stayed.

 

Doesn't this mean it will be held open permanently? Can it not be struck out or something? Albeit I am getting ahead of myself, but I do not like the idea of it being open indefinitely?

 

Also, if they do not repsond and it is stayed, what happens to the entry on my credit file?

 

JQ :confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Folks

 

I have received a notice from the court acknowledging my defence and stating they have forwarded to the claimant/solicitor and they await a response. if nothing is heard within 28 days it will be stayed.

 

Doesn't this mean it will be held open permanently? Nothing is open..its a speculative claim until the claimant proceeds to allocation of the claimCan it not be struck out or something? No nothing to strike out ...not until its been allocated .Albeit I am getting ahead of myself, but I do not like the idea of it being open indefinitely? Not open..going nowhere.

 

Also, if they do not repsond and it is stayed, what happens to the entry on my credit file? It stays...CRAs are nothing to do with court claims

JQ :confused:

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...