Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx for your feedback. That is the reason I posted my opinion, because I am trying to learn more and this is one of the ways to learn, by posting my opinions and if I am incorrect then being advised of the reasons I am incorrect. I am not sure if you have educated me on the points in my post that would be incorrect. However, you are correct on one point, I shall refrain from posting on any other thread other than my own going forward and if you think my post here is unhelpful, misleading or in any other way inappropriate, then please do feel obliged to delete it but educate me on the reason why. To help my learning process, it would be helpful to know what I got wrong other than it goes against established advice considering the outcome of a recent court case on this topic that seemed to suggest it was dismissed due to an appeal not being made at the first stage. Thank-you.   EDIT:  Just to be clear, I am not intending to go against established advice by suggesting that appeals should ALWAYS be made, just my thoughts on the particular case of paying for parking and entering an incorrect VRN. Should this ever happen to me, I will make an appeal at the first stage to avoid any problems that may occur at a later stage. Although, any individual in a similar position should decide for themselves what they think is an appropriate course of action. Also, I continue to be grateful for any advice you give on my own particular case.  
    • you can have your humble opinion.... You are very new to all this private parking speculative invoice game you have very quickly taken it upon yourself to be all over this forum, now to the extent of moving away from your initial thread with your own issue that you knew little about handling to littering the forum and posting on numerous established and existing threads, where advice has already been given or a conclusion has already resulted, with your theories conclusions and observations which of course are very welcomed. BUT... in some instances, like this one...you dont quite match the advice that the forum and it's members have gathered over a very long consensual period given in a tried and trusted consistent mannered thoughtful approach. one could even call it forum hi-jacking and that is becoming somewhat worrying . dx
    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕 The more I read this forum and the more I engage with it's incredible users, the more I learn and the more my knowledge expands. If my case gets to court, the Judge will dismiss it after I utter my first sentence, and you DCBL and Highview don't even know why .... OMG! .... So excited to get to court!
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Xercise4Less Harlands CRS threats


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2557 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Slick

I have been reading several threads about this and found it hugely useful. I sent the letter offering £9.99 last payment for final month and requested that they stop harrassing me immediately. I have continued to be texted on a weekly basis and increasingly threatening letters. I just wanted to check in the following one sent to me as it's finally made me feel anxious. Damn them!

 

Re: CRS No xxxx

Following our initial letter, we are disappointed that your account with Xercise 4 Less is still in arrears and our fee has not been paid.

 

We would still like to reach an amicable resolution to this, however, if you fail to respond to this letter we will have no option but to commence further action to recover the monies owed. The options available to us are:

 

1. Legal Action. We believe you are in breach of a legally binding contract with Xercise for less because you have not payed your membership and our fees. We may pursue a claim under this contract through the Courts. If we do so the following process would apply:

 

1. We right you a formal letter asking what what we are demanding and give you a final opportunity to pay.

2. If this failed to settle the matter we would issue proceedings against you in the county court

3. You could either then :

a) make the payment

b) dispute the amount owed

c)if you dispute the amount owed the court process would continue at the end the court would make a decision on our claim

d) a strict court imposed timescale will apply in relation to court process.

 

Were we successful in our our claim or if you ignore the claim, a CCJ may be registered requiring you to make payment you may also be liable for costs of pursing legal action and interest on amount owed.

 

If you then fail to pay the amount covered by the CCJ we would then take the next steps required to enforce the judgement. To do this we have to make an application to court.

 

2. Outsource to external agents.

Your account would be passed to another collection agency who will take further action to recover monies owed. YOU CAN AVOID THIS HAOOENING IF IN THE NEXT 10 DAYS YOU CONTACT US ON XXX to ARRANGE PAYMENT WITH US.

 

Yours CRS Nuria Manson

 

 

--------------------------------------------------------

 

What do you think I "owe" 171.50 and should have got back to them by today???

Link to post
Share on other sites

The bit that worries me especially is Were we successful in our our claim or if you ignore the claim, a CCJ may be registered requiring you to make payment you may also be liable for costs of pursing legal action and interest on amount owed.

 

If you then fail to pay the amount covered by the CCJ we would then take the next steps required to enforce the judgement. To do this we have to make an application to court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

MAY ignore!!

 

 

std dca threat-o-gram

 

 

a DCA is NOT A BAILIFF.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is IN THE NEXT 10 DAYS thing and we could pass this on to someone else hot air? Thank you so much for all your help guys! My husband is getting them too and I just keep repeating what you say to him. If their harrassment stops I'll let you all know x

Link to post
Share on other sites

std willy waving ignore

 

 

a DCA is NOT A BAILIFF

 

 

and ONLY the OWNER of a debt can do court

and

they haven't since 2011

 

 

go read some threads

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Help and welcome to CAG

 

Your posts and replies to them have been moved to avoid further hijack of someone's thread. Use this from now on to discuss your case.

 

If you read other threads here, you'll see the same advice all the time - Harlands/CRS are just chancers who look to extract whatever money they can when the chance arises.

 

However, before we can advise you properly, we need more info :-

 

1. When did you join.

 

2. What sort of m/ship was it - a rolling monthly, or a 12 month.

 

3. Did you give notice to cancel - if so, in what manner.

 

4. When did you give notice to cancel.

 

5. When was the last DD taken by Harlands.

 

6. If you cancelled within the minimum m/ship period, was there any recognised reason for this.

 

Ignore any demands in the meantime and don't worry about their threats. It's normally Hot Air !!

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...