Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other!
    • the Town and Country [advertisments ] Regulations 2007 are not easy to understand. Most Council planing officials don't so it's good that you found one who knows. Although he may not have been right if the rogues have not been "controlling" in the car park for that long. The time only starts when the ANPR signs go up, not how long the area has been used as a car park.   Sadly I have checked Highview out and they have been there since at least 2014 . I have looked at the BPA Code of Practice version 8 which covers 2023 and that states Re Consideration and Grace Periods 13.3 Where a parking location is one where a limited period of parking is permitted, or where drivers contract to park for a defined period and pay for that service in advance (Pay & Display), this would be considered as a parking event and a Grace Period of at least 10 minutes must be added to the end of a parking event before you issue a PCN. It then goes on to explain a bit more further down 13.5 You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is. 13.6 Neither a consideration period or a grace period are periods of free parking and there is no requirement for you to offer an additional allowance on top of a consideration or grace period. _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________So you have  now only overstayed 5 minutes maximum since BPA quote a minimum of 10 minutes. And it may be that the Riverside does have a longer period perhaps because of the size of the car park? So it becomes even more incumbent on you to remember where the extra 5 minutes could be.  Were you travelling as a family with children or a disabled person where getting them in and out of the car would take longer. Was there difficulty finding a space, or having to queue to get out of the car park . Or anything else that could account for another 5 minutes  without having to claim the difference between the ANPR times and the actual times.
    • Regarding a driver, that HAS paid for parking but input an incorrect Vehicle Registration Number.   This is an easy mistake to make, especially if a driver has access to more than one vehicle. First of all, upon receiving an NTK/PCN it is important to check that the Notice fully complies with PoFA 2012 Schedule 4 before deciding how to respond of course. The general advice is NOT to appeal to the Private Parking Company as, for example, you may identify yourself as driver and in certain circumstances that could harm your defence at a later stage. However, after following a recent thread on this subject, I have come to the conclusion that, in the case of inputting an incorrect Vehicle Registration Number, which is covered by “de minimis” it may actually HARM your defence at a later stage if you have not appealed to the PPC at the first appeal stage and explained that you DID pay for parking and CAN provide proof of parking, it was just that an incorrect VRN was input in error. Now, we all know that the BPA Code of Practice are guidelines from one bunch of charlatans for another bunch of charlatans to follow, but my thoughts are that there could be problems in court if a judge decides that a motorist has not followed these guidelines and has not made an appeal at the first appeal stage, therefore attempting to resolve the situation before it reaches court. From BPA Code of Practice: Section 17:  Keying Errors B) Major Keying Errors Examples of a major keying error could include: • Motorist entered their spouse’s car registration • Motorist entered something completely unrelated to their registration • Motorist made multiple keying errors (beyond one character being entered incorrectly) • Motorist has only entered a small part of their VRM, for example the first three digits In these instances we would expect that such errors are dealt with appropriately at the first appeal stage, especially if it can be proven that the motorist has paid for the parking event or that the motorist attempted to enter their VRM or were a legitimate user of the car park (eg a hospital patient or a patron of a restaurant). It is appreciated that in issuing a PCN in these instances, the operator will have incurred charges including but not limited to the DVLA fee and other processing costs therefore we believe that it is reasonable to seek to recover some of these costs by making a modest charge to the motorist of no more than £20 for a 14-day period from when the keying error was identified before reverting to the charge amount at the point of appeal. Now, we know that the "modest charge" is unenforceable in law, however, it would be up to the individual if they wanted to pay and make the problem go away or in fact if they wanted to contest the issue in court. If the motorist DOES appeal to the PPC explaining the error and the PPC rejects the appeal and the appeal fails, the motorist can use that in his favour at court.   Defence: "I entered the wrong VRN by mistake Judge, I explained this and I also submitted proof of payment for the relevant parking period in my appeal but the PPC wouldn't accept that"   If the motorist DOES NOT appeal to the PPC in the first instance the judge may well use that as a reason to dismiss the case in the claimant's favour because they may decide that they had the opportunity to resolve the matter at a much earlier stage in the proceedings. It is my humble opinion that a motorist, having paid and having proof of payment but entering the wrong VRN, should make an appeal at the first appeal stage in order to prevent problems at a later stage. In this instance, I think there is nothing to be gained by concealing the identity of the driver, especially if at a later stage, perhaps in court, it is said: “I (the driver) entered the wrong VRN.” Whether you agree or not, it is up to the individual to decide …. but worth thinking about. Any feedback, especially if you can prove to the contrary, gratefully received.
    • Women-only co-working spaces are part of the new hybrid working landscape, but they divide opinion.View the full article
    • The music streaming service reports record profits of over €1bn (£860m) after laying off 1500 staff.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

false notice of attendence high court writ by High Court Solutions


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2532 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

this is a commercial rent issue.

 

I have an action against the landlord being processed by CCMCC for a sunstantial amount after the landlord installed solar panels without any notice (my lease is for the entire building) during this process carried out whilst I was away on my honeymoon

 

 

scaffolders erected scaffolding on the roof of my £75,000 race lorry and smashed the roof

 

Landlord refused to supply insurance details,

this then led on to it being discovered the building actually doesn't have planning permission it has a "agricultral storage" covernant on it, it can not be used for commercial purposes.

 

 

My lease has the permitted use as "light industrial and machinary repairs" I have had to cease trading as the council have said they will not change permission of use.

 

in response to the CCMCC the landlord it would appear have instructed High Court Solutions to take control of the building and eject all my goods, change the locks etc.

 

The notice of attendance was served (well posted through my letter box I wasn't in) at my house

 

 

after they did this (no former notice has been received at all) the top of the notice states queens bench division but district registry and county court claim number are blank, as case reference number starts HCS so I assume it is there internal one.

 

below this it states

"I have received a high court writ against you in respect of the above matter made up as follows"

 

then it lists judgement debt with an amount in it,

but no judgement costs or execution costs only enforcement fee and vat have amounts in them.

 

I have not had any correspondence from the landlord accept a reply to my pre action notice,

he has had a notice of action and also a duty of care notice and the HC EA was aware of the CCMCC claim but claimed it was bogus.

 

I have requested the writ and quoted the CCMCC ref to the company but had no replies

 

I think what has been done is a CRAR, again this is without any notice so I can set aside.

 

could anyone advise on the need to supply the writ, or how I can obtain a copy given I have no ref number or district registry?

and can a high court writ be gained without a court hearing at a lower court?

 

Many thanks

James

Link to post
Share on other sites

why do you think its false?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

1) there are no costs for a judgement

2) it states a high court writ, I have an action against the landlord that was commenced in December of last year I am pretty sure he could not get a court hearing without notice without declaring the action against him.

3) i have never recieved any court papers of any kind, nor have i recieved a demand for rent, when the police were involved last year for harrasment they could not take any action on the grounds of obtaining money by deception as I had only notified him in december that we were had been notified by the council the building had an agricultral use only covernant on it (its a new build when we moved in) and as such he can ot rent it for commercial use. From January the landlord has not collected the rent (paid in cash) and has accepted he did damage the vehicle but claims that it was my fault for not moving it as I had no permission to park it there for the 5 years it had been there! and he did stop me going about my business but then refused to supply his insurance details. We now know he does not have landlord insurance, not did he pay the deposit into the scheme as required by law. He is a farmer, he thinks he is god

Link to post
Share on other sites

Contact your nearest County court that deals with high court writs and see if they can find one in your name.

 

In cases where a building is being used unlawfully, as there is no legal permission for the current usage, then the landlord can apply to evict the tenant with very little notice and the high court enforcement agents will try to get the costs back from the tenant.

 

Now i don't know enough about these issues and i am not sure others will know enough about such commercial legal issues. It seems quite complicated to me and I am not sure how you can lodge an appeal against the writ, because the unlawful usage might well trump all of the other issues you have.

 

If you can find which court dealt with the writ, you can request copies of their application to see what was said. If necessary the request for information from the court can be made under i think CPR 5.4 and there is a small fee of about £11 for photocopying, but you would get everything on file. Once you have the information, you might well have to see a Solicitor that deals with such commercial tenancy situations.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

thanks for the link, I am aware of this process.

 

as for the unlawful use, to be absolutely clear

the landlord has given me a lease with permitted use as "light industrial and machainary repairs".

 

 

After the dispute started the council became involved and they checked and when the building was built new (just prior to me moving in)

the plannng permission was granted with a clause (covernant) in it of "agrcultural use only"

 

The council state that they would not have given permission for the building to built for any commercial use.

 

 

This is different to the planning consent for ratable value permissions B1, C2 etc.

 

However I have rang the police and they are now investigating this matter.

 

by way of an update

there is no high court writ

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

yes if using a CRAR you are correct

(no notice was received under the CRAR regs either

plus the amount is for rent and electricity as he is the electricity supplier by way of a secondary meter,

and you can not recover anything other than rent undr CRAR)

 

however the high court enforment officers paper work states

 

"I have today received a high court writ....."

 

as I said the police are now involved as it is gaining by malice and or gainig by deception

 

A judge issued an injuction today using the section 8 and N244 forms for reference

Link to post
Share on other sites

Pleased to hear you have an Injunction which will no doubt prevent further action for now. I would suspect the paperwork the HCEO has used is just a generality and may be overlooked - but still worth pointing out.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh and I forgot to say

the beetle, that belongs to a DC at Northampton Police

 

I have sold the story to a leading newspaper who have ran articles on this show before i got £1 for it - figured that was all THEY were worth

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

High Court Solutions are a tin pot outfit that originally starred in Can't Pay We'll Take It Away. Most of their staff left and went to DCBL. The owner, David Brasen is an Insolvency Practitioner by trade. I'd suggest you contact him as it's clear they still understand little of the HCEO process. To be honest, I thought they'd ceased trading.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...