Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have had a secondary thought.  I borrowed £s from a completely separate entity 6y ago. It was personal and unsecured. I was going to repay upon sale of the property. But then repo and I couldn't.  Eventually they applied and got a charging order on the property.  Their lawyers wrote that if I didn't repay they may apply for an order for sale.  I'm not in control of the sale.  The lender won't agree to an order for sale.  The judge won't expedite it/ extract from trial.  Someone here on cag may or may not suggest I can apply for an order v the receiver?  But could I alternatively ask this separate entity with a c.o to carry out their threat and actually make an application to court for an order for sale v the receiver instead?
    • You left the PCN number showing, but no worries, I've redacted it. Euro Car parks are very well known to us.  I've just skimmed through the titles of the latest 100 cases we have with them (I gave up after 100) and, despite all their bluster and threats, in not one have they taken the Cagger to court. You stayed there for 2 hours &:45 minutes.  I'm guessing the limit is 2 hours and 30 minutes, right?  
    • If the claimant fails to draft directions the court can order a Case Management Hearing to set them but normally in Fast Track claims the claimant sets the directions...Unlike small claims track which are always set the court.
    • Not Evris offer, the court offers mediation service.   All claims proceed to hearing if mediation fails /not happen.   Why do you not wish to attend in person to stand your claim ?     Absolutely you must comply with the courts directions or your claim risks being struck out. Preparation for a hearing should happen irrespective of mediation.   https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/460613-suing-a-parcel-delivery-company-when-you-dont-have-a-direct-contract-with-them-–-third-party-rights-copy-of-judgment-available/#comment-5255007   Andy  
    • LPA.  (I'm fighting insolvency due to all the stuff that he and lender have done).  He appointed estate agents - (changed several times). Disclosure shows he was originally appointed for a specific reason (3m after repo) : using his powers as acting for leaseholder to serve notice on freeholders (to grab fh).  There was interest from 3 potential buyers. He chose one whose offer depended on a positive result of the notice.  Disc also shows he'd taken counsel advice - which was 'he'd fail'.  He'd simultaneously asked to resign as his job (of serving notice) was done and he'd found a buyer.  Lender asked him to stay on to assign notice to the buyer.  Notice failed, buyer didn't buy.  So receiver stayed.  There was 1 buyer who wanted to proceed w/o fh but receiver/ lender wasted 1y trying to get rid of them!  Disc shows why. But I didn't know why at the time. In later months Lender voiced getting rid of receiver. Various reasons - including cost.  But there's a contradiction/ irony: as I've seen an email (of 4y ago) which shows the receiver telling lender not to incur significant costs and to minimize receiver costs.    Yet lender then asked him to serve another notice - again counsel advice indicated 'he'd fail'.  And he did fail.  But wasted 3y trying and incurred huge legal costs - lender trying to pass on to me. Lender interfered - said wanted to do works.  Receiver should have said no.  But disc. shows he agreed to step aside to let them do the works - on proviso lender would discuss potential costs first (they didn't), works wouldn't take long (took 15m), and lender would hold interest (they didn't) (this last point is crucial for me now - as I need to know if I can argue that all interest beyond this point shouldnt be allowed?)   I need to check receiver witness statement in litigation with freeholders to see exactly what he said about 'his position'. But I remember it being along the lines of - 'if the works increased the value of the property he didn't have a problem'.  Lender/ receiver real problems started at this point. The cost of works and 4y passage of time has meant there is no real increase in value. Lender (or receiver) didn't get any permissions (statutory or fh) (and didn't tell me) and just bulldozed the property to an empty shell.  The freeholders served notice on me as leaseholder for breach of covenants (strict no alterations).  The Lender stepped in (acting for me) to issue notice for relief of forfeiture - not the receiver.  That wasted 2y of litigation (3y if inc the works) and incurred huge costs (both sides).  Lender's aim was to do the works that every potential buyer balked at due to the lease restrictions.  Lender and receiver knew couldn't do works w/o fh permission. Lender did them anyway; receiver allowed.  Receiver remained appointed.  I'm arguing lender interfered in receiver duties.  Receiver should have just sold property 4-5y ago w/o allowing any works.  Almost 3y since works finished the property remains unsold (>5y from repo). The property looks brand new - but it was great before.  The lender spent a ton of money - hoping that would facilitate a quick sale.  But the money they spent and the years they have wasted has meant they had to increase sale price.  It's now completely overpriced.  And - of course - the same issues that put buyers off (before works) still exist.   The receiver has tried for 2y to assert the works increased value. But he is relying on agents estimates - which have proved highly speculative. (Usual trick of an agent to give a high value to get the business - and then tell seller to reduce when no-one buys.). And of course lender continues to accrue interest (despite 4y ago receiver saying pause interest). Lender tried to persuade receiver to use specific agent. Disc shows this agent was best friends with the lender's main investor in the property.  Before works this agent had valued it low.  After works this agent suggested a value 70% higher!  The lender persuaded receiver to sack one agent and instead use this agent.  No offers. (Price way too high).   Research has uncovered that this main investor has since died.  I guess his investment is part of probate? And his family want it back?    Disc shows the sacked agent had actually received a high offer 1y ago.  Receiver rejected it.  (thus I don't know if the buyer would have ever proceeded). He was relying on the high speculative valuation the agents had given him to pitch for the business. The agents were in a catch-22.  The receiver sacked them. Disc shows there has been 0 interest ever since (inc via new agent requested by lender). I don't think lender or receiver want all this to come out in public domain via a trial.  It will ruin their reputations. If I can't get an order for sale with lender - can I apply separately against receiver?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

building min contractor has locked us out of our home, and refuses to carry out the job


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2536 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi my okd friends

I need an EXTREMELY URGENT advice from you good people.

Wished to refurbish the old house after 30 years which meant change of everything including wiring and water system etc.

 

I employed a firm of archirects who with a QS sent tenders out and as the result we instructed a firm of contractors to do the job.

 

After a while architects left the scene so we employed a building controller in their replace to interact with builders.

 

There was to be a contract drawn by QS for "minor work project". Unfortunately a copy of it was sent to me last week! As I had signed a Letter of Intent, I assumed that all terms and condictions in darft of contrcat which I has seen would suffice.

 

The builders went throught demolition phase, and should start on construction. The payment is as the follows:

 

The builder gives a list of work and expenditure to QS. He without checking to see whether is adequate or the work is carried out, accepts the payment due and forwards builders' invoice.

 

The building controller we appointed acts in place of architect but her responsibilty has been limited to signing the stage Cetrificate - meaning that the work was done accordingl to existing plans and drawings!.

 

Despite all those safe guards at a lot of expense we now find ourselves in a very bad posiotion. Builder has not followed an iota of terms and conditions in contract, yet keeps naming it as a tool to ex-communicate us and carry on mis-leading the QS and the Controller.

 

The very first part of construction has run into big trouble that he wants through his "uknown to us" sub-contractor charge us for electrical works BUT...he quoted a figure of nearly £50,000.00!(should be max £10k with most expensive products in market)) for a job including rewiring of 5 bedroom very average and meduim size house.

 

They do not specify the products listed nor correct number of products to be used.

 

The list I provided keeps being thrown away. Thus has been going on for past 2.5 months.

 

Meanwhile I amconcerned that they have started to attempt with same approach with other tasks within project.

 

 

Because of us trying to get a proper & accurate quote to give them the go ahead, they have shut down the site for past 8 days, because of health & safety regs we are not allowed to go in.

 

We finally persuaded all those involved to have a meeting at the site in 2 days time.

 

Obviously we can not work together. We have paid 2 invoices so far which partly may be a loss to us - no hope of getting some back.

 

BUT WHAT AM I TO DO WHEN AT THE TABLE, WE REACH THE END.

 

CAN THEY KICK ME OUT AND KEEP HOLDING THE HOUSE UNTIL WHEN?

 

IS THERE SOMEONE, AN EXPERT I CAN TAKE WITH ME TO PROTECT ME, ASSESS WHAT THEY HAVE DONE ON THAT DAY?

 

I AM SO WORRIED THAT THIS MAY TAKE A LONG COURT BATTLE.

 

I JUST WANT TO PAY FOR WHAT THEY HAVE DONE FAIRLY. OR RETRIEVE PART OF MONEY I HAVE UNJUSTLY PAID.

 

 

THE MAIN QUESTION IS: WHAT IS GOING TO HAPPEN AS THEY ARE THUGS. AND HOW CAN I GET THE HOUSE BACK TOMORROW?

 

I do hope there is someone out there who can urgently advise me. Really can not afford to go to lawyers - lost a lot on architects and builders and so forth already, and I am currently left with a shell of the house living in a mice infested flat somewhere else.

Please help.

Sophie

she!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 58
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

It's your house, go there, change the locks and agree with the contractors a mutual convenient time for them to collect their tools and material.

They will surely tell you that you own money, but they can only sue you.

I would video all contact with them and at first sign of stupidity (aggression) call the police.

Kick them out of your house and employ a proper contractor who should give you a quote to stick to.

Having an open ended estimate and charging £50k for electric is just criminal (not literally but it should be)

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you ever so much for your fast response.

 

 

They have not been at work in our house for some 8 days.

 

 

Our several requests to get in because we still have possessions there have been turned down.

 

 

So by now they have taken all materials we paid for.

 

 

Legally we are told that due to insurance regs, only they can be there and can refuse us entry!

 

 

My sheer scare is when we get to the point to say "contract is off".

 

 

Of course they will attempt to get some money out of us which possibly we can appoint an expert to asssess all they work, however i need that person who inspects and assesses work on that very day as well as somwhow get the keys off them - kick them out!

 

 

Where can i find an inspector or expert within one day to be present on wednesday?

 

 

I shall record everything as you said but hate to be kicked out of my place for one more day!!!!!!

she!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't you have your own keys?

If you don't, It's your house so surely you know how to break in.

Usually there's an easier entry in every home and the owner knows about this.

If your house is secure, get a locksmith to drill the lock or, just break a small window panel.

It would be a small price to pay compared to £50k for electric.

The story about h&s and insurance is cow manure.

Remember, this is your house and you can enter it whenever you want.

Get in and change the locks.

Any claim they would submit would be hilarious considering they asked for £50k for electric.

The judge would not need to be an expert to know that this is a clear rip off price based on the unclear terms of your quote.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Health & Safety rules dictate to me that I am not allowed to go in without having a representative of theirs at the house, and they have not attended for days and have refused my requests to go in. I am 100% sure I can not break in. They have put up a fence with chains and bolts, yes as you say I can get someone to break them but possibly with presence of police who do not exist!

 

I need to find three things:

- How to write a letter to formally terminate the contract or should I drive them to admit to having terminated the contract by their actions

 

- Find couple of impressive looking guys to accompany me. Last time builders swore at me, intimedated and took their tools and my materials all because they were fully paid and wanted to go to another job - the police told me to buzz off.

 

- Find a construction expert to asses and record the state of the house before they leave (if they do). They may remain in control until they exorted unjustifiable moneys or for eever if it goes into legal actions

 

- I need all those TODAY to be ready for tomorrow's meeting, where do I find EMERGENCY assistant guys?

she!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Up to now, our QS, Project Controller and main contractors have been the source. I just found someone up north from Internet.

 

I spoke to him and he said "rubbish"!! "you write to them, say you have H&S helmet & jacket, and you are going in. If they do not unbolt chains and barricades then you should call the police in". Too late, after nearly 10 days!

 

Question remains however as this man can be here with me on 11th April the earliest in the capacity of an advisor and project manager at the meeting.

 

He suggests to cancel tomorrow's get together because we might make mistakes in talking to them and end up in courts and soforth.

 

I really don't want to go to court, don't owe them money, and if one takes a week could figure out that I may have over-paid them as well.

 

I just want to get rid of them, kick them out but do not give them grounds to take all the materials left here that I have been charged for.

 

Also prevent them from falsly claiming that they have ordered/arranged this and that to make me pay more.

 

Contrcat is not signed despite them referring to it at all times, so legally one could call it "Void", "terminated by their actions" or "terminate it by myself"....all these words have implications that I am not familiar with and in choosing one tomorrow might dig myself in deeper trouble.

 

I don't know if anyone is familiar with these terms and approaches to help me go there tomorrow and end it all?

she!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and welcome to CAG, sorry to hear about the tough situation you have found yourself in.

 

It is your house, not theirs. Demand entry and if that fails just walk straight in.

 

I think the first thing you need to do is to make sure you understand your contractual position. You need to read the paperwork you have to try and work out what contract you have entered into. This will tell you whether you are entitled to terminate the contract or not.

 

In practical terms, perhaps the best way to get the builders to leave would be to stop paying them? They won't stay on site if they aren't getting paid. Of course it could be expensive for you to find another builder to fix the mess.

 

If you like, it would be a good idea to upload the contract documentation you have (with personal details obscured). I will take a look and try to explain what it says in simple English.

 

He suggests to cancel tomorrow's get together because we might make mistakes in talking to them and end up in courts and soforth.
This is nonsense, the best thing to do is almost always to speak to people to see if a solution can be found.

 

I really don't want to go to court, don't owe them money, and if one takes a week could figure out that I may have over-paid them as well.

 

I just want to get rid of them, kick them out but do not give them grounds to take all the materials left here that I have been charged for.

 

Also prevent them from falsly claiming that they have ordered/arranged this and that to make me pay more.

In order to understand your liability, you need to tell us what the contract says (it seems that you do not have a clear understanding of what the contract says, which is why I think you need to upload a copy if you want to get sensible advice).

 

Contrcat is not signed despite them referring to it at all times, so legally one could call it "Void", "terminated by their actions" or "terminate it by myself"....all these words have implications that I am not familiar with and in choosing one tomorrow might dig myself in deeper trouble.
You can accept a contract by your conduct in asking the parties involved to proceed with the work, so the contract is probably binding on you even though it wasn't signed.

 

You need to understand what the contract actually says before arguing about it. It may well be that the contract helps you and supports your position. For example there is likely to be a "termination" section. You need to understand what the contract says before taking drastic action.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just go to your house and gain entry by any means.

They are builders, not csi!!!

Get into your house and lock them out.

Then tell them to jog off because the material belongs to you.

Nothing they can do apart from swearing and threatening which you will duly video record and report to police.

Also make sure that any telephone conversation is recorded.

Make their life a misery like they have done to you, report any stupid behaviour to the police and remember that to gain the old bill attention you need to use these precise words: "I now fear for my life and that of my family".

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would have thought that making untrue statements to the police exposes you to prosecution for wasting police time, or perverting the course of justice. I don't think it is a good idea to say this, unless it is actually true.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think a good idea to ring building control at your council where you got planning permission. Request a visit to the site as soon as possible as you need urgent help with your situation.

 

BTW I presume you could get back in when they go home. Change lock or put a chain on or both.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you can do anything necessary to gain access to your own property unless a court order says otherwise.

 

 

So, when they have gone home cut the padlock on the gate and gain entry.

(or have the door lock drilled/picked by a locksmith if only front door stopping access)

 

 

If you need to leave you change the padlock and leave a note telling the contractors that they are fired.

 

 

When they then send you an invoice for works done but not paid for you can offer to either pay what you think is reasonable or go to arbitration vis the Federation of Master Builders or any other trade organisation they belong to.

 

 

If that doesnt yeiled a satisfactory outcome you should b prepared to tak the matter to court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your very useful advice. I have read the conteract. Technicall they were suposed to provide list of things within 2 weeks after acceptance of tender - they did not.

 

No Plans, no schedules other than 26 weeks fixed.

 

In addition they should have provided further technical on weekly basis which they did not.

 

No weekly report or schedule.

 

No warranty collaterla for sub-contractots.

 

First problem started when the electrician, against terms of conteract was told by main contractor not to provide a plan,diagram, schedule, and the several quotes they have provided is vague, incomplete, no product Id.

 

So they have made us doing around thissubject for such long time, refusing to allow us resolve it. This is one of the main games, "you do not accept our nearly £60k quote? we will make ou then, We use that as excuse; and similar with other items, to shut down the site as we can not progress further until you agree".

 

There are no termibation clause by them or us within contract.

 

And meanwhile today, they suddenly stated emailing us tio inform they are engaged in a number of other tasks whilst the site remains shut down. So they already have very professionally created false evidence of expenditure.

 

I have no info regarding legal terms of contract other than it is "minor work type"!!

she!

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK then, so they have breached the contract in several respects.

 

Are you completely sure that there is no clause in there regarding termination of the contract? Have you read the whole thing? Does the contract say that it incorporates the form of an industry standard contract (such as the JCT Standard Building Contract)? It would be extremely helpful to see if a PDF if you are able to upload one, I will be able to tell you pretty quickly where you stand.

 

If there is genuinely no termination clause in the contract - this would be unusual - the basic legal position would be that you can terminate a contract if the other party has breached a fundamental term of that contract. It does have to be a fundamental term (not something minor). I don't think failing to provide for example weekly reports is enough to justify termination; but refusing to do work they are required to do under the contract would be fundamental.

 

If you have a right to terminate, you can terminate by sending the builder a formal letter which should (1) specify that the builder has breached a fundamental term of the contract - and identify in your letter the fundamental terms they have breached, (2) state that you are exercising the right to terminate the contract with immediate effect as a result, (3) state that the builder is not to access your property unless you are there, but you will agree to make reasonable arrangements for the builder to remove any materials or other items which belong to them.

 

I have no info regarding legal terms of contract other than it is "minor work type"!!

Do you mean the JCT Minor Works Building Contract? If so, that is an industry standard form contract, which may be incorporated into your contract by reference. If so, there will be a termination clause in the JCT Minor Works Building Contract which you need to comply with.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank so much for your advice. I will scan the conteract tomorrow and upload it for you

 

found one ref: " the articles of agreement and contract with contractor's design 2016 issued by the joint contracts tribunal" . I note that Adjudicator's nominators names by Employer or Contractors are left blank.

 

If JCT is mentioned that what am I to do? - in case my scanner does not work!

 

By the way, today I went to my house, they have even barricated me from acess to my mail - it's box is just behind their baricades - All my bills have been sitting there now for more than 2 weeks, is that right? can they do it?

 

All door, windows have now also additional baricades preventing me from breaking windows. Even front door is boarded up ---all without a single word of notice? can it be done?

 

One thing I am certain of is that there no clear mention of exit clauses there.

 

I hope I can scan them for you. Many thanks, I am grateful.

 

soph

 

I tried to speak to the council about it but they ignored me, said talk to Citizen Advice Bureau!

 

Problem is that because there have not been a fight over money, how can they stop work without notice, refuse to provide a man to open the door and due to insurance and H&S regs just keep an eye on me to let me do my measuring , my post et?.

 

Builder refuses to reply to my emails. He sent an indirect message telling me to "get l.." when I requested that!

 

They are not just there. Place has been deserted for more than 2 weeks now!!

 

Besides, now I have to break chains, metal locks, baricades, as well as all "nailed" boarding to entrance door and other blockades in case I go up the ledder and enter through the balcony.

 

Quite honestly I find this very offending too.

 

One strange thing I have noticed on contract - in most areas they mention "approval of architect" !!! but we had to sign as employer and we

 

have been paying 2 certificates approved by either the previous architect or new project manager (as well as the QS) who proved to be working for whom??? I wonder.

 

I have to get that scanner to work before you running out of patience or I myself go any more crazier than I am now. Thank you all

she!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Mrsshe, you have been advised by several members to get into your house and change the locks.

What are you waiting for?

A court order to enter your own house?

The h&s rubbish is just that, rubbish.

Get a locksmith and break in, otherwise it will be months before you get anywhere.

It's your house, only the courts and emergency services can stop you from entering.

Break in.

Link to post
Share on other sites

How can i upload my contract to cag?

 

Click on the "Go Advanced" box at the bottom of the "quick reply" box. Scroll down a bit and you should see a click-box to "Manage Attachments". Follow the instructions for uploading a file, and it should append the PDF to your post.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you received my uploaded file?

 

Unfortunately, personal information is showing so I have had to unapprove the file. Site team members can still view it, so expect a response shortly.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

PDF in post##21 approved now

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

have you reeived my uploaded contract?

 

 

what do you think

 

got your message thank you.

 

 

Couldn't get rid of personal details sorry.

 

 

I can't wait to hear your thoughts.

she!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...