Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • 1st letter image.pdf1st letter 2nd page.pdf
    • Many thanks for the replies and advice!   I what to send this email to the Starbucks CEO and the area manager. Your thoughts would be appreciated.   [email protected] [email protected]   Re: MET Parking PNC at your Starbucks Southgate site   Dear Ms Rayner, / Dear Heather Christie,   I have received a Notice to Keeper regarding a Parking Charge Notice of £100 for the driver parking in the Southgate Park Car Park, otherwise infamously known as the Stanstead Starbucks/McDonalds car park(s).   Issued by: MET Parking Services Ltd Parking Charge Notice Number: XXXXXXXXX Vehicle Registration Number: XXXX XXX Date of Contravention: XX.XX.XXXX Time: XX:XX - XX:XX   After a little research it apears that the driver is not alone in being caught in what is commonly described as a scam, and has featured in the national press and on the mainstream television.   It is a shame that the reputation of Starbucks is being tarnished by this, with your customers leaving the lowest possible reviews on Trustpilot and Trip Advisor at this location, and to be associated with what on the face of it appears to be a doubious and predatory car park management company.   In this instance, during the early hours of the morning the driver required a coffee and parked up outside Starbucks with the intention of purchasing one from yourselves. Unfortunately, you were closed so the driver walked to McDonalds next door and ordered a coffee, and for this I have received the Notice to Keeper.   It is claimed that the car park is two separate car parks (Starbucks/McDonalds). However, there is no barrier or road markings to identity a boundary, and the signage in the car park(s) and outside your property is ambiguous, as such the terms would most likely be deemed unfair and unenforcable under the Consumer Rights Act 2015.   I understand that Starbucks-Euro Garages neither operate or benefit from the charges imposed by MET Parking. However, MET Parking is your client.   Additionally, I understand that the charge amount of £100 had previously been upheld in court due to a ‘legitimate interest in making sure that a car park was run as efficiently as possible to benefit other drivers as well as the local stores, keeping cars from overstaying’.   However, this is not applicable when the shop or store is closed (as was the case here), as there is no legitimate interest. Therefore, the amount demanded is a penalty and is punitive, again contravening the Consumer Rights Act 2015.   As the driver’s intention of the visit was genuine, I would be grateful if you could please instruct your client to cancel this Notice to Keeper/Parking Charge Notice.   Kind regards
    • I received the promised call back from the Saga man today who informed me that the undertakers have decreed it IS a modification and they will need to recalculate a quote individually for me. However it all sounds very arbitrary. The more I think about it, and with help from forum replies, the more I am sure that it is not a modification. If for example the original seatback had become damaged by a spillage or a tear, I would be entitled to replace it with the nearest available part. The problem is when it comes to a payout after an accident, there is no telling what an individual insurer will decide when he notices the change. I am still undecided which of the two best routes to go with, either don't mention the replacement at all, or fill in the quote form without mentioning, and when it comes to buying the insurance over the phone, mention it at the time.
    • Please post up their letter so we understand what they've asked. You need to cover up your name and address and their reference number. HB
    • Hello,  I received the standard letter.  I don't understand No. 3: If this is in relation to a ticket irregularity, then if you were unable to produce a pass because you did not have it with you or if your pass was withdrawn because you were unable to produce a valid photocard to accompany it, please enclose a photocopy of the pass/photocard with your reply. Question: do i enclose my photocard? my partner's freedom pass was confiscated.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Arnold shark cancelled finance


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2557 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

I had my audi in at arnold clatk for its 5th repair under warranty within 10 minths ownership. The repair was practically a full engine rebuild and taking 2 weeks.

 

The 2nd day of it being in the garage i eventually realised i was sick of the car and disheartened so called up arnold clark to give me a trade in value.

 

The man on the phone asked me to drop the car off, which i told him its in his workshop being worked on.

He went away and valued my car and got back to me with a price which would wipe out all my finance and let me start fresh.

 

I went up and had a sit down and looked through some new cars and decided on a 16plate passat.

 

All was fine.

Car got orderd, deposit paid, finance and everything agreed in principle all signed by both parties, and shipped up from england and i was due to collect it.

 

My car came out the garage before my new car arrived so i had about 1 week of driving it.

 

I then went to the garage on a friday to collect my new car and hand my audi back as a trade in.

 

When settling down to do the handover he took all my cars details, log book, service, mots, keys etc.

 

He then went to my car to check the mileage and at that came almost sprinting back to the desk to tell me i gave him the wrong mileage.

 

I told him on the phone my car is ay roughly 70,000miles.

He went and viewed the car himself to confirm this.

But in the trade in value forms he has put 26,000 miles.

This obviously drastically increased the value of my car.

 

Now... arnold clark already posted out the V5 owenership for the passat to me which i have in my name.

. but they wanted me to pay an extra 3k towards it to make up for the value of the audi that they valued wrong.

 

We couldnt come to an agreement and i said its your mistake,

they had my audi and 2 weeks to look at it.

 

 

Everything was agreed and signed and then cancelled as they noticed their mistake and wouldnt honour the deal unless i paid an extra 3k towards the passat.

 

Where do i stand with this?

Edited by Bounci3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Arnold Clark are famous for all of the wrong reasons.

 

 

You may well have to sue them for breach of contract but that contract will be damned difficult to prove cant be repudiated because of the error.

 

 

I agree that you should get what you agreed but do you have both sets of paperwork regarding the trade in value of your Audi and the purchase agreement for the new car based on ?

 

 

If you dont then you are in a poor position to force the sale of the VW,

but you can go after the for the difference in price of that one

and another car you buy because you cant have that one ("loss of bargain")

 

You can also ask for your old car back nicely repaired as per the warranty and then take it elsewhere and do a trade-in there or if they wont keep to any agreement sue them for the value of the Audi as it is clearly not of merchantable quality

Link to post
Share on other sites

Audi--5 repairs in 10 months---not a good advert for Audi.

You're in a difficult situation, as I for one would not accept a car that Clark did a major engine job on---why not a reconditioned engine??

At the end of the day you may be better off telling sharkie to shove the VW where the sun don't shine then quickly get rid of the Audi.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

I have all the paperwork that was signed. It shows my audis price. The vw price. My monthly payments and so on. Only issue is that it shows the wrong recorded mileage for my Audi, whichis the mileage their staff wrote down after inspecting my car

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...