Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Payplan and my debts


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2589 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

No, not being chased at the moment.

 

I have a separate thread running as I'm with Payplan and they are pressuring me to increase my payments.

 

It was just a general question as to why DCAs would sell a debt onto another DCA, like what would be the benefit to them?

 

And I also assume that the more times a debt is sold on, the less the DCA would settle for if it was paid off?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 61
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

A fairly reliable indicator of potential unenforceability is where a DCA offers a discounted settlement, but a discounted settlement even if paid would not clear a default on a credit record, it would show partial.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

DCAs usually are registered collectors (or try),solely collectors who threaten and the like BUT are just collectors for owners, then you have Debt Buyers = who buy the debt and own it , and can if they think worth while issue court proceedings and try their luck that way!

:mad2::-x:jaw::sad:
Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd dump payplan and do it myself if i were you.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its also just become a new financial year so the dca will want to show it looking good as a write off on their accounts.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Click Here To Make A Donation

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

yep dump PP do it yourself

 

 

or simply stop all payments

and deal wit the forest as it comes thru your door with our help.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've been reading through the forums (fori?) to try and familiarise myself with terminology and I've seen that it's not possible to CCA a bank account.

 

I'm a bit confused because I've sent a CCA request to a DCA in respect of an "overdraft" of over £2,000, although my overdraft limit was £300.

 

Have I done the wrong thing?

Link to post
Share on other sites

doesn't matter

they'll simply ignore it

or willy wave back and tell you so.

 

 

sar to the Original creditor might be useful mind

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

no ...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Me again

- I haven't had any response whatsoever to my CCA requests

and I've written to Yorkshire Bank for an SAR

and they have 40 days to reply so I'm not expecting anything from them yet.

 

However,

I've got copies of my credit report from, two different bodies

- Clear score and Experian and

both show that I have a "very good" credit rating.

 

My Experian report shows that in 2010 I owed Yorkshire Bank £11k

but in June 2014 the balance went to nil and "S" marked against it, meaning it was satisfied.

 

I assume that's when Yorkshire Bank sold the debt.

There's nothing on my credit report regarding my other debts (Yorkshire Bank and MBNA).

 

Nothing

- absolutely nothing

- else shows up on my credit report to say that I owe anyone any money.

I take it that's a good sign, right?

 

And reading the second page of my

"You have been selected to receive a discount on your debt to us" letter, it says that if I stop payment, then the full balance will become due.

Can they do this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

And reading the second page of my "You have been selected to receive a discount on your debt to us" letter, it says that if I stop payment, then the full balance will become due. Can they do this?

 

No...only the OC can recover the full amount if payment is breached...as in a default notice being issued then court proceedings.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

so more cash cow accounts sorted then...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I currently owe money to three DCAs and MBNA. The DCAs are chasing debts due to Yorkshire Bank going back around 10 years.

 

I've been in a DMP for 8 or 9 years and have never missed a payment.

 

I've recently got a copy of my credit report, which is very detailed and it shows no defaults and in fact, my Yorkshire Bank loan was marked as "Satisfied" in 2013 even though I've never paid it off.

 

Why would it be marked satisfied and if I stopped paying and the DCAs came after me for non-payment, wouldn't it be difficult to prove that I owe money when one debt has been marked as satisfied and my credit report is clear with no defaults, no balances outstanding or anything? How can this be?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you need to seek information from Yorkshire Bank about this i.e how much the debt was.

 

Don't trust DCA's to give accurate information. The debt amounts are often wrong, they add interest when they should'nt, they don't send annual statements.

 

Who is running your DMP and are they providing regular info ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

defaults go after 6 years.

it may have been marked 'satisfied' by an original creditor as it has then been sold on?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The loan with Yorkshire which shows "Satisfied" was £11,300 but rather than be satisfied, the debt was passed to one DCA after another. Is this normal?

 

I'm with Payplan. I regularly get letters from DCAs offering a reduced settlement figure, which varies from 1/2 to 1/3 of the debt. If I rang the DCA to offer payment, is it likely that an offer of 10% would be accepted?

Link to post
Share on other sites

seems then as i posted. original creditor sells it on,

marks their record as satisfied.

but, the matter is still outstanding re the new owner

Link to post
Share on other sites

Might be the case, but it is not an accurate way of updating the record.

 

 

From what i have read most creditors when selling a debt on,

either just leave the debt record as it is or they delete it,

with the new debt owner being added as a replacement after the debt sale.

 

In this situation,

i think Payplan need to be asked about this,

as they are no doubt deducting a fee,

by administering the DMP.

They need to supply the information.

 

What type of loan with Yorkshire and when was it originally taken out ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes thats correct =- When the debt is sold - It will get marked as Satisfied from that perspective.

Even if the balance is still outstanding.

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ask yourself one question..

 

why would a major bank sell one of my debts on

and not take me to court and crush me?????????????

 

you've been blindly paying a your DMP for 8-9yrs

have you not once thought... I wonder if I really do owe all these debts?

 

a DMC will never check the enforceability of any debt

because they get paid to arrange payment plans

 

pers i'd be cancelling the plan and we'll deal with the deforestation that falls through your door on a debt by debt basis

 

are you still living at the same address where you took all these accounts out at?

 

sorry but I smell a cash cow here.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

its a real shame that I see in 2006

again in 2009

and again in 2011

you were already given this advice but you chose to ignore it...

 

 

check a debt enforceability....

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes thats correct =- When the debt is sold - It will get marked as Satisfied from that perspective.

Even if the balance is still outstanding.

thought so. happened with mine, and others.

the new owners then took over.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...