Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • No, do the section 75 chargeback to your credit card provider.
    • See what dx thinks but it seems to me that sending a photo of your own pass isn't relevant to what happened. Let's wait and see what he says. HB
    • 1st letter image.pdf1st letter 2nd page.pdf
    • Many thanks for the replies and advice!   I what to send this email to the Starbucks CEO and the area manager. Your thoughts would be appreciated.   [email protected] [email protected]   Re: MET Parking PNC at your Starbucks Southgate site   Dear Ms Rayner, / Dear Heather Christie,   I have received a Notice to Keeper regarding a Parking Charge Notice of £100 for the driver parking in the Southgate Park Car Park, otherwise infamously known as the Stanstead Starbucks/McDonalds car park(s).   Issued by: MET Parking Services Ltd Parking Charge Notice Number: XXXXXXXXX Vehicle Registration Number: XXXX XXX Date of Contravention: XX.XX.XXXX Time: XX:XX - XX:XX   After a little research it apears that the driver is not alone in being caught in what is commonly described as a scam, and has featured in the national press and on the mainstream television.   It is a shame that the reputation of Starbucks is being tarnished by this, with your customers leaving the lowest possible reviews on Trustpilot and Trip Advisor at this location, and to be associated with what on the face of it appears to be a doubious and predatory car park management company.   In this instance, during the early hours of the morning the driver required a coffee and parked up outside Starbucks with the intention of purchasing one from yourselves. Unfortunately, you were closed so the driver walked to McDonalds next door and ordered a coffee, and for this I have received the Notice to Keeper.   It is claimed that the car park is two separate car parks (Starbucks/McDonalds). However, there is no barrier or road markings to identity a boundary, and the signage in the car park(s) and outside your property is ambiguous, as such the terms would most likely be deemed unfair and unenforcable under the Consumer Rights Act 2015.   I understand that Starbucks-Euro Garages neither operate or benefit from the charges imposed by MET Parking. However, MET Parking is your client.   Additionally, I understand that the charge amount of £100 had previously been upheld in court due to a ‘legitimate interest in making sure that a car park was run as efficiently as possible to benefit other drivers as well as the local stores, keeping cars from overstaying’.   However, this is not applicable when the shop or store is closed (as was the case here), as there is no legitimate interest. Therefore, the amount demanded is a penalty and is punitive, again contravening the Consumer Rights Act 2015.   As the driver’s intention of the visit was genuine, I would be grateful if you could please instruct your client to cancel this Notice to Keeper/Parking Charge Notice.   Kind regards
    • I received the promised call back from the Saga man today who informed me that the undertakers have decreed it IS a modification and they will need to recalculate a quote individually for me. However it all sounds very arbitrary. The more I think about it, and with help from forum replies, the more I am sure that it is not a modification. If for example the original seatback had become damaged by a spillage or a tear, I would be entitled to replace it with the nearest available part. The problem is when it comes to a payout after an accident, there is no telling what an individual insurer will decide when he notices the change. I am still undecided which of the two best routes to go with, either don't mention the replacement at all, or fill in the quote form without mentioning, and when it comes to buying the insurance over the phone, mention it at the time.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Ruthbridge for cabot - old Next Mail Order 'debt'


mel1977
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2591 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi,

i am just wondering if anyone on here has had dealings with a company called Ruthbridge debt collectors please.

 

Out of the blue last week i got a letter from them stating they were working on behalf of Cabot financial services and looking to recover a debt of £2357.45 off of me in relation to Next Retail mail order.

 

I have had no dealings with a company called Cabot at all,

no letters, no correspondance, no phone calls

yet they claim i have failed to come to an agreement with this company and that is why it has been passed on to them.

 

I have also not been a Next customer in nearly 10 years and i have checked my credit report and cannot see any details of this anywhere on there.

 

can anyone please advise on what i can do moving forward.

 

thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Either ignore it or send a prove it letter to cabot.

 

 

Remember, if cabot own the debt then it is very very likely that the debt is unenforceable. They rarely chase legit debts. Thats not to say they dont, but it is very rare.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

is this debt on your credit file?

is it defaulted?

when did you last pay it?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

No, the first thing i did when i got the first letter last week was check my credit file and it is not on there.

 

I have no idea if it is defaulted and im not sure where i would find that out and no the last dealings i had was with Next themselves when they refused to accept the amount i was offering to pay each month to clear off the debt.

 

i am also very sure the debt amount was nowhere near as high as that!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry I was on a small screen you said that in post 1

are all your old addresses showing on your credit file too?

if you took this out when living somewhere else it could be they have been sending letters to your old address.

 

now you said you failed to agree a solution with next..when was this please?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The first letter i received from Ruthbridge was last week,

they claimed that it had been passed on to them because Cabot had failed to establish any contact with me.

 

 

I can honestly say that during my 6 years here i have never received any letters from Cabot.

i ignored the first letter and waited to see if they would continue to pursue it.

 

today the second one arrived,

this one is claiming that they want to resolve the matter amicably and they are now willing to offer me a discount of 70% subject to their criteria.

 

 

It then tells me that to take advantage of their offer i must pay it by the 26/03/2017 and that this will be settlement of liability and an assurance i will no longer be pursued by them or their client.

 

It also then goes on to say that should i do this then they will update my credit file to partially settled. Given that i cannot see this debt on my credit file i fail to see how they can do this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes i can see all my credit from the address that the next account was held up until now. this debt is not showing on there at all. i have not held a next account in nearly 10 years and i have been in this property for nearly 6.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The first letter i recieved from Ruthbridge was last week, they claimed that it had been passed on to them because Cabot had failed to establish any contact with me. I can honestly say that during my 6 years here i have never recieved any letters from Cabot. i ignored the first letter and waited to see if they would continue to pursue it.

today the second one arrived, this one is claiming that they want to resolve the matter amicably and they are now willing to offer me a discount of 70% subject to their criteria. It then tells me that to take advantage of their offer i must pay it by the 26/03/2017 and that this will be settlement of liability and an assurance i will no longer be pursued by them or their client.

It also then goes on to say that should i do this then they will update my credit file to partially settled. Given that i cannot see this debt on my credit file i fail to see how they can do this?

 

:wink:I think reading between the lines above its obvious what your course of action should be.....file.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay I will dissect what the above really means.......

 

 

The first letter i received from Ruthbridge was last week, they claimed that it had been passed on to them because Cabot had failed to establish any contact with me.Not quite..... passed on from Cabot for them to pursue because Cabot know its a lemon I can honestly say that during my 6 years here i have never received any letters from Cabot.So not that urgent or valid i ignored the first letter and waited to see if they would continue to pursue it.

today the second one arrived, this one is claiming that they want to resolve the matter amicably and they are now willing to offer me a discount of 70% subject to their criteria.Now why would they offer 70% discount on a debt if you owe it ? It then tells me that to take advantage of their offer i must pay it by the 26/03/2017 and that this will be settlement of liability and an assurance i will no longer be pursued by them or their client.There not really pursuing you now...just hoping you fall for it

It also then goes on to say that should i do this then they will update my credit file to partially settled. Given that i cannot see this debt on my credit file i fail to see how they can do this? Answered your own question...file it and ignore

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Andy,

 

Thanks for clearing that up for me :) is it wise to just ignore them though?

I am only asking because i have worked very hard to build up a very good credit rating and would hate for them to be able to destroy that. should i send them a statute barred letter or would that be opening a whole new can of worms?

Link to post
Share on other sites

How can they destroy your credit rating if its statue barred and already passed it 6th anniversary on the CRAs ?

 

Its your choice..but telling them its statute barred when they already know it is appears counter productive to me and only a means of engaging with them...I personally wouldn't acknowledge them.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

bottom line

just remember

a DCA or their fake/tame solicitors are not bailiffs

and have no such legal powers.

 

 

my only slight concern here is I bet you took this out at your old address

and that where cabot have sent everything to date

 

 

they employed ruths [well changed letterhead] to make it look like they [cabot] don't know your true address

and will thus file to your old one.

and get a CCJ by default.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Doubt very much Caboot will litigate...not once they passed it to the next desk..Ruthbridge...Caboot would have already issued if it was legit.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

i have actually moved 4 times since 1998 for no other reason than they have all been short lease up until my current property.

 

 

i took my next account out when i was at my very first address and i still had this account in 2003 when i moved into the address i can see on my credit file.

i believe i had the account until around 2005-2006 latest as that is when my child got sick and i was forced to leave work.

 

it was around this time that i began making arrangements to pay with my creditors and that is why i can still see some evidence certain debts on my credit report because i carried some of these to my third address when i moved again as i was still paying them off.

 

 

If i work out the dates i can see that these should be coming off my credit file any time soon as the 6 year mark since paid is approaching and i can also see that they are all satisfied and closed.

 

Next however would not agree to a sensible payment plan and demanded full payment or debt collection.

this was around 2006.

 

 

I dont recall having ever received the debt collection letters

but if i did then i no longer have them.

 

 

They certainly never sent me to court as i have no ccj's on my credit file at all.

I did my best to come to an arrangement but honestly i didnt tell them when i moved as i dont recall them being an issue at that time.

 

i was quite surprised when i got the letter last week as this is the first contact they have made in at least 8 years possibly longer.

 

That is what is worrying me because i dont want them to obtain a judgement by default for something that should by now be statute barred.

 

 

I am assuming this debt is because of the age and because i cannot even see it anywhere on my credit file.

 

I am in two minds as to how to proceed because the only other debt

i had problems with around this time was transferred to a company called turnbull and rutherford.

 

 

they made my life a living hell.

but they got a ccj via default for a debt that was supposed statute barred.

 

 

its cleared and gone now but i dont want to go through that again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they are corresponding to you at your current address...then why should they issue to a previous address...you have proof by the letter they have your current address...so if they do try the old previous address judgment stunt...you have grounds to set a side for that reason and because it is knowingly statute barred.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Andy,

 

Yes, i see your point and have been thinking the same thing.

 

 

i havent been hard to find,

i have been here 5 years now and my last address i was at for 2 years.

 

 

At no time have i received anything at either address up until now.

 

 

They clearly havent issued judgement yet at the old address,

because the letter states if i dont take advantage of their offer then they will be returning the account to Cabot who may look at instructing alternate activity.

 

I think i may ride this one out a little longer and see what their next move is.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...