Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I can only speak from personal experience. But a similar thing happened to me. Seriously dented door.  I made the other insurance pay. They regarded it as a write off. Took the money, replaced the door. Never heard anything more about it.    Except clearly someone sold my details to claims company, because I got loads of calls in bad English for a few month's 
    • The incident was 03rd March 2024 - and that was the only letter that I have received from MET 15th April 2024 The charge I paid was at the Stansted Airport exit gate (No real relevance now - I thought this charge was for that!!).   Here is the content of email to them (Yes I know I said I was the driver !!!!) as said above -  I thought this charge was for that!! "Stansted Airport" Dear “To whom it may concern” My name is ??  PCN:  ?? Veh Reg: Date of Incident: 03rd March 2024 I have just received a parking charge final reminder letter, dated 10th April 2024 - for an overstay.  This is the first to my knowledge of any overstay. I am aware that I am out of the 28 days, I don’t mean to be rude, this feels like it is a scam My movements on this day in question are, I pulled into what looked like a service station on my way to pick my daughter and family up from Stansted airport. The reason for me pulling into this area was to use a toilet, so I found Starbucks, and when into there, after the above, I then purchased a coffee. After which I then continued with my journey to pick my daughter up. (however after I sent this email I remember that Starbucks was closed so I then I walked over to Macdonalds) There was no signs about parking or any tickets machines to explains about the parking rules. Once at Stansted, I entered and then paid on exit.  So Im not show where I overstayed my welcome.. With gratitude    
    • Just to enlarge on Dave's great rundown of your case under Penalty. In the oft quoted case often seen on PCNs,  viz PE v Beavis while to Judges said there was a case for claiming that £100 was a penalty, this was overruled in this case because PE had a legitimate interest in keeping the car park free for other motorists which outweighed the penalty. Here there is no legitimate interest since the premises were closed. Therefore the charge is a penalty and the case should be thrown out for that reason alone.   The Appeals dept need informing about what and what isn't a valid PCN. Dummies. You should also mention that you were unable to pay by Iphone as there was no internet connection and there was a long  queue to pay on a very busy day . There was no facility for us to pay from the time of our arrival only the time from when we paid at the machine so we felt that was a bit of a scam since we were not parked until we paid. On top of that we had two children to load and unload in the car which should be taken into account since Consideration periods and Grace periods are minimum time. If you weren't the driver and PoFA isn't compliant you are off scot free since only the driver is liable and they are saying it was you. 
    • Thank you dx. I consider myself well and truly told :) x Thank you dx. I consider myself well and truly told :) x
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2503 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

We have been harassed with debt collectors by First Utility. We switched suppliers on 9th February. On 22nd February First Utility put a stop on our account for 8 weeks whilst the final bill was re-assessed. They sent debt collectors to our door on 27th February. The bill was paid on 3rd March. They continued to send many texts asking us to settle the bill. I continue to receive emails and texts harassing me for payment up to yesterday (16th March). First Utility promise to resolve the matter; then the texts and emails continue. They say our details have been wiped from the debt collector's database, but the texts and emails continue.

 

So today I called a charity who get significant funding from First Utility and whom First Utility proudly publicise on their website. I spoke to the account handler who assured me that they have stringent controls and carry out full due diligence on their relationship to companies they are associated with. I pointed out that there could be many desperate families, some of whom they help, who are being similarly harassed by First Utility and that First Utility have a dysfunctional administration system plus a fine disregard for the legalities of sending round debt collectors. Was that really a company they wanted to be associated with?

 

If you have a problem like mine, contact a charity that First Utility supports. Ask to speak to the account handler for First Utility and send them your story. Once you have done that, call First Utility's media centre. I spoke to:

 

Joanne Murefu, First Utility:

07885 966269

 

 

These are desperate ways to make First Utility listen and react; but as I had already written to my MP, and the Guardian, and the Telegraph, I was left with no other choice.

 

Challenge the hypocrisy of First Utility: they say on their website:

 

'We want to change the face of the industry by fighting on your behalf. We're not happy for things to stay as they are so we challenge the status quo to make energy simpler, fairer and cheaper.'

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi MakeFirstUtilitylisten and Welcome to CAG

 

Unorthodox approach but novel...lets hope it has an effect..but I fully agree with your sentiments and understand the depths driven to and actions that one must take.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Andy - I had to think long and hard to come up with it. But it has already made them sit up today. They are also recommended by Good Housekeeping Magazine - I am going to write to GH now and tell them what happened to us. I worry about people getting stuck in this nightmare alternative universe that is First Utility. Ofgem are essentially toothless; they just slap FU with a £50 fine or something. So First Utility know that they can act without limits.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Very true...and not just FU...all the big energy providers need to look at their service.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Contact also Good Housekeeping, who endorse First Utility and whom First Utility feature on their website:

 

Endorsements at GH:

 

ghiendorsement at hearst.co.uk

 

 

Press at GH:

 

media at hearst.co.uk (sorry I am new so I can't post whole email addresses)

 

and ask them if their brand isn't slightly tainted by association with First Utility's dark deeds. GH is a trusted brand whom consumers rely on; I don't think being associated with First Utility reflects well on them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, I already have a result of sorts; so this approach does work. I had a call from First Utility's Executive Office and was told that an email was being sent (of course as this is FU it hasn't arrived yet) which goes into our case in detail.

 

Apparently Phil Gripton (CE) and Ian McCaig are aware of this matter and it is being taken 'extremely seriously'. Well, we'll see.

 

I've also discovered that Fidelite, the debt collectors, are members of the CSA and the FCA and they have a strict code of conduct to follow.

 

It appears that First Utility should have informed me that they had passed us on to debt collectors (I guess they didn't have time, they did it so quickly after they issued the original bill) and as for continuing to contact us after First Utility had told them to stop, their defence will likely be that First Utility didn't contact them. So we will see what they have to say when we complain about harassment, but it's yet another line of enquiry that means we will be listened to and taken seriously. The CSA are very responsive.

 

Meanwhile the charity have contacted me to say they are taking this very seriously. So there's a lot of seriousness going on! We will see what happens, I will post once I have a response from First Utility.

Edited by MakeFirstUtilitylisten
Link to post
Share on other sites

I wish you all the best with your contacts " Make First Utility Listen", I have already been through their Executive Complaints Team and direct e-mailing Ian McCaig, problem is one team does not speak to the other team and harrasment continues.

 

Keep us updated on your journey, I have already given them a list of my charges for time, e-mails, waiting on phone calls being answered and also letters, just need to add it up when proceeding to Small Claims.

Don\'t let the B**tards grind you down

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi ajs, interesting that you have also been through the Executive Complaints Team. I had a response but it was inadequate and sought to whitewash what had happened; so I rejected it and the derisory offer of compensation and asked for a deadlock letter. I am sure they will drag that one out for as long as they can.

 

But, I did get an immediate response from them after contacting the Charity. So that does work. I have had more contact from them today than I have ever had. And they have admitted fault re all the debt collection activity. But this has taken me most of the day. And my head hurts!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well well. The fabulous, alternative universe that is First Utility. Today I got a letter from Fidelite: 'WARRANT OF ENTRY TO ENTER YOUR HOME' (in big letters) which, when I actually read the letter, was about their intention to apply for a warrant of entry. This is after the full apology and admission by First Utility that they were wrong to use debt collectors in the first place. It beggars belief. I am making a complaint about Fidelite to the CSA and of course, First Utility have said that they will make sure Fidelite don't contact us again - (why do I doubt that?) but they are just not in control of their debt collection process. Something that Ofgem need to be aware of.

Link to post
Share on other sites

How can they even try for a warrant of entry,

 

You are no longer with FU,

 

either scaremongering or incompetence,

if they did go for it make sure you get to see the judge and claim your expenses.

 

 

leakie

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quite, Leakie.

 

Update on this; I spoke to the Energy Ombudsman today as First Utility didn't seem keen to give us a deadlock letter.

 

They agreed that the case was so serious that they are taking it on without a deadlock letter. I am posting this so that other people in a similar situation can know that you don't always have to wait eight weeks or get the agreement of your energy supplier before you can approach the Ombudsman. I wish I had called them sooner. However, they did say that in engaging with First Utility intensively we have shown goodwill in attempting to reach a resolution.

 

I was very careful to do the following throughout:

 

1. Insist FU send me emails confirming their actions

2. Kept all correspondence

3. Read all First Utility's emails explaining their conduct very carefully and wrote back pointing out all their inconsistencies

4. Kept all the harassing texts from First Utility (sent after the bill had been paid) and took photos of them for inclusion in my complaint to the Ombudsman.

 

We also found news on Ofgem's site of an open letter sent to First Utiility which makes sense of our experience - 80% of First Utiility's customers were either 'very' or 'quite' dissatisfied, and the complaints handling process was very poor. I can't post links but if you go to Ofgem or google 'First Utility Ofgem open letter' you will find it.

 

ofgem.gov.uk

 

 

I hope this post can be helpful to others. So far it has been a lot of effort when if we had contacted the Ombudsman maybe a month ago when we got the first debt collector letter, things could have been easier.

 

We feel very strongly that First Utility wished to punish us for switching supplier, and I will make this point to the Ombudsman.

Link to post
Share on other sites

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Thank you for the this post. I too have been harassed by FU for about 2 years now. The last correspondence I got was on the 19/9/16 stating they were investigating 'deadlock' - not too sure what this means - and it went quiet, a few days ago the emails and texts restarted. Yesterday I got a call to say we had reached deadlock and the amount was still outstanding and they claimed I got this letter on the 14/9/16?!

 

I've never had this letter, but it's apparently now in the post.

 

Basically we left this company in October 2015, I think. I was always in credit and after 28 days we still hadn't had our refund so I rang up, spoke to a call handler and he worked out we were in credit by £357. He arranged for us to have this back. In the January we got an email stating we owed this money back and they re took the money from a cancelled direct debit. I then rang our bank advising they had no right to take the money, which we had returned, yet we are still going round in this circle, we've never owed money on anything. We are also aware the meter reading was given incorrectly and even though they agree this was wrong they are still chasing us for the money and I've send the meter photos 3 times now!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Skye I am sorry to hear you've also had problems.

 

Please contact Good Housekeeping. They were concerned by what had happened to me and First Utility got straight back to them to explain. But GH said that mine was the first ever complaint that they had received on FU. They promised that they do take this kind of thing 'seriously'- so I do suggest you get in touch. They are very responsive. FU rely on GH to shore up their reputation, so you may find that FU will respond quickly to this and your issue may get sorted. I hope so and it would be great to know if it works.

 

Email:

ghiendorsement at hearst.co.uk

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...

cant see how they FU can put up those logos re 'award winning service' on their homepage.

partic when Ofgem recently (this year) did an open letter about their poor customer service and complaints procedure, and FU are high up on all the tables re number of relative customer complaints.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They must be struggling to give any power company this award, but come on, First Utility??????

 

Shows the sorry state that the industry is in.

 

cant see how they FU can put up those logos re 'award winning service' on their homepage.

partic when Ofgem recently (this year) did an open letter about their poor customer service and complaints procedure, and FU are high up on all the tables re number of relative customer complaints.

Don\'t let the B**tards grind you down

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

An update: the Energy Ombudsman upheld our complaint and First Utility had to apologise and pay us £150.

 

This was something of a derisory amount and my only consolation is that they also have to pay for the Ombudsman enquiry - about £350 I think - but I also do feel that the relationship between the Ombudsman and the Utility companies is rather too close. However, I really don't have the energy to complain about the Ombudsman!

 

I do believe that my approach - contacting the organisations who shore up their reputation and who are answerable to the public in a much more direct way - is useful if you are stuck in a nightmare as we were, with First Utility refusing to even listen. First Utility will only sit up and take action if they are shamed into doing so.

 

We are now with Bulb and we could not be happier; our bills have gone down dramatically and they are unfailingly polite and pleasant.

Edited by MakeFirstUtilitylisten
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...