Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx for your feedback. That is the reason I posted my opinion, because I am trying to learn more and this is one of the ways to learn, by posting my opinions and if I am incorrect then being advised of the reasons I am incorrect. I am not sure if you have educated me on the points in my post that would be incorrect. However, you are correct on one point, I shall refrain from posting on any other thread other than my own going forward and if you think my post here is unhelpful, misleading or in any other way inappropriate, then please do feel obliged to delete it but educate me on the reason why. To help my learning process, it would be helpful to know what I got wrong other than it goes against established advice considering the outcome of a recent court case on this topic that seemed to suggest it was dismissed due to an appeal not being made at the first stage. Thank-you.   EDIT:  Just to be clear, I am not intending to go against established advice by suggesting that appeals should ALWAYS be made, just my thoughts on the particular case of paying for parking and entering an incorrect VRN. Should this ever happen to me, I will make an appeal at the first stage to avoid any problems that may occur at a later stage. Although, any individual in a similar position should decide for themselves what they think is an appropriate course of action. Also, I continue to be grateful for any advice you give on my own particular case.  
    • you can have your humble opinion.... You are very new to all this private parking speculative invoice game you have very quickly taken it upon yourself to be all over this forum, now to the extent of moving away from your initial thread with your own issue that you knew little about handling to littering the forum and posting on numerous established and existing threads, where advice has already been given or a conclusion has already resulted, with your theories conclusions and observations which of course are very welcomed. BUT... in some instances, like this one...you dont quite match the advice that the forum and it's members have gathered over a very long consensual period given in a tried and trusted consistent mannered thoughtful approach. one could even call it forum hi-jacking and that is becoming somewhat worrying . dx
    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕 The more I read this forum and the more I engage with it's incredible users, the more I learn and the more my knowledge expands. If my case gets to court, the Judge will dismiss it after I utter my first sentence, and you DCBL and Highview don't even know why .... OMG! .... So excited to get to court!
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

allianz insurance my nightmare


stevvieboi
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2607 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi folks, in a bit of a predicament regarding an accident back in July 2016.

 

I am insured through Allianz through safeguard for my motorhome insurance,

 

 

back in July i had a buyer for it, so decided to use it one last time before parting with it.

on my way home, passed through a town not far from my home address,

 

 

is a narrow street, with cars parked down one side,

in designated parking bays,

but these take up half of the road lane,

meaning anyone passing will have to straddle the other lane of the road,

the wrong side,

the other lane has double yellows,

so no parking.

This was the lane i was travelling along,

 

 

when approaching near the end of line of parked cars,

this driver decided not to wait or give way to avoid an accident,

the road is clear to see if anything is coming,

and parts where you can pull into to allow the oncoming traffic to carry on their journey.

 

My motorhome at its widest point is just under 9ft wide,

taking up its presence on the road,

the main street is that narrow at points,

it is not safe to pass,

as their is just not enough room,

 

 

when i realised this driver was not going to stop,

i slammed on my brakes,

almost at a standstill when he hit my mirror,

smashed it,

dented the door,

and scrapped along the coach body of the motorhome.

 

i pulled into the space right across the road from me,

where he should have pulled into,

 

 

he admitted he should have gave away,

then saying he was as far over as he could go,

meaning if one of the parked cars opened their door,

he would have taken that off,

as well as hitting me,

 

 

exchanged details,

to find out later he is disputing the claim saying it was my fault,

when he was on my side of the road,

nowhere for me to go to avoid him,

other than mounting a pavement or driving into a building,

one of the local businesses seen what happened and gave me his contact details for a witness.

 

My problem now is,

the insurance company say they have not received anything from him and him saying he has sent them it twice,

and without this statement i would have to accept responsibility or go 50/50,

 

 

i have even given them a dash cam vid of the road and where the accident happened,

not a clip of the actual accident,

but more to show the condition of the road,

and space with passing cars in both directions,

 

 

they are now saying that they can check this on google,

and because the clip is not of the actual accident,

it would not count.

 

Now google cant show the road conditions,

of passing cars,

and the clip was done to prove this fact,

seems to be a known area for this happening,

informed them the repairs would not be done until it had being resolved.

 

Recently got a call from the bodyshop saying the insurance company has now authorised the claim,

and booked it in,

 

 

i presumed it had now being resolved and the 3rd party had accepted responsibility,

no letter,

call or email from my insurance to tell me this,

 

 

when it has not being resolved and i would have to pay the 300 excess,

depending on how the 3rd party goes,

it would be claimed back from their insurance.

 

I feel now they have taken the upper hand and forced me into a position,

where i have told them i will not accept any responsibility for the accident,

and prepared to take it to court,

where i was informed it would not go to court as the claim was under 1k and my only option is to accept a 50/50.

 

I have also had a lot of out of pocket expense,

as the motorhome is now not worth what i had a buyer for it last year,

and as they have not got the witness statement,

then i have no case to answer and will have to accept 50/50.

 

I rang the motor legal protection i had on my policy,

found out this is a complete waste of money as they offered no help at all,

and said it would be better to just accept 50/50.

 

 

i have being up a few times to see the witness,

even leaving him a copy of the witness statement for him to sign,

has asked me to come back for it next week,

but if i have problems getting this off him

 

 

where do i stand,

what can i do,

as it will also affect my future insurance,

and for an accident where i was at no fault at all

and thoughts on this would be greatly appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

You either accept 50/50 or you yourself take the third party to court to claim everything e.g cost of repair, excess etc. You have to build your own case, as your Insurers are refusing to do this, because so far they have little to justify them pursuing it.

 

It is your decision to take, but if you lose any court claim, then it is at your cost. You will have taken the matter on, independent to your Insurers.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...